The Hotel End

The Hotel End => Cobblers Corner => Topic started by: dodger on August 08, 2010, 15:06:12 pm



Title: We Love Sammo!
Post by: dodger on August 08, 2010, 15:06:12 pm
May I thank you  and your colleagues for there contribution to an unforgetable day yesterday.

We left Sixfields at 8am arriving at Plainmoor after 2pm. The traffic jams were not the clubs fault of course unless the team coach driver had caught the inertia bug which ran through the team. The result has a much anticipated pint of Cornish Gold and fish and chips were replaced by a bottle of coke and a bacon bap.

By half time I wished I had settled for 2 pints and fish and chips. Obviously your statement on Thursday about not putting the ball on Bransons head was a red herring designed to fool any Torquay spy who might have been at the trust meeting, since our players managed to hit the target regularly from 40-50 yards but not managing to hit our own players from 5.

5 minutes into the second half I wondered whether to join the players on the pitch as they seemed to enjoying a spot of sunbathing and being completely unaware of anything going on around them.

At the final whistle it was back on the coach thankfully we thought
only to find all the drinks had been consumed on the outward journey and it was 9pm before we got any sort of stop falling foul of driver regulations.

We eventually arrived at Sixfields after the team bus so I assume that somewhere along the line the players had shown some urgency. Unfortunately none were around so that I could thank them for their contribution to my day.





Title: Re: Dear Mr Sampson
Post by: 4everdelayed on August 08, 2010, 15:11:19 pm
down after one game, we're going down after one game.


Title: Re: Dear Mr Sampson
Post by: NTFC Nut on August 08, 2010, 15:38:42 pm
I wanna go home,
I wanna go hoooooooooome,
This is the worst trip,
I've ever been on!


 ;D


Title: Re: Dear Mr Sampson
Post by: Ralap on August 08, 2010, 16:46:24 pm
May I thank you  and your colleagues for there contribution to an unforgetable day yesterday.

We left Sixfields at 8am arriving at Plainmoor after 2pm. The traffic jams were not the clubs fault of course unless the team coach driver had caught the inertia bug which ran through the team. The result has a much anticipated pint of Cornish Gold and fish and chips were replaced by a bottle of coke and a bacon bap.

By half time I wished I had settled for 2 pints and fish and chips. Obviously your statement on Thursday about not putting the ball on Bransons head was a red herring designed to fool any Torquay spy who might have been at the trust meeting, since our players managed to hit the target regularly from 40-50 yards but not managing to hit our own players from 5.

5 minutes into the second half I wondered whether to join the players on the pitch as they seemed to enjoying a spot of sunbathing and being completely unaware of anything going on around them.

At the final whistle it was back on the coach thankfully we thought
only to find all the drinks had been consumed on the outward journey and it was 9pm before we got any sort of stop falling foul of driver regulations.

We eventually arrived at Sixfields after the team bus so I assume that somewhere along the line the players had shown some urgency. Unfortunately none were around so that I could thank them for their contribution to my day.


I've just about had it with your negativity Fred.


Title: Re: Dear Mr Sampson
Post by: dodger on August 08, 2010, 17:28:56 pm
You are the one who gets depressed over the smallest of things, espescially when you go for a piss ;D


Title: Re: Dear Mr Sampson
Post by: ClaretCobbler on August 08, 2010, 17:50:02 pm
May I thank you  and your colleagues for there contribution to an unforgetable day yesterday.

We left Sixfields at 8am arriving at Plainmoor after 2pm. The traffic jams were not the clubs fault of course unless the team coach driver had caught the inertia bug which ran through the team. The result has a much anticipated pint of Cornish Gold and fish and chips were replaced by a bottle of coke and a bacon bap.

By half time I wished I had settled for 2 pints and fish and chips. Obviously your statement on Thursday about not putting the ball on Bransons head was a red herring designed to fool any Torquay spy who might have been at the trust meeting, since our players managed to hit the target regularly from 40-50 yards but not managing to hit our own players from 5.

5 minutes into the second half I wondered whether to join the players on the pitch as they seemed to enjoying a spot of sunbathing and being completely unaware of anything going on around them.

At the final whistle it was back on the coach thankfully we thought
only to find all the drinks had been consumed on the outward journey and it was 9pm before we got any sort of stop falling foul of driver regulations.

We eventually arrived at Sixfields after the team bus so I assume that somewhere along the line the players had shown some urgency. Unfortunately none were around so that I could thank them for their contribution to my day.






I know the team coach driver, hes a good friend of mine, so watch what you say.

And if he did have something it would have spread to everyone, i was stood with Thornton and him yesterday, he said it came on suddenly friday night and couldnt stop being sick.


Title: Re: Dear Mr Sampson
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on August 08, 2010, 18:01:43 pm

I know the team coach driver, hes a good friend of mine, so watch what you say.

And if he did have something it would have spread to everyone, i was stood with Thornton and him yesterday, he said it came on suddenly friday night and couldnt stop being sick.
You might be able to read what the words say but you don't understand them much do you


Title: Re: Dear Mr Sampson
Post by: saturday banana on August 08, 2010, 18:33:21 pm
Dear Football League,
Thank you for picking our first game as away in the far reaches of SW England.
Had we have been nearer I may have travelled to the game, but given the proximity to my hols I really couldn't be arsed...so I thankyou your random computer for saving me a wasted day watching the incorrectly pick team get hammered 3-0.

I now look fwd to the rest of the season, safe in the knowldege that my beloved NTFC have got their worst performance of the season out of the way on day 1 and every game from here on in, will be a delightful blend of fast flowing attacking footy culminating in a magnificent May afternoon at Wembley when we beat Oxford Utd 5-4 AET in the play off final!!

Once again...I thank you ;D


Title: Re: Dear Mr Sampson
Post by: Ralap on August 08, 2010, 19:02:16 pm
You are the one who gets depressed over the smallest of things, espescially when you go for a piss ;D


You seem to be confusing me with Graham, young man.   ;)


Title: I Love Sammo!
Post by: DrillingCobbler on September 04, 2010, 16:24:00 pm
Christ, why wouldn't Tim Oglethorpe just leave him alone in that interview? !! The guy was hurting, you could clearly tell he was fuming...didn't want to say anything that would get him in trouble. This job, and our club mean so much to the bloke. Never could we say that about a manager before.

Week from hell, lets hope that next week is better and we get some luck versus Southend and bring in some players.


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: bungle on September 04, 2010, 16:32:24 pm
Agreed. Whilst I've had occasion to question some of Sammo's tactics and signings, I would never, ever question the man's integrity, committment and passion for the cause.

He's endured an awful week and he needs our support. We've got four points from five games, which on the face of it is not great but let's remember that we've been given a tough start fixture-wise - out of the teams we've played so far, the only we one we beat last season was Accrington. At least we're above Bradford and Gillingham!



Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: clarkeysntfc on September 04, 2010, 16:35:51 pm
Agree totally - we need to support Sammo. Cardoza on the other hand.


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Marvo on September 04, 2010, 16:58:08 pm
I thought Sammo was totally at fault with his pre-match comments before Hartlepool, was it any surprise whatsoever that the players played exactly how he said they might?

I also think the public slating of Thornton is totally out of order, that sort of thing should be kept behind closed doors.

He also said we're not after a centre-back anymore, god knows what was supposed to happen today had Beckwith or Holt been injured.

I like Sammo, he's Cobblers through and through but he needs to cut out these mistakes, he's making a rod for his own back!


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Insider on September 04, 2010, 17:03:37 pm
Agree totally - we need to support Sammo. Cardoza on the other hand.

It's all going to end in tears, we all know it. 


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: 4everdelayed on September 04, 2010, 17:05:39 pm
Yeah I agree with Marvo regarding Sammo's comments about Thornton, seems unfair to single him out. If he's not applying himself fully, Sammo should deal with it like he seems to have done with Davis a few weeks ago. A bit of petulance, dealt with internally and Davis has worked his way back into the first team. No need for public shaming of a player in my opinion.

This is his first full season as manager though and he's going to make mistakes. It's been a poor start, and I'm sure if we had money available to get both a forward and a defender in, we would, but facts are that our budget is clearly very tight even with this added bit of cash from the cup game. Personally, I'm glad we're getting a striker in as a priority, though I can see Marvo's arguments for favouring getting a defender in.

Still, not going to be too harsh on Sammo, I've been disappointed with this start to the season and we've been absolutely outclassed twice already which is a real shame but it's too early to be getting on his back now. We need a win. Then hopefully we can kick on forward, fingers crossed.


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: bungle on September 04, 2010, 17:08:34 pm
I thought Sammo was totally at fault with his pre-match comments before Hartlepool, was it any surprise whatsoever that the players played exactly how he said they might?

I think he was just trying to manage expectations regarding what I for one regard as a completely meaningless game.  I think a lot of people's reaction to the Hartlepool game was way OTT as far as I'm concerned.

I agree with you to some extent regarding Thornton: that's not going to do his morale any good. Having said that, Sammo wears his heart on his sleeve and if he thinks Thornton could have made the difference and preserved our lead I don't blame him for being angry.

 


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Insider on September 04, 2010, 17:20:37 pm
I agree re not dissing a player in public, but equally those who think Thornton is our saviour should look at his performance against Wycombe, when he went into hiding in the second half. 


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: wazzacobbler on September 04, 2010, 19:17:29 pm
What was actually said. Comments not up on ntfc mobile website yet


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: 4everdelayed on September 04, 2010, 19:50:41 pm
What was actually said. Comments not up on ntfc mobile website yet

i can't directly quote from memory but he basically said Thornton's performance was poor on tuesday so he was dropped, the interviewer (rightly) asked whether it was fair to single out Thornton when there were so many bad performances on tuesday, Sammo replied that he wasnt impressed at all with Thornton on tuesday and wasn't impressed with his efforts today either. He said he's not applying himself enough and will have to work to get back in the side.


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: 606 Parklands_Cobbler on September 04, 2010, 21:18:54 pm
after re hearing it on the bbc page, it sounded to me like he wasnt impressed with what Thornton was doing at the moment he was given the interview along with the hartlepool game,,,,probably just messing around and not doing a proper warm down? Just guessing.


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Gonzales on September 04, 2010, 21:34:44 pm
Seems a bit harsh to criticise and single out one player like that, but Thornton is one of the better players at the club, and more is expected of him than the likes of Slowe. Besides, Sammo can't drop all of them.


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Dr Feelgood on September 04, 2010, 21:48:24 pm
Maybe CD is waiting for a big payday against Liverpool before getting another striker in..


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Tiki-Taka on September 05, 2010, 13:20:45 pm
Sammo is our biggest asset in my humble opinion. He cares about the club like we do, has a refreshing honesty about him, makes the tough decisions (Bayo, Gilbert) and is very clear he wants the same commitment from his players if they are to feature in his team (Gutteridge after Rotherham, Davis after Torquay, Purcell's attitude in training, Thornton's recent laziness when not in possession of the ball)

He knows the players better than us so if he thinks Thornton needs a public bollocking to get the best out of him then so be it. In any walk of life you manage different people in different ways so some of the responses seem OTT, especially seeing as we have criticised previous managers for failing to publically acknowledge poor performances.

Having had the pleasure of talking to him on several occasions he has a very sharp football brain but in his first full season he will make a few mistakes and we have to accept that, as in the long term he will be a very good manager.

The players he is talking to at the moment are proven at this level (and above) and re-enforce the chairmen's £ commitment to this season - the issue we have is that is well known we are ambitious/have just landed a plum tie at Anfield/have an injury crisis which leaves us exposed to agents/players wanting silly money.

I hope he lands the players he wants and we get a few wins under our belt so that some of the criticism seen in other threads is nipped in the bud. Viva Sammo !


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on September 05, 2010, 13:22:54 pm
we are ambitious
thanks for that, you've just cheered up my sunday saying that  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: clarkeysntfc on September 05, 2010, 15:08:21 pm
We're in no way shape or form ambitious!


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: NTFC Nut on September 05, 2010, 15:14:46 pm
We're in no way shape or form ambitious!

Really? I think we are, the eagerness and enthusiasm to push the redevelopment issue with the council from both fans and the board shows that we are, it's just that under the current "only housing or nothing until 2026" stance that the incumbent council is taking we don't have the means to take any really ambitious steps right at this moment. It's a long-term ambition we have but it's an ambition nonetheless.


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Grove on September 05, 2010, 15:20:13 pm
Really? I think we are, the eagerness and enthusiasm to push the redevelopment issue with the council from both fans and the board shows that we are, it's just that under the current "only housing or nothing until 2026" stance that the incumbent council is taking we don't have the means to take any really ambitious steps right at this moment. It's a long-term ambition we have but it's an ambition nonetheless.

There is nothing stopping development,if he was that ambitious hed have built the ground up by now.The surrounding land should be used/sold in the best interests of the town, be is Cobblers or not,it isnt his to develop



Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: NTFC Nut on September 05, 2010, 15:57:54 pm
And how is he supposed to get the money to build the ground up, and get a better quality of players in? Cash from the redevelopment is vital to this club moving forward. You look at the size of the town and it warrants a successful football club, particularly if Saints bugger off to MK as they're threatening to. We got big crowds in the past (when we played P*sh in their first few seasons as a football league club we'd get nigh on 20,000 through the gates, and Northampton was a smaller place back then) and we just need a catalyst to get the crowds in again. While we're playing in a 7,500 capacity ground with Steve Guinan leading the front line and all hopes resting on the shoulders of an 18-year-old lad from Rothwell, we're always going to be a tinpot 4th division club.


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: GrangeParkCobbler on September 05, 2010, 16:41:28 pm
He could have spent his reported £8.5m "investment" on day one, building up the ground. Certainly the West Stand project could have been completed and he'd have sat back for the last 5 years reaping the rewards from the executive boxes and conferencing suites.

Instead, he's £8.5m down the tubes, still with a leased ground, still with a mid-table fourth tier team and still with no hope of selling land which his not his own!


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Insider on September 05, 2010, 16:45:47 pm
And how is he supposed to get the money to build the ground up, and get a better quality of players in? Cash from the redevelopment is vital to this club moving forward.

What part of this don't you understand?  Cardoza was given a lease on however many acres at Sixfields to develop a football ground, which he indicated he had the funds to do when he first came in.  It's not his land to build retail, houses, offices or anything else for that matter that was outside the terms of the original lease.  If he didn't have the money he shouldn't have taken it on, though he did manage to piss well in excess of £7m up the wall paying £3000 a week wages. 


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Insider on September 05, 2010, 16:47:30 pm
He could have spent his reported £8.5m "investment" on day one, building up the ground. Certainly the West Stand project could have been completed and he'd have sat back for the last 5 years reaping the rewards from the executive boxes and conferencing suites.

Instead, he's £8.5m down the tubes, still with a leased ground, still with a mid-table fourth tier team and still with no hope of selling land which his not his own!

SNAP!!


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Tiki-Taka on September 05, 2010, 17:27:21 pm
I'm not going to get drawn into the debate about what should / shouldn't have been done in previous years as I think that others (from memory Drilling, Son Of Geoff, Vintage, Bingers) do an excellent job of representing a balanced view of the world.

As ever when results are disappointing there is an upturn in criticising the club, DC and now it appears Sammo is also fair game, which in my opinion is bang out of order.

I know the transfer stuff is frustrating but it is more complicated than most appreciate. If we agree a wage for a player and then (once Purcell's injury news broke) they upped their demands by 25% then of course it is going to lead to delays whilst we re-negotiate or find an alternate (in addition to now also needing to find a replacement for Purcell)

The point of this topic was that through all of this Sammo comes across as passionate, driven, respected and not prepared for players (including transfer targets) to take the piss. This is what I want the manger of my club to demonstrate so Viva Sammo !


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Insider on September 05, 2010, 18:16:35 pm
As ever when results are disappointing there is an upturn in criticising the club, DC and now it appears Sammo is also fair game, which in my opinion is bang out of order.

Really?  If the old forum posts could be viewed, I think you'd see a long history of that by those that refuse to kow-tow to the official line.

The point of this topic was that through all of this Sammo comes across as passionate, driven, respected and not prepared for players (including transfer targets) to take the piss.

I haven't been overly critical of Sampson as yet, though I do question some of his contract awards this year and the signing of Slowe. The fact that the jury's still out on his tactical nous and his signings is being voiced by many others on here.  But "respect" must also now be questioned given public trashing of Thornton and the spat with Davis already this season.  I'm more than happy for Sampson to be judged at the end of this season.  But that shouldn't exempt him from criticism.  On his other qualities, I agree.

As for the comment about delays in transfers, we were told the Bayo affair was all about knowing early if he was committed or not, so that his substantial (so we were told) wages could be invested elsewhere.  Now we haven't really replaced him (certainly not in monetary terms) and yet before the Liverpool draw we were reading publicly that there was no more money!


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Tiki-Taka on September 05, 2010, 18:36:04 pm
Cheers Insider - being new-ish to this it gives me a better sense of where you are coming from.

I know what you mean about the messages being difficult to follow. It's a pity the club can't give us full transparency but some things will never be for public consumption which means there will always be plenty to be (mis) interporated and interegated on slow Sunday afternoons like this !


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Gonzales on September 05, 2010, 19:00:55 pm
I personally do not condemn DC for choosing to spend big money on the likes of Low and Kirk as we actually had a good team at that time, but the problem was that unlike Notts County last season, we failed to get out of the League several times before finally doing so, but by then we had made losses in those years and couldn't spend any more money. If Calderwood or even Wilkinson had got us promoted at the first time of asking then it is likely that Cardoza would've made more money available. Unfortunately, the players that we did pay substantial amounts for all left under the Bosman ruling, something that the club could do little about. Cardoza has taken the risks, and we are all burdened with the consequences. What needs to happen now is for Sammo to get the full length of his 3 year contract to build the team the way he wants, as at the moment he is stuck with a lot of the players that were brought in at the end of the Gray era. At the moment he has brought in 8 of his own players, but there are still 14 other players that Sammo may or may not want. A prime example is Guinan, the man that Sampson has tried to offload for the entire summer, and at the moment he top of the list on supporter's complaints. Of course this is the fault of previous management, who stupidly gave Guinan a 2 year contract at the age of 35.
This season our squad is still mainly SG signings, and I don't think that Sammo can be judged properly until next season.

John Still had 6 years, and some very average conference finishes, but stability was rewarded.


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Bingers on September 05, 2010, 20:34:34 pm
I'm not going to get drawn into the debate about what should / shouldn't have been done in previous years as I think that others (from memory Drilling, Son Of Geoff, Vintage, Bingers) do an excellent job of representing a balanced view of the world.


I think your memory must be crap Mr Taka.  Drilling isn't balanced, he gets very cross sometimes and says rude words (never met the bloke, but he admits to it on here) and I'm just here for the humour.  Vintage is a bit old and as for Son Of Geoff, ignore him and listen to his Dad.


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: clarkeysntfc on September 05, 2010, 20:36:48 pm
One thing to correct, DC hasn't still got a mid-table league 2 club. We were in mid-table in league 1 when he arrived.


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Tiki-Taka on September 05, 2010, 21:01:59 pm
Cheers Bingers, appreciate the insight from a more experienced poster (unless you are grooming me, in which case I am a bit scared)  ;D


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Bingers on September 05, 2010, 21:19:10 pm
Cheers Bingers, appreciate the insight from a more experienced poster (unless you are grooming me, in which case I am a bit scared)  ;D

Do you need grooming?  That auntie certainly needs grooming.  I don't reckon his hair has ever seen a hairbrush, let alone been stroked by one.

No, with a name like Tiki-Taka, I magine you are a buddhist monk and are as bald as a coot, just like the long-lamented Father Hiroshima Twinkie, God bless him on his travels.


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Insider on September 05, 2010, 21:21:59 pm
there are still 14 other players that Sammo may or may not want.

Name them. And don't include those to whom he gave new contracts in the summer.  Hinton, Beckwith, Gilligan and Guinan are the ones I can identify.


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Insider on September 05, 2010, 21:26:29 pm
Name them. And don't include those to whom he gave new contracts in the summer.  Hinton, Beckwith, Gilligan and Guinan are the ones I can identify.

Whoops, mate just said Gilli signed a new contract this summer.


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Tiki-Taka on September 05, 2010, 21:30:20 pm
Bingers, your imagination is far better than the humble truth !

I also recognise a trap when I see one and therefore will avoid your subliminal request for me to send you a picture of my shiny head !

I'm off to research whether this site has a "help button" like other popular social networking sites just incase you persist with your advances.


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Ralap on September 05, 2010, 21:54:17 pm
I'm getting fed up of all this negativity, why only the other day Tony Clarke told us on here that the club broke even last year. He and us should be very proud of that achievement.


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Insider on September 05, 2010, 21:57:40 pm
I'm getting fed up of all this negativity, why only the other day Tony Clarke told us on here that the club broke even last year. He and us should be very proud of that achievement.

What he said was "the club broke, even last year..." !


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Ralap on September 05, 2010, 22:04:49 pm
What he said was "the club broke, even last year..." !


Oh s***, I didn't have my reading glasses on.


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Gen.Disorda on September 06, 2010, 21:52:23 pm
Sammo is a legend , even my mum commented about how it was nice to hear a football manager who is straight talking and dosnt take s*** from  ANY of his players


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: SteveRiches on September 06, 2010, 23:48:47 pm
Sammo is a legend , even my mum commented about how it was nice to hear a football manager who is straight talking and dosnt take sh*t from  ANY of his players

I've been a Sammo man from the very moment DC gave him the job, despite some of the doubters who sprang up on here to say how he was the wrong choice!
He knows the game, and knows what he wants out of the players, and there's a more than reasonable chance he'll be able to shape this lot into a decent unit in time for a tilt at promotion this season. And of course he'd be the first to also acknowledge the expertise of Crosby, who also knows how people tick. I really hope they both get the success they deserve in a time of extremely difficult financial restraint.


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: pattcobb on September 07, 2010, 05:01:00 am
The only thing I will say about Sammo's style of management is his tactics and team set-ups. In his day great centre half at this level possibly at his best in Atkins team which played a simple 4-4-2 or 5-3-2. I just thing for this division and for players at this level that is the way to play, nice and simple no fancy formations. This season with mixed success we have played 4-2-3-1 4-5-1 and 4-1-3-2. I'm not saying revert to Atkins style hoof ball, but lets not confuse players.


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Trotty on September 07, 2010, 06:27:11 am
Time will tell if he was the right appointment. I'd be lying if I thought he was at the time. At the moment he looks like a man under pressure and so early in the season that doesn't bode well. You don't become a good manager overnight and Sammo's still in the very much at the start of his managerial career. He's been given a long term deal by the club and i'm sure the fans will back him. Hopefully during that time he can improve and improve the team.


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: The Hask on September 07, 2010, 11:10:04 am
Time will tell if he was the right appointment. I'd be lying if I thought he was at the time. At the moment he looks like a man under pressure and so early in the season that doesn't bode well. You don't become a good manager overnight and Sammo's still in the very much at the start of his managerial career. He's been given a long term deal by the club and i'm sure the fans will back him. Hopefully during that time he can improve and improve the team.

One good league win will wash away this pressure I am sure.


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: DustCobb on September 07, 2010, 11:25:03 am
I had a good feeling about us beating Southend on Saturday....however with there now likely to be a big crowd i have lost that good feeling!


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Erith_Cobbler on September 07, 2010, 11:26:47 am
I had a good feeling about us beating Southend on Saturday....however with there now likely to be a big crowd i have lost that good feeling!

We never seem to beat Southend. A(nother) draw wouldn't be that bad.


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Trotty on September 07, 2010, 11:42:28 am
I'm unable to go on Saturday due to work commitments so I'm predicting a home win too.  8)


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Tyro on September 07, 2010, 17:51:10 pm
Southend beat Torquay at the weekend so I think they'll come here with some confidence :-\


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Gonzales on September 07, 2010, 18:36:07 pm
Name them. And don't include those to whom he gave new contracts in the summer.  Hinton, Beckwith, Gilligan and Guinan are the ones I can identify.

Ahem, I think you will find that Guinan was signed on a 2 year Contract, and Beckwith and Hinton were both re-signed due to an appearance clause in their contract, all of said players were signed by SG

Ok, perhaps I exxagerated. Discounting players who signed new deals in the summer, the senior players who were committed on at least a 2 year deal, before Sammo took over are:

Dunn, Rodgers, Gilligan, Guinan, Walker and McKay

Now, whilst most of these players are wanted here and are an important part of the team, I think that there are certainly better players around who Sammo could bring in. Dunn, McKay and to a lesser extent Gilly (Sorry Marvo) are certainly talented players who will hopefully be at the club for years to come. The likes of Paul Rodgers however, are only suited to this level, and in the increasingley unlikely event that we get promoted, Rodgers and Guinan will probably leave the club. Sammo is not going to offload the entire squad, but he will have certain players that he likes, and that he will want to bring to this club, as every other manager in football does.


Title: Re: I Love Sammo!
Post by: Insider on September 07, 2010, 21:45:02 pm
Ahem, I think you will find that Guinan was signed on a 2 year Contract, and Beckwith and Hinton were both re-signed due to an appearance clause in their contract, all of said players were signed by SG

Ok, perhaps I exxagerated. Discounting players who signed new deals in the summer, the senior players who were committed on at least a 2 year deal, before Sammo took over are:

Dunn, Rodgers, Gilligan, Guinan, Walker and McKay

Now, whilst most of these players are wanted here and are an important part of the team, I think that there are certainly better players around who Sammo could bring in. Dunn, McKay and to a lesser extent Gilly (Sorry Marvo) are certainly talented players who will hopefully be at the club for years to come. The likes of Paul Rodgers however, are only suited to this level, and in the increasingley unlikely event that we get promoted, Rodgers and Guinan will probably leave the club. Sammo is not going to offload the entire squad, but he will have certain players that he likes, and that he will want to bring to this club, as every other manager in football does.

You are still incorrect:

"Paul Rodgers has verbally agreed a new one-year contract which I'm really pleased with and when I offered him the contract he wanted to sign straight away, which was great," Sampson told the club's official website after Saturday's 3-1 win at Port Vale.   8th March, 2010

Northampton Town midfielder Ryan Gilligan has become the latest player to agree a new contract at Sixfields.
The 23-year-old is set to sign and joins Dean Beckwith, Craig Hinton and Paul Rogers, in agreeing a new deal.
"It's pleasing because 11 goals from midfield is very good going, so we are glad to have him tied down," boss Ian Sampson told BBC Radio Northampton.
  26th March 2010

Rodgers and Gilligan were both new deals. Hinton and Beckwith were extensions based on appearances as you say.  But that means that if I count correctly, only the following were not Sammo decisions:

Beckwith, Dunn, Guinan, Hinton, McKay, Walker

So out of Sammo's squad of 22, well over two thirds are his signings.  Your original point is plain wrong.  And even you are questioning Rodgers' signing!



Title: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: DrillingCobbler on September 18, 2010, 21:12:45 pm
Im staggered that no body has really bothered with this today but here goes.

Sammo's substitution of Harris. What do people think? I thought it was shocking, a terrible terrible thing to do and will kill the player. He's been Sammo's self confessed centreback back up all season...now apparently he's 4th choice and was given 35 minutes to prove otherwise.

He had a shocker for 20 minutes. Then 15 minutes of being fairly steady. Then he was subbed. Im sorry but that is not the way to manage a football team.

Rant over!


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: auntie on September 18, 2010, 21:15:05 pm
I am gobsmacked by today. Poor Seb was one thing but Jacobs dropped in favour of an out of position wedders. bonkers.


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: DustCobb on September 18, 2010, 21:18:07 pm
Saving Jacobs for Wednesday no doubt, shop window blah blah blah.


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: auntie on September 18, 2010, 21:21:32 pm
Really? Is that what it's come to. f***in 'ell.


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: DustCobb on September 18, 2010, 21:23:08 pm
Wouldn't be a f***ing suprise would it, we sell anybody that has an ounce of talent.


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: auntie on September 18, 2010, 21:23:21 pm
wednesday has gone to everyone's head. i wish i was 12 again. you've all ruined it for me.


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: DustCobb on September 18, 2010, 21:28:41 pm
I think Sammos current problem is he doesn't know his best team or formation and he is also in love with Ryan Gilligan which is possibly making some of the other players jealous that also fancy some man love.


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: Marvo on September 18, 2010, 21:39:41 pm
Been at work but managed to hear Sammo's pre-match interview, reminded me very much of the Hartlepool one and I had resigned myself to a defeat before the game had even kicked off. He said Shrewsbury were going to be a hard nut to crack, they had good players all over the pitch, a few of our youngsters were going to learn a few lessons, etc, etc. If the manager doesn't rate our chances, what hope have we got, no wonder the players play to the level he expects.


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: DustCobb on September 18, 2010, 21:46:34 pm
Funny you say that Marvo, i said the exact same thing to Wazzacobbler a little earlier, we may aswell have waved the white flags and not bothered sending a team to Shrewsbury.


http://www.northamptonchron.co.uk/sport/football/cobblers/northampton_town_shrews_will_be_tough_to_tame_says_sampson_1_1167071


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: Fred_NTFC on September 18, 2010, 22:57:57 pm
More than anything, it seems bizarre that Wedderburn was dropped and then played out of position after being comfortably our best performer in the middle of the park beforehand. I don't consider myself a master tactician, but even I would suggest that he's not a wide player.

I don't think it was the right game to start Harris in anyway, but it seemed strange that he didn't wait to half-time when we were going through a calmer period.



Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: Power Football on September 19, 2010, 06:50:32 am
Was Sammo right?

Well he certainly wasn't right in starting the poor lad....

It seems we are asking the same questions each week, all about Sammo's team selection, tactics and substitutions. I love the fella to bits but how many more times is he going to make these mistakes without serious questions being asked of him.

I had high hopes for yesterday and when i saw the teamsheet i thought we would see Wedders Osman and Thornton in the middle with Mckay and Gilly out wide. Instead he decided to employ some sort of diamond formation which culminated in Wedderburn playing as a left midfielder, total madness against a team top of the table.

The fact we have exctly the same amount of points this season from the same time last year is quite telling. The difference is this year the side isn't any better and without Bayo has regressed. Can anybody see us going on a similar type of run this year as last?





Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: Winslow Lee on September 19, 2010, 07:19:27 am
Bringing Gilligan back to the centre is the biggest mystery to me, I thought Osman and Wedderburn were looking pretty solid with no reason to make a change. Suddenly Gilligan is injured, decides to play through it and Sampson seems obliged to play him. A fully fit Gilligan wasnt worth a place in the middle but an injured, not match fit, out of form Gilligan is?




Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: HertsCobbler on September 19, 2010, 07:40:46 am
It seems that Sammo has a fondness for playing Gilli like Atko had for Dean Peer!


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: SteveRiches on September 19, 2010, 08:08:49 am
Or Stuart Gray's fondness of Leon Constantine?


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: HertsCobbler on September 19, 2010, 08:09:53 am
Or Stuart Gray's fondness of Leon Constantine?

I think that was more vanity in the sense that he was hoping to prove he had not dropped a massive ball.  Thinking about it was Atko Peer's brother in law?


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: 1 for the team on September 19, 2010, 08:22:06 am
i think samo was totally out of order doing that to seb harris the poor lad and i was at the game and yes he had a mad 10 min then who did not and harris did start to get into the game and put some good blocks in he even block the shot that lead to the first goal . if i was samo i would not take that game of harris  into  account of what the lad can bring to a team like Northampton.  i guess the moment maybe have got to him a bit ,i do hope the fans get behind harris and support him he was never the worse player on the pitch ( escape goat maybe ) for an all round bad display

come on the cobs


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: Insider on September 19, 2010, 08:30:09 am
His handling of Harris is one thing, but the public slagging of Thornton in the pages of the Chron is bang out of order.  If he's questioning Thornton's commitment, he should be doing that behind closed doors.  But then perhaps he's paving the way for the ongoing selection of Gilligan and his commitment over the mercurial talent that is Thornton.   ::)


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: Grove on September 19, 2010, 08:39:37 am
 Escape goat    ;D  fantastic, hes just a kid.


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: HertsCobbler on September 19, 2010, 09:19:30 am
I still think Harris is more suited to being a striker.


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: PineWoody on September 19, 2010, 09:46:00 am
My personal view on Sammo is starting to change somewhat. He came in last year, when things were going s***e, managed to change our fourtunes completly and nearly pulled off a miracle in getting us to the play offs. But this season has been nothing short of bog-standard at best. If it had not been for us getting a miracle at Reading, I think Sammo may have found himself under a bit moee pressure, but instead the distraction of the Liverpool game, which people have been talking about for weeks appears to have clouded over some serious issues.

I find myself disagreeing with his team selection every single week. I'm not a football manager, only a fan, but I can never say I have disagreed with a team so many times and so constantly, even when we were doing s*** under previous managers I've thought, yeah thats proberly our best team. How on earth he is not playing a midfield 4/5 with Jacobs, Thornton, Osman (now injured) and Wedderburn, every game when all of these players are fit is beyond me.

Equally, in my opinion, Sammo had a poor transfer window. I understand there were budget cuts which limited him significantly and made his already difficult job much harder in terms of trying to build a squad. But we left ourselves woefully short of cover in central defence, as I do not beleive that Sammo would not have known to some sort of degree the extent of Hinton's injury, and lacking completely in any sort of strikeforce having let our best striker by a countrymile go, without replacing him, until recently with Mckenzie.

I still beleive we can turn this season around, just, but to do it, Sammo is going to need the players who can win games, such as Jacobs, Thornton and Davis on his side and his handling of the player so far seems to have been a bit wayward, but equally I do understand you can't just let players walk over you as a manager.


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: Tyro on September 19, 2010, 10:18:52 am
Terry Angus said on the radio that early on Holt put his hands on Harris' shoulders & gave him a pep talk. The opposition players & management would've seen this & would've been able to exploit the weakness so through those actions maybe Sammo had little choice than to replace Harris ???


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: Welly Cobb on September 19, 2010, 10:21:18 am
Harris, while untested, looked very solid in the pre-season in the centre of defence, so I can see why we focussed on getting the Bayo replacement everyone and their dog was clamouring for, as he appeared to be back-up in an injury crisis. Yesterday he did not seem mentally prepared for the game, and he obviously needs working on. Taking him off has probably hurt him a bit, but he'll just have to take it for the team and learn from it. I've also thought that Osman has been as often poor as he is decent, though I wasn't sure about dropping Wedderburn last week.

But as has been said, picking the team is more than just writing down the best names on paper. You have to consider a lot of behind-door issues. Football players are people with lives as opposed to abstract illusions that suddenly arrive on the pitch come the start of a football match, and its hard to really judge the correctness of a team selection without the full knowledge of everything that is going on behind the scenes, other than by results, which have been average so far. With the budget we were given (Was it something along the lines of a squad of about 18 if we have kept Bayo's wages), Sammo has done what he can. I think he hasn't helped himself too much with that rediculous streak we went on last year, as everyones expectations of a manager who has only had one year in charge seem to be far too high.

We played the team who are top of the league away from home. Shrewsbury have spent a lot of money these last years to try and get up, and this is finally paying off (though who knows what they'll do when they got to league 1 again. Probably the same as us and hundreds of other lower league teams and f*** around for a bit and then come back down with a larger debt). Last year we lost 3-0 to them. Last year, we got hammered by Notts County 5-1, who also had spent more money that they should realistically have, and we lost at home to Barnet when they went top of the league. We have average attendances for this league, and we shouldn't be expecting to be walking it because we've spent more time in league 1 than league 2. We're still mid-table, and Sammo will be fine aslong as we don't end up too periously close to bottom of the table come January. If he doesn't make the play-offs at the end of the year though, I'll imagine he'll be gone, so he has his target to aim for and a large majority of the year to get there.


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: auntie on September 19, 2010, 10:34:13 am
Last year, we got hammered by Notts County 5-1

You missed the holty goal as well then  ;D I think that the frustrating thing is, is that, injuries aside, we never seem to play the same XI two games running. Some of the changes are mystifying. Bringing gilly back last week at the expense of Wedders for example. The reasoning for this was that Gilly had scored 11 goals last season and he would give us attacking options. Yet in reality Gilly was played so deep he had a seat in the North stand. Why was Jacobs dropped for an out of position Wedders yesterday. The Davis / jacobs combination on the left has been proved to work.

I appreciate we have been hit by an injury crisis but that should have accounted for just one change yesterday. The common theme amongst all the top clubs in our division is that the same players are playing week in week out.


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: Marvo on September 19, 2010, 10:51:33 am
We're still mid-table, and Sammo will be fine aslong as we don't end up too periously close to bottom of the table come January. If he doesn't make the play-offs at the end of the year though, I'll imagine he'll be gone, so he has his target to aim for and a large majority of the year to get there.

We might as well say goodbye now then because the play-offs in my opinion are beyond this team (and manager). Last season we went on an incredible run that left us just short of the play-offs. It has been said time and time again that we had too much to make up after a bad start. Well my friend, this start is just as bad and the odds of us replicating that run from last season have to be long to say the least.

We're up against simliar sized clubs with similar sized crowds and similar sized budgets. The ONLY real difference for any of the teams in this division is the ability of the manager to put together a squad, select the right line-up and tactics and instill a belief and desire in his players. Sammo is failing on all fronts!


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: Macc Cobbler on September 19, 2010, 12:05:14 pm
I actually think it was correct for Sammo to take off Harris before half-time .......... he was having a nightmare and was being sorely exposed and we could not afford to go a second goal down. I felt sorry for Harris as he looked a forlorn figure sitting on his own on the bench at half-time, but it was just not working.
Re the original team selection, I thought Sammo got it massively wrong however. This perseverance with Gilligan could be the downfall of him. He should have started with Osman and Wedderburn in the middle, and whilst Jacobs has been disappointing in his last couple of games I would have persevered with him on the left.


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: nathan r on September 19, 2010, 12:59:10 pm
i wasn't sure slatting Thornton publicly was the right thing to do, but to be fair he's got a reaction from as Thornton came on
and changed the game against Southend and scored yesterday.

As for Harris, i wasn't at the game but could this have waited until half time?  Although they were both playing s*** i felt for Rodgers and Hinton when they were subbed just before half time last year at Burton.


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: pattcobb on September 19, 2010, 13:09:28 pm
My personal view on Sammo is starting to change somewhat. He came in last year, when things were going sh*te, managed to change our fourtunes completly and nearly pulled off a miracle in getting us to the play offs. But this season has been nothing short of bog-standard at best. If it had not been for us getting a miracle at Reading, I think Sammo may have found himself under a bit moee pressure, but instead the distraction of the Liverpool game, which people have been talking about for weeks appears to have clouded over some serious issues.

I find myself disagreeing with his team selection every single week. I'm not a football manager, only a fan, but I can never say I have disagreed with a team so many times and so constantly, even when we were doing sh*t under previous managers I've thought, yeah thats proberly our best team. How on earth he is not playing a midfield 4/5 with Jacobs, Thornton, Osman (now injured) and Wedderburn, every game when all of these players are fit is beyond me.

Equally, in my opinion, Sammo had a poor transfer window. I understand there were budget cuts which limited him significantly and made his already difficult job much harder in terms of trying to build a squad. But we left ourselves woefully short of cover in central defence, as I do not beleive that Sammo would not have known to some sort of degree the extent of Hinton's injury, and lacking completely in any sort of strikeforce having let our best striker by a countrymile go, without replacing him, until recently with Mckenzie.

I still beleive we can turn this season around, just, but to do it, Sammo is going to need the players who can win games, such as Jacobs, Thornton and Davis on his side and his handling of the player so far seems to have been a bit wayward, but equally I do understand you can't just let players walk over you as a manager.
I must say i agree with all this. Sammo has made some pretty strange decisions lately. Yesterday we had a converted striker playing alongside a converted left midfileder at centre half. I also do not agree with the way Sammo seems so dismissive of the Liverpool game, not sure this is inexperience but I reckon Sammo should give it the big one. "Nothing to lose, they're the ones under pressure, give a right good go" Instead our (boring?) manager bleats something about Bradford being more important. We all know that is probabably true, but come on Sammo lighten up we are likely not to win at Anfield but lets give it a good go please.


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: Marvo on September 19, 2010, 13:12:05 pm
I'm not so sure Bradford is so important now, any points gained will probably mean that we finish 15th this season instead of 16th.


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: Welly Cobb on September 19, 2010, 13:22:54 pm
Weren't we two points off the play-offs before the start? We lost in what was probably going to be the hardest fixture in the calender this year. We shouldn't be ruling ourselves out at this stage - it's a s*** league and pretty much anything can happen.


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: Macc Cobbler on September 19, 2010, 13:29:24 pm
I am looking at the table today ........ and we are only two points off the bottom of the table.


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: Marvo on September 19, 2010, 14:04:38 pm
It's not about how many points we are behind, or in front for that matter, it's about how good we are and at the moment it is obvious that we are nowhere near good enough. What makes matters worse, I seriously doubt our manager has the nous to change things, at least not for the better! I've seen NOTHING this season that suggests we can get promoted this term.


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: The Hask on September 19, 2010, 16:04:17 pm
Weren't we two points off the play-offs before the start? We lost in what was probably going to be the hardest fixture in the calender this year. We shouldn't be ruling ourselves out at this stage - it's a sh*t league and pretty much anything can happen.

Far too early and Shrewsbury played well and looked a very good side, in my opinion the true test will be Home to Hereford - if we don't get three points it will be then I will join the doom and gloom bandwagon


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: The Hask on September 19, 2010, 16:05:23 pm
i wasn't sure slatting Thornton publicly was the right thing to do, but to be fair he's got a reaction from as Thornton came on
and changed the game against Southend and scored yesterday.

As for Harris, i wasn't at the game but could this have waited until half time?  Although they were both playing sh*t i felt for Rodgers and Hinton when they were subbed just before half time last year at Burton.

Better to sub early than concede more goals


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: The Hask on September 19, 2010, 16:07:44 pm
Or Stuart Gray's fondness of Leon Constantine?

Bless Mr C - he scored for York again yesterday


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: DustCobb on September 19, 2010, 17:19:56 pm
Better to sub early than concede more goals

We only conceeded 1 goal with Harris on the pitch.

We lost 3-1.


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: wazzacobbler on September 19, 2010, 17:41:10 pm
Far too early and Shrewsbury played well and looked a very good side, in my opinion the true test will be Home to Hereford - if we don't get three points it will be then I will join the doom and gloom bandwagon

Why wait that long? We are s***


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: The Hask on September 19, 2010, 19:38:29 pm
We only conceeded 1 goal with Harris on the pitch.

We lost 3-1.

I know but at the time of the sub we were 1-0 down so the decision to sub would have taken the fact - sub or concede more goals - no-one had the benefit of this hindsight at that point


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: DustCobb on September 19, 2010, 19:42:24 pm
I know but at the time of the sub we were 1-0 down so the decision to sub would have taken the fact - sub or concede more goals - no-one had the benefit of this hindsight at that point

I know, i was just being a wanker  ;D


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: The Hask on September 19, 2010, 20:36:04 pm
I know, i was just being a wanker  ;D

I will let you off then  ;)


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: bungle on September 19, 2010, 20:38:27 pm
I think we've reached the point where serious questions have to be asked about Sammo's ability to take us forward.

He was handed an extremely tough group of opening fixtures and he's had some nasty injuries to contend with, but these factors, whilst mitigating, should not obscure the fact that he has made some truly shocking decisions.  

He blew the striker budget on Tadgh Purcell only to decide that transfer-listed geriatric, Steve Guinan, was a better option up front. He has constantly tinkered with the team from the start, never giving the impression that he knows our best 11. He's made questionable man-management decisions concerning Thornton and Harris. Now he's lavishing praise on a half-fit Ryan Gilligan for playing through the pain barrier, as if the guy is the indispensible fulcrum of our side, when everybody else would tell you he's way down the midfield pecking order behind Thornton, Osman, Wedderburn and Jacobs, all of whom, with the exception of Osman, have the virtue of being fully bloody fit. How must Wedderburn feel when a 60-70% fit Gilligan is preferred to him in centre midfield? I don't care if he's only 18, the lad should be starting in his proper positon.

I'm starting to question again, as I did during the early days of his reign, whether Sammo has the tactical nous, the transfer acumen and the man management skills to be a succesful manager. There's no doubting his integrity and his passion, and I'd dearly love him to succeed; he just needs to be a little more circumspect, a little less heart-on-sleeve and to use his brain a bit more.  When the sideshow of the Liverpool game is out the way and we've played a few of our easier fixtures, we should have a clearer idea of how things stand.



Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: clarkeysntfc on September 20, 2010, 08:03:13 am
In 5 games time we'll have completed a quarter of our league campaign, which in my view is a fair time to make a judgement.


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: Sid on September 20, 2010, 12:39:13 pm
The panic button should be being pressed if we start falling away and are in danger of relegation. The severe lack of a big striker and a decent centre back will be the thorn in
Sammo's tactics until he sorts these positions out - and from what I can see, the club have pretty much exhausted all avenues on this front and are getting nowhere fast.

For a bit of perspective, we lost our second league game of the season, away from home, to a better team. Torquay away on the opening day was also similar. We have lost 2 from 7 games so far 2010/011, having faced 3 decent sides on our travels. Last season we lost 1 in 3 matches, including 10 away from home.

Last season's good run of form came because the club managed to blood a good confident side week in week out. That confidence is lacking partly because Sammo is struggling to find that first 11, and the right tactics to fit the players. I'd wait until end of October - another 7 games (including 4 home games) before seeing if changes have paid off.

Personally, I'm preferring the fact we are getting the ball down, passing it about a la Shrewsbury instead of lumping it around. - imagine the level of negativity on the board is we were in this position and we were incapable of playing a pass to feet (cue the ridiculous comments...)  ;D


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: bungle on September 20, 2010, 12:49:09 pm
Anything is better than dealing with the real issues.....

By which I suppose you mean Cardoza's management of the finances.

Perhaps I'm naiive, but I still think that the central issue is the management of the team. I still believe that a decent manager with tactical nous, transfer acumen and the ability to improve players would get us promoted out of this division, even with the slender resources currently at our disposal. I'm getting increasingly concerned that Sammo is not the man to do this.  

 


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: NTFC Nut on September 20, 2010, 13:14:06 pm
When you consider that our playing budget was reduced by 25% from last year's budget (which I seem to recall DC saying in his Q&A was around the £1.2m mark?), and then you take out the wages of Purcell (who will contribute nothing on the field of play this season) and the transfer-listed duo (who were brought in on League One wages by Gray and are assumably on the same terms as last season), the rest of the playing budget cannot be more than about £800k. That is not one of the higher budgets in the division and in fact, puts us at about where we look likely to finish this season, lower mid-table. The likes of Macclesfield and Barnet aren't operating on much less than £800k. I'm not really sure what some of you expect Sammo to do.


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: Marvo on September 20, 2010, 14:13:06 pm
Well stop picking an unfit Gilligan (and playing him out of position) might help.



Sorry, I couldn't help myself.


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: bungle on September 20, 2010, 16:59:21 pm
I'm not really sure what some of you expect Sammo to do.

You judge a manager not by the circumstances in which he finds himself but by the decisions he makes in response. Sammo has made poor decisions in areas in which I would expect a good manager to do better, no matter what the circumstances: team selection, tactics and man-management. As Marvo says, can anyone really defend the continued selection of Gilligan at the moment?


Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: TbananaG on September 20, 2010, 17:08:13 pm
Taking Harris off was a terrible piece of (mis-)management. He didn't have a great start to the game, but he was starting to settle, and what can it do to anyone's coinfidence to be taken off after half an hour?!

But who picked him to start? This wasn't some unknown loan player who performed less well than we'd hoped - it was Seb Harris, doing exactly what we might have expexcted.

And, all the psychology aside, it was a poor football decision as it turned out. JJ got out-jumped and out-muscled for their second, which I don't think would have happened to Harris, and he stood off the forward and let him shoot for their third - so you could even argue that the decision cost us the game.

And who's the manager who's reached this point of having three midfielders and an out of position attacking right back as his defence, injuries and bad luck aside - Harris shouldn't be made a scapegoat for that.

And what does it say of the manager's relationship with the captain - as the other centre back, did Holt say don't pick him, or did he say take him off...or do the manager and the captain disagree?

Shrewsbury are a very good team - including Harrald who was available to be bought for a long time this summer - big, effective centre forward anyone?! Nah, why would we need one of those. So, it's no surprise we lost, even if we do end up winning more than we lost this season. I also think that's about the last we'll see of Harris and he'll just fade away out of the game because he's probably just not good enough (but who signed him?)....but it was still a very poor bit of management.



Title: Re: Was Sammo Right?
Post by: PineWoody on September 20, 2010, 17:14:31 pm
. I'm not really sure what some of you expect Sammo to do.
My issues have very little to do with the squad, becuase I understand and accept that he has been operating with at least one hand tied behind his back. Infact, the signings of Hall, Johnson and Purcell all looked decent and Purcell's injury is just one of those things. My problem is the decisions that Sampson has made with that squad in terms of selection, tatics and man-management. I do not hate Gilligan, infact I think he is a decent squad player, but how he starts in central midfield infront of either Osmand or Wedderburn, who I think looks a very decent player is beyond me, and how he starts out wide ahead of Thornton or Jacobs is equally bemusing. We have seen that an off form Jacobs causes more problems than most other palyers in our squad.

And I still havent understood why Guinan started the first 5 games of this season, despite looking really s***e last year, and equally s***e in competitive games this year.

I have not given up hope on Sammo doing a good job for this team and our club, far from it, but his some of his decisions have been questionable at best.


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: guest216 on September 23, 2010, 10:34:30 am
Honestly don't think I could ever criticize Sammo, or even Osman after this. They're all heroes. 


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Marvo on September 23, 2010, 10:55:37 am
The thing is, although a lot of supporters said this game didn't matter, of course it did for long after the result against Bradford on Saturday, whatever it is, is long forgotten, some of you youngsters will still be boring the pants over the new generations about this night. I can see Karl getting stick for once again mentioning last night some 30 years down the line.  :)


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: guest49 on September 23, 2010, 11:46:37 am
For a game that is 'more important' on Saturday, can you see the squad aquaplaning across sixfields after a 95th minute winner? ;D 


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: DL2 on September 23, 2010, 12:03:33 pm
Do you know Tel I was only thinking this morning what a Cobblers Legend he is.  On top of that he does genuinely care, he lives and breathes it with us, and to top it all he is a thoroughly decent bloke too. 

I am so pleased and proud for him.



Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: DustCobb on September 23, 2010, 12:14:46 pm
Sammos celebrations were awesome!


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on September 23, 2010, 13:05:39 pm
The thing is, although a lot of supporters said this game didn't matter, of course it did for long after the result against Bradford on Saturday, whatever it is, is long forgotten, some of you youngsters will still be boring the pants over the new generations about this night. I can see Karl getting stick for once again mentioning last night some 30 years down the line.  :)
i'm just gutted they aren't the sky game this weekend because i'd love to be in a pub full of the f***ers right now


Title: Sammo says.......
Post by: County Cobbler on September 26, 2010, 06:11:57 am
Sammo said, in his post match interview that, 'getting a striker is on the backburner'.
When Purcell was fit he said the priority was 'getting a striker in', well McKenzie has surely only replaced Purcell. Am I misreading the situation?
DC said this week 'we aim to bring in 1 or 2 players', then surely there is no position a higher priority if we aim to get promotion!
We have needed another striker in the squad for over a month and having the contacts and obtaining players is part of Sammos job.
Good luck.


Title: Re: Sammo says.......
Post by: brickowski on September 26, 2010, 06:58:35 am
They just beat Liverpool.

Go away.


Title: Re: Sammo says.......
Post by: Marvo on September 26, 2010, 07:16:17 am
You have Hall, McKenzie and Beckwith not starting at present, all three you would have been expecting to command a place in the starting line-up but who do you drop to accomodate them?

We've lost one league game in the last seven and have beaten Brighton, Reading and Liverpool in the cup, of course signing any more players is now on the backburner, we're not Manchester United!


Title: Re: Sammo says.......
Post by: wazzacobbler on September 26, 2010, 08:42:05 am
When Purcell was fit we were playing with 2 strikers up front. We don't need more than Billy, Leon and Stevie G when you also have Herbert who, although is finding his feet rather well on the wing, can be pushed up front if needed. 4 strikers in a squad is enough for now. It's if another long term injury happens we will need a new one. In my opinion, our strikeforce is in form and I'm happy with that right now


Title: Re: Sammo says.......
Post by: Razor on September 26, 2010, 15:17:22 pm
We need 4 new strikers, 3 new midfielders and 7 new defenders sort it out Sammo >:(


Title: Re: Sammo says.......
Post by: dazza on September 26, 2010, 15:19:59 pm
We need 4 new strikers, 3 new midfielders and 7 new defenders sort it out Sammo >:(


We still wont have any chance at all at Ipswich though.


Title: Re: Sammo says.......
Post by: NTFC Nut on September 26, 2010, 15:34:19 pm

We still wont have any chance at all at Ipswich though.

Of course we'll have a chance. A very, very slim chance. Not a "good chance" as some of you are suggesting. The lads will put in a performance to be proud of, of that I'm sure, but if Ipswich play to their full potential it shouldn't matter how well we play, they should have enough about them to get the job done.

Once the (understandable) hysteria around Wednesday dies down you may look back and realise how ridiculous it is to start talking about how we've got a "good chance" up there. Lightning can't keep striking again and again and again; cup games are one-offs, anything can happen on the night and form often goes out the window- but that works both ways. Anfield will have no bearing on the Ipswich game. Wednesday was our night and nights like that come round once in a blue moon. That's why they're so special.


Title: Re: Sammo says.......
Post by: Dr Feelgood on September 26, 2010, 16:00:51 pm
here we go again ;D


Title: Re: Sammo says.......
Post by: Grove on September 26, 2010, 17:29:17 pm
Sammo said, in his post match interview that, 'getting a striker is on the backburner'.
When Purcell was fit he said the priority was 'getting a striker in', well McKenzie has surely only replaced Purcell. Am I misreading the situation?
DC said this week 'we aim to bring in 1 or 2 players', then surely there is no position a higher priority if we aim to get promotion!
We have needed another striker in the squad for over a month and having the contacts and obtaining players is part of Sammos job.
Good luck.
 
DC has previously backed the club financially but it was the managers that wasted the investment.
Only a stupid business person would continue subsidising the club until the structure is in place to expand the club (and stadium).
Compared to other clubs the club is now on a sound financial footing and like the Liverpool windfall, he is releasing the extra cash for two more players.
Yes we all want millions spent of other peoples money to get the club into the Championship but not at the expense of bankruptcy.



Title: Re: Sammo says.......
Post by: County Cobbler on September 26, 2010, 19:33:18 pm
Grove-and your point is?


Title: Re: Sammo says.......
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on September 26, 2010, 19:49:54 pm
Make your mind up?


Title: Re: Sammo says.......
Post by: auntie on September 26, 2010, 19:56:10 pm
Can we please restrict conversations/arguments about Ipswich to the identified thread. One thread has been deleted already. This one will join it if it carries on....

you're so masterful tel...ipswich, IPSWICH, IPSWICH

I'm so bloody happy it sickens me  ;D


Title: Re: Sammo says.......
Post by: County Cobbler on September 26, 2010, 20:03:44 pm
The point I was trying to make (however poorly) was that I agree with DC keeping to a strick budget and only spending extra funds to the agreed budget, ie the Liverpool windfall. I believe the priority is a striker with the available funds because Guinan and Herbert will not complement McKenzie and McKay.


Title: Re: Sammo says.......
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on September 26, 2010, 20:06:56 pm
I can see Herberts position being a right winger by the end of the season


Title: Re: Sammo says.......
Post by: Marvo on September 26, 2010, 21:10:40 pm
Yep, Herbert is starting to look really good, I just wonder if he can do it from the off?


Title: Re: Sammo says.......
Post by: TbananaG on September 27, 2010, 09:31:28 am
Sammo also said he's "got a few phone calls in". I think the position is that we're still looking if someone good becomes available, but there's no rush or panic.


Title: Samp out ?
Post by: CHEESEOATCAKES on October 09, 2010, 17:24:29 pm
Does anyone think the Cobblers are starting games with their strongest team ?


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: dazza on October 09, 2010, 17:28:12 pm
Does anyone think the Cobblers are starting games with their strongest team ?


I certainly don't


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: MK_Cobbler on October 09, 2010, 17:48:32 pm
Sampson thinks were moving in the right direction, for that statement alone he should f*** off.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: ntfc_alex on October 09, 2010, 17:51:41 pm
A few weeks a go sammo was being hailed as a hero


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: CHEESEOATCAKES on October 09, 2010, 18:09:34 pm
A few weeks a go sammo was being hailed as a hero


The only manager to win at Anfield this season and be sacked ?


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Dr Feelgood on October 09, 2010, 20:00:59 pm
Get Akto back fast...he'll get us promoted from this s*** div..Then when we get in the Championship get Samp back


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: ntfc_alex on October 09, 2010, 20:41:15 pm
After the bradford game and to an extent the chesterfield game everyone was saying how we were playing the best football in years and how sammo was going to lead us up the table. Two games later, albeit poor results, suddenly people are calling for his head saying were doomed. Short memories. We may not go up this year, we probably won't, but give the man a chance. He's building a young squad which yeah, is missing a few players, such as a Target man but that is what building a squad is about, and as they get more and more experience they are only going to get better.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Insider on October 09, 2010, 21:05:32 pm
After the bradford game and to an extent the chesterfield game everyone was saying how we were playing the best football in years and how sammo was going to lead us up the table. Two games later, albeit poor results, suddenly people are calling for his head saying were doomed. Short memories. We may not go up this year, we probably won't, but give the man a chance. He's building a young squad which yeah, is missing a few players, such as a Target man but that is what building a squad is about, and as they get more and more experience they are only going to get better.

Speak for yourself.  Sammo is getting it wrong on so many fronts.  Why did he opt for a central defensive three plus two wing backs today when we've played all season with a back four? Why change it and bring Beckwith back in what may prove to be a must win match instead of reinstating him gently?  Why does he persist in the Gilligan-Osman defensive midfield combo that has consistently failed to deliver?  And that with a back five?  Why does he continue to publicly slag off players in post match and "stocking filler" midweek interviews?  Why is he not investing in the young squad you refer to instead of using our club to blood someone else's youngsters?  Jacobs and Konstantinou have at least as much potential as Parker.  Why did he offer much needed contracts to Slowe and Harris?  And why oh why has he left one of the best midfield prospects I've seen in a long time in Nigel Wedderburn to fester on the bench?  We have the talent if only he throws caution to the wind as he did at Reading.  Mr Tinker Man has struck again and ultimately will be the architect of his own downfall.   We cannot real afford another failure, so go on man, be brave and at least go down fighting.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: NTFC Nut on October 09, 2010, 21:21:03 pm
This is a very young, inexperienced but talented side we've got, give these players a season or two to iron out their inconsistencies and get a little more experience and we'll be laughing, especially if that huge gaping Bayo-size hole gets filled sooner rather than later.

The players aren't the only inexperienced ones. Sammo may make a mistake tactically here and there, because he's still learning, but there is a good manager in there somewhere. He was being lauded across the football league last season for the achievement of pulling us out of the relegation battle and into promotion contention in the space of about two and a half months. He hasn't turned into a bad manager overnight.

He and Crosby will get it right, I'm sure. They're not working with the biggest of budgets, especially when you consider a lot of cash is tied up in three of our highest earners, Hinton, Guinan and Purcell- two of whom Sammo wants out, and one of whom is on the treatment table until the spring. But despite those constraints they've pieced together one of the most technically gifted sides we've had in years. Some of the football we saw against Chesterfield and Bradford was a joy to watch, and we were just lacking someone to finish off the chances we were creating. I think we all know we're only one striker away from doing that, and I'm sure Sammo is focused on unearthing that striker. He found key players around November and December time last season that played a big part in our revival and we have to have faith in him and Crosby to do that again. Zola is still up for grabs.

Patience is key with the set-up we have at the minute. I genuinely don't believe we're in danger of going down. When this young side is high on confidence they can tear most teams in this division a new arsehole, and we will pick up enough points over 46 games that we won't be in danger. We may be in "danger" of a season, maybe two, in the League Two wilderness, but we may need to accept that, endure it and afford this team a bit of time to find its feet. If we can keep this side together and Cardoza doesn't resort to selling the Thorntons, Jacobses, Johnsons, Dunns and McKays, in a couple of years we'll have a team with the know-how, experience and bloody mindedness to match their undoubted raw ability.

Short-term fixes never bring long-term success and a promotion-winning side is built over a period of years, not months. Which is probably why Sammo and Crosby were handed 3 year contracts- this is a long-term project they're embarking on and they need us to have faith in them and support them, not start getting on their backs after a couple of poor results. They will get it right if we give them enough time. Patience is a virtue that will be rewarded. In this instance anyway. :)


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Dan on October 09, 2010, 21:27:41 pm
How much time does someone who has only won 3 games in 20 deserve? If this was Gray still he would be hounded by now. If we lose on Saturday to Hereford then i think it could be over for Sammo. I really hope this doesn't happen because like everyone i want Sammo to be a success. But the pressure is definitely on him now.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Son Of Geoff on October 09, 2010, 21:35:32 pm
He didn't play 3 centre backs.

We all know so little about Wedderburn it's beyond me why people rate him so highly. For f***'s sake, some people don't even know he's called Nathaniel..


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: NTFC Nut on October 09, 2010, 21:40:49 pm
Dan- like I said, short-term fixes never work. Who would we appoint in his place? Name an available manager you know would do better beyond reasonable doubt. Sammo and Crosby are trying to build something here, and they've knocked down the rubble that was left of Grey's regime over the summer and are rebuilding from the very bottom. We couldn't have continued down the road we were on; we were reliant on a continually injured 30-stone blob of a journeyman who wasn't going to be around for long anyway, and the side being built around him were a rabble of cloggers who were bullying their way to results. In the short term, fair enough, they were getting the points, but they would have been found out sooner or later, much like the Atkins team, and had we been promoted, we would have been murdered with that side in League One (as many of the more sensible posters on here pointed out during our good run last season).

Although 3 wins in 20 is not a pretty statistic to look at, the squad Sammo has assembled is good enough to avoid relegation this year and with a whole campaign's experience under their belts, they'll be better for it next year- and unlike the side we had last season they do have a big future ahead of them. The key with any developing young side is stability, and I hope our supporters and board allow them that by not calling for Sammo's head so prematurely.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Insider on October 09, 2010, 21:47:07 pm
especially if that huge gaping Bayo-size hole gets filled sooner rather than later.


A few weeks ago you were creaming your pants at the signing of Leon McKenzie.  Now you're saying the problem hasn't gone away.  I actually agree that the there is great potential in this inexperienced young squad, but my argument is why are we not playing them?  I would also contend that the best football we've played all season was at Reading when we fielded nearly all the youngsters.

And for Geoff's edification, Wedderburn has started in 7 games this season and we only lost one of them (at Shrewsbury - I don't count JPT as football!).  


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: NTFC Nut on October 09, 2010, 21:51:36 pm
Leon's body language has disappointed me quite a bit when I've seen him although by the sounds of it he impressed in his little cameo today, so the jury is very much still out on that one. Either way, we needed a striker before Tadhg's season was ended and we've only got one in, so there's still room in the squad for another.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: NTFC Nut on October 09, 2010, 21:53:27 pm
With regards to "why aren't we playing them", there is definitely a risk in fielding a side made up entirely of kids, you need a couple of older heads in the line-up, which is probably why Guinan was getting the nod ahead of Tadhg at the start of the season.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Erith_Cobbler on October 09, 2010, 21:55:34 pm
With regards to "why aren't we playing them", there is definitely a risk in fielding a side made up entirely of kids, you need a couple of older heads in the line-up, which is probably why Guinan was getting the nod ahead of Tadhg at the start of the season.

So where are these older heads? Guinan has been dropped now that the transfer window has closed, despite Purcell being out for the season. Apart from Holt, do we have any players over 25 years old?


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: NTFC Nut on October 09, 2010, 22:00:09 pm
So where are these older heads? Guinan has been dropped now that the transfer window has closed, despite Purcell being out for the season. Apart from Holt, do we have any players over 25 years old?

I'd like to think Guinan not being in the line-up is more to do with him offering sod all than the transfer window shutting. Sammo is playing with McKay up front because he feels that is the best option available to him, and if McKenzie is only fit enough for second-half cameos off the bench, which is the conclusion Sammo seemed to come to after the Shrewsbury game, then it's hard to argue with it. We badly need a 90-minute target man, preferably an experienced one, and Sammo will be as acutely aware of that as any of us are. "Several" clubs in our division are trailing Zola and I'd be shocked if we're not one of them, considering we're one of the clubs that probably needs a striker like him the most.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Dan on October 09, 2010, 22:00:46 pm
Dan- like I said, short-term fixes never work. Who would we appoint in his place? Name an available manager you know would do better beyond reasonable doubt. Sammo and Crosby are trying to build something here, and they've knocked down the rubble that was left of Grey's regime over the summer and are rebuilding from the very bottom. We couldn't have continued down the road we were on; we were reliant on a continually injured 30-stone blob of a journeyman who wasn't going to be around for long anyway, and the side being built around him were a rabble of cloggers who were bullying their way to results. In the short term, fair enough, they were getting the points, but they would have been found out sooner or later, much like the Atkins team, and had we been promoted, we would have been murdered with that side in League One (as many of the more sensible posters on here pointed out during our good run last season).

Although 3 wins in 20 is not a pretty statistic to look at, the squad Sammo has assembled is good enough to avoid relegation this year and with a whole campaign's experience under their belts, they'll be better for it next year- and unlike the side we had last season they do have a big future ahead of them. The key with any developing young side is stability, and I hope our supporters and board allow them that by not calling for Sammo's head so prematurely.

I agree with a lot of what you have put. But the supporters have been very supportive of him which wouldn't have been the case for a lot of managers. The squad is certainly capable of avoiding relegation, but that doesn't guarantee that it will happen.

I like the fact Sammo and Malcolm are trying to play football, and I like the fact they are giving the youth a go this year, but even if we stay up, if the youngsters impress then there is no guarantee they will still be here next year in any case.

For me this is a crucial part of Sammos regime and I think this could be the biggest week of his career so far. Next week is such a big game, and after Herefords positive result today far from a foregone conclusion.

I definitely don't think changing Sammo is the right thing to do, we need continuity right now rather than uncertainty. The problem is how long do we allow poor form to continue? Do we run the risk of leaving things too late? Then again its quite possible that in 5 games time we have gone unbeaten and all will be rosy again and I hope it is.

Onwards to next week and we as fans need to get right behind them from the off  :)



Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Dan on October 09, 2010, 22:03:09 pm
But it isn't.... This is Sammo...........

As far as I'm concerned he gets as long as he likes.

If we go down it's DC's fault........... Simple. Same as it was DC's fault we went down from league one...

I agree with that.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Insider on October 09, 2010, 22:12:48 pm
With regards to "why aren't we playing them", there is definitely a risk in fielding a side made up entirely of kids, you need a couple of older heads in the line-up, which is probably why Guinan was getting the nod ahead of Tadhg at the start of the season.

And look where that got us!


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: NTFC Nut on October 09, 2010, 22:14:20 pm
And look where that got us!

About as far as the current set-up is getting us?


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: 4everdelayed on October 09, 2010, 22:15:57 pm
22nd in league two and one point off the relegation places to non-league, yeah?


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Marvo on October 09, 2010, 22:20:19 pm
If we can keep this side together and Cardoza doesn't resort to selling the Thorntons, Jacobses, Johnsons, Dunns and McKays, in a couple of years we'll have a team with the know-how, experience and bloody mindedness to match their undoubted raw ability.



When have we ever, in our entire history, turned down offers for our better players? If ANY of those players begin to stand out in matches and make names for themselves they'll be gone. You live in cloud cuckoo land Nut, I hope the weathers better than it is down here on earth.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: NTFC Nut on October 09, 2010, 22:21:21 pm
22nd in league two and one point off the relegation places to non-league, yeah?

If we are still there come May I will be stunned. You can't piece together a side with an average age of about 21 over the summer and expect them to be flying high and picking up results left, right and centre less than a quarter of the way through the season.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: NTFC Nut on October 09, 2010, 22:25:11 pm
When have we ever, in our entire history, turned down offers for our better players? If ANY of those players begin to stand out in matches and make names for themselves they'll be gone. You live in cloud cuckoo land Nut, I hope the weathers better than it is down here on earth.

As I said, I hope that in this instance Cardoza resists the urge to cash in on them and looks at the bigger picture- the potential benefits of keeping this side together for a few seasons. The length of the contracts offered to Sammo and Crosby suggests to me that he understands this is a long-term project, not a short-term one, and as a result he'll be aware that the best way he can help his management staff is to keep things as stable as possible.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Coolcat on October 09, 2010, 22:30:55 pm
Although 3 wins in 20 is not a pretty statistic to look at, the squad Sammo has assembled is good enough to avoid relegation this year and with a whole campaign's experience under their belts, they'll be better for it next year- and unlike the side we had last season they do have a big future ahead of them. The key with any developing young side is stability, and I hope our supporters and board allow them that by not calling for Sammo's head so prematurely

NTFC NUT...this is where your pro-Sammo argumet falls flat. Not only has Sammo had two seasons...now, the great squad he's assembled is good enough to avoid relegation...FFS!!!...stop making convaluted excuses..reminds me of the two or three seasons of excuses for Dunn.
Frankly, sick of hearing " Sammo will learn from his mistakes" for another defensive line up ::)!


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Marvo on October 09, 2010, 22:31:56 pm
As I said, I hope that in this instance Cardoza resists the urge to cash in on them and looks at the bigger picture- the potential benefits of keeping this side together for a few seasons. The length of the contracts offered to Sammo and Crosby suggests to me that he understands this is a long-term project, not a short-term one, and as a result he'll be aware that the best way he can help his management staff is to keep things as stable as possible.

It aint going to happen and you're more foolish than I already take you for if you believe it will!

Anyway, even if Cardoza wanted to keep them, the players wouild leave like a shot if a bigger club comes in for them and why shouldn't they.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Insider on October 09, 2010, 22:35:38 pm
Figure this: Wedderburn didn't start at Torquay (Gilligan did) and we got thumped 3-0.  Wedderburn then started the next 6 games and we didn't lose.  Come Shrewsbury, guess what?  All of sudden Gilligan declares that he doesn't need an op, he starts (as does Wedderburn) but now Jacobs drops to the bench,  and we lose 3-1.  The loss of form  has coincided with the reinstatement of Gilligan and Osman in midfield.  There have been other reasons: the persistence with Guinan, the constant tinkering with the line up and formation, players playing out of position, lack of defensive cover, the loss of Purcell, and some rank poor signings.  But by and large is Sammo's team.  As I've said before I'm more than happy to see this eason out and let him be judged then, but I doubt others will be guite so forgiving.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: 4everdelayed on October 09, 2010, 22:41:25 pm
Nut, I admire your optimism but I must ask, what is stable about sitting 22nd in the table almost a 1/4 of the way through the season having won only 3 games in the last 18? We have one experienced head that has a future at the club. One. No consistent goalscorer and our chairman is too tight to bring one in, yet we still decided to allocate a portion of our budget on Slowe and Harris? We decide to stop fielding a reserve side, and then are surprised that the likes of McKenzie aren't match fit? We cut a quarter of the budget and in the process lost a player you refer to as a '30 stone blob journeyman' who single-handedly rescued us innumerable points last season and was the only consistent goal threat in our squad (and haven't adequately replaced him nor look to be doing so anytime soon). Anytime a player shows promise (i.e. Jacobs) they're immediately being talked up as potentially being sold because we're so used to losing anyone with a bit of quality. What, to you, suggests that this is a setup with a positive future? A few seasons ago we were in the top-half of league one! Now we're 90th of 92 clubs in the league.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: NTFC Nut on October 09, 2010, 22:46:02 pm
Although 3 wins in 20 is not a pretty statistic to look at, the squad Sammo has assembled is good enough to avoid relegation this year and with a whole campaign's experience under their belts, they'll be better for it next year- and unlike the side we had last season they do have a big future ahead of them. The key with any developing young side is stability, and I hope our supporters and board allow them that by not calling for Sammo's head so prematurely

NTFC NUT...this is where your pro-Sammo argumet falls flat. Not only has Sammo had two seasons...now, the great squad he's assembled is good enough to avoid relegation...FFS!!!...stop making convaluted excuses..reminds me of the two or three seasons of excuses for Dunn.
Frankly, sick of hearing " Sammo will learn from his mistakes" for another defensive line up ::)!

Firstly, Sammo has not had two seasons. He was appointed 12 months ago last Tuesday.

Secondly, he may not have assembled a "great" squad, but you'd be hard-pressed to name a squad in this division with more raw technical ability. There are several gems in our squad, and at the moment they are in the process of being polished.

Thirdly, Dunn is a great example of what I'm talking about: dropped several clangers in his early days that cost us but there is a good keeper in there who is now starting to come to the fore, and given a couple of seasons' experience is now looking like a very handy keeper at this level, with the potential to play higher.

And fourthly..."convaluted"...explain... ???


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: 4everdelayed on October 09, 2010, 22:52:46 pm
Thirdly, Dunn is a great example of what I'm talking about: dropped several clangers in his early days that cost us but there is a good keeper in there who is now starting to come to the fore, and given a couple of seasons' experience is now looking like a very handy keeper at this level, with the potential to play higher.

And what did it cost us exactly? Hmm..... Where are we now, compared to where we were in Dunn's early days?


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: NTFC Nut on October 09, 2010, 23:00:41 pm
Nut, I admire your optimism but I must ask, what is stable about sitting 22nd in the table almost a 1/4 of the way through the season having won only 3 games in the last 18? We have one experienced head that has a future at the club. One.

I'm not disputing any of that, but I'm saying keeping the ship steady and not rocking it by mutineeing against the captain is the best chance we've got of putting it back on course.


No consistent goalscorer and our chairman is too tight to bring one in, yet we still decided to allocate a portion of our budget on Slowe and Harris?

We brought one in. He got injured. s***e luck, yeah, but not the chairman's fault. He then brought another one in (who admittedly doesn't look anything like sharp enough as of yet) and or all we know is working on bringing in a target man. As for Slowe and Harris, I'd imagine they're on peanuts. We need squad players, and with the wages we're paying to some of our starters and even some fringe players (Guinan, Hinton), getting in young, enthusiastic players at the peak of their fitness who will give it 100% every game for very little money, and be happy to bide their time on the bench and wait for their chance, is probably the best option open to us.


We decide to stop fielding a reserve side, and then are surprised that the likes of McKenzie aren't match fit? We cut a quarter of the budget and in the process lost a player you refer to as a '30 stone blob journeyman' who single-handedly rescued us innumerable points last season and was the only consistent goal threat in our squad (and haven't adequately replaced him nor look to be doing so anytime soon).

I loved Bayo as much as anyone, but he never was a long-term solution and was in fact drafted in as a short-term fix by Gray initially. He couldn't get a contract in League One this summer because signing someone with his injury and fitness record is too big a risk to take, and with a 25% reduced budget, keeping him on would mean the rest of the side would be even weaker. Biting the bullet and letting him go was a big blow initially but was, and still remains, the right decision imho.


Anytime a player shows promise (i.e. Jacobs) they're immediately being talked up as potentially being sold because we're so used to losing anyone with a bit of quality. What, to you, suggests that this is a setup with a positive future? A few seasons ago we were in the top-half of league one! Now we're 90th of 92 clubs in the league.

If we can keep this set-up together, I firmly believe it has a bright future. The raw potential there is huge. If we do sell off our most promising players, break this squad up and go into further decline, there's only one man to point the finger at when it all goes wrong and that man sure isn't Sammo.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: MCHammer on October 09, 2010, 23:26:54 pm
It's bloody hard sometimes as a supporter and I know the stats don't lie.....however I can't help but feel we just need to hold our nerve (chairman, players, manager and supporters) and things will turn round.

I came away from the Bradford and Chesterfield games feeling more positive than I had for a long, long time.  I could finally see Sammo's style of play creeping through.  You could tell there were still issues to resolve and we were a long way from the finished article but the signs are there of a decent footballing side. 

What I enjoyed most was the confidence we had started to find while on the ball.  The players, for the most part, were becoming much more composed and were starting to choose the right options especially allowing for Thornton and McKay being the two main outlets.  We clearly need more of a cutting edge and generally better quality in the final third but surely even the most hardened cynic can see what they are trying to achieve.

Sammo is making mistakes but then I'd be shocked if he wasn't.  He is maybe tinkering too much to try and find something that's missing but he's also getting some things right.

Granted Macclesfield was by all accounts a very, very bad day at the office but having been to the game today, up until the sending off and even then for most of the first half the signs were again of a decent performance.

Like I say the stats don't lie and the results and league position aren't good enough but I've seen many managers leave this club and for most it was obvious the time had come.  I don't feel that way about Sammo.  He badly needs a result next week but I don't think it should be an all or nothing game as today proves that circumstances can affect greatly the result of one game.  My own personal opinion is that this is the time when people really need to dig deep and keep the faith as I don't believe adding pressure to anyone is going to help especially with the type of football we are trying to play.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Coolcat on October 09, 2010, 23:29:28 pm
Firstly, Sammo has not had two seasons. He was appointed 12 months ago last Tuesday.

Secondly, he may not have assembled a "great" squad, but you'd be hard-pressed to name a squad in this division with more raw technical ability. There are several gems in our squad, and at the moment they are in the process of being polished.

Thirdly, Dunn is a great example of what I'm talking about: dropped several clangers in his early days that cost us but there is a good keeper in there who is now starting to come to the fore, and given a couple of seasons' experience is now looking like a very handy keeper at this level, with the potential to play higher.

And fourthly..."convaluted"...explain... ???

OK..rephrase...12 months isn't two years...but is well into TWO SEASONS.

Dunn..SEVERAL clangers...sorry to answer a question with a question..but what do you class as 'several'...a substantial quantity to ensure relegation?

Convoluted....A  rather long..twisted..set of excuses..in which no matter how many failures there are..a great keeper..a great team..a great manager is just around the corner!
 ::)


 


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: ntfc_alex on October 09, 2010, 23:45:12 pm
I don't think last seasons rescue mission constitutes a whole season on which we can judge sammo. He is still being bound by the fact our 2 highest earners are players from the gray era, of which both have been.transfer listed, thus reducing the budget that had already been reduced even further.

Coolcat, you can.not honestly say you were against sammo after the Liverpool, bradford and Chesterfield games, so why has one poor game and one game where by all accounts we probably wouldst of lost with 11 men changed your mind?

Sammo is a big a legend at the club as you can get, he deserves more time. If were still around the relegation zone come the start of January then by all means contemplate sacking him, but right now, he deserves time and respect.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: County Cobbler on October 10, 2010, 05:52:16 am
The main critisism I have of Sammo is his inability to sign a centre forward, which most people agree we desperately need, to provide a more positive team formation.
Again I have been told we tried to sign two strikers this week but failed. This following on from statements TWO months ago we required another striker (McKenzie only just replaced Purcells tragic injury).
I can imagine going into my Chairman at work and saying I tried hard but nobody will give me any orders!!!


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: SteveRiches on October 10, 2010, 07:24:13 am
The quality is there in this squad, this is no comparison between the current poor league form and the situation we had under Gray where the league form was also bad but additionally the squad was simply not good enough. I'm prepared to stick my neck out and back this lot. I also felt that after his cameo appearance yesterday, McKenzie deserves a start. There is no way he was offside for his "goal", the ball had stuck to him throughout the move as he went through and there was always a Cheltenham defender goal-side of him. That linesman got so many decisions wrong, he was a disgrace.
Play McKenzie and McKay together because McKay alone can't run the show. If they can't produce the goods then fair enough think again, but they must be given a chance. Our goal tally is pitiful and trying to play without a proper striker is such an obvious mistake that it's time we stopped fannying about with it. What we decide to do as a one-off against Ipswich is different, but in the league we need to compete up front.
Despite us being down to 10 men we produced a storming finish, this was NOT another Macclesfield.
The BBC cameraman missed the alleged stamp by Beckwith, and so many people have differing opinions. I'm sure I saw him return deliberately to stand on the bloke's stomach, but I'd love to be proved wrong. Did anyone have a cameraphone running?


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: bungle on October 10, 2010, 07:30:09 am
The headline on the offy says it all: 'Decisions Cost Cobblers'. Whilst the writer is clearly referring to a few alleged blunders by the referee, the most costly decisions were made by Sammo himself.

Managers should be judged on their decision making: on their ratio of good to bad calls. Let's look at some of the decisions Sammo has made recently:

1. The continued selection of a half-crocked Ryan Gilligan ahead of a fit Wedderburn
2. The constant tinkering with the team, which suggests he still has no earthly idea what our best 11/formation is. Our decent post-xmas run last year was built on a steady team selection. What price consistency?
3. The signing of Parker, a player no better than what we had before in a position in which we had ample cover.
4. The waste of the striker budget on Purcell who, even before his unfortunate injury, was deemed an inferior option to Steve Guinan.


In terms of results and league position we have made no progress since last year. I'm not sure that Sammo is learning from his mistakes and improving as a manager. There is now a lot of pressure on the Hereford game. There are no managers at any level who can lose four games on the trot and walk away unscathed.





  


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: SteveRiches on October 10, 2010, 07:37:51 am
The headline on the offy says it all: 'Decisions Cost Cobblers'. Whilst the writer is clearly referring to a few alleged blunders by the referee, the most costly decisions were made by Sammo himself.

Managers should be judged on their decision making: on their ratio of good to bad calls. Let's look at some of the decisions Sammo has made recently:

1. The continued selection of a half-crocked Ryan Gilligan ahead of a fit Wedderburn
2. The constant tinkering with the team, which suggests he still has no earthly idea what our best 11/formation is. Our decent post-xmas run last year was built on a steady team selection. What price consistency?
3. The signing of Parker, a player no better than what we had before in a position in which we had ample cover.
4. The waste of the striker budget on Purcell who, even before his unfortunate injury, was deemed an inferior option to Steve Guinan.


In terms of results and league position we have made no progress since last year. I'm not sure that Sammo is learning from his mistakes and improving as a manager. There is now a lot of pressure on the Hereford game. There are no managers at any level who can lose four games on the trot and walk away unscathed.

Can't agree with you on your point 3, Parker showed class above normal yesterday. He must start next week. I'm not saying that there's no place for Rodgers, that's a different argument.
  


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: DrillingCobbler on October 10, 2010, 08:16:52 am
I must say - I didn't go yesterday though - that I am again starting to seriously doubt Sammo's managerial capabilities. Yesterdays team selection was...strange...to say the least. He is clearly the only man on the planet who thinks Gilligan is a better option currently than Wedders. The one up front thing is not a joke anymore. Whilst it enables us to play nice approach play, we simply don't have enough bodies in the box at the end of the countless good moves we are putting together each week.

We talk about bad luck. But my definition of bad luck when it comes to football is shots that hit the post, bar...pens not given, pens given to opponents mistakenly etc. None of these we can grasp on, we simply are not testing the oppositions goal. The offside decision yesterday was a one off, and arguably cost us a point. BUT after 11 games where should we truly be in the league? Probably where we are in all honestly. We've played well at times, but Macclesfield, Torquay and Shrewsbury were terrible. Accrington at home, Wycombe at home...got what we deserved on both occasions. Southend...maybe a tad fortunate to win that one, Chesterfield we played superbly and with another body up front would have battered them.

Theres a few on here that have changed their tune since the infamous 'broom thread' I started this time last year, thats for sure! But sacking the guy is clearly not an option because both him and Crosby have 3 year contracts. So our only option is to keep backing them and hope that we start moving up the table. I think we will but not if he persists with playing one striker up top. He sounded very agitated again when interviewed yesterday - he's clearly feeling the pressure. But he loves our club like we all do. I must say though that if it was an 'outsider' managing the team in this way, I would want him out. Its that area where Im struggling with.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: dazza on October 10, 2010, 08:19:55 am


We all know so little about Wedderburn it's beyond me why people rate him so highly. For f***'s sake, some people don't even know he's called Nathaniel..


I've seen enough of Weddderburn this season to know he is better than a injured Gilligan!!! Have you not been watching this season?


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Son Of Geoff on October 10, 2010, 08:31:20 am
What is it that makes him better than Gilligan though? I don't doubt he has the ability to knock the ball beautifully over 40 yards, but he's slow and doesn't strike me as strong for his size. I think Gilligan needs replacing but I don't believe Wedderburn is the right player to do that.

And in all honesty, centre-mid isn't our biggest problem right now. We can f*** about with midfielders 'til the cows come home but if we can't score what's the point?


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: MK_Cobbler on October 10, 2010, 10:46:26 am
Where's the Sampson or new broom guy gone?  :-*


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: PineWoody on October 10, 2010, 11:15:24 am
Please tell me you joking Geoff? I agree centre midfield, maybe not our biggest priority right now, but how you can even begin to justify leaving Weddberburn out is beyond me. Him and Osman were starting to form a very effective partnership, something which is important, and more than that, i thought he looked a very decent player. And in the X games Gilligan has played this season, he has done sweet FA.

It may not be the be all + end all of our teams fourtunes about who starts in centre midfield, but Sammo's stubborness in picking an unfit, ineffective Gilligan is causing a doubts to be raised over his manegerial capibilities, similar to when Guinan started the first few games of the season ahead of a, then fit Purcell.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: NTFC Nut on October 10, 2010, 11:20:34 am
There is now a lot of pressure on the Hereford game. There are no managers at any level who can lose four games on the trot and walk away unscathed.

We lost 5 on the trot around November time under Gray in 07/08 when we nearly reached the League One play-offs. Very few people would have wanted Sammo out as recently as the Tuesday before last- we were 8th at one stage against Chesterfield, and a point off the playoffs, having reached the 4th round of the Carling Cup for the first time since the sixties. So you can only assume it's 2 and a bit games (admittedly they were poor performances) that has turned a significant number of our fanbase against Sammo. Why?


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Erith_Cobbler on October 10, 2010, 11:39:47 am
So you can only assume it's 2 and a bit games (admittedly they were poor performances) that has turned a significant number of our fanbase against Sammo. Why?

Look at the f***ing table!!! And it's not just the previous 2 and a bit games, it's his record over the past 20 or so games. Lose against Hereford and Sammo really has put us in the sh*t.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: DrillingCobbler on October 10, 2010, 11:41:16 am
Nut...for me, and I believe most, its not so much the results that are the issue. After all, we are only 11 games into the season.

(1) Team selections. The Gilligan/Wedders, Guinan/Purcell, Parker/Jacobs, 1 up front etc.
(2) His signings. Whilst some have been very good, a lot of them have been poor to say the least. With Purcell he was unlucky with him getting injured - but that doesn't disguise the fact that Guinan was favoured him for the first few games so a question about that signing is also raised. In addition, Hall cant get in the team, Herbert has rarely started in the last 11 months, Harris, Slowe etc.
(3) His complete failure to replace Bayo.
(4) His complete failure to produce an inhouse central defensive partnership that is even adequate for league2.
(5) His man management skills - for me it was shocking what he did with Harris at Shrewsbury, I accept though that others will see that differently.

He's brought some good things to the party as well so I know there is mitigation. The results in the Carling Cup for starters. His openness and straight forward talking. The downsizing of the playing budget, his failure to get shot of Guinan and Hinton hasn't helped his case to re-shape the team as he has liked.

But as far as I see it, the negatives currently far outweigh the positives. I want him to succeed like no other, so Im not about to start chanting Sammo Out. But he's been in the job now for 12 months and overall I would give him a grade C. The momentum though is not with him which is the very worrying part of it.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on October 10, 2010, 11:57:51 am
I think we should just keep sacking managers. That's always been a recipe for success.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Coolcat on October 10, 2010, 12:14:38 pm
I don't think last seasons rescue mission constitutes a whole season on which we can judge sammo. He is still being bound by the fact our 2 highest earners are players from the gray era, of which both have been.transfer listed, thus reducing the budget that had already been reduced even further.

Coolcat, you can.not honestly say you were against sammo after the Liverpool, bradford and Chesterfield games, so why has one poor game and one game where by all accounts we probably wouldst of lost with 11 men changed your mind?

Sammo is a big a legend at the club as you can get, he deserves more time. If were still around the relegation zone come the start of January then by all means contemplate sacking him, but right now, he deserves time and respect.

I take what you're saying fella...and would largely have to agree with you. However, rightly or wrongly..when I think of Sammo's tenure...Notts County (a) last season...always springs to the fore...followed by a (cup run and two games aside)..a defensive..toothless lineup and team. Yesterday (Cheltenham) again highlighted..as did the great passing game v Spires..a complete lack of creating clear chances...let alone putting them away!
One up front...related surely?


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Insider on October 10, 2010, 12:38:05 pm
Here's a hypothetical question for you all.  If, and I stress IF, the Cobblers were to be relegated, would you be happy to see Sammo start the 2011/12 season as manager?  Straight yes or no answer.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Tyler on October 10, 2010, 12:39:40 pm
No.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: bungle on October 10, 2010, 12:53:03 pm
I think we should just keep sacking managers. That's always been a recipe for success.

The problem stems from the appointment process. As TFAMH said, from the multitude of managers appointed by DC, only Calderwood has been a qualified success. We've also had Fenwick, Wilkinson and Gorman, all of whom were absolute joke appointments.  Sammo is not quite in that category, and his win against Liverpool will live long in the memory. However, i've never been convinced of his tactical nous and his ability in the transfer market.

Sammo will get more time than most - he's a club legend after all. If we lose against Hereford, though, I think many will call for his head.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: DustCobb on October 10, 2010, 13:03:39 pm
Jesus wept i'm glad i'm on holiday.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Cobbler_Paul on October 10, 2010, 13:22:17 pm
Here's a hypothetical question for you all.  If, and I stress IF, the Cobblers were to be relegated, would you be happy to see Sammo start the 2011/12 season as manager?  Straight yes or no answer.

Answer is no obviously, but I'm sure it won't come to that.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Tom on October 10, 2010, 13:49:05 pm
Sampson thinks were moving in the right direction, for that statement alone he should f*** off.

The guys given alot to this club, want him here or not show some respect.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: ntfc_alex on October 10, 2010, 14:45:44 pm
No


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: sxcobbler on October 10, 2010, 15:03:33 pm
Sammo  would need to be sacked before we were relegated in order to find someone capable of keeping us up......if we think of getting out of this division as being tough...try the Blue Square prem, with a plethora of ex- league sides stuck in it!


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: mackemcobbler on October 10, 2010, 15:03:51 pm
But it isn't.... This is Sammo...........

As far as I'm concerned he gets as long as he likes.

If we go down it's DC's fault........... Simple. Same as it was DC's fault we went down from league one...
It will be Sampsons fault if we go down because he is the manager & as the manager he signs the players,picks the team & tells them how to play so the buck stops with him,just because he is an ex Cobbler who is allso a legend do,snt mean he should escape any flack that may come his way


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Insider on October 10, 2010, 15:06:39 pm
Sammo  would need to be sacked before we were relegated in order to find someone capable of keeping us up......if we think of getting out of this division as being tough...try the Blue Square prem, with a plethora of ex- league sides stuck in it!

I take it that's a "NO"?!


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: 4everdelayed on October 10, 2010, 15:10:00 pm
To be honest, if we go down we won't come straight back up regardless of who's in charge. I can't think of many sides that have done that at all. We'd be gearing up for a good few seasons down there. So no, I wouldn't want Sammo in charge next season if he was to take us down, but whoever would come in would have an extremely tough job ahead of them (that's not even taking into account DC's budget cuts etc.).


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: mackemcobbler on October 10, 2010, 15:12:14 pm
Here's a hypothetical question for you all.  If, and I stress IF, the Cobblers were to be relegated, would you be happy to see Sammo start the 2011/12 season as manager?  Straight yes or no answer.
No


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: PepesProdigy on October 10, 2010, 16:07:13 pm
in ten games time when were like 2 points outside play offs or in them, im gunna copy and paste some of those quotes that are bouncing around in this thread, im just gunna sit back and laugh at those idiots who want him out, maybe if we beat ipswich and get to quarter finals of the carling cup, you might forgive him. sammo and malcolm are building sumthing at northampton, we havn't had that since calderwood, it took him 3 attempts to get out of this s***hole of a division, man up the lot of you and respect that rome wasn't built in a day and that when we hit form were gunna trounce teams in this divison, like we did against bradford, like we did in the 1st half against chesterfield and like we did against f***in LIVERPOOL!


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Tyler on October 10, 2010, 16:22:03 pm
in ten games time when were like 2 points outside play offs or in them, im gunna copy and paste some of those quotes that are bouncing around in this thread, im just gunna sit back and laugh at those idiots who want him out, maybe if we beat ipswich and get to quarter finals of the carling cup, you might forgive him. sammo and malcolm are building sumthing at northampton, we havn't had that since calderwood, it took him 3 attempts to get out of this sh*thole of a division, man up the lot of you and respect that rome wasn't built in a day and that when we hit form were gunna trounce teams in this divison, like we did against bradford, like we did in the 1st half against chesterfield and like we did against f***in LIVERPOOL!

Happy pills again Si?

Face it, without the cup run i think there'd be little argument here


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: PepesProdigy on October 10, 2010, 16:24:05 pm
I reckon that's another yes...........

ha! i havn't made my mind up yet.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Marvo on October 10, 2010, 16:50:05 pm
in ten games time when were like 2 points outside play offs or in them, im gunna copy and paste some of those quotes that are bouncing around in this thread, im just gunna sit back and laugh at those idiots who want him out, maybe if we beat ipswich and get to quarter finals of the carling cup, you might forgive him. sammo and malcolm are building sumthing at northampton, we havn't had that since calderwood, it took him 3 attempts to get out of this sh*thole of a division, man up the lot of you and respect that rome wasn't built in a day and that when we hit form were gunna trounce teams in this divison, like we did against bradford, like we did in the 1st half against chesterfield and like we did against f***in LIVERPOOL!

I know people like to pretend they read what they want to but just as a matter of fact, has anybody called for Sammo to be sacked YET?


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Insider on October 10, 2010, 17:13:51 pm
I know people like to pretend they read what they want to but just as a matter of fact, has anybody called for Sammo to be sacked YET?

Exactly. The purpose of my hypothetical question was simply to test the wisdom of offering Sammo a 3 year deal in the event of relegation.  One would hope that there'd be some sort of trigger clause of we were to be.  I think we owe it to Sammo to be judged at the end of the season.

We have an interesting parallel with Brentford, where my Bees colleague told me to look at their forum today.  They're in an almost identical position to us (except Scott actually got them promoted) and in the same round of the Carling after beating Everton. They almost universally want Scott sacked and now, and you could cut and paste their comments into these threads.  One post is a classic, their very own Nut launches a staunch defence of Scott, but then rounds it off by saying "I think we need to give him 8 weeks"!


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Tyro on October 10, 2010, 18:56:36 pm
I don't think any league team that has been relegated has come back straight up ???


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: 4everdelayed on October 10, 2010, 19:14:54 pm
I can't think of one, but the teams that go down always seem to expect an instant return therefore whoever the manager is is pretty much under instant pressure. Just look at Darlo/Grimsby, go on their message boards, they make this place look like heaven.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Claret Lady on October 10, 2010, 19:24:47 pm
This thread is one of the reasons why I was never sure Sammo should get the job in the first place - he is a cobblers legend and this was always going to happen if things went wrong  :(


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Insider on October 10, 2010, 20:17:46 pm
Shrewsbury and Carlisle have both been relegated and bounced straight back. Lincoln and Darlington in the late 80s.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Coolcat on October 10, 2010, 20:54:38 pm
I know people like to pretend they read what they want to but just as a matter of fact, has anybody called for Sammo to be sacked YET?


Well, I didn't think he should have got the job in the first place...Does that count? ;D


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Macc Cobbler on October 11, 2010, 07:12:01 am
Here's a hypothetical question for you all.  If, and I stress IF, the Cobblers were to be relegated, would you be happy to see Sammo start the 2011/12 season as manager?  Straight yes or no answer.

Yes !


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: wrigleys on October 11, 2010, 07:34:04 am
Yes !

No. This is taking the pi**


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: NTFC Nut on October 11, 2010, 10:51:42 am
Here's a hypothetical question for you all.  If, and I stress IF, the Cobblers were to be relegated, would you be happy to see Sammo start the 2011/12 season as manager?  Straight yes or no answer.

No, but if it came to that, I'd be stunned.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Forest on October 13, 2010, 07:52:27 am
This is just stupid, Give him some time at least to christmas,


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Marvo on October 13, 2010, 12:03:45 pm
This is just stupid, Give him some time at least to christmas,

Stupid is as stupid does.

How on earth can you put a timescale on these sort of things? If we lose heavily to Hereford on Saturday and the team showed little spirit or fight then Sampsons position would surely be in doubt. If our current form continues until Christmas we'd be f***ed, there has to be an improvement long before then. You have to judge things day to day, game by game. I think almost everybody would like to see Sammo make a success of this job but wanting something and actually getting something are two completely different things. We've won twop games out of eleven, are you seriously suggesting we leave it until Christmas if that record was to become 2 games out of 21? Don't be so bloody daft!


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Forest on October 13, 2010, 12:23:47 pm
how can you assume we are going to loose the next ten before christmas,
we played well agaist chesterfield and were unlucky yes we had a bad result and performace agaist maccesfield but we were well on top at cheltenham, before and upto half time with ten men,
you have to give a manager time, otehrwise if you go through a bad patch like we are (2 wins in 11) clubs will be sacking managers every few months,
You got to give managers half a season 23 games, then see where we are then
WE ARE 7 POINTS OFF PLAY OFFS theres 35 games left!


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: threeinabed on October 13, 2010, 12:28:24 pm
how can you assume we are going to loose the next ten before christmas,
we played well agaist chesterfield and were unlucky yes we had a bad result and performace agaist maccesfield but we were well on top at cheltenham, before and upto half time with ten men,
you have to give a manager time, otehrwise if you go through a bad patch like we are (2 wins in 11) clubs will be sacking managers every few months,
You got to give managers half a season 23 games, then see where we are then
WE ARE 7 POINTS OFF PLAY OFFS theres 35 games left!

Sammo Out !!


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Marvo on October 13, 2010, 12:35:55 pm
how can you assume we are going to loose the next ten before christmas,
we played well agaist chesterfield and were unlucky yes we had a bad result and performace agaist maccesfield but we were well on top at cheltenham, before and upto half time with ten men,
you have to give a manager time, otehrwise if you go through a bad patch like we are (2 wins in 11) clubs will be sacking managers every few months,
You got to give managers half a season 23 games, then see where we are then
WE ARE 7 POINTS OFF PLAY OFFS theres 35 games left!


I'm not assuming anything, you're the one saying we should wait until Christmas WHATEVER the results are in the meantime. I was just showing how stupid that remark is.

As for your last sentence, we were in the same position last year and went on a long winning run but still couldn't make up the difference. I think it highly unlikely we'll reproduce that sort of run this time round but hey, fingers crossed.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Forest on October 13, 2010, 12:45:16 pm
I aint saying he should be given time to christmas end of story,
But people calling for his head after we loose three in a row just frustrates me,
I agree what you are saying marvo but he should be given some time to turn it around,
If we loose the next 3, action may be taken.
But he has had 11 games out of 46.
there is no reason why we cant loose 2 in the next 11 be around the play offs and then everyone will be praising him again!


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Marvo on October 13, 2010, 12:52:27 pm
I aint saying he should be given time to christmas end of story,
But people calling for his head after we loose three in a row just frustrates me,


and I'll ask once again, just WHO is calling for his head?


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: threeinabed on October 13, 2010, 13:23:18 pm
and I'll ask once again, just WHO is calling for his head?

sammo out


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: County Cobbler on October 13, 2010, 14:42:36 pm
The whole situation is in Sammo's control.
He has assembled a good footballing defence and midfield. What he has not done is obtain a front two who are good enough for this division. DC has provided the funds to obtain the strikers, so I assume it is Sammo who has not been able to persuade the required players to sign. He has been very unlucky in the injury to Purcell, but 6 weeks ago it was obvious we required a second quality forward (McKenzie is only a replacement for Purcell...probably). Besides getting the players to play, a major part of his job is obtaining new players to improve the squad. Something managers like Graham Carr and Dave Bowen were excellent at and a major part of their success.
Over to you Sammo, DC has supplied the tools.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Ralap on October 13, 2010, 14:57:46 pm
DC has supplied the tools.


Has he?


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Marvo on October 13, 2010, 15:26:48 pm
That was funny, County Cobblers says "DC has supplied the tools" and straight away Ralap turns up.  ;D


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: County Cobbler on October 13, 2010, 15:34:43 pm
Relap-YES.
Have you not noticed that funds from Liverpool and Ipswich have been promised to Sammo instead of previous windfalls being swallowed up in the club.
You must pay attention!
Life is more fun being optimistic instead of a manic depressive.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: guest47 on October 13, 2010, 15:46:43 pm
Relap-YES.
Have you not noticed that funds from Liverpool and Ipswich have been promised to Sammo instead of previous windfalls being swallowed up in the club.
You must pay attention!
Life is more fun being optimistic instead of a manic depressive.

I always understood a manic depressive to be someone who swings from being wildly optimistic to wildly pessimistic. Remind you of anyone, County?


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Ralap on October 13, 2010, 16:11:05 pm
That was funny, County Cobblers says "DC has supplied the tools" and straight away Ralap turns up.  ;D

 ;D Pure coincidence mate. I have been having a right laugh at the s***e being written on here over the last few weeks by the Bi-polar lobby.

County Cobbler, Mr Cardoza has made many promises in his time at the club and we are still waiting to see the majority of them come to fruition. I prefer to wait patiently, seeing is believing with anything involving Mr Cardoza as far as I am concerned.

You obviously don't know me at all CC so I better inform you that I am still optimistic (not blindly like some) about things at the club currently. I whole heartedly go along with the McHammer view on things. We should be patient and give Sammo as much time as he needs, he is still learning the job and so is making mistakes along the way but I believe in him and the squad of players he is putting together. Liverpool was a night never to be forgotten, the football they played up there and in subsequent games until Chesterfield scored their first was some of the best I have seen in my 45 years watching the club. Why would I be pessimistic? I was pleased to hear Mr Cardoza giving his support to Sammo during the Zola thing, I don't think he does it enough and I certainly don't think he has supported him enough financially. Hopefully he will soon and I will thank him for it. We have known for months that we needed more options up front, that should have been his top concern. I look forward to the new players coming in.

If those are the words of a manic depressive...


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Insider on October 13, 2010, 17:07:26 pm
Relap-YES.
Have you not noticed that funds from Liverpool and Ipswich have been promised to Sammo instead of previous windfalls being swallowed up in the club.

Really? 

I sense some backtracking on DC's part (and it does sort of create some doubt about just how far he is prepared to go to defend Sammo):

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/n/northampton_town/9083627.stm

It's a pretty insipid statement, and nowhere have I heard him "promise" funds from Liverpool and Ipswich to Sammo.  I could have sworn I heard him on the telly this week saying that he hadn't made as much as he thought we would out of the Liverpool game (though didn't mention the additional Southend ticket sales). 




Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: New Dawn Fades on October 13, 2010, 17:13:09 pm
Finally a view i can agree with.The season is a marathon not a sprint.Patience is needed by all


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Insider on October 13, 2010, 17:34:17 pm
Finally a view i can agree with.The season is a marathon not a sprint.Patience is needed by all

Ecoutez et repetez!

I am more than happy to see Sammo judged at the end of the season.  Others, I sense, are going to be less forgiving!


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Ralap on October 13, 2010, 18:03:18 pm
If Mr Cardoza was to get rid of Sammo before the end of the season can you imagine the pathetic budget the next victim will have next season?

I don't think we will be relegated and I wouldn't be too unhappy with another mid-table finish as long as Sammo is allowed to continue his work in the same manner and hopefully with a bigger budget. I am excited by the young talented players at the club, that's most of them, and I hope the club carry on bringing through talented youngsters and support them with a good standard of experienced players keen to play a passing game on the ground.

 


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Macc Cobbler on October 13, 2010, 19:03:12 pm
and I'll ask once again, just WHO is calling for his head?

Exactly ! I would echo the sentiments of many that patience is needed


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: clarkeysntfc on October 13, 2010, 19:09:51 pm
I think Saturday is huge. If we were to lose, there would unquestionably be massive pressure on Sammo and DC, and the fans will definitely start to turn vocal. We've got some tough games to come, Oxford away, Gillingham won't be easy despite their dire away record, and Port Vale on the horizon. The slide has got to be halted soon otherwise it could become a very difficult one to arrest.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Coolcat on October 13, 2010, 20:20:31 pm
Stupid is as stupid does.

How on earth can you put a timescale on these sort of things? If we lose heavily to Hereford on Saturday and the team showed little spirit or fight then Sampsons position would surely be in doubt. If our current form continues until Christmas we'd be f***ed, there has to be an improvement long before then. You have to judge things day to day, game by game. I think almost everybody would like to see Sammo make a success of this job but wanting something and actually getting something are two completely different things. We've won twop games out of eleven, are you seriously suggesting we leave it until Christmas if that record was to become 2 games out of 21? Don't be so bloody daft!

Totally agree Marvo. Also, irritating to say the least that questioning Sammo is some kind of knee jerk reaction..well into his second season ffs!
Yes, we had mini revival, starting with Dagenham game (h) before xmas..fizzling out after a high at Grimsby...ended up no higher than at least should have been expected!


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Coolcat on October 13, 2010, 20:22:57 pm
I aint saying he should be given time to christmas end of story,
But people calling for his head after we loose three in a row just frustrates me,
I agree what you are saying marvo but he should be given some time to turn it around,
If we loose the next 3, action may be taken.
But he has had 11 games out of 46.
there is no reason why we cant loose 2 in the next 11 be around the play offs and then everyone will be praising him again!

Loose: Essex girl

Lose: Cobblers ;)


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: auntie on October 13, 2010, 20:26:07 pm
to be fair to the big wood, our defense is a little loose thus causing us to lose in a loose way.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: auntie on October 13, 2010, 20:28:56 pm
marvo's probably out in some big wood right now flashing his headlights.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Ralap on October 13, 2010, 23:28:46 pm
flashing his headlights.



Is that like your pet name for them?


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: GrangeParkCobbler on October 14, 2010, 12:00:46 pm
From todays Chron.......

http://www.northamptonchron.co.uk/sport/football/cobblers/northampton_town_cardoza_tips_sampson_to_steer_cobblers_to_promotion_1_1560236


no pressure Sammo!!!

So many great soundbites in one interview.....

“Sammo is taking us in the right direction", 
“We’re very close to getting wins and turning it around", 
"the football we are producing at the moment is the best I’ve ever seen here",
 “We’ve come a long way",
 “It’s taking us a little while longer than we thought"
“I left Cheltenham feeling pretty upbeat on Saturday because I thought we were by far the better team.”

Hmmmmmm!



Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Ralap on October 14, 2010, 12:09:51 pm
Once again the HE provokes a response....  ;D

For what it's worth.... I stand-fast by my opinion that even if we go down, Sammo is the man...


I am with you there Nigel.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Marvo on October 14, 2010, 14:10:02 pm
I'm not.

Well not if we go down.

Well not if we are in the same predicament at Christmas.

Well not if we lose our next three matches.

Maybe if we win the League Cup though!


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Monkey on October 15, 2010, 08:43:40 am
Kicking Sammo out now wont solve anything. I think he potentially has a long term future here if he is given support and a bit of time.

I like the fact he answers the questions too.

Honest words on the offy site about the Zola and Guinan situations and offering Jacobs a new deal.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: bungle on October 15, 2010, 12:55:47 pm
For what it's worth.... I stand-fast by my opinion that even if we go down, Sammo is the man...

Why, though? Is it just because he happens to be a cobblers legend and a man of great loyalty and integrity? When Stuart Gray started losing matches and making bad decisions everybody wanted him out asap.  Why is Sammo a special case? 

Now I'm not saying Sammo should be sacked. Not yet anyway. However, we have to look critically at his decisions and ask if he is improving as a manager and we are improving as a team.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: MK_Cobbler on October 15, 2010, 13:13:08 pm
Watch this space, he has 'irons in the fire' again...  ;)


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: GrangeParkCobbler on October 15, 2010, 13:15:43 pm
Once again the HE provokes a response....  ;D

For what it's worth.... I stand-fast by my opinion that even if we go down, Sammo is the man...

Covering all bases!!!

Sammo is the man.....to get us out of trouble
Sammo is the man.....to lead us back into the Football League
Sammo is the man.....who'll kop the flack if we go down
Sammo is the man.....who'll take all the blame whilst others get away scot free!


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: DrillingCobbler on October 15, 2010, 14:03:32 pm
I too would support the bloke if we went down, but only on the following basis:

(1) That he addresses the obviously shortcomings of the current squad and fast.
(2) He stops persisting with this ridiculous 1 up front formation, particularly for home games.
(3) He continues to learn from his mistakes.

At the end of the day - and I often defended Gray on this basis as well - many of the problems he is experiencing are out of his control. The budget cuts, failing to off load high earners from previous regimes etc. BUT the mistakes that he has made in recent times have been fundamentally very basis ones and I personally want to see signs that these mistakes are not recurring ones. I readily admit to knowing very little about football compared with an ex-professional who has spent his life playing and coaching it...but sometimes its easier to look in from the outside. We all benefit from being able to do that.

The current results cannot be blamed on DC. The formations, tactics etc - DC is not the man who decides these. Sammo, unlike Gray has not lost any player for a fee which has not been returned to him to spend on a replacement. Gray lost a fantastic goalkeeper on deadline day lets not forget! Sammo has also had the benefit of being able to choose his own assistant manager whereas Gray was 'given' his assistant to him! It really is down to Sammo now, to at least finish in the top half of the table. He's been given the tools to do that job - lets hope he fulfils the minimum criteria!


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Son Of Geoff on October 15, 2010, 14:16:37 pm
I like the formation.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: abington_cobbler on October 15, 2010, 15:21:31 pm
I too would support the bloke if we went down, but only on the following basis:

(1) That he addresses the obviously shortcomings of the current squad and fast.
(2) He stops persisting with this ridiculous 1 up front formation, particularly for home games.
(3) He continues to learn from his mistakes.

At the end of the day - and I often defended Gray on this basis as well - many of the problems he is experiencing are out of his control. The budget cuts, failing to off load high earners from previous regimes etc. BUT the mistakes that he has made in recent times have been fundamentally very basis ones and I personally want to see signs that these mistakes are not recurring ones. I readily admit to knowing very little about football compared with an ex-professional who has spent his life playing and coaching it...but sometimes its easier to look in from the outside. We all benefit from being able to do that.

The current results cannot be blamed on DC. The formations, tactics etc - DC is not the man who decides these. Sammo, unlike Gray has not lost any player for a fee which has not been returned to him to spend on a replacement. Gray lost a fantastic goalkeeper on deadline day lets not forget! Sammo has also had the benefit of being able to choose his own assistant manager whereas Gray was 'given' his assistant to him! It really is down to Sammo now, to at least finish in the top half of the table. He's been given the tools to do that job - lets hope he fulfils the minimum criteria!

(2) He stops persisting with this ridiculous 1 up front formation, particularly for home games.

I find it funny that people want Sammo to stop playing with 1 up front yet when we were playing with a traditional 442 formation people were saying we need to play with a 451 formation as it suits our players better


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: bungle on October 15, 2010, 18:11:32 pm
I find it funny that people want Sammo to stop playing with 1 up front yet when we were playing with a traditional 442 formation people were saying we need to play with a 451 formation as it suits our players better

The formation suits our squad; unfortunately, Sammo is selecting the wrong players to play in it.  Wedderburn and Osman should be the defensive midfielders with Thornton ahead of them in the whole and two widemen (Davis and Mckay?) on either wing. The much heralded targetman would be the one to play up front.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: Insider on October 15, 2010, 18:28:38 pm
Watch this space, he has 'irons in the fire' again...  ;)

What they didn't tell you was that the fire had gone out weeks ago.  Yet another week of "we'lre looking to bring in..."waffle, waffle, blah, blah, blah "we've a few names in mind..." drone, drone, "but he's injured..." zzz, zzz "he wants this, he wants that...." fizzzz phuttt, the Zola firework was a dud.  It's all rather tiresome and predictable. I'd far rather they say there's no bloody money, this squad has got to get us out of trouble, and be done with it. 


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: PepesProdigy on October 15, 2010, 21:05:45 pm
I find it funny that people want Sammo to stop playing with 1 up front yet when we were playing with a traditional 442 formation people were saying we need to play with a 451 formation as it suits our players better

exactly!

we need to play 4.5.1 cuz thats where we get the best out of thornton, and hes our best player. we HAVE got to make the most of that, we just need that one striker thats good enuf to play uptop on his own.


Title: Re: Samp out ?
Post by: SteveRiches on October 16, 2010, 06:34:06 am
exactly!

we need to play 4.5.1 cuz thats where we get the best out of thornton, and hes our best player. we HAVE got to make the most of that, we just need that one striker thats good enuf to play uptop on his own.

Well, if it was bringing goals and points, I'd agree with you. But at the moment, it isn't. So we need to be flexible enough to try a different system...it isn't anything dramatically different that may emerge this afternoon, and if it doesn't do the trick then switching between 2 systems is hardly rocket science: indeed, I'd hope we have more than just 2 systems up our sleeve! What's let us down in the past is in sticking to a rigid system during a game when we can all see it isn't working, but we stick with it until we go a goal behind, then it's often too late to get control back.


Title: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: Trotty on October 16, 2010, 19:52:05 pm
Did Sammo start his match summary on the radio by mentioning he hopes this team will go on to win promotion after today. WTF?  :-\


Title: If Sammo went
Post by: Tyler on October 16, 2010, 19:54:11 pm
Alot of people are quick to say get rid of Sammo, but who would any of you have to replace him? Off the top of my head there isn't a massive list of names available


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: 4everdelayed on October 16, 2010, 19:56:46 pm
the LMA don't still do that 'list of unemployed managers' do they?


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: Zen Master on October 16, 2010, 19:59:02 pm
http://www.leaguemanagers.com/


Whole list of managers on here.


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: HertsCobbler on October 16, 2010, 20:05:17 pm
Hardly anything to excite me there.

Jim Gannon would be superb, but he wants to stay op narth for starters.  Penney did well at Donny but was a flop at Oldham.

We could of course do a Kettering and appoint someone from some random league.


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: 606 Parklands_Cobbler on October 16, 2010, 20:10:47 pm
John Deehan?


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: TheBigPicture on October 16, 2010, 20:10:55 pm
I don't know, but the point in hand is Sammo isnt the man. It would be crazy talk to say he should remain just because there isnt anybody else adequate to replace him right now.


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: ajp on October 16, 2010, 20:12:24 pm
Poach Justin E from rushden he's doing a decent job


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: Erith_Cobbler on October 16, 2010, 20:20:03 pm
Glen Thurgood


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: TheBigPicture on October 16, 2010, 20:23:00 pm
Clarence - He's been here long enough now, about time we gave him the job.


Title: Re: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: nn2cobbler on October 16, 2010, 20:23:10 pm
link to listen below

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/n/northampton_town/9099115.stm


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: Gibbo on October 16, 2010, 20:42:58 pm
Should the job become vacant please don't make the dreadful mistake of looking for the best man for the job....

There is only one criteria that needs to be met...

I'll give you a clue. It entails virtually none of these £££££££££££££££££££££££££££

That counts me in then I have none of them


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: auntie on October 16, 2010, 20:44:13 pm
I think the job should go to the highest bidder.


Title: Re: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: auntie on October 16, 2010, 21:05:28 pm
Did Sammo start his match summary on the radio by mentioning he hopes this team will go on to win promotion after today. WTF?  :-\

he did trotty. made me snot quietly.


Title: Re: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: ntfc_alex on October 16, 2010, 21:10:24 pm
Did he say anything else interesting?


Title: Re: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: auntie on October 16, 2010, 21:11:47 pm
no you non-carer.


Title: Re: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: ntfc_alex on October 16, 2010, 21:15:30 pm
You're getting quite boring now. If I didn't care I wouldn't still go. There's a difference between not letting something bother you and nor caring.


Title: Re: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: Trotty on October 16, 2010, 21:21:30 pm
You're getting quite boring now. If I didn't care I wouldn't still go. There's a difference between not letting something bother you and nor caring.

So today didn't bother you?  ???


Title: Re: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: auntie on October 16, 2010, 21:23:55 pm
You're getting quite boring now. If I didn't care I wouldn't still go. There's a difference between not letting something bother you and nor caring.

come here!


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: sxcobbler on October 16, 2010, 21:53:11 pm
Go for the cheap option ...........................

again.

NOT.


Title: Re: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: TheBigPicture on October 16, 2010, 22:01:16 pm
geez you guys are making me laugh, i need it!  ;D


Title: Re: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: sxcobbler on October 16, 2010, 22:03:55 pm
I wish i could find something to laugh about...

what a shambles

Is that the worst half of Cobblers football ever ???


Title: Re: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: PepesProdigy on October 16, 2010, 22:09:08 pm
well the question he got asked was wether or not he had himself been involved in a match quite like that when he played for us, he said yes against halifax when we lost 4.3, but that year we got promoted, the guy was trying to make i light hearted joke in a bad day at the office. he always comes across very honest, ive still got total respect for the guy he never chats crap. good on ya sammo.


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: Enya_NTFC on October 16, 2010, 22:52:35 pm
Clarence - He's been here long enough now, about time we gave him the job.

he'd just bang his drum at the team  :D


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: PepesProdigy on October 16, 2010, 23:26:50 pm
i reckon gordon strachen will become available very soon?


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: Tyro on October 16, 2010, 23:28:32 pm
Ian Atkins has been quoted as saying he feels his time at Sixfields has anothe chapter but being out of the game so long would he still be in touch ???

A fantasy management team of Woddy & Nord, Gareth Southgate & Andy Woodman so you get a goalkeeping coach as well.

Obvious BIG names Paul Jewell & Iain Dowie but we couldn't really afford them.

Colin Calderwood but would the entertainment factor get a thumbs down.

A rank outsider Martin Hunter who has managed England youth teams & has been in coaching set ups at Norwich, Southampton, Watford & Darlington who used to be my sports teacher back in the 80's managed to turn me into a fairly decent runner back in the day & could motivate any of us to become better.


Title: Re: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: Tyro on October 16, 2010, 23:30:21 pm
Considering the result he sounded quite chipper but Geoff Doyle didn't really give him a grilling :-\


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: Coolcat on October 16, 2010, 23:30:42 pm
Hardly anything to excite me there.

Jim Gannon would be superb, but he wants to stay op narth for starters.  Penney did well at Donny but was a flop at Oldham.

We could of course do a Kettering and appoint someone from some random league.

Jim Gannon..serious? Wasn't he a total disaster at Motherwell?...Or was that Giles Coke? ;)


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: NTFC Nut on October 16, 2010, 23:43:57 pm
Mike Newell? Dean Glover? Martin Allen? Paul Ince?


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: Marvo on October 17, 2010, 07:35:05 am
Poach Justin E from rushden he's doing a decent job

Good call.


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: Zen Master on October 17, 2010, 07:45:29 am

Mike Bassett.

But careful one too many and it could turn......


(http://)









Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: Tyler on October 17, 2010, 07:48:11 am
Mike Newell? Dean Glover? Martin Allen? Paul Ince?

Personally, i wouldn't go anywhere near Newell. Dont even know who Glover is, Ince might want a highish wage so i'd take Mad Dog


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: ntfc_dan on October 17, 2010, 08:14:17 am
Looking on that website there are a lot of good, divisive, organised managers on there! Who would soon shape this 'promotion' worthy so called shambles, oh sorry team into shape! Sorry Sammo, do the decent thing step down let someone else enter this mad town! Realistically, in sammo's year incharge what's he actually done other than... Bottle the end of last season when it mattered, IMO let two of our best players leave in guttridge n bayo ( okay guttridge was replaced with wedderburn, who for the life of me doesn't get a start), beat Liverpool, and slowly drag us down the league?


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: clarkeysntfc on October 17, 2010, 08:53:10 am
I think the icing on the cake was when Sammo slammed the ball down on the floor. A totally pathetic thing to do which obviously shows he cares but if he can't keep his composure how're his team going to? Any idiot can show passion, very few can manage.


Title: Re: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: auntie on October 17, 2010, 09:05:16 am
Considering the result he sounded quite chipper but Geoff Doyle didn't really give him a grilling :-\

geoff doyle couldn't grill a smart price pork chop.


Title: Re: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: clarkeysntfc on October 17, 2010, 09:06:19 am
Doyle couldn't grill a bloody beef burger never mind ask proper interview questions.


Title: Re: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: Ted on October 17, 2010, 09:21:53 am
Doyle was abysmal on the radio yesterday. First he said it was the players fault, and then he criticised all three of Sammo's substitutions.Mind you, he was probably as bewildered as we all were at the sudden collapse.


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: Winslow Lee on October 17, 2010, 09:23:00 am
Poach Justin E from rushden he's doing a decent job

Seem to remember the majority of people on here calling for another manager doing a good job just down the road before Sammo was appointed. Luckily he ended up at the scum or we could have already been relegated!.



Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: bungle on October 17, 2010, 09:34:59 am
Seem to remember the majority of people on here calling for another manager doing a good job just down the road before Sammo was appointed. Luckily he ended up at the scum or we could have already been relegated!.

Conference to the championship is a huge leap. Cooper should never have taken the job at Posh; he was on a hiding to nothing. Conference to league two is a much easier transition. I'd be happy with Edinburgh. He knows his way around the lower leagues, and presumably has some decent contacts from his Spurs/Portsmouth days. Taking the Dims into the play-offs last season was a major achievement given their lack of resources.

We'd have to pay compensation but personally I'd much rather pay for a decent manager than take a punt on a wild card like Zola.


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: cricketside on October 17, 2010, 09:45:03 am
Justin Edinburgh?

Just like that bloke from Kettering that was the next saviour? Did well with sh*teborough, but only from a Npton perspective.


Title: Re: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: dazza on October 17, 2010, 09:54:07 am
So today didn't bother you?  ???


Why do you let stuff bother you when you have no say on the outcome. Just move on to the next game.

Roll on Oxford.


Title: Re: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: Trotty on October 17, 2010, 10:07:10 am

Why do you let stuff bother you when you have no say on the outcome.

 ;D  ;D  ;D


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on October 17, 2010, 10:16:19 am
wow. just wow. It'll be Michael Jacobs

Some of you lot naming managers that have been heard of outside of their own families! you jokers! They would cost more than £300 a week


Title: Re: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: Tyro on October 17, 2010, 10:42:45 am
I think Tim Oglethorpe would ask questions in a certain way that would get a true reaction.


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: Tyler on October 17, 2010, 11:00:07 am
Dont get Edinburgh. We need someone who's an actual proven manager. The only manager that has resembled that inthe DC era is Gorman, and he came at a really bad time


Title: Re: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: Power Football on October 17, 2010, 11:11:49 am
Wasn't too impressed with Sammo on the radio yesterday, should have apologised to the fans but didn't, also the whole part about the players doing the exact opposite of what he said at half time won't have gone down too well.

If he hasn't already lost the dressing room, these sort of comments could very well lead to that being the case and once that happens the manager has to go i'm afraid....


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: bungle on October 17, 2010, 11:25:29 am
Dont get Edinburgh. We need someone who's an actual proven manager. The only manager that has resembled that inthe DC era is Gorman

Edinburgh took the Dims to the play-offs last year and is currently sitting pretty in joint fourth having won four out of the last five games, despite not having great resources. I don't know about you, but that's enough proof for me that he knows how to manage a football team. There isn't a huge difference between League Two and the conference as the likes of Dagenham proved last season.

As for Gorman, that was one of the worst appointments of all IMO. The man was quite clearly not in a fit emotional state to manage a football team. Also whilst he may have had a proven track record as an assistant, aside from half a season at Wycombe before their capitulation, he was never all that as a manager.

 


Title: Re: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: Trotty on October 17, 2010, 12:47:53 pm
Wasn't too impressed with Sammo on the radio yesterday, should have apologised to the fans but didn't, also the whole part about the players doing the exact opposite of what he said at half time won't have gone down too well.

I'm not sure what was said at half time. It was obvious we was leaving ourselves so stretched at 3-0 and 3-1. Not once did I see from my position behind the home bench any instruction not to leave themselves so open.

The same thing with Parker. Sammo said he was substituted for losing his shape. Not once did I see Sammo or Crosby trying to get an instruction to him.


Title: Re: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: Marvo on October 17, 2010, 16:10:15 pm
When you criticise players in public, which Sammo did, you lose respect of ALL your players, not just those you criticise. I don't think the players respect him and for any manager, that's the end of the road.


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: supajama on October 17, 2010, 20:00:06 pm
Shame Steve Tilson took the Lincoln job as he would have been perfect. I'd go for a hungry non league manager who can get in decent players on the cheap. He will also know all about the non league should we drop into it!  :o


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: Bingers on October 17, 2010, 20:35:06 pm
How about poaching Guinan from under Hereford's noses - that would really be revenge.











Or would it?


Seriously though I bet Sean Parrish would get it.  Promote from within and cheap.  Could you see that mindset happening.


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: Tyro on October 17, 2010, 20:35:23 pm
I wonder if Paul Ince would want to start at the bottom rung of the ladder again ???


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: DrillingCobbler on October 17, 2010, 21:17:37 pm
We would not be in the mess we are now in if Cooper had taken charge. Well I suppose technically we could be bottom or 2nd from bottom, but somehow I doubt we would be.

Back to this thread, my choice would now be the current manager of the Village Idiots.


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: guest47 on October 17, 2010, 21:33:09 pm
Be realistic folks, there's only one candidate in DC's eyes.
Crosby.


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: ajp on October 17, 2010, 21:45:23 pm
We would not be in the mess we are now in if Cooper had taken charge. Well I suppose technically we could be bottom or 2nd from bottom, but somehow I doubt we would be.

Back to this thread, my choice would now be the current manager of the Village Idiots.

Yep me too


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: sxcobbler on October 17, 2010, 22:26:32 pm
Another cheap option .................



that'll be bl88dy expensive in the long run.


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: Enya_NTFC on October 17, 2010, 22:35:11 pm
Another cheap option .................



that'll be bl88dy expensive in the long run.

I was thinking that...like with Sammo...not really the cheap option was he? Or at least he won't be...


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: PepesProdigy on October 17, 2010, 23:57:58 pm
we could just stay with sammo.
show the legend some respect, and watch him turn things around?
what da think?


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: DustCobb on October 18, 2010, 03:41:47 am
I don't care if he is god, he isn't up to the job. I love him as a club legend as much as everyone, but he isn't a good manager.


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: Deepcut Cobbler on October 18, 2010, 08:15:56 am
I think the icing on the cake was when Sammo slammed the ball down on the floor. A totally pathetic thing to do which obviously shows he cares but if he can't keep his composure how're his team going to? Any idiot can show passion, very few can manage.

.................and if he didn't, there would be those saying that he just stands there doing nothing and doesn't care..                        ..it is a fine line... ;)

We will not go down, keep him and let Sammo learn and gain his experience this season, (which is how you gain experience in this game, chicken and egg syndrome).  Some new managers are lucky and jump straight into a winning stream but are found out when the going gets tough.  Sammo is getting a good grounding and experience at the hard end, what for next season????


We will win the league at a canter ........................ 8)


Title: Re: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: Positively Mad Mark on October 18, 2010, 08:52:05 am
Perhaps it was recorded at half time. ;D


Title: Re: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: sxcobbler on October 18, 2010, 09:22:37 am
When you criticise players in public, which Sammo did, you lose respect of ALL your players, not just those you criticise. I don't think the players respect him and for any manager, that's the end of the road.

Totally agree.....the slippery slope, Sammo, such a shame.....I just don't know what Crosby is in all this, surely he can't plead naivety ( having said that ask any Sunderland fan...they think he's crap)


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: Ted on October 18, 2010, 10:59:44 am
Poach Justin E from rushden he's doing a decent job

He's doing a great job at the Dims under very difficult circumstances.He's desperate to be a league a league manager, something that he'll never achieve at the Dims.Therefore, he's available, he's cheap and some club is going to get him sooner or later and I just hope it's us.


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: RussNTFC on October 18, 2010, 12:48:31 pm
I don't think I'm alone when I say that I'm gutted for Sammo with the ways things are going.  But what to do with Sammo? It would be harsh to get rid of him. Would he be sacked? Re-employed within the club? Or will he resign? I don't get the whole notion of who else would we have as a manager as there is always someone better out there, but look at Cardoza's record, not once has he ever signed a successful lower league manager, he always goes for someone who was either an assistant manager or an unexperienced/young coach or John Gorman!

I'm all for giving Sammo a chance, but 4 defeats in a row, but on Saturday winning 3-0 at half time and then losing 4-3 at home against a team at the bottom of the league who are managerless. It's not looking good. I also thought it was obvious (since pre-season) that we needed a decent League 2 central defender, but we still don't have him, basically a player like Sammo!


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: Positively Mad Mark on October 18, 2010, 13:16:24 pm
Stick with Sammo.


Title: Re: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: EastNpton on October 18, 2010, 13:36:26 pm
The press asked the wrong question. Shouldn't have asked why they took McKenzie off but why they replaced him with Guinan?

This is the man who had been nothing short of shocking and then you have the issue of him applying for their manager's job.

Sammo should have brought either Jacobs or Rodgers on for Guinan and it wouldnt have hurt to let Parker go forward.

Sammo did little to get Parker to track back or indeed calm his side down who were playing like nutters


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: NTFC Nut on October 18, 2010, 15:06:14 pm
Colin Calderwood but would the entertainment factor get a thumbs down.

Hibernian are announcing their new manager at a press conference this evening and rumour has it that it's Calderwood.


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: Vintage Cobbler on October 18, 2010, 15:13:30 pm
If Sammo went it would be a very sad day for us all but he has to be on the brink after 4 successive defeats and a terrible league position.  Chances are under DC's stewardship Crosby would be asked to become manager although his loyalties may be with Sammo and so he may decline gracefully.  Whatevever the outcome there are glaring weaknesses throughout this team such as Dunn, all our centre backs,  Guinan and a number of fringe players, that all need to be addressed as a priority.  Also, as we saw on Saturday there is a complete lack of leadership on the pitch when things go wrong and, as I commented on another posting, it is no good Sammo throwing his toys out of the 'pram on the touchline at such times.


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: Grove on October 18, 2010, 15:33:58 pm
Hibernian are announcing their new manager at a press conference this evening and rumour has it that it's Calderwood.

Good luck to him, hey drilling  ;D i seem to remember a post when Burnley were in the prem and  Newcastle were in the cjhampionship, you gloating about Gray being at a higher level, just another club he got relegated eh ! whilst CC has 3 promotions in 6 years hmmm not bad  ( tounge in cheek mate)  :-*


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: sbedscobb on October 18, 2010, 15:35:44 pm
Sammo needs the backing of those players he gave a break to, the likes of Thornton,  Dunn, Johnson, Herbert, Holt and Rodgers and by showing faith in faultering players such as Gilligan, Mckay and Guinan has got him to the brink of the sack. Hopefully those players realise that and collectively give it thier all to halt the rot, thats if its not too late.


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: Vintage Cobbler on October 18, 2010, 15:58:50 pm
I wouldn't decribe McKay as faultering.  He is a promsing player but has been labouring up front on his own without having the pace and physique needed in the hurly burly of League 2.  As for Gilligan, he always seems to be an automatic choice whoever is manager but although he works hard I don't see that he has improved or shows any signs of improving.  But it is the spine of the team that matters and we are weak in goal and at centre back.  One swallow doesn't make a summer so far as McKenzie is concerned but we will see. We are still short of a another quality striker given that Guinan is past it.  I don't see Harris, Rodgers or Herbert as being up to the standard required and Slowe appears to be an unfortunate signing.



Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: sxcobbler on October 18, 2010, 16:01:23 pm
Stick with the cheap option.


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: DrillingCobbler on October 18, 2010, 16:05:33 pm
Good luck to him, hey drilling  ;D i seem to remember a post when Burnley were in the prem and  Newcastle were in the cjhampionship, you gloating about Gray being at a higher level, just another club he got relegated eh ! whilst CC has 3 promotions in 6 years hmmm not bad  ( tounge in cheek mate)  :-*

Wow, a Scottish premiership team has come in for him. Thats the same league that Giles Coke played in after leaving us. And did remarkably well in, before rejoining an English league 1 team.

I would say thats about his level mate, as long as he's got more money than all of his rivals of course!  ;D ;D


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: oldbloke on October 18, 2010, 16:21:21 pm
Send for Strachan.......Not

Stick with Sammo


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: NTFC Nut on October 18, 2010, 16:37:36 pm
Confirmed now:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/h/hibernian/9102714.stm

And Drilling, somehow I can't see him having a bigger budget at Hibs than Celtic or Rangers. Well, maybe Rangers... ;D


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: DrillingCobbler on October 18, 2010, 16:49:47 pm
Confirmed now:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/h/hibernian/9102714.stm

And Drilling, somehow I can't see him having a bigger budget at Hibs than Celtic or Rangers. Well, maybe Rangers... ;D

Thats them fcuked then! They are currently in 8th place, I will be keeping a close eye on their results from now on in. This is Colin's first true test I reckon!  ;D ;D


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: 4everdelayed on October 18, 2010, 16:52:06 pm
I don't see Harris, Rodgers or Herbert as being up to the standard required and Slowe appears to be an unfortunate signing.

Rodgers is better than the other two, looks a solid option at right-mid, not a starter every week but a decent option for cover, also the fact that he can play either side of full-back is handy.
Herbert's an impact sub at best.
Harris and Slowe.... Enough said.


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: NTFC Nut on October 18, 2010, 16:53:53 pm
Thats them fcuked then! They are currently in 8th place, I will be keeping a close eye on their results from now on in. This is Colin's first true test I reckon!  ;D ;D

It's a real shame, I like Hibs, took in a game at Easter Road when I was up in Edinburgh a few years ago and have a soft spot for them...but they are absolutely f***ed now. Let's see how Calderwood does with virtually no transfer budget and a raucous crowd of supporters who know they should be higher, and demand results- and quick. Can't see him lasting long and they will be deep in the mire by the time he leaves.


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: Marvo on October 18, 2010, 16:58:24 pm
but look at Cardoza's record, not once has he ever signed a successful lower league manager, he always goes for someone who was either an assistant manager or an unexperienced/young coach or John Gorman!


Hindsight is such a wonderful thing.

When they were talking of appointing Gorman I was against it as said as much. I was in a very small minority and got a lot of stick on here. It turned out I was right but it amazes me how you lot can have a go at Cardoza over his choice when the MAJORITY on here were all in agreement. In fact, the one manager you didn't want was Calderwood as you had never heard of him at the time!


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: NTFC Nut on October 18, 2010, 17:01:34 pm
Hindsight is such a wonderful thing.

When they were talking of appointing Gorman I was against it as said as much. I was in a very small minority and got a lot of stick on here. It turned out I was right but it amazes me how you lot can have a go at Cardoza over his choice when the MAJORITY on here were all in agreement. In fact, the one manager you didn't want was Calderwood as you had never heard of him at the time!

Well a manager is always going to become the "wrong choice" sooner or later because either his team will go on a poor run of form, he will be branded "clueless" and sacked, or he will jump ship, be a c*** for doing this, and become a hate figure. So just saying you were against Gorman's appointment at the time doesn't make you some modern-day Nostradamus.


Title: Re: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: Son Of Geoff on October 18, 2010, 17:32:30 pm
I got the impression that Sammo wasn't convinced Osman was actually injured.


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: Marvo on October 18, 2010, 17:38:51 pm
Well a manager is always going to become the "wrong choice" sooner or later because either his team will go on a poor run of form, he will be branded "clueless" and sacked, or he will jump ship, be a c*** for doing this, and become a hate figure. So just saying you were against Gorman's appointment at the time doesn't make you some modern-day Nostradamus.

You prick, I'm not nor was I ever making the point I was right, the point is the amount of people on here who suddenly deride other peoples decisions, in this case Cardoza, when they AGREED with the appointmenmt in the first place!

As for you Nut, I suggest other posters click on your profile and read your posts over the last couple of months. Never has anybody "switched sides" on the same subject so often, nor have they got so much wrong, so often. Your track record is appaling, in fact if you say ever say something, the safe bet is to form the opposite opinion!


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: NTFC Nut on October 18, 2010, 17:52:52 pm
You prick, I'm not nor was I ever making the point I was right, the point is the amount of people on here who suddenly deride other peoples decisions, in this case Cardoza, when they AGREED with the appointmenmt in the first place!

As for you Nut, I suggest other posters click on your profile and read your posts over the last couple of months. Never has anybody "switched sides" on the same subject so often, nor have they got so much wrong, so often. Your track record is appaling, in fact if you say ever say something, the safe bet is to form the opposite opinion!

 :D f***ing hell, struck a nerve there, did I? Just saying that being against Gorman's appointment at the time wasn't some kind of incredible prediction- we could all see he was still recovering from going through a difficult time, which had adversely affected his spell at Wycombe, and therefore it was a big gamble- and nor doesn't make your word gospel in every discussion about potential new managers.


Title: Re: If Sammo went
Post by: Marvo on October 18, 2010, 17:57:38 pm
Once again you completely miss the whole point of the post which was not about me but about you lot who support almost every terrible decision that is made until it goes awry then have the nerve to complain about the decision. Hypocrite!


Title: Re: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: irishman7_uk on October 18, 2010, 18:16:53 pm
I am getting bored of listening to Sammo on the radio.  If the result hasnt gone well he is too quick too slag off individual players and think that has come back to haunt him.  Slagging off HIS defence often this season is one example. They are now really full of confidence! Wouldnt mind if he fixed what he is quick to moan about.

I think on the touchline and when interviewed he comes accross has so inexperienced when results are not going his way.


Title: Re: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: telboy on October 18, 2010, 18:31:15 pm
On the other hand , If i feck up at work its me that gets the rollicking !! I didnt hear any players apologising to the fans for being fannies either . Sammo imo wasnt ever the right manager just yet . as for Guinan , he should have been subbed straight off for the reserve goalie if need be.


Title: Re: Sammo on the Radio
Post by: DustCobb on October 19, 2010, 03:16:00 am
Then only player that apologised is the one who didn't need to!!!


Title: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: dannygntfc on October 24, 2010, 10:10:13 am
It has been confirmed by a freind of mine who knows a relative of one of the coaches, that Sampson and malcom will lose their job after the ipswich game if it ends in defeat. If we somehow are successful against ipswich then their fate will be decided by the outcome of the gillingham game.
I am not just putting this out to start rumours. And it has come from a strong source.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: EastNpton on October 24, 2010, 10:11:57 am
Sack Gray and replace him with Sammo, sack Sammo and replace him with whoever.

It's a club level problem and not just a managerial one


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: sxcobbler on October 24, 2010, 10:16:22 am
3 Year contracts........madness.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Fred_NTFC on October 24, 2010, 10:24:34 am
It has been confirmed by a freind of mine who knows a relative of one of the coaches

And it has come from a strong source.
 
;D




Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: SteveRiches on October 24, 2010, 10:24:42 am
It has been confirmed by a freind of mine who knows a relative of one of the coaches, that Sampson and malcom will lose their job after the ipswich game if it ends in defeat. If we somehow are successful against ipswich then their fate will be decided by the outcome of the gillingham game.
I am not just putting this out to start rumours. And it has come from a strong source.

That would figure from what I have pieced together from lots of circumstantial observations. We cannot allow the club to plunge into the Conference, so if this sacking comes to pass then I shall have every sympathy with the Chairman's wish to do something decisive to keep us up...however I do think that the timetable of Ipswich/Gillingham is a bit too tight and he needs to hold faith just a touch longer. By which I mean a month maximum. Our injuries are not helping.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: dazza on October 24, 2010, 10:24:53 am
MY mate said that his uncles daughters nephews friend know someone who knows the name of someone who knows BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: dazza on October 24, 2010, 10:25:49 am
Our injuries are not helping.


Neither is the pathetically poor discipline.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: cricketside on October 24, 2010, 10:30:05 am

Neither is the pathetically poor discipline.

Which is firmly the job of the manager, of course.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: dannygntfc on October 24, 2010, 10:30:43 am
yeah fair enough dazza, but i dont want to name names so thats how i had to put it.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: SteveRiches on October 24, 2010, 10:31:08 am

Neither is the pathetically poor discipline.

Quite - a serious of key reds, not just this season but at the end of last.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Insider on October 24, 2010, 11:08:42 am
A very good friend of mine connected to Rushden and Diamonds (and Barton Cobbler knows him too and may have heard the same thing in the Stags last night) said that Justin Edinburgh did not go for the Lincoln job and believes he is being lined up to be the next Cobblers manager.  Ordinarily I'd have put this in the rumour bucket, but this is the same person who told me that Jackman was going back to Gillingham even before we were relegated and that Gary Mulligan was signing for us weeks before his name was even mentioned.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Whytewell on October 24, 2010, 11:11:40 am
Assuming you're right, Insider, why on earth should we expect JE to be any more successful with this lot than the current management?


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Marvo on October 24, 2010, 11:12:41 am
Assuming you're right, Insider, why on earth should we expect JE to be any more successful with this lot than the current management?

Er, because he might be a better manager?


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Ted on October 24, 2010, 11:14:21 am
Assuming you're right, Insider, why on earth should we expect JE to be any more successful with this lot than the current management?

Because he's a far superior man-manager, has an enviable record with extremely limited finances and has very good contacts a lot bloody closer than Middlesbrough.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Insider on October 24, 2010, 11:19:19 am
On a slightly different note.  How come Sammo with all his so called contacts missed out on Mark Randall who has just signed a 3 month loan deal with Rotherham?  We have suck weakness all over the pitch, he'd have been a useful addition and he's from here and been on our books (and that would have allowed Gilligan to have his operation).  Meanwhile, I also saw that Karl Darlow was on the subs bench for Forest yesterday.  He was at Villa, unhappy there and from Northampton wanted to sign for the Cobblers, but we ummed and aahed about offering him a contract, despite all our goalkeeeping woes.  


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Chamois on October 24, 2010, 11:21:07 am
If Edinburgh leaves R&D, I would expect it to be for a better job than the Cobblers one. What would the compensation cost for IS and MC? Probably more than the Carling Cup money. Madness. How many managers have we had since DC arrived at the club in December 2002?


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Marvo on October 24, 2010, 11:23:53 am
The madness was giving them a 3 year contract!


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: ntfc_dan on October 24, 2010, 11:25:41 am
On a slightly different note.  How come Sammo with all his so called contacts missed out on Mark Randall who has just signed a 3 month loan deal with Rotherham?  We have suck weakness all over the pitch, he'd have been a useful addition and he's from here and been on our books (and that would have allowed Gilligan to have his operation).  Meanwhile, I also saw that Karl Darlow was on the subs bench for Forest yesterday.  He was at Villa, unhappy there and from Northampton wanted to sign for the Cobblers, but we ummed and aahed about offering him a contract, despite all our goalkeeeping woes.  

Mark Randall would of been perfect signing, he was a regualar when on loan at dongs and always seemed to play well. He lives in MK, yet another potential good signing MISSED


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: St Edmundsbury Cobbler on October 24, 2010, 11:27:03 am
Why does he give them contracts of 3 years?

The last three have failed to get anywhere near his targets for the season.  In fact his target in 2008/2009 was to reach the playoffs, Gray couldn't have been any further off target with that one!!!!  And STILL he got the chance to build a side to "challenge for automatic promotion" from League 2 last year........  Whoops.

This season's target certainly wasn't phaffing about in the bottom half of the table.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: ntfc_dan on October 24, 2010, 11:28:30 am

This season's target certainly wasn't phaffing about in the bottom half of the table.

do you mean relegation zone?


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: St Edmundsbury Cobbler on October 24, 2010, 11:29:40 am
do you mean relegation zone?

I don't think that was Cardoza's target either.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: TbananaG on October 24, 2010, 11:30:43 am
Yeah, I once heard it rumoured that, when football clubs aren't doing very well, the manager sometimes loses his job. Brilliant!


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: DustCobb on October 24, 2010, 12:16:25 pm
JE won't come to us as manager, almost a sideways step, thats how far we are falling here.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Marvo on October 24, 2010, 12:21:17 pm
JE won't come to us as manager, almost a sideways step, thats how far we are falling here.

Yeah he would.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on October 24, 2010, 12:22:51 pm
It's just rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic. What I'll do though is change Sammo's name to the new managers on here so that all of these threads are still valid in 12 months time


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Mark-JB on October 24, 2010, 12:42:00 pm
Why does he give them contracts of 3 years?

It doesn't mean that Cardoza has to pay up the full 3 years or anything approaching it.

Lawrie Sanchez was on Radio 5 live fairly recently talking about the plight of managers and it appears that if Sammo and Crosby were to be sacked they'd be lucky to walk away with a year's worth of wages let alone the remaining balance on the 3 years.

Basically - the length of contract is a huge red herring.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: dazza on October 24, 2010, 12:56:29 pm
The madness was giving them a 3 year contract!


In a nutshell


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Vintage Cobbler on October 24, 2010, 13:37:38 pm
Sammo's future is clearly hanging by a thread.  Gillingham or Lincoln is more likely to be the deciding game.  There are times when you are relieved if not happy when the manager is shown the door but if this happens to Sammo it will be a sad day for us all.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: mackemcobbler on October 24, 2010, 14:58:30 pm
That would figure from what I have pieced together from lots of circumstantial observations. We cannot allow the club to plunge into the Conference, so if this sacking comes to pass then I shall have every sympathy with the Chairman's wish to do something decisive to keep us up...however I do think that the timetable of Ipswich/Gillingham is a bit too tight and he needs to hold faith just a touch longer. By which I mean a month maximum. Our injuries are not helping.
why would a months grace make any difference, by then we could be out of all the cups & rooted to the bottom of the league,allso our injuries are nothing to do with where we are in the league.Steve you are starting to sound like the crap we get on BBC Northampton about how unlucky the team are ect


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Tyler on October 24, 2010, 15:02:49 pm
I honestly think we should just sack him now. It's delaying the inevitable. This team is cascading down in terms of league position, confidence and now what appears to be actual ability and belief and it doesnt look like we're going to trip over and stop this rot anytime soon. It's fine having this idea of 'give Sammo cash in January and watch us shoot' but what if that doesnt work? We are well and truly, absolutely, 100% without a shadow of any sort of reasonable or otherwise doubt f***ed.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: 4everdelayed on October 24, 2010, 15:07:01 pm
We could find ourselves seriously adrift with a few more losses, have Barnet and Lincoln coming up, Hereford have turned their form around (with a new manager, I might add). We're already 2 behind Barnet, could increase dramatically unless we find a win somewhere.
And before someone says Lincoln and Barnet are winnable, we thought the same about Macc, Cheltenham and Hereford and sunk without a trace in all three.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Enya_NTFC on October 24, 2010, 15:55:07 pm
Never thought Sammo was the right man for the job, looks like I was right.



Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: RussNTFC on October 24, 2010, 16:13:10 pm
Think I'll be seeking confirmation from my best mates wife's brother who is a coach at Peterborough!

Who knows what the chairman is thinking.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: ntfc_dan on October 24, 2010, 16:24:46 pm
All this justin edinburgh talk reminds me of the mark cooper talk last time, which turned out to be b*llocks.

On another note, with what Tyler said, Stop delaying the envetiable and sack sammo, if there is money to spend in january, get someone in so that he has a good 6-8 weeks to be around the team and judge them, before the money we have is wasted!!


Title: New manager?
Post by: RussNTFC on October 24, 2010, 16:25:05 pm
There's enough people on here making all sorts of suggestions who should replace Sammo, if he does go.

Who would you appoint as manager?


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Enya_NTFC on October 24, 2010, 16:27:19 pm
All this justin edinburgh talk reminds me of the mark cooper talk last time, which turned out to be b*llocks.

On another note, with what Tyler said, Stop delaying the envetiable and sack sammo, if there is money to spend in january, get someone in so that he has a good 6-8 weeks to be around the team and judge them, before the money we have is wasted!!

What talk?  We, the fans wanted him - there was never any rumors he would come here.....


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: NTFC Nut on October 24, 2010, 16:32:29 pm
Justin Edinburgh if we could get him. Of the currently unemployed managers, Martin Allen or Paul Ince (preferably the latter although his wage demands might be a sticking point). But hopefully we'll start picking up the results soon and it won't come to that.


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: ntfc_dan on October 24, 2010, 16:35:41 pm
why would edinburgh come here? its like our manager going to p*sh


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: Power Football on October 24, 2010, 16:36:02 pm
Whoever asks for the least money.

Perhaps Cardoza could do one of those reverse auction things and ask applicants to write down their salary requirements. The lowest individual bid gets the job...


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: Tyler on October 24, 2010, 16:36:11 pm
Would Edinburgh actually come here? It's like Calderwood going to p*sh instead of Forest


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: NTFC Nut on October 24, 2010, 16:41:09 pm
why would edinburgh come here? its like our manager going to p*sh

The operative words being "if we could get him"...


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: ntfc_dan on October 24, 2010, 16:48:02 pm
me? i have done well on football manager, always managed to get cobblers into the prem. i know i have no actual league experience but i can always show cardozza my football manager cv :D


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: EastNpton on October 24, 2010, 17:04:32 pm
We are bottom of the league. If it was down to team selection only you coudlnt do much worse


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: Dr Feelgood on October 24, 2010, 17:11:47 pm
There's enough people on here making all sorts of suggestions who should replace Sammo, if he does go.

Who would you appoint as manager?

Fenwick


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: MK_Cobbler on October 24, 2010, 17:15:46 pm
There's enough people on here making all sorts of suggestions who should replace Sammo, if he does go.

Who would you appoint as manager?

Hope Powell


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: cricketside on October 24, 2010, 17:26:07 pm
This team is cascading down in terms of league position...

I can absolutely promise you that the cascading has stopped for the rest of the season. You heard it here first.


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: Marvo on October 24, 2010, 17:35:36 pm
Only one question needs to be asked at the interview....

Would you pick Ryan Gilligan?


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: Tyler on October 24, 2010, 17:42:56 pm
Only one question needs to be asked at the interview....

Would you pick Ryan Gilligan?

 ;D

I back Gilligan more than most but f*** me he has been dire lately


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: wrigleys on October 24, 2010, 18:13:53 pm
Billy Rodaway (sp?)

Saw him at Old Orleans the other week...


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: Dr Feelgood on October 24, 2010, 18:16:44 pm
Gordon Strachan


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: Son Of Geoff on October 24, 2010, 18:19:15 pm
;D

I back Gilligan more than most but f*** me he has been dire lately

Yep, he's been struggling. It's a shame Waddleburn isn't professional enough to keep himself fit.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Chamois on October 24, 2010, 18:19:43 pm
Unless there is money made available - which seems unlikely - what will be gained by changing the manager?


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Son Of Geoff on October 24, 2010, 18:21:26 pm
Unless there is money made available - which seems unlikely - what will be gained by changing the manager?

If you seriously need this answering, you're not half sharp.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Erith_Cobbler on October 24, 2010, 18:25:48 pm
From the Forest Green Rovers website:

"Manager Nick Angel brings Northampton Town to The New Lawn with the fixture due to be played week ending the 6th/7th November"

Do they know something we don't??


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: TheBigPicture on October 24, 2010, 19:49:56 pm
He's already at the club...  Ladies and gentlemen i give you Bobby Gould.


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: dazza on October 24, 2010, 20:06:51 pm
Gordon Strachan


You can **** right off  ;)


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: mbcobbler on October 24, 2010, 20:24:39 pm
Atkins for old times sake!


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: SteveRiches on October 24, 2010, 20:39:35 pm
why would a months grace make any difference, by then we could be out of all the cups & rooted to the bottom of the league,allso our injuries are nothing to do with where we are in the league.Steve you are starting to sound like the crap we get on BBC Northampton about how unlucky the team are ect

Well mate, we'll agree to disagree. If league results don't come within the month, though, then I'm sure we'd all agree that whatever is decided if the current management gets ditched is that from December to the end of the season is enough time for anyone new to get enough points for safety. Kevan Broadhurst managed it on no money and no resources. Then of course we sacked him!
The worry is that, whatever happens, it'll just be more of the same system that ends up in the sacking of another manager. The answer to it is not around at the moment, I don 't know of a club which operates a different system. Maybe we're even stuck with it. You obviously can't select a team by committee, neither can you decide tactics that way. And in the end, a committee can't decide which players to buy. BUT I do wonder whether clubs could have a wider board of people whose job is to support the management team and who would be able to speak frankly and be heard by open-minded manager(s).
If we really did have an open discussion between players and management the other week then at least something has been tried, but even then, many players are of the attitude that they'll contribute as little as possible until their ass gets regularly kicked.
We have a dedicated fitness coach, which theoretically is a great step in the right direction, but in most of our recent games we have been out-run by fitter-looking teams. Our second half at Oxford was a disgrace, they were so much quicker to the ball than us. I'm at a loss, all I know is that the manager-merry-go-round is driving me nuts.

When have I said we're unlucky? Hardly ever. Our league position reflects perfectly the paucity of our play.

On the point of injuries, they have to be a massive contributor to our woes; if you run through our list of 1st XI squad, there are hardly any who haven't been afflicted. Pull up the list on the official club site and run through it. There's only about half-a-dozen who haven't been recently injured.


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: The Hask on October 24, 2010, 21:02:52 pm
There's enough people on here making all sorts of suggestions who should replace Sammo, if he does go.

Who would you appoint as manager?


i wonder if Steve guinan would apply for the job!!!!


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: mbcobbler on October 24, 2010, 21:05:29 pm
i wonder if Steve guinan would apply for the job!!!!

If it gets him off the playing budget, give him the job!!!!!


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: bungle on October 24, 2010, 21:11:34 pm
I don 't know of a club which operates a different system.

Oh I don't know Steve - I can think of a few. Clubs who appoint managers based on ability rather than sentiment; clubs who conduct a proper selection process with interviews and consultations rather than just appointing the backroom guy who's already on the payroll; clubs who might think twice about giving the job to a caretaker manager who's just overseen a horrendous run of results.

You don't need to 'select a team by commitee' as you put it. You just need a guy in charge who knows what he's doing. You don't need to enter the 'managerial merry-go-round' every season if you appoint the right guy in the first place.



Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: DrillingCobbler on October 24, 2010, 21:37:13 pm
The problem is the appointment in the first place. Not once has Cardoza employed a manager without baggage or a terrible record. Not once has he given the job to a manager with a good record of winning football matches. As such, when the team starts to struggle many fans are very quick to blame the manager and want him sacked. Sammo has done nothing since late March to suggest he has what it takes to be a decent manager (Liverpool excepted) and in most cases is producing the type of results that were feared on him getting the job full time.

Justin Edinborough. Manages a local team with no money and has proved in the last 18 months to be an excellent manager. He has great contacts, he's young. He's played at the highest level. And he's on the up. He would not cost much in wages (we could certainly afford him if Diamonds can!), maybe we would have to pay compensation but it would be a price worth paying. He is the kind of manager we should be looking to bring here, on a 3 year odd contract and let him build something. He's worked his apprenticeship at Diamonds, we can provide him with his next step up the ladder. He would re-galvanise the support, I mean who would be against him? Sammo didn't stand much of a chance because as soon as he hit a bad patch 75% of us are thinking "I knew this would happen".

Back to Sammo. I would let him have this week and re-evaluate the situation next Sunday. If we produce another Oxford/Hereford/Shrewsbury/Macclesfield etc then Im sorry but its time to go. He deserves Tuesday and a crack at getting us to the quarter finals, it would be disrespectful to the man to relieve him of his duties before then. And then I guess you have to give him Saturday. I hope we win and he buys himself some more time, but I cannot help but think its delaying the inevitable.

We are where we are. Undoubtedly it will cost a large sum of money to get rid of both Sammo and Crosby and bring in their replacements. Probably circa 200k - a complete and utter guess but when you think about it is surely going to run into 6 figures. So Cardoza isn't going to make the decision as perhaps as quick as we all would that don't have to foot the bill. The fact that they have 3 year contracts makes this option that much harder to make as well. But again the same people on here who were celebrating the announcement of these long deals earlier this year are now saying Cardoza was stupid to award them. I must admit to thinking around Febuary/March time that we really had found ourselves a decent manager and that I had been very wrong to initially think otherwise. But Sammo's lack of contacts meant a summer of struggle with regards to building a team capable of getting decent results and that I fear has been his biggest downfall. Not knowing enough people who can help him out. Tactics wise, every manager gets questions. From the England manager to the manager of your kids football team. I can live with that, we all see a match differently. Venting our frustrations during the course of a game or on here is what its all about, but I can guarantee that the next manager will make bizaar substitutions and will probably play an unfit and woefully out of form Gilligan, as well as recruiting someone onto his backroom staff who will be perceived as being a waste of money. But at the end of the day, its all about winning and we are not doing that. And we don't remotely look like we are going to start anytime soon.


Title: Sammo. How long?
Post by: DrillingCobbler on October 24, 2010, 21:48:51 pm
Well as I was the author of the original Sammo or new broom thread I thought that I might as well start a new one!  ;D

Lets see what the hotelender's want. No spin. Unlike this time last year Im pretty cool about things, not overly stressed about the situation. Im prepared to give the bloke another week. So thats the way I've voted. And before I get asked why by somebody, I have considered the whole picture. The costs involved, the respect, Ipswich match this week etc. Heart versus head.

I hope he wins this battle, I really do. Good luck Sammo.





Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: 4everdelayed on October 24, 2010, 22:01:37 pm
I voted 'wait until after Gillingham' for the following reason:

the guy has earned himself the chance to have a crack at Ipswich, the form we're in is dreadful but he lead us to this point and he deserves this game. I don't think we'll win, but he's earned the chance to give it a go. Re: Gillingham, it can be his last chance in front of the home crowd. If we lose, we have Lincoln next week and looking at their league position that must be seen as a must win, therefore we should get a new manager in right after the Gills game to give him a week to prepare.

My personal opinion, but I can also see the justification in a couple of the other options too.


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: Tyler on October 24, 2010, 22:05:48 pm
Lincoln is a week Tuesday ???


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: mbcobbler on October 24, 2010, 22:07:42 pm
I have voted for after the gillingham game. Sammo deserves a crack at ipswich but if we lose to gillingham then it could be curtains for him (especially as they haven't won away for like 2 years).



Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: 4everdelayed on October 24, 2010, 22:13:03 pm
Lincoln is a week Tuesday ???

 :o My mistake, thought it was saturday, if I could change to 'after Ipswich' I would then :-\


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: Marvo on October 24, 2010, 22:17:50 pm
Can't possibly answer the question as it depends upon the results of the games mentioned.


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: NTFC Nut on October 24, 2010, 22:32:48 pm
I've said give it a few weeks: We've got Gillingham (h), Lincoln (a), Port Vale (h), Barnet (a) and Rotherham (a) before the end of November. If Sammo gets less than 9 points from that little lot, show him the door. I think he could build something here if given time but it depends how much time we can afford to give him: if we're deep in the relegation mire by the end of November we can't take the risk of plummeting into the Conference as part of his learning curve, especially as we would lose the likes of Thornton, McKenzie etc, who any future promotion-challenging team would be built around.


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: Trotty on October 25, 2010, 05:48:08 am
I think he'll go this week. Probably after the Ipswich game barring another unlikely result.


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: Trotty on October 25, 2010, 05:51:57 am
Of the options mentioned Justin Edinburgh looks the best from the realistic options.


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: Marvo on October 25, 2010, 07:16:20 am
I've said give it a few weeks: We've got Gillingham (h), Lincoln (a), Port Vale (h), Barnet (a) and Rotherham (a) before the end of November. If Sammo gets less than 9 points from that little lot, show him the door.

Jesus Christ, if the new bloke got 9 points "from that little lot" I'd be happy.


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: Trotty on October 25, 2010, 07:40:44 am
I've said give it a few weeks: We've got Gillingham (h), Lincoln (a), Port Vale (h), Barnet (a) and Rotherham (a) before the end of November. If Sammo gets less than 9 points from that little lot, show him the door.

and if we only get one or two points or worse. Where does that leave us?


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: DrillingCobbler on October 25, 2010, 07:45:07 am
Early signs are that the majority are still wanting him to be given a little more time. If we can get the figure of voters to around the 100 mark today, then that will give us a good cross section of the support - and will tell DC what we all feel.

Marvo...no need to sit on the fence mate, I think your stance is clearly to give him a few weeks. Which could be two weeks, 3 weeks or even longer. Dependent on the results in the meantime. Because if we were to lose this Saturday then there is an option for that!

For me though, it isn't just about results. If we were to lose 1-0 versus Gills through a dodgy penalty but hit the post 5 times and genuinely be unlucky then I would think differently. But my biggest concern is we don't actually look like winning...the last time we did was against Chesterfield.


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: Trotty on October 25, 2010, 07:48:52 am
Early signs are that the majority are still wanting him to be given a little more time.


The majority seem to be saying he should go in the next week.


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: Vintage Cobbler on October 25, 2010, 07:57:56 am
Straw polls can be dangereous things.  On BBC radio Northampton before the Oxford game Tim O said he had asked a cross section of Cobblers fans for their views and he reported that most were in favour of giving Sammo time, the implication being longer than being mooted on this board.  So it raises the question of how representative are 100 posters on this board.  We could be a "noisy" minority. 


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: cricketside on October 25, 2010, 08:01:45 am
So a new manager automatically means an improvement in results? In that case, take one on for a month and get another for the following month. Champions. It's not rocket science.


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: cricketside on October 25, 2010, 08:13:39 am
Trevor Gould?


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: Marvo on October 25, 2010, 08:18:16 am
So a new manager automatically means an improvement in results?

In our case, it's difficult to see how they could get any worse. The club record is 7 defeats on the spin.


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: Marvo on October 25, 2010, 08:21:09 am

Marvo...no need to sit on the fence mate, I think your stance is clearly to give him a few weeks. Which could be two weeks, 3 weeks or even longer. Dependent on the results in the meantime. Because if we were to lose this Saturday then there is an option for that!



I'm not sitting on the fence, I'd give him the Ipswich game but then say goodbye UNLESS we were to win of course which obviously changes the entire picture. Can you imagine, quarter-finals of the League Cup and we then sack the manager?

I really like Sammo (as a bloke) but the Gilligan thing is doing my head in!


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: cricketside on October 25, 2010, 08:21:32 am
Fine. So the new man gets 2 wins with the same players. Get rid of him and the next will get - say - 3 or 4. By the time we get the 6th we'll be in the play-offs.


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: sxcobbler on October 25, 2010, 08:28:43 am
Well it's going to be a lot easier to stay in this league as opposed to gaining promotion from the Blue Square, but losing is habit forming and we have a nasty habit.

Our current form added to ridiculous disciplinary conduct clearly points to a new Management team being required as as possible....but in fairness Sammo deserves to have a pop at the Tractor Boys.

What happens then, as to another prospective disastrous appointment by DC is anybodies guess....with any hope he is surely already searching through the the leagues, top non- leagues and those out of work from the  League Managers Association as we speak...and this time take some expert advice, as with CC /JD, please. The cheap option often turns out to be very expensive [ who's idea was it to give 3 year contracts....3 months is a long time in football...things change as we know (the heroics at Liverpool seem like a dream now)].If and when a new man is appointed he clearly needs time to assess the players and be poised for action in the January transfer window and  hopefully use his contacts in the game for quality loanees, that can make such a difference at this level. All of this is obvious to all of us.

Action must be already well under way as we speak ....especially if the target manager is not immediately available. The clock is ticking.


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: SteveRiches on October 25, 2010, 08:37:30 am
I've said give it a few weeks: We've got Gillingham (h), Lincoln (a), Port Vale (h), Barnet (a) and Rotherham (a) before the end of November. If Sammo gets less than 9 points from that little lot, show him the door. I think he could build something here if given time but it depends how much time we can afford to give him: if we're deep in the relegation mire by the end of November we can't take the risk of plummeting into the Conference as part of his learning curve, especially as we would lose the likes of Thornton, McKenzie etc, who any future promotion-challenging team would be built around.

Agreed!


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: abington_cobbler on October 25, 2010, 08:41:09 am
Terry Angus for his obvious passion for the club - who can forget his reaction when Osman scored that penalty at Anfield  ;D 


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: bungle on October 25, 2010, 09:07:52 am
I think he should go after the Ipswich game. He achieved a fantastic result against Liverpool, and he deserves a crack at the next round. It would be nice to give him a proper send-off.

However, I think we've all seen enough to know that he's not the long term answer. Our recent run of defeats is worryingly reminiscent of the downward spiral which ensued after the Barnet game last year: shipping two or three goals every game, makeshift defence changing every week etc. In fact its been even worse than that. I see no signs of Sammo improving as a manager or learning from his mistakes.

I think Sammo and Crosby should both go after the Ipswich game, with Parrish taking over as a (temporary!) caretaker whilst a rigorous selection process is put in place to find a successor. Edinburgh would be my ideal candidate. He's done very well with the Dims on a limited budget, knows his way around the lower leagues and must have some fairly good contacts from his Spurs/Portsmouth day. DC should be moving heaven and earth to bring in someone of that quality.









Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: DustCobb on October 25, 2010, 09:22:49 am
I think he should go after the Ipswich game. He achieved a fantastic result against Liverpool, and he deserves a crack at the next round. It would be nice to give him a proper send-off.

However, I think we've all seen enough to know that he's not the long term answer. Our recent run of defeats is worryingly reminiscent of the downward spiral which ensued after the Barnet game last year: shipping two or three goals every game, makeshift defence changing every week etc. In fact its been even worse than that. I see no signs of Sammo improving as a manager or learning from his mistakes.

I think Sammo and Crosby should both go after the Ipswich game, with Parrish taking over as a (temporary!) caretaker whilst a rigorous selection process is put in place to find a successor. Edinburgh would be my ideal candidate. He's done very well with the Dims on a limited budget, knows his way around the lower leagues and must have some fairly good contacts from his Spurs/Portsmouth day. DC should be moving heaven and earth to bring in someone of that quality.





I concur.


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: cox23jam on October 25, 2010, 09:49:02 am
I have voted for after the gilligham match, end of the month. If the poor form continues don't think we can continue to wait until later.


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: cox23jam on October 25, 2010, 09:50:32 am
Mad dog martin allen would at least keep us out of the conference and would at least give everyone a kick up the ...


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: Chamois on October 25, 2010, 09:53:38 am
What is Angus doing? Journalism, or is he working for the club already?


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on October 25, 2010, 10:03:26 am
It doesn't really matter does it? I've absolutley no confidence in anybody better being brought in.


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: DustCobb on October 25, 2010, 10:06:20 am
Fair point.

Miserable f***ing times.

Don't look at the league table.

f***.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Positively Mad Mark on October 25, 2010, 10:12:07 am
Haven't read the whole thread but why would you sack a managed for losing a game when you are the underdog?  Ipswich for example!


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on October 25, 2010, 10:13:30 am
Mark. We are the underdog in every game we play, what with being 91st out of 92 and all that


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Chamois on October 25, 2010, 10:14:08 am
It would make no sense to sack the manager after a cup defeat against a championship side. No sense at all. Either you do it now or wait till after Gillingham.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: DustCobb on October 25, 2010, 10:14:32 am
Not to mention the only team below us came back from 3-0 down and beat us.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Tyler on October 25, 2010, 10:17:52 am
It would make heaps of f***ing sense to sack him after Ipswic. That'd make it 6 defeats on the bounce and i'm not usre if i can face sitting through number 7 at the weekend against a team who havent won away since the day we were relegated. How long can we afford to sit back and say 'we cant do it yet' it has to be done. Sacking Sammo obviously wont be an easy thing to do but its for the best


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Chamois on October 25, 2010, 10:20:10 am
For the best? Do you have a crystal ball? What if we get someone equally incompetent and - worse still - doesn't care about the club. No one can accuse Sammo of not caring.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: DustCobb on October 25, 2010, 10:21:32 am
He cares too much, that is part of the problem imo. As silly as that sounds.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Chamois on October 25, 2010, 10:23:57 am
Paisley, Shankly...did they care too much? I don't think you can care too much.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: DustCobb on October 25, 2010, 10:25:54 am
I think you can.

Thats the beauty of message boards, differing opinions can be aired  :D


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Power Football on October 25, 2010, 10:28:35 am
Haven't read the whole thread but why would you sack a managed for losing a game when you are the underdog?  Ipswich for example!

Agree in principle, but if Ipswich absolutely rip us apart and win 4 or 5 nil then i think that may be just cause.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Chamois on October 25, 2010, 10:33:52 am
Of course we can disagree but explain how one can care too much, please. Are you suggesting that you lose any sense of objectivity if you love something or someone too much? That it's better not to care (too much)?


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: DustCobb on October 25, 2010, 10:36:06 am
Sure...

Just feel that sometimes if people care too much then it can affect there train of thought as such, let feelings cloud their judgement, look at Sammo's touchline antics...too much passion?


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Chamois on October 25, 2010, 10:39:16 am
It's an interesting debate and I'm not sure where the truth lies.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Marvo on October 25, 2010, 11:06:49 am
I am. DustCobb is right.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Monkey on October 25, 2010, 11:30:25 am
I could have guessed there was a good chance of Sammo getting sacked after Gillingham.

Considering his record in the cup, it makes sense (in a way) to keep him until after Ipswich. Barring something miraculous over the next few weeks, another unlikely cup victory will simply delay the inevitable.

I am actually gutted for him but think he will remain a cobblers legend, providing he goes sooner rather than later and doesnt stay long enough to contribute any further toward a relegation struggle.

If DC had any business sense, youd have thought the 3 year contracts contained a get out clause for a poor run of results etc.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: guest216 on October 25, 2010, 11:34:47 am
I am. DustCobb is right.

Then you're a mug for thinking Sammo cares anymore than any of the top most successful managers in the country.


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: guest49 on October 25, 2010, 12:43:15 pm
The conclusion of clicking on 'new replies to your posts'.....a month is a long time in football.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Zen Master on October 25, 2010, 12:47:16 pm
Caring too much is a problem if it affects judgement. Head must rule heart in decision making in a professional capacity. Leave the heart felt decisions for personal matters or for football fans not football employees.




Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Trotty on October 25, 2010, 13:22:38 pm
The problem is that he cares to much? Don’t be so wet. 

I’d say that the problems are far more fundamental like poor organisation, bad man management, rubbish tactics and team selections.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Iest_ntfc on October 25, 2010, 13:25:25 pm
He must care for gilligan too much, hence him playing every week despite very poor form


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Ralap on October 25, 2010, 15:00:06 pm
I'm with Tel...


Come on Sammo, your legendary status hasn't been tainted round my way mate.


SUPER SAMMO...not so sure about Malc


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Ted on October 25, 2010, 15:26:46 pm
Sammo's still a Cobblers legend to me and always will be.However, that doesn't hide the fact that he's a crap manager.


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Chamois on October 25, 2010, 15:29:13 pm
People were eulogising about the management at Easter. What has gone wrong since then? Bayo's departure? Key injuries? An inspirational leader surely does not become a dire one in a matter of a few months.


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Ted on October 25, 2010, 15:31:34 pm
Far too many atrocious decisions in a short space of time.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Chamois on October 25, 2010, 15:41:33 pm
The anti-Gilligan tirades leave me cold. The guy scored lots of goals for us last season and is playing through pain now, having volunteered to put off his operation. He turned down better offers elsewhere to re-sign for us. If you've seen him interviewed, he's got a brain, which puts him ahead of most sportsmen.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Power Football on October 25, 2010, 15:45:43 pm
He turned down better offers elsewhere to re-sign for us.

If he did, then this can't be true:

he's got a brain, which puts him ahead of most sportsmen.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: bungle on October 25, 2010, 15:48:36 pm
The anti-Gilligan tirades leave me cold. The guy scored lots of goals for us last season and is playing through pain now, having volunteered to put off his operation. He turned down better offers elsewhere to re-sign for us. If you've seen him interviewed, he's got a brain, which puts him ahead of most sportsmen.

I don't have a problem with Gilligan on a personal level. He's a footballer and he wants to play as often as possible. What bothers me is Sammo's continual decision to select an unfit, underperforming player when there are better options (Wedderburn, Jacobs etc) in the squad.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Chamois on October 25, 2010, 15:50:26 pm
Jacobs isn't a central midfielder and Wedderburn gets slagged off on this forum for being out of shape.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: DrillingCobbler on October 25, 2010, 15:51:40 pm
The anti-Gilligan tirades leave me cold. The guy scored lots of goals for us last season and is playing through pain now, having volunteered to put off his operation. He turned down better offers elsewhere to re-sign for us. If you've seen him interviewed, he's got a brain, which puts him ahead of most sportsmen.

With me, its not an anti-Gilligan thing. Its an anti-why the fcuk is he being picked at the moment because he is absolutely woeful!

I like Gilligan and have defended his corner on numerous occasions in the past. But making him captain and picking him every week currently is one of the most ridiculous situations I can recall a Cobblers manager putting us in for as long as I can remember...with him in the team we are effectively playing with 10 men.

Get him operated on and pick someone else in the meantime to play there instead.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Iest_ntfc on October 25, 2010, 15:59:53 pm
The anti-Gilligan tirades leave me cold. The guy scored lots of goals for us last season and is playing through pain now, having volunteered to put off his operation. He turned down better offers elsewhere to re-sign for us. If you've seen him interviewed, he's got a brain, which puts him ahead of most sportsmen.

I'm not anti-gilligan at all, in fact i would say i'm a fan of his but the fact is he has been very very poor this season and has not scored 1 goal yet and has not looked like scoring, by last years standard he should have at least 2 goals in his 11 games he's played this season.

It's quite easy to see that his injury is to blame for this poor form as he's not going into tackles or pushing up like we know he can.

The one person to blame is Sammo, why the hell he can't see that playing an unfit midfielder is not helping the cause i do not know, as much as i like gilly, he's not that good that we can live without him for 8-12 weeks especially given his crap form.

Sammo should stop playing the lad and let him go and have his op and get fit for the back end of the season. This is just another example of his poor decision making and man management.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: DustCobb on October 25, 2010, 16:00:25 pm
Same as everyone else really, Gilligan is actually a nice fella, one with his head screwed on aswell. However he seems to have become almost undroppable!


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: County Cobbler on October 25, 2010, 16:01:49 pm
My problem with the Gilligan situation is Sammo's insistance to play him with Osman as a second holding midfielder. I prefer Osman as the holding midfielder with Davis and Jacobs wide with Thornton central in front of Osman.With Hall as the left back we might start playing players in their best position instead of Sammo's patched up formation...........although Dunn might be the tall centre forward option tomorrow!!!


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Chamois on October 25, 2010, 16:03:42 pm
I think that Sammo's logic is probably as follows: RG is our longest-serving player, is a potential goalscorer, he comes from a footballing family and has a sound knowledge of the game. Unfortunately, his injury seems to be making him less mobile so maybe that op needs to take place sooner rather than later.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: bungle on October 25, 2010, 16:08:13 pm
My problem with the Gilligan situation is Sammo's insistance to play him with Osman as a second holding midfielder. I prefer Osman as the holding midfielder with Davis and Jacobs wide with Thornton central in front of Osman.With Hall as the left back we might start playing players in their best position instead of Sammo's patched up formation...........although Dunn might be the tall centre forward option tomorrow!!!

Nail on head. It's no coincidence that during our decent run last season Sammo actually played players in their proper positions.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: DustCobb on October 25, 2010, 16:09:57 pm
Was it Brian Clough who said football is a simple game? Play players in their correct positions and you're halfway there?


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: DrillingCobbler on October 25, 2010, 16:10:26 pm
I think that Sammo's logic is probably as follows: RG is our longest-serving player, is a potential goalscorer, he comes from a footballing family and has a sound knowledge of the game. Unfortunately, his injury seems to be making him less mobile so maybe that op needs to take place sooner rather than later.

That logic could have been the case 2 months ago. But now? He's about as much as a potential goalscorer as Guinan, and that is saying something!


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Iest_ntfc on October 25, 2010, 16:11:45 pm
I think that Sammo's logic is probably as follows: RG is our longest-serving player, is a potential goalscorer, he comes from a footballing family and has a sound knowledge of the game. Unfortunately, his injury seems to be making him less mobile so maybe that op needs to take place sooner rather than later.

I don't think Sammo has any logic, hence why were in our current situation. You can see by the number of posts that it plain to see he needs dropping due to poor form and injury (not because we dont like him) by everybody apart from sammo.

If gilly had the op back at the start of sept he'd be  well on the way to recovery by now and maybe we'd be higher up the league


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Mistical on October 25, 2010, 16:53:39 pm
Justin Edinburgh. Manages a local team with no money and has proved in the last 18 months to be an excellent manager.

Sorry to put a depressing slant on this but why would Edinburgh come to us? Just looked at the Conference table and the Diamonds have won 4 of their last 5 games (drawn the other) and just beaten Kettering to get into the 1st Round of the FAC. They're clearly on the up and are 6th in the table. Would he really want to come here, to a team that are 23rd in League Two when he's clearly got something going down there? There are only 7 places between us at the moment and I'm no manager but I'm guessing it's nicer to manage a team sat 6th in the league than a team 23rd in the league. :(


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Bingers on October 25, 2010, 16:58:44 pm
Now I accept that I wasn't there last week and therefore didn't have to sit through it, but I would also have taken Leon off at that stage if he had taken a knock.

If your injury prone striker had just got a hattrick and had taken a knock which could have seen him out of the next game if not protected, would you want to protect him?

If you were three up against the bottom club and had an out of form striker on the bench who had a good chance of getting a confidence goal which could spark his season, would you try it?

As for the rolling over and letting the aforementioned bottom club get four goals back and the aforementioned out of form striker not getting that crucial confidence goal, I have no answers.

I still love Sammo and really hope that he leads us to victory tomorrow night and Saturday and that the rest of the season comes good.

Even if it doesn't, he remains one of my favourite Cobblers legends.  He was there when I cried at Wembley, he was there when Boy Bingers cried at Anfield.


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Bingers on October 25, 2010, 17:09:39 pm
And another thought, would he have had more success with players who have the same passion as him, not these mercenaries who think they are God's gift despite the fact that they are only playing Division Four football.  When Sammo was playing, you had respect for the players that they would do their best and took a pride in their club.  You got the sense that they were hurt by defeat.  Not ending up thinking that they would be out on the piss that evening playing on their (minor) celebrity status.  The only one who I have got any real respect for is Holty.  I get the impression that he would roll his sleeves up and get on with it, whereas too many others' heads go down.  I might let Jacobs off as he is young and could still choose the right path, but if he becomes a tosser then he can forget it as well.  Scottie was probably the last one who I felt put the club first.  Before that there were more, but in the future there are going to be fewer and fewer.  If anything is going to drive me away from the game, it is this. 

I can forgive bad results and God knows we've had a few over the years, but lack of commitment, that is unforgivable.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Marvo on October 25, 2010, 17:16:28 pm
He'd be here like a shot. We're a League club, Diamonds aint, nor will they ever be again. Edinborough is working miracles over there, it can't last, he hasn't got the resources. He knows that!


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Zen Master on October 25, 2010, 17:17:16 pm
Football league vs non league
1200 ish vs 4500 attendances
Relatively good budget in comparison.

Mmmm why would he ?


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Marvo on October 25, 2010, 17:18:56 pm
Then you're a mug for thinking Sammo cares anymore than any of the top most successful managers in the country.

I don't know what you're refering to but it certainly wasn't a post I made. Maybe you're the mug?


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Chamois on October 25, 2010, 17:20:05 pm
Bear in mind also the fantastic facilities at Nene Park, gym, training pitches etc. I'd swap it for Sixfields tomorrow.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Zen Master on October 25, 2010, 17:26:09 pm
Darlington have fantastic facilities.
The facilities at RDFC worked well during their brief spell as a league club.
 


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Tyler on October 25, 2010, 17:56:39 pm
What the f*** is this! A sensible, not even half funny post from Bingers?! ;D


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: BackOfTheNet on October 25, 2010, 18:22:26 pm
I'm desperate for Sammo to turn this around.  He's been through it all with us over the years and as far as I'm concerned he's as much (if not more) a Cobbler as anyone sitting in the stands. When he was first in the running for the job I was in two minds; on the one hand he deserved his chance and I wanted him to get the job and do well.  On the other, I was kind of dreading us ending up in the situation we are starting to find ourselves in and him having to leave under a cloud.

Here's hoping he gets us back up and running again, starting tomorrow at Ipswich. C'mon, Sammo!!


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: Tyro on October 25, 2010, 18:22:33 pm
I would love to see Terry Angus involved somewhere in the club.

Listening to him on the radio he does seem to see things that if pointed out to a Manager could be put right.


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: auntie on October 25, 2010, 18:47:07 pm
cheryl cole talks a lot of sense. politically conscious with a working class background. fully aware of contrasting musical genres. really digs wayne from the flaming lips. has a vague idea of the off-side rule. knows how to fire up an absinthe on team building day. might drop her shorts...i don't know.


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Bingers on October 25, 2010, 19:58:14 pm
What the f*** is this! A sensible, not even half funny post from Bingers?! ;D

Are you suggesting that I manage as much as half funny usually?  Anyway, this is no laughing matter.

Right, off t' hotel bar to watch Gabor get the winner against Leeds, which will be a laughing matter, just its a pity that its half term, so I can't wind up quite as many Leeds fans.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Deepcut Cobbler on October 25, 2010, 20:04:04 pm
Same as everyone else really, Gilligan is actually a nice fella, one with his head screwed on aswell. However he seems to have become almost undroppable!

In three Sunday papers he was rated as our best player alongside MacKenzie!!  ;D


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: Coolcat on October 25, 2010, 20:05:30 pm
I would love to see Terry Angus involved somewhere in the club.

Listening to him on the radio he does seem to see things that if pointed out to a Manager could be put right.


Love the guy...but that's the problem..going down Sentiment Avenue again...Mr. Angus totally untried at any level!


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: Bingers on October 25, 2010, 21:53:06 pm


Love the guy...but that's the problem..going down Sentiment Avenue again...Mr. Angus totally untried at any level!

So is Cheryl Cole.  Given the two, I'd take Cheryl, but probably choose Terry as manager.


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: guest47 on October 25, 2010, 22:28:53 pm
Whoever asks for the least money.

Perhaps Cardoza could do one of those reverse auction things and ask applicants to write down their salary requirements. The lowest individual bid gets the job...

I think they did that last time  ;)


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Atmospheric Lavatories on October 26, 2010, 08:36:52 am
I really, really hope that Sammo turns this round.  There would absolutely no pleasure in seeing him go. 


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: Lanky Cobbler on October 26, 2010, 10:08:55 am
my unrealistic option would be Alan Pardew but we'd have no chance


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Chamois on October 26, 2010, 10:16:37 am
None at all. He will always be a legend.
Maybe the problem is that in every other country managers require all their coaching badges, man-management courses and managerial skills courses etc. before they are qualified. Here anyone can become a manager, even with no experience. At times I sense that Sammo's man-management is a bit crude.


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: DustCobb on October 26, 2010, 10:20:24 am
my unrealistic option would be Alan Pardew but we'd have no chance

That would be your unrealistic option? Mine would be Jose Mourinho.


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: Chamois on October 26, 2010, 10:29:35 am
Pardew is dire and looks about as much fun as a Croydon librarian. I'd be in favour of taking a massive risk by doing what Kettering have just done: appointing someone unknown from non-league football. The last time we did it - Graham Carr - it brought us a hungry manager and the two best players to grace our club in the last thirty years.


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: sxcobbler on October 26, 2010, 10:37:13 am
Pardew is dire and looks about as much fun as a Croydon librarian. I'd be in favour of taking a massive risk by doing what Kettering have just done: appointing someone unknown from non-league football. The last time we did it - Graham Carr - it brought us a hungry manager and the two best players to grace our club in the last thirty years.

A possible angle indeed...not only did it come up trumps with  Graham et al but it also worked with Peter Morris as assistant......when we got the legend that is 'Larry' Grayson & even Trott-y ( who was a lot people's hero).
If not as a Manager then as an Assistant ...if someone talented, hungry and keen would come ?


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: Chamois on October 26, 2010, 10:42:19 am
Non-league is an undervalued option. Look at how players such as Westcarr have thrived. Of Carr's non-league finds, McGoldrick - who I don't think was THAT great - went on to Arsenal and the 1994 World Cup Finals, Morley at West Ham in the PL, Hill moved to the top flight as well. Even Wilcox and Gilbert impressed in the second tier of league football. These players cost peanuts for NTFC and were probably paid in the same currency.


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: Lanky Cobbler on October 26, 2010, 10:46:18 am
We took a risk with sammo and it hasnt worked. The last time we took a risk and it paid off was with Calderwood. Now is the time for a proven manager to come in whos going to give the players a proper kick up the yaris but actually have some tactical knowledge. What Pardew did with reading wasnt really boring was it?!


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: Chamois on October 26, 2010, 10:47:55 am
A 'proven manager' who is 'out of work'; isn't that an oxymoron?


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: Chamois on October 26, 2010, 10:51:39 am
DC made a comment - in the Chron - before the Hereford match that if we lost to the league's bottom side he would be forced to take action. We haven't heard from him since.


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: DustCobb on October 26, 2010, 10:52:38 am
He's still in the emergency board meeting  ::)


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Ted on October 26, 2010, 11:48:07 am
There's no room for sentiment in business.It's like the old chap who used to work for me who lost his fingers in a strimmer accident.Even though he'd worked for me for over 15 years, he couldn't do his job to the standard required, and had to go.


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Chamois on October 26, 2010, 11:51:46 am
I'm sure you are a caring boss, Ted. Mind you, shouldn't he have sued you for the strimmer incident?


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Ted on October 26, 2010, 11:54:05 am
I'm sure you are a caring boss, Ted. Mind you, shouldn't he have sued you for the strimmer incident?

No, it was in his own garden and in his own time.Besides, I've never entertained the compensation culture.


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Chamois on October 26, 2010, 11:58:56 am
You probably worked him so hard, on bare minmum wages, that he was forced to do his own garden in the dark at midnight. Must be grounds for a claim.


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: bungle on October 26, 2010, 13:56:40 pm
Maybe the problem is that in every other country managers require all their coaching badges, man-management courses and managerial skills courses etc. before they are qualified.

This is a good point. Does anyone know if Sammo has any coaching badges to his name?




Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: DrillingCobbler on October 26, 2010, 14:46:08 pm
There's no room for sentiment in business.It's like the old chap who used to work for me who lost his fingers in a strimmer accident.Even though he'd worked for me for over 15 years, he couldn't do his job to the standard required, and had to go.

Surely he could have used his other hand to pleasure you? !!  ;D ;D


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Bingers on October 26, 2010, 19:26:16 pm
There's no room for sentiment in business.

Its not business, its football.  There is loads of room for sentiment, thats why we're all Cobblers supporters.  That's why we'll hark on about the Liverpool until I lose my teeth and I become incontinent.


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Tyler on October 26, 2010, 21:57:50 pm
Its not business, its football.  There is loads of room for sentiment, thats why we're all Cobblers supporters.  That's why we'll hark on about the Liverpool until I lose my teeth and I become incontinent.

Gotta be honest bingers, i think a few of us will also talk about the game after the end of next June too ;)


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Chamois on October 26, 2010, 22:44:55 pm
Supporting the Cobblers is ALL about sentiment. It has nothing to do with business, and I sometimes wonder if it has anything to do with results either. It's pure blind love. Call it a curse if you like, but it is devotion for a few thousand of us.


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: bri77 on October 26, 2010, 23:21:18 pm
I'm not ready to be blaming Sammo for everything yet. I find his subs really strange sometimes and don't agree with them but the blame has to lay with the players. They looked like they couldn't be bothered tonight. It is such a shame that in football the players don't get the boot when they are not up to the job it always falls on the manager.


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Chamois on October 26, 2010, 23:56:39 pm
We have to bear in mind that we don't see the players in training; we don't know which ones are carrying knocks etc. Booing the decision to take off McKenzie v Hereford, for example: no manager would have taken him off unless it was necessary.


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: RussNTFC on October 26, 2010, 23:58:15 pm
No doubt that Sammo will always be a legend.....

But we have now lost 6 games in a row, last time that happened was 2003 when we got relegated under Martin Wilkinson.

C'mon Sammo get into the players minds, turn them into world beaters.  ;D


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: GrangeParkCobbler on October 27, 2010, 00:22:58 am
We have to bear in mind that we don't see the players in training; we don't know which ones are carrying knocks etc. Booing the decision to take off McKenzie v Hereford, for example: no manager would have taken him off unless it was necessary.

Necessary??? We were 3-0 up against the Leagues bottom team, into the second half, McKenzie gets a slight knock, gets taken off as a precaution..... not necessarily necessary!! I would add though, in Sammos defence on that one that you couldnt have forseen what happened in the next 20 minutes or so!

This Saturday/Tuesday excuse though..........why not just come out an say I've signed another crock??!! Not a bad crock I'll give you that, but a crock all the same!


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: RussNTFC on October 27, 2010, 00:31:33 am
My dad suggested Malcolm Crosby!   ;D


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: The South Side on October 27, 2010, 00:37:04 am
I believe I read somewhere on here that the club record for consecutive defeats was 7. If we match that on Saturday, then irrespective of how we feel about the bloke, a change has to be made. This can't go on. We have some decent players in our team, but it's all a bit of a shambles right now.

It has to be done before it's too late. I'd love to see him prove the doubters wrong, but tonight's throwing on of Holt up front was what I saw as (almost) the last throw of a desperate man. I remember Gray doing the same thing with that useless bald git we had on loan from Fulham (Watts?) - that didn't work either.


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: The South Side on October 27, 2010, 00:39:22 am
DC made a comment - in the Chron - before the Hereford match that if we lost to the league's bottom side he would be forced to take action. We haven't heard from him since.

He's probably still trying to sign that striker we were promised too............. ::)


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Insider on October 27, 2010, 00:42:27 am
Even if we lose against Gillingham the apologists will still defend him on the grounds that we'll be tired after our midweek exertions, and that our big pitch works against us when we're tired.  Problem now is that prospective loanees are turning us down because of our position in the bottom two.  We're not just spiralling downwards, we're in a nosedive.


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: GrangeParkCobbler on October 27, 2010, 00:43:48 am
He's probably still trying to sign that striker we were promised too............. ::)

Or he could be helping out on the phone with some of those "thousands of phonecalls" we made looking for defensive cover!

Hopefully though he's just going through the balance sheet, adding tonights cut to the income section, making our break-even figures look even better for when he puts the club up for sale....please!!


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Marvo on October 27, 2010, 08:21:32 am
One more game. He'll have McKenzie, Beckwith and Johnson back, plus any loanee he might be able to bring in and we're playing Gilligham who haven't won away since Moses cames down from the mountain. Lose this one Sammo and I can't see how anybody will be able to argue your case.


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Marvo on October 27, 2010, 09:09:16 am
There's a reason after over 100 years the club record is 7 defeats on the trot, even in our darkest hours we never exceeded that benchmark. You can complain about everything from the Chairman to the puddle but the buck has to stop with the manager. Don't try and tell me that Sammo's job has been harder than the likes of Phil Chard when almost all the players were shown the door midseason, or the infamous committee or when McRitchie was doing his best to wipe us off the face of the earth or even when we were collecting small change in buckets . Even in all those horrific times we never had a record like this, six defeats conceeding 15 goals in the process.


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: sxcobbler on October 27, 2010, 09:09:57 am
Sentiment has no place in this.....if wasn't for that stupid 3 year double contract they would both be gone.

Losing is habit forming ....we are out of control...in a head long spiral.

Stop it before it is too late.

The players are at fault but it is the managers job to manage them,so the buck stops there.


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Bingers on October 27, 2010, 15:43:24 pm
You can complain about everything from the Chairman to the puddle

That bloody puddle has a lot to answer for.  Redevelopment would be complete by now if it wasn't for that bloody puddle.  We'd have beaten Grimsby if it wasn't that bloody puddle.  And we'd have kept Adcock and Barnes.  And we'd never have been relegated from the old First Division.  I could go on.


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: DustCobb on October 27, 2010, 15:45:26 pm
I miss the puddle, bring back the puddle please God, cheers.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Iest_ntfc on October 27, 2010, 16:16:53 pm
It has been confirmed by a freind of mine who knows a relative of one of the coaches, that Sampson and malcom will lose their job after the ipswich game if it ends in defeat. If we somehow are successful against ipswich then their fate will be decided by the outcome of the gillingham game.
I am not just putting this out to start rumours. And it has come from a strong source.

You got this one right then?  ;D


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: The Hask on October 27, 2010, 16:58:21 pm
I miss the puddle, bring back the puddle please God, cheers.

There was a large puddle in the coach park at Ipswich yesterday for any puddle lovers.


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: DustCobb on October 27, 2010, 17:00:52 pm
I'm glad the puddle has made an away trip, thats the sign of a true puddle.


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Mark-JB on October 27, 2010, 19:12:38 pm
I hate to think how premature most of you are in bed...


Title: Re: New manager?
Post by: Coolcat on October 27, 2010, 20:25:24 pm
That would be your unrealistic option? Mine would be Jose Mourinho.
;D ;D ;D



Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Marvo on October 27, 2010, 22:51:24 pm
I hate to think how premature most of you are in bed...

Never make it as far as the bed.  :-[


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: MikeNTFC on October 27, 2010, 23:13:25 pm
When he said 'coaches' I think he must have meant one of Geoff Amos'.

How would a coach know if they're going to be sacked. I don't think even DC knows what hes doing at the moment so to have a memeber of the coaching staff knowing before him is unlikely. To be fair, I can't even see him walking after the Gillingham game come what may, until the fans are chanting for him to get out I don't think DC will make a decision. How can he sack a manager that the fans sing the name of every week?


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Marvo on October 27, 2010, 23:20:19 pm
How can he sack a manager that the fans sing the name of every week?

One minute the fans know f*** all and should be ignored. The next chairman are taking our thoughts into consideration. I wish people would make their minds up.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: MikeNTFC on October 27, 2010, 23:28:12 pm
If he had a half empty stadium of people chanting 'Sammo Out' on Saturday he'll be more likely to be gone on Monday, agree or not?


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Marvo on October 27, 2010, 23:30:32 pm
I agree but that doesn't show strong leadership, in fact excatly the opposite, making a decision to placate the fans. Cardoza should make his decision on his own terms but from what I can see I think Sammo is leaving him little choice.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: MikeNTFC on October 27, 2010, 23:38:01 pm
Do remember, this was the man who took a summer and a few games to sack a manager who got a team which should have NEVER been relegated, relegated.



Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Bingers on October 28, 2010, 07:18:55 am
I hate to think how premature most of you are in bed...

I don't think about how any of you lot are like in bed.

Sorry, that's with the exception of Bexxy when she had those loooooonnnnnngggggggg pair of legs as an avatar on the old site. ;)


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Bingers on October 28, 2010, 07:23:21 am
Gotta be honest bingers, i think a few of us will also talk about the game after the end of next June too ;)

Nice one, Tyler.

If the goalkeeping doesn't work it (not that big an "if" really) you can always fall back on being a comedian. :-*


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Mark-JB on October 28, 2010, 08:10:51 am
I don't think about how any of you lot are like in bed.

Sorry, that's with the exception of Bexxy when she had those loooooonnnnnngggggggg pair of legs as an avatar on the old site. ;)

Filthy!  :o


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Marvo on October 28, 2010, 08:15:42 am
Do remember, this was the man who took a summer and a few games to sack a manager who got a team which should have NEVER been relegated, relegated.



Tell me about it. Unfortunately he was swayed by supporters who kept saying that the useless and inept Gray should be given more time. De ja vu?


Title: We may as well lay off Sammo
Post by: EastNpton on October 28, 2010, 11:35:41 am
Because

A: He clearly doesn't take a blind bit of notice about what the fans think, or
    what players we wanna see etc

B: Because no decent manager is gonna want to come here and manage
     a mediocre squad with the likes of Alistair Slowe

C. It'll take too long for a new manger to make a significant change.

So we may aswell just get behind him and the team for Saturday

If you want a constructive argument about the way the team is performing it goes way beyond Sammo




Title: Re: We may as well lay off Sammo
Post by: abington_cobbler on October 28, 2010, 11:56:36 am
I always get behind the team - the trouble is getting others to join in!


Title: Re: We may as well lay off Sammo
Post by: Marvo on October 28, 2010, 12:21:27 pm
Because

A: He clearly doesn't take a blind bit of notice about what the fans think, or
    what players we wanna see etc

B: Because no decent manager is gonna want to come here and manage
     a mediocre squad with the likes of Alistair Slowe

C. It'll take too long for a new manger to make a significant change.

So we may aswell just get behind him and the team for Saturday

If you want a constructive argument about the way the team is performing it goes way beyond Sammo




Ahhh. the old "surrender to your fate" ploy, didn't it work well in the case of Stuart gray?


Title: Re: We may as well lay off Sammo
Post by: Chamois on October 28, 2010, 12:45:35 pm
"He clearly doesn't take a blind bit of notice about what the fans think, or what players we wanna see etc"
No self-respecting manager does.


Title: Re: We may as well lay off Sammo
Post by: Exe on October 28, 2010, 12:48:12 pm
"It'll take too long for a new manger to make a significant change"

Er, actually there's quite a lot of historical precendent to suggest that changing managers in October/November can reverse a side's fortunes.


Title: Re: We may as well lay off Sammo
Post by: DrillingCobbler on October 28, 2010, 12:49:13 pm
Because

A: He clearly doesn't take a blind bit of notice about what the fans think, or
    what players we wanna see etc

B: Because no decent manager is gonna want to come here and manage
     a mediocre squad with the likes of Alistair Slowe

C. It'll take too long for a new manger to make a significant change.

So we may aswell just get behind him and the team for Saturday

If you want a constructive argument about the way the team is performing it goes way beyond Sammo




You sound like the bloke who sticks with his Mrs who wont go near him and who's ugly because he's too scared that he might end up on his own and have to cook his dinner as well!


Title: Re: We may as well lay off Sammo
Post by: Marvo on October 28, 2010, 12:50:26 pm
You sound like the bloke who sticks with his Mrs who wont go near him and who's ugly because he's too scared that he might end up on his own and have to cook his dinner as well!

Hey, leave Bingers out of it!!!


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Chamois on October 28, 2010, 13:07:04 pm
Criticising a manager for 'slagging players off' seems bizarre to me. Ferguson described his keeper's blunder the other week as a primary pupil's error, Clough was always doing it, yet when Sampson criticised Harris after Shrewsbury he actually blamed himself, saying that the guy wasn't quite ready yet. He is quick to praise, something he has often done with Davis this season and with Thornton praises him when he has done well but pointing out that the guy needs to be more consistent. I'm not aware of any manager who does not criticise individual players in public. Yes, in an ideal world these things would stay in-house but we require managers to talk at post-match conferences when they have not had time to chew the fat and their frustrations inevitably come out.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Marvo on October 28, 2010, 13:19:52 pm
Criticising a manager for 'slagging players off' seems bizarre to me. Ferguson described his keeper's blunder the other week as a primary pupil's error, Clough was always doing it, yet when Sampson criticised Harris after Shrewsbury he actually blamed himself, saying that the guy wasn't quite ready yet. He is quick to praise, something he has often done with Davis this season and with Thornton praises him when he has done well but pointing out that the guy needs to be more consistent. I'm not aware of any manager who does not criticise individual players in public. Yes, in an ideal world these things would stay in-house but we require managers to talk at post-match conferences when they have not had time to chew the fat and their frustrations inevitably come out.

Apologist.

I don't know why that word came to mind.


Title: Re: We may as well lay off Sammo
Post by: Bingers on October 28, 2010, 15:11:42 pm
Hey, leave Bingers out of it!!!

Exactly, you won't catch me making my own dinner.

Yorkshire blokes (even pretend ones like me) expect that when they get 'ome, tea is on t' table.  And there'll be trouble at t' mill if it 'ent.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Bingers on October 28, 2010, 15:12:44 pm
Apologist.

I don't know why that word came to mind.

Sorry, I'm not sure either.


Title: Re: I actually love Sammo...
Post by: Tyler on October 28, 2010, 15:47:38 pm
Nice one, Tyler.

If the goalkeeping doesn't work it (not that big an "if" really) you can always fall back on being a comedian. :-*

I learn from the best :D


Title: Save Sammo
Post by: CHEESEOATCAKES on October 29, 2010, 19:18:17 pm
The players are 100 % behind Sammo. The Carling Cup adventure is over. It's league points that matter now.This group of players will show tomorrow how much they want Sammo to stay in charge ! Get your pennies on a win for the Cobblers


Title: Re: Save Sammo
Post by: DrillingCobbler on October 29, 2010, 19:34:27 pm
I hope they do. I really do. Come on you tossers, don't let it happen....


Title: Re: Save Sammo
Post by: Insider on October 29, 2010, 21:59:51 pm
The players are 100 % behind Sammo.


Hmm.  Didn't the Chron say that "Gilligan thinks the players are giving 100%"?  There's a bit of a difference there.  Sammo's treatment of some of the players this season suggest otherwise: Davis, Wedderburn, Thornton and now Holt.  Guinan can be considered in the same camp.  Hardly a resounding endorsement. 


Title: Re: Save Sammo
Post by: sxcobbler on October 29, 2010, 22:06:42 pm
If Only..........


Title: Re: Save Sammo
Post by: guest47 on October 29, 2010, 22:36:06 pm
It would be great if the performances of the players depended on the amount of passion they have for the club, and even better if they were able to turn it on and off at will.
The sad fact is that it's rather more footballing ability and consistency that counts, and it seems as if some of our lot don't have as much as we first thought.
They can play with as much passion as you like, it will only result in yellow cards and the odd red one, but it's only football skill and tactical nous that will win you games.


Title: Re: Save Sammo
Post by: Marvo on October 30, 2010, 03:11:10 am
It would be great if the performances of the players depended on the amount of passion they have for the club

Be careful what you wish for!


Title: Re: Save Sammo
Post by: bungle on October 30, 2010, 07:53:19 am
It would be great if the performances of the players depended on the amount of passion they have for the club, and even better if they were able to turn it on and off at will.
The sad fact is that it's rather more footballing ability and consistency that counts, and it seems as if some of our lot don't have as much as we first thought.
They can play with as much passion as you like, it will only result in yellow cards and the odd red one, but it's only football skill and tactical nous that will win you games.

Spot on. It's not all about passion and 'giving 100%'. A player can give 100% and run around like a headless chicken making reckless challenges every five minutes. I wouldn't put our poor results to a lack of effort at all. We keep losing because we lack organisation, consistency and guille.

What we need is to be more calm, professional and intelligent. Sammo has to start embodying these qualities himself.



Title: Re: Save Sammo
Post by: Ted on October 30, 2010, 09:31:41 am

Hmm.  Didn't the Chron say that "Gilligan thinks the players are giving 100%"?  There's a bit of a difference there.  Sammo's treatment of some of the players this season suggest otherwise: Davis, Wedderburn, Thornton and now Holt.  Guinan can be considered in the same camp.  Hardly a resounding endorsement. 

You can add Seb Harris to that list.To throw him into central defence against the best team in the league away from home was naive in the extreme.


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: DrillingCobbler on October 30, 2010, 09:37:43 am
Just bumping this up, only to see if a few more people cast their vote/current stance.

I should of perhaps added 'after Lincoln' seeing as there is a 11 day gap then until the next league game.

On reflection, thats where Im at. After Lincoln. I will make my own judgement after Tuesday. We need to win at least 1 of the next 2 games, or at minimum draw them both. Basically we need to somehow put a halt to this terrible run of successive defeats. If we cant, then 11 days should be enough time for DC to find the right replacement and get him in place to start our recovery. I do not want a period of having a caretaker manager in charge of us for league matches; a new broom would be needed end of. I would let Andy Holt take charge of us for the FA Cup game if no body has come in by that point.


Title: Re: Save Sammo
Post by: DrillingCobbler on October 30, 2010, 09:42:10 am
Im up for todays game. I actually think we will win. Looking forward to seeing Bayo's return as well.


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: Ted on October 30, 2010, 09:44:14 am
1 point from the next two games and he's gone, 2 points and he might just get a stay of execution and anything more than that and you can tuck this thread away for a couple of weeks.However, I'm still of the extremely strong opinion that neither Sammo or the Cardozas are taking this club anywhere upwards.


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: DrillingCobbler on October 30, 2010, 09:52:11 am
1 point from the next two games and he's gone, 2 points and he might just get a stay of execution and anything more than that and you can tuck this thread away for a couple of weeks.However, I'm still of the extremely strong opinion that neither Sammo or the Cardozas are taking this club anywhere upwards.

Totally agree 100%. Im basing my thinking behind us not having to spend a large chunk of money we don't have on paying off the management duo until as late as possible. For me, if we are bottom of the league and becoming detached from the middle of the table a 3rd of the way through the season then realistically decisive action would need to be taken.

I also do not think anybody new coming in would get us promoted this season, so the benefits of us finishing 8th as opposed to 22nd are negligible. As long as we stay up I will be happy, given our current squad, form and circumstances. If Sammo shows during the next few days he can achieve that then I would rather the money be used to bring in additional players in January.


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: Mark-JB on October 30, 2010, 09:54:53 am
Clearly we can't keep losing games.

If we were to lose the next 2 or 3 then I think everyone knows something needs to happen.

That said, if we were to start picking up the odd win and showing signs of arresting the slide then I'd give him until after Xmas and then re-evaluate.


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: DrillingCobbler on October 30, 2010, 10:04:29 am
Clearly we can't keep losing games.

If we were to lose the next 2 or 3 then I think everyone knows something needs to happen.

That said, if we were to start picking up the odd win and showing signs of arresting the slide then I'd give him until after Xmas and then re-evaluate.

That is very much my stance as well. If he can get us a few points above the bottom 2 I will be happy. Well not happy but you know what I mean!! Any realistic chance of us getting promoted this season has gone - teams do not go from the relegation zone after a 3rd of the season into the promotion zone by the end of it. And particularly when the team has so many obvious weaknesses that are going to take at least another transfer window and probably a pre-season to properly resolve.



Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: Iest_ntfc on October 30, 2010, 10:17:43 am
If we get to after Lincoln with anything other than 4 points then for me there is no way back for him.

2 or 3 points will buy him more time but really will just be a delaying tactic as im still not convinced he has what it takes but i would love him to prove me wrong.

For me the most telling game out of the next 3 in regards to what this team is all about will be Forest Green, that is a must win because if we can't beat a team 2nd from bottom in the BSQ then we might as well just turn the sixfields lights off  :(  and before anyone says it's the league thats more important, losing that game will kill any confidence off that this team has and will take an even bigger effort to come back from.


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: DustCobb on October 30, 2010, 10:26:08 am
We have to win 1 of the next 2 league games, we have to.

The Forest Green Cup game is pretty irrelevant really, Forest Green will increase their effort like we did in the Carling Cup etc.


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: derbycobbler on October 30, 2010, 10:27:26 am
I'd definitely have Sammo in "the last chance saloon".

Probably something like 4 points from the next 2 games and 10 points from the next 5 league games prove he can turn things around.  That means loose today and he's gone!

If we are to change manager to try to avoid relegation then this should be done no later than early December for the new manager to make full use of the January Transfer Window.

If we keep Sammo for the rest of the season and get relegated then I my view the accountability must stand with DC.




Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: Deepcut Cobbler on October 30, 2010, 10:30:38 am
Do we want the current cow or the one in the next field that happens to be greener?  8)


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: Iest_ntfc on October 30, 2010, 10:32:51 am
Do we want the current cow or the one in the next field that happens to be greener?  8)

Depends if Daisy can start to produce some Milk this week or not  ;D  ;D


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: Mark-JB on October 30, 2010, 10:41:35 am
Do we want the current cow or the one in the next field that happens to be greener?  8)

A green cow? Must be one of those concrete ones in Milton Keynes!


Title: Re: Save Sammo
Post by: nathan r on October 30, 2010, 11:14:47 am
everyone is getting too carried away as if we do loss sammo then who says we are getting a better manager!?!?!

If we had gone out and got and got an experienced manager with a proven track record and given him the resources to be a success then yes call for his head.

Sammo was an unproven risk. This is his first job and was given a hugely reduced budget before his first full season in charge, which makes it very difficult to build your own side.

I'm not saying Sammo is the best manager out there and maybe not the best manager for us right now all i'm saying is that IF he goes then someone else unproven and cheap will be given a go and what's the difference!?!?!

Let's get behind the team and sammo and show our support because believe me if you think this is bad it's going to get a lot worse before it gets better.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: brickowski on October 30, 2010, 12:20:53 pm
i've been away for a while - has this happened yet? or was it more billy bulls***


Title: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: EastNpton on October 30, 2010, 16:44:37 pm
Time for all the "Sammo out" brigade to stop the continual calls for his head. Don't get me wrong it is understandable and to a certain degree useful to let him know that this poor form can't continue.

However, Sammo has shown today that he can get it right and you wont find another person who is committed to the club as Ian.

If Sammo continues to preside over a losing team then he will get sacked but lets not go out of our way to help that decision. A club legend like him deserves better!

Let's forgive and forget those (including myself) that have come out with some outlandish criticism (inc the guy that wanted us to lose today!) and back Sammo in what is a tough job


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: Dr Feelgood on October 30, 2010, 16:45:24 pm
Sammo Out


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: Tom on October 30, 2010, 16:48:54 pm
I agree with you in general that they need to stop, and i don't think they should have started in the first place.

1 win is 1 win, we need to keep it going....I wouldn't expect the calls for him to be sacked to stop...remember some people on here have nothing better to do ;-)


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: EastNpton on October 30, 2010, 16:54:26 pm
I was sat near him today and you could see the passion/desperation in his face.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: Mark-JB on October 30, 2010, 16:55:29 pm
You want your Sammo in
You want your Sammo out

In
out
In
out
Shake it all about.
Do the Sammo-Cokey and you turn around

That's what it's all about!


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: Dr Feelgood on October 30, 2010, 16:57:18 pm
I was sat near him today and you could see the passion/desperation in his face.
Maybe he had the s***s


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: wrigleys on October 30, 2010, 16:58:32 pm
Maybe he had the sh*ts
;D


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: EastNpton on October 30, 2010, 17:04:12 pm
When Gilligan got injured and Leon was also carrying a knock, Sammo turned to Crozzer and mouthed something like what should we do...to which Crozzer obviously replied...call for the beloved almighty one that is Guinan.

Guinan was stripped down to come on in an instant but unfortunately his energy crashed as soon as he came onto the pitch  ;D


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: 4everdelayed on October 30, 2010, 17:05:25 pm
Good result today, but let's not get carried away. A loss on Tuesday and the pressure is back on. Fingers crossed we can start a good run of form now.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: EastNpton on October 30, 2010, 17:07:53 pm
Gillingham are no mugs. The important thing is that we've shown we can mix it. Gotta support Sammo now!


Title: Re: Save Sammo
Post by: EastNpton on October 30, 2010, 17:09:06 pm
Funny how it takes a Stoke fan to speak the truth. Well done today Sammo and team!


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: Ted on October 30, 2010, 17:09:23 pm
There'll be no amnesty from me, not after one win anyway.The same goes for Gilligan, who I thought had a decent game, but what we need is consistency throughout the team and and the management.However, I'm going to enjoy tonight, and Mrs Ted has informed me that she doesn't yet have a headache, so there may well be rumpy pumpy within the walls of chez Ted.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: dannygntfc on October 30, 2010, 17:12:33 pm
Good gritty performance today, something we havent done at all this season. Gilligan was my man of the match today, if only he played like that all the time. Hall and beckwith looked solid together. Some good signs that there is some light at the end of the tunnel.
But as a few have said a bad result against lincoln and a upset at forest green and fans (including myself) will be calling for his head once more.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: EastNpton on October 30, 2010, 17:12:58 pm
Ted you're forgiven for your little outburst. Now if you could refrain from being such a rampant working class tory you'll find salvation  ;D


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: Mark-JB on October 30, 2010, 17:13:53 pm
Good result today, but let's not get carried away. A loss on Tuesday and the pressure is back on. Fingers crossed we can start a good run of form now.

Glass half full? Glass half empty?

Completely agree with you but concentrate on the next game tomorrow. Today's for enjoying the glow of an all too rare victory  :afro


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: 4everdelayed on October 30, 2010, 17:15:31 pm
Gillingham are no mugs. The important thing is that we've shown we can mix it. Gotta support Sammo now!

They're probably the worst side in the Football League away from home. Haven't won in almost 40 away games. But I agree, time to rally behind Sammo, this could be the first result of a turnaround or a false dawn, we've got to get behind him.


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: Marvo on October 30, 2010, 17:26:35 pm
I reckon he's got at least until Barnet, even if we lose the next three.


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: HertsCobbler on October 30, 2010, 17:29:21 pm
If Sammo carries on making strange changes in the game it is going to bite him big time.


Title: Re: Save Sammo
Post by: Marvo on October 30, 2010, 17:36:13 pm

I'm not saying Sammo is the best manager out there and maybe not the best manager for us right now all i'm saying is that IF he goes then someone else unproven and cheap will be given a go and what's the difference!?!?!



The difference might be that the new bloke is better? (or worse)


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: dazza on October 30, 2010, 17:39:40 pm
Have they been sacked yet?


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: DustCobb on October 30, 2010, 19:03:00 pm
Today was about the 1st time his changes made sense so not sure what you are on about.


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: clarkeysntfc on October 30, 2010, 19:22:10 pm
Fairly good performance today, bit scratchy 2nd half but solid. Long long way to go.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: Chamois on October 30, 2010, 19:42:22 pm
Well-earned victory, hope Sammo enjoys his weekend. (Still reeling from the revelation that the Sun-reader Ted is married!)


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: Ted on October 30, 2010, 19:51:58 pm
Well-earned victory, hope Sammo enjoys his weekend. (Still reeling from the revelation that the Sun-reader Ted is married!)

I really don't understand why the fact that I'm married should surprise you.Among my many talents, I've been blessed with a certain charisma that drives women wild.Every day I inform Mrs Ted how fortunate she is in posessing a wonderful husband like me.When we first met she was apprehensive about getting into a serious relationship  because of my well known fondness for wine, women and song.However,I subsequently gave up singing and we've happily married for over 30 years.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: Gibbo on October 30, 2010, 19:56:07 pm
Ted, do us a favour, go back to singing.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: everbrite on October 30, 2010, 19:57:16 pm
I really don't understand why the fact that I'm married should surprise you.Among my many talents, I've been blessed with a certain charisma that drives women wild.Every day I inform Mrs Ted how fortunate she is in posessing a wonderful husband like me.When we first met she was apprehensive about getting into a serious relationship  because of my well known fondness for wine, women and song.However,I subsequently gave up singing and we've happily married for over 30 years.

you will impress yr misus if you cud spel beter >:D


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: TheBigPicture on October 30, 2010, 19:59:16 pm
I really don't understand why the fact that I'm married should surprise you.Among my many talents, I've been blessed with a certain charisma that drives women wild.Every day I inform Mrs Ted how fortunate she is in posessing a wonderful husband like me.When we first met she was apprehensive about getting into a serious relationship  because of my well known fondness for wine, women and song.However,I subsequently gave up singing and we've happily married for over 30 years.

 ;D   You're my hero.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: defender on October 30, 2010, 20:09:04 pm
I can't get to games much anymore but watching BBC TEXT it seemed that we were tighter at the back and played a bit more direct, which I did say on here that we needed to, Sammo was honest enough to say that today's tactics may be a learning curve for him,you don't get that degree of honesty from many managers. let's all get behind him and the team. We may have made the first step to better things. COME ON COBBLERS1 


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: NTFC Nut on October 30, 2010, 20:29:32 pm
The crucial thing here is that Sammo seems to be learning from his mistakes. Putting Hall in at centre-back and moving Holt back out to the left is looking like a masterstroke based on today's performance, and not only do we now have Holt back on his favoured left-hand side and the head-on-a-stick option should we need it, we also have a composed, experienced player in the middle.

The substitutions Sammo made today were certainly effective in hanging on to the lead and all of them had a positive impact (even Guinan for once!). I don't think we can dispute that Sammo and Crosby got it tactically spot on today- if they can keep doing that, as well as instilling the right attitude and adding a couple of crucial signings (a midfield enforcer and a preferential option to Guinan on the bench) we can perhaps start working our way up this bloody table! Come On Tayn! 


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: DustCobb on October 30, 2010, 20:32:08 pm
We don't need anyone in midfield.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: Tyler on October 30, 2010, 20:33:04 pm
We don't need anyone in midfield.

What he said. I thought midfield were excellent today


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: DustCobb on October 30, 2010, 20:35:12 pm
If we had the cash then yeah another midfielder would be welcome, however striker and defence must surely take preference, surely.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: Gibbo on October 30, 2010, 20:36:07 pm
I can't get to games much anymore but watching BBC TEXT it seemed that we were tighter at the back and played a bit more direct, which I did say on here that we needed to, Sammo was honest enough to say that today's tactics may be a learning curve for him,you don't get that degree of honesty from many managers. let's all get behind him and the team. We may have made the first step to better things. COME ON COBBLERS1 

That text service is getting better and better every day.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: NTFC Nut on October 30, 2010, 20:41:13 pm
We don't need anyone in midfield.

The whole midfield 5, Osman and Gilligan in particular, panicked and gave away possession when put under pressure as we were hanging on to the points towards the end of the game. I still think we could do with an experienced, Ian Taylor-esque figure in the middle to grab the game by the scruff of the neck when we're behind and be the calming influence when we're protecting a lead. I'd prioritise that over a defender based on today's showing.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: 4everdelayed on October 30, 2010, 20:45:50 pm
The problem is Taylor came from us from Championship and with Prem experience, not sure how many defensive midfielders there are of the calibre available on a free at the moment (if there are any at all)... and if they'd come to us... any names?


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: Tyler on October 30, 2010, 20:46:24 pm
The whole midfield 5, Osman and Gilligan in particular, panicked and gave away possession when put under pressure as we were hanging on to the points towards the end of the game. I still think we could do with an experienced, Ian Taylor-esque figure in the middle to grab the game by the scruff of the neck when we're behind and be the calming influence when we're protecting a lead. I'd prioritise that over a defender based on today's showing.

I thought Osman, Wedderburn and Gilligan were all fantastic. Gilligan didnt have the most exciting game of his life but i thought he passed well and got forward at the right times. A defender and striker is what we need


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: tcobb on October 30, 2010, 20:48:38 pm
Think its a bit early for an amnesty ! Gillingham have not won in 34 away games,although there manager was disappointed not to be able to win at a place like Northampton !  Sammo has not improved in one game and has shown very poor managerial skills so far, and for me he has not shown any reason why he should have been appointed in the first place.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: clarkeysntfc on October 30, 2010, 20:50:11 pm
A good result against a team who haven't won away since the stone age, with some decent performances. Long way to go before any degree of success though. Anything less than top 7 is a season of failure (DC said himself) and we're still very much in the relegation picture.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: 4everdelayed on October 30, 2010, 20:55:01 pm
Indeed, in fact a loss at Lincoln on Tuesday, and other results could see us back in 23rd or 24th. Sorry to be pessimistic  :P


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: NTFC Nut on October 30, 2010, 21:03:30 pm
The problem is Taylor came from us from Championship and with Prem experience, not sure how many defensive midfielders there are of the calibre available on a free at the moment (if there are any at all)... and if they'd come to us... any names?

They don't need to be of Taylor's calibre- we're not going for a title challenge here, we're trying to steer clear of relegation to the Conference. Seth Johnson is a name that springs to mind but I don't think he's played professional football for a couple of years now. Steven Glass perhaps?


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: TheBigPicture on October 30, 2010, 21:23:11 pm
Trust me nothing much has changed, it'll be back to the usual witch-hunt of players, management and ownership when if we lose to Lincoln.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: PepesProdigy on October 30, 2010, 21:57:51 pm
Gillingham are no mugs.

they are away.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: NTFC Nut on October 30, 2010, 22:02:51 pm
they are away.

Agreed. You could see exactly why they haven't won away since the Roman invasion, particularly after they went behind.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: Tyro on October 30, 2010, 23:38:45 pm
The Three T's, Tyro, Ted & Tyler, all experiencing differing levels of romantic angsts  :P


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: Marvo on October 31, 2010, 06:30:29 am
However, I'm going to enjoy tonight, and Mrs Ted has informed me that she doesn't yet have a headache, so there may well be rumpy pumpy within the walls of chez Ted.

Well I hope you enjoyed yourself Ted.

It was a good idea to get it in early (oh er), she'll obviously be far too busy tonight!  :)


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: DrillingCobbler on October 31, 2010, 08:15:17 am
Good God, some of the stuff I read on here makes me think I was at a totally different game to you lot!

Anyway, here goes. Im clearly on my own with this but hey ho. I thought the tactics yesterday were the worst under Sammo's stewardship. Yes we won, but I try to look beyond the result. I accept that we needed to grind out a result and I thought that between 15 - 45 minutes in the first half we played very well. Gillingham couldn't win a header at the back and as such could not deal with Holt. Even Billy was flicking the ball on! But the 2nd half? It was as bad as it was versus Hereford with the exception of our central defence keeping its shape. Because the rest of the team didn't. Where was Jacobs playing? Guinan ffs. 3 changes he made - last week at Oxford and Ipswich when we were losing he only made 1! I thought that all 3 substitutions made the team less effective, and obviously when Guinan came on we may as well have just gone down to 10 men.

We spent the last 20/25 minutes playing 4-5-1 AGAIN, that after a decent performance with 2 strikers on the pitch in the first half.

Whilst I am delighted that we won, I just felt that Sammo made it has hard for us as possible to achieve it. Some will argue that those changes were forced upon him, I would counter that by saying that under no circumstances should Guinan ever play for us. He's terrible END OF. Seb shouldn't of gone out on loan, he should be coming off of the bench if McKenzie takes a knock.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: bungle on October 31, 2010, 09:21:14 am
I agree with you to some extent, Drilling but we have to be pragmatic. It's pretty clear that Sammo will stay on as manager, barring another horrific run of results. I share your opinion that he is deeply flawed as a manager, but, as Jefferson Lake has intimated, the fact is that we simply can't afford to sack him and Crosby and replace them with a credible alternative. Given that this is the case, we have little choice but to support him.

As you say the performance yesterday:

was as bad as it was versus Hereford with the exception of our central defence keeping its shape.

However, defensive solidity is not to be sniffed at: along with having a prolific striker, it's what makes the difference at this level. Sammo has finally remembered that he's had an experienced, composed defender in the squad all along: Marcus Hall. Why he was benched for so long is beyond me. Sammo has tinkered far too much with the back four (you'd think he'd have learnt his lesson from the Kanyuka period last season), and this, for me, has been the real key to our downfall. 

If we can keep a settled back four and Leon stays fit, we might just be ok. This was the key for us last season: settled, solid back four plus prolific centre forward (Bayo). It won't be pretty, but at the moment I'd happily take mid-table mediocrity over a relegation dogfight.

Next summer, things can be reassessed. Guinan (and Hinton) will finally be off the wage bill, Purcell will hopefully be fit and we can start to achieve something in this league. Remember that it took Calderwood two and a bit seasons to get promoted; perhaps Sammo needs a similar ammount of time.





                                           



 














Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: Ted on October 31, 2010, 09:33:34 am
Good God, some of the stuff I read on here makes me think I was at a totally different game to you lot!

Anyway, here goes. Im clearly on my own with this but hey ho. I thought the tactics yesterday were the worst under Sammo's stewardship. Yes we won, but I try to look beyond the result. I accept that we needed to grind out a result and I thought that between 15 - 45 minutes in the first half we played very well. Gillingham couldn't win a header at the back and as such could not deal with Holt. Even Billy was flicking the ball on! But the 2nd half? It was as bad as it was versus Hereford with the exception of our central defence keeping its shape. Because the rest of the team didn't. Where was Jacobs playing? Guinan ffs. 3 changes he made - last week at Oxford and Ipswich when we were losing he only made 1! I thought that all 3 substitutions made the team less effective, and obviously when Guinan came on we may as well have just gone down to 10 men.

We spent the last 20/25 minutes playing 4-5-1 AGAIN, that after a decent performance with 2 strikers on the pitch in the first half.

Whilst I am delighted that we won, I just felt that Sammo made it has hard for us as possible to achieve it. Some will argue that those changes were forced upon him, I would counter that by saying that under no circumstances should Guinan ever play for us. He's terrible END OF. Seb shouldn't of gone out on loan, he should be coming off of the bench if McKenzie takes a knock.

I thought we played like a team trying to end a run of awful results.Of course it wasn't pretty, it was never going to be.The important thing was that after the first ten minutes we never really looked like conceding.Billy looked mentally and physically drained, which is hardly surprising after playing lone man upfront for the majority of the season.I do agree with you regarding Guinan, he just isn't worth a place even on the bench.Why he couldn't have gone out on loan instead of Seb I will never know.Even if we had to pay a good portion of his wages, he's more use playing for someone else than playing for us.As for Sammo, he's a stubborn bugger who's very fortunate to still be in a job. However, for once he got the tactics right yesterday and I will give him praise for that.Nevertheless, I still have serious doubts about his managerial qualities, and it will be interesting to see if he can capitalise on the extra time that he's gained as manager of NTFC.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on October 31, 2010, 09:42:21 am
I thought we played like a team trying to end a run of awful results.Of course it wasn't pretty, it was never going to be.The important thing was that after the first ten minutes we never really looked like conceding.Billy looked mentally and physically drained, which is hardly surprising after playing lone man upfront for the majority of the season.I do agree with you regarding Guinan, he just isn't worth a place even on the bench.Why he couldn't have gone out on loan instead of Seb I will never know.Even if we had to pay a good portion of his wages, he's more use playing for someone else than playing for us.As for Sammo, he's a stubborn bugger who's very fortunate to still be in a job. However, for once he got the tactics right yesterday and I will give him praise for that.Nevertheless, I still have serious doubts about his managerial qualities, and it will be interesting to see if he can capitalise on the extra time that he's gained as manager of NTFC.

Totally agree, 100%. Couldn't give a damn about anything else but 3 points today!


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: clarkeysntfc on October 31, 2010, 11:45:22 am
Bungle - Calderwood got us to the play-offs in each of his first 2 seasons. Sammo won't achieve this.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: EastNpton on October 31, 2010, 13:34:28 pm
Good God, some of the stuff I read on here makes me think I was at a totally different game to you lot!

Anyway, here goes. Im clearly on my own with this but hey ho. I thought the tactics yesterday were the worst under Sammo's stewardship. Yes we won, but I try to look beyond the result. I accept that we needed to grind out a result and I thought that between 15 - 45 minutes in the first half we played very well. Gillingham couldn't win a header at the back and as such could not deal with Holt. Even Billy was flicking the ball on! But the 2nd half? It was as bad as it was versus Hereford with the exception of our central defence keeping its shape. Because the rest of the team didn't. Where was Jacobs playing? Guinan ffs. 3 changes he made - last week at Oxford and Ipswich when we were losing he only made 1! I thought that all 3 substitutions made the team less effective, and obviously when Guinan came on we may as well have just gone down to 10 men.

We spent the last 20/25 minutes playing 4-5-1 AGAIN, that after a decent performance with 2 strikers on the pitch in the first half.

Whilst I am delighted that we won, I just felt that Sammo made it has hard for us as possible to achieve it. Some will argue that those changes were forced upon him, I would counter that by saying that under no circumstances should Guinan ever play for us. He's terrible END OF. Seb shouldn't of gone out on loan, he should be coming off of the bench if McKenzie takes a knock.

Drilling, I usually enjouy your posts but think you've been on a different planet this weekend. No way did we play as badly as against Hereford. In fact it was the complete opposite with Sammo putting the emphasis on team shape and defensive solidity.

Yes, it wasn't pretty but it was effective (and Sammo has admitted that the more direct style is not to his taste).

I can understand your concerns with Sammo but yesterday tactically he got it spot on (apart from Guinan, who he is trying to replace). The subs were all forced with Billy looking totally off the pace, Gilligan asking to come off and McKenzie taken off as a precaution after taking several whacks to the knee.

Before you keep slating Sammo I'd ask myself does a club legend deserve it?



Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: SteveRiches on October 31, 2010, 14:03:00 pm
Sammo put out a team with strength and no fancy shenanigins to play Gillingham, and it worked. Horse for courses. Give him some credit. The fancy stuff can come back later when the fear of losing has gone and our players are more relaxed. Lincoln are a long-ball hit and chase unit, so maybe the same tactic will work there. If the fancy-boys are on the bench there will be options for change.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: wazzacobbler on October 31, 2010, 14:07:12 pm
I called for Sammo's head after the Macclesfield defeat (the last game I was at) and I admit that I meant it.

I'm really happy that we have finally won a game... it took long enough!

However, one win is only one win. We need to continue winning games from now on and for Sammo to learn from this spell.

All I want is for Sammo to achieve, believe me I do. But the one thing I wont stand by and watch is him take us into the basement of the Conference without me wanting fresh managerial blood in the hot seat.

I hope we keep it up but if we don't move away from the danger zone and things look bad I will stand by my words after the Macc game.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: The Hask on October 31, 2010, 14:31:47 pm
I said I would not join the Sammo Out unless Gills beat us so I am relatively happy as we won however a performance and win at Lincoln is essential too and with our away record it will be tricky.



Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: Chamois on October 31, 2010, 15:56:58 pm
Back to the thread, Lincoln away is another massive game. Two more wins this week and operation amnesty would be a resounding success...for the time being!


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: WFCobbler on October 31, 2010, 16:09:36 pm
How come Lincoln keep changing Managers yet keep same 'lump it up 'em style'? What reception will Holty get? - they almost bought him in close-season or has someone else pointed that out!? I would have used Seb v Imps for his heading.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: Chamois on October 31, 2010, 16:17:57 pm
Lincoln seem to have been like that for ages. Same with Rotherham. And we rarely seem to win at either!


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: Winslow Lee on October 31, 2010, 16:36:16 pm
I Think if we employ the same tactics as saturday against Lincoln on tuesday it will end in disaster, it will be like playing them at their own horrible longball game. I just cant see us being able to win a physical battle against them or causing the same sort of threat from set pieces.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: Tyler on October 31, 2010, 16:43:10 pm
The reason we were so dominant from set pieces was teir absolutely tiny team


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: Marvo on October 31, 2010, 16:54:48 pm
Well after being down for so long, we're up again at the minute, so get ready for the roller-coaster ride to continue come Wednesday.


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: Macc Cobbler on October 31, 2010, 19:35:33 pm
I've said give it a few weeks: We've got Gillingham (h), Lincoln (a), Port Vale (h), Barnet (a) and Rotherham (a) before the end of November. If Sammo gets less than 9 points from that little lot, show him the door. I think he could build something here if given time but it depends how much time we can afford to give him: if we're deep in the relegation mire by the end of November we can't take the risk of plummeting into the Conference as part of his learning curve, especially as we would lose the likes of Thornton, McKenzie etc, who any future promotion-challenging team would be built around.

It would be interesting to understand how the nine points target was reached ....... as two wins amd three draws, or three wins, would be optimistic in a good season.

At least we have three points in the bag already, against a team most people thought we were destined to lose to.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: Macc Cobbler on October 31, 2010, 19:45:37 pm
Time for all the "Sammo out" brigade to stop the continual calls for his head. Don't get me wrong it is understandable and to a certain degree useful to let him know that this poor form can't continue.

However, Sammo has shown today that he can get it right and you wont find another person who is committed to the club as Ian.

If Sammo continues to preside over a losing team then he will get sacked but lets not go out of our way to help that decision. A club legend like him deserves better!

Let's forgive and forget those (including myself) that have come out with some outlandish criticism (inc the guy that wanted us to lose today!) and back Sammo in what is a tough job

Well said  :)


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: IzzyCobbler on October 31, 2010, 19:53:39 pm
I wanted to throw my thoughts in on yesterdays game and the Sammo-out brigade....

For the first ten minutes I nearly joined you. It was a shambles for 600 seconds, I couldn't believe it when I saw Holty and Gilly out wide. I thought Sammo had lost the plot but it proved a masterstoke in my oppinion. Holty was utter class yesterday, stuck out wide to shackle David Bentley, provide a bit or aerial support int the middle when needed and even made a few nice dashes down the line. I'm also a Gilly fan, one of few it seems. His set-piece deliveries were spot-on and resulted the the first goal and the penalty. His block would've made John Terry proud as well. The best game he's had for ages.
 


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: Marvo on October 31, 2010, 19:57:30 pm
The one thing I always find disturbing on this messageboard is when posters start making up imaginary targets to vent their spleen against. Can somebody please name the posters who have called for Sammo to be dismissed. I know there were a few that said that if this run wasn't halted and quickly then he should go but just who were the posters who were crying "Sammo Out" because I'm buggered if I know.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on October 31, 2010, 20:08:30 pm
Well, you. You never used the actual words but it's fairly obvious it's what you want. Certainly comes across like that.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: Marvo on October 31, 2010, 21:31:59 pm
Well, you. You never used the actual words but it's fairly obvious it's what you want. Certainly comes across like that.

Oh, it's me is it? I've never been described as a brigade before.

What I want is a successful on the field Northampton Town FC. I don't care who the manager is who delivers it, I don't care who the players are that achieve it. If it's Sammo and the current squad, so be it, I'd be almost as delighted as the Chairman. Do I think it will be? No, but I'm more than happy to be proven wrong.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: TheBigPicture on October 31, 2010, 21:58:30 pm
The one thing I always find disturbing on this messageboard is when posters start making up imaginary targets to vent their spleen against. Can somebody please name the posters who have called for Sammo to be dismissed. I know there were a few that said that if this run wasn't halted and quickly then he should go but just who were the posters who were crying "Sammo Out" because I'm buggered if I know.

Me, and in big bold letters. Is there anything else i can help you with today?


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: NTFC Nut on October 31, 2010, 22:07:59 pm
It would be interesting to understand how the nine points target was reached ....... as two wins amd three draws, or three wins, would be optimistic in a good season.

At least we have three points in the bag already, against a team most people thought we were destined to lose to.


Because I'm working on the assumption that most teams in and around the drop zone will get around a point a game. We were two points adrift of safety before Saturday's game, so if the other teams pick up 4 or 5 points in this period, and we pick up 9, we should put a reasonable bit of daylight (2/3 points) between us and the drop zone, and confidence should have been replenished to some degree. If we don't have that points cushion and confidence by the end of November, then I'd start to genuinely fear for our football league future, and at that point it's time for a change of the man at the helm.


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: Dr Feelgood on November 01, 2010, 02:05:35 am
I reckon Sammo should be given to Xmas


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: Marvo on November 01, 2010, 05:17:59 am
Me, and in big bold letters. Is there anything else i can help you with today?

Thank f*** for that, I thought it was me.  :P


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: 1 for the team on November 01, 2010, 07:51:36 am
i heard a rumour  he had to get 4 points out of 3 games what should not be hard may i say ??? starting at oxford so we will see come tomorrow ( he has 3 so needs a draw or win to keep his job )


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: DrillingCobbler on November 01, 2010, 08:45:02 am
This is pretty much the choice we have:

Budget 2010/11 season.

Sammo stays - circa 1million quid. (based on this season)
Sammo leaves, new man appointed - circa 900k. (based on compo costs etc)

Its a big decision for DC. What we did see on Saturday, regardless of our views on the performance, tactics etc...was a team playing for him. They could have folded after going behind so early on but they turned it round and got the 3 points. By the time we play Port Vale I am hopeful that our first choice team will be fully fit/available and we can start having some continuity with its selection, particularly in defence.

He's obviously still under huge pressure, but I don't think a defeat tomorrow will see a decision made. I read a post yesterday from Bungle and I am total agreement with him. We have little choice at the moment to stick by him because the financial implications of making changes now would hold us back again NEXT SEASON. Views will change on a game to game basis though because of the critical position we are in the table.


Title: Re: Sammo critic amnesty
Post by: Iest_ntfc on November 01, 2010, 09:35:17 am
I called for his head on a stick, and i'm still not convinced he's the right man for the job although his change of tactics on Saturday has given me a slight glimmer of hope that he's learning from his mistakes.

Saturday was a massive win and has bought him more time, but it will count for nothing if we can't build on it and get more points (hopefully 3 but 1 at a minimum) on Tuesday and a win on Saturday.

Don't get carried away by 1 win, most of the Sammo out camp have based there thoughts after 6 straight defeats, so it's going to take a similar run in the opposite direction before i'm back on side with Sammo.

Please prove me wrong sammo


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: Iest_ntfc on November 01, 2010, 09:42:56 am
i heard a rumour  he had to get 4 points out of 3 games what should not be hard may i say ??? starting at oxford so we will see come tomorrow ( he has 3 so needs a draw or win to keep his job )

I heard a rummer that if he didn't dress up as a pumpkin and stand out DC house for Halloween he was getting the sack  >:D


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: SteveRiches on November 01, 2010, 12:45:19 pm
I tend to believe the Chairman when he says quite definitely that there has been no ultimatum of a set date or number of points, just an agreement that improvement needs to come relatively quickly. The two are not the same.

Anyone else who would like me to put their questions to David Cardoza, I'm meeting him tomorrow so please e-mail me on cobblersteve@hotmail.com before tomorrow morning (Tues)


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: Macc Cobbler on November 01, 2010, 13:27:29 pm

Views will change on a game to game basis though because of the critical position we are in the table.


This is the truth of the matter and we need to get away from the match by match knee jerk reaction.

Irrespective of the result tomorrow night, DC has to look at the bigger picture ........ are we performance wise going in the right direction and is Sammo the right person for the job.

If DC believes that Sammo remains the right person for the job, he should give him the dreaded vote of confidence as all the unsubstantiated rumours flying aound are not helping the situation.



Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: Iest_ntfc on November 01, 2010, 13:32:57 pm
If DC believes that Sammo remains the right person for the job, he should give him the dreaded vote of confidence as all the unsubstantiated rumours flying aound are not helping the situation.

I disagree, If he's under pressure then it will keep him on his toes to get the results needed


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: Marvo on November 01, 2010, 14:09:57 pm
I tend to believe the Chairman when he says quite definitely that there has been no ultimatum of a set date or number of points, just an agreement that improvement needs to come relatively quickly. The two are not the same.



You can play crap and win, you can play brilliantly and lose. That's football. It's not the actual result, it's the manner in which it came about.


Title: Re: Sammo. How long?
Post by: Tyro on November 01, 2010, 18:19:04 pm
You can play crap and win, you can play brilliantly and lose.

Sounds like my marriages  :P


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: WFCobbler on November 15, 2010, 14:31:58 pm
It has been confirmed by a freind of mine who knows a relative of one of the coaches, that Sampson and malcom will lose their job after the ipswich game if it ends in defeat. If we somehow are successful against ipswich then their fate will be decided by the outcome of the gillingham game.
I am not just putting this out to start rumours. And it has come from a strong source.
So you can discount that source then! Try HP Brown - much stronger


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: Sid on November 16, 2010, 12:17:31 pm
Gotta admit, have had a good s****** at some of the comments made in this thread.

Seems to have gone quiet now. Anyone else still want Sammo out? Because I'm sure whenever it happens (1 month/1 year/2 years/3 years down the line) this will become the "I told you so" thread.


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: GrangeParkCobbler on November 16, 2010, 22:37:12 pm

Seems to have gone quiet now.

Everyone is so happy we've reached the giddy heights of 20th in Division 4!


Title: Re: Sammo and malcom to be sacked.
Post by: TheBigPicture on November 17, 2010, 00:22:24 am
Well of course it's all gone quiet on this front, the ones calling for Sammo's head who may still have their doubts on certain things are obviously still here, it's just that when a team generally starts to do the right things, that tends to indicate that somethings going right. (Ermm...who's going to come on here and continue to call for his sacking when we've been winning - what part of that isnt self-explanatory?) 

Just as a general point - I love it when certain posters on here only choose to get on the bandwagon once its in the majority, it show's the measure of that person. Deep breath!.... rant over.


Title: What was Sammo supposed to do?
Post by: EastNpton on November 20, 2010, 18:09:38 pm
With Davis tackling like a sunday league player and getting himself needlessly sent off after only 10 minutes. Before that we were looking very strong and many thought we'd score a hatful. Barnet had their heads down but came alive only after Davis left the pitch.

Would have been a different game otherwise



Title: Re: What was Sammo supposed to do
Post by: BackOfTheNet on November 20, 2010, 18:13:50 pm
I agree.  Leaving the ground today I said that had we had eleven men on the pitch we'd have won that.  It's an odd thing to say on the back of that sort of scoreline but our heads went down and their tails went up in perfect synchronisation, unfortunately.


Title: Re: What was Sammo supposed to do
Post by: Ted on November 20, 2010, 18:14:00 pm
With Davis tackling like a sunday league player and getting himself needlessly sent off after only 10 minutes. Before that we were looking very strong and many thought we'd score a hatful. Barnet had their heads down but came alive only after Davis left the pitch.

Would have been a different game otherwise



Sammo picks the team-it's as simple as that.Davis made schoolboy errors at Torquay, a game which was effectively over a little after half time.To say that they have learning difficulties is the understatement of the year.


Title: Re: What was Sammo supposed to do
Post by: 4everdelayed on November 20, 2010, 18:14:48 pm
don't play a left-winger at left-back when you have a solid natural left-back available.
don't take off your leading goalscorer and only goal threat and replace him with a kamikaze right-back.
don't take off your strongest midfielder and keep on a complete clueless idiot like Gilligan.
don't play 1 up front when you're chasing a game against the worst team in the football league.
don't wait until you're 3-1 down to bring on your most creative players, and when you do bring them on give them somebody to aim their passes at.


Title: Re: What was Sammo supposed to do
Post by: EastNpton on November 20, 2010, 18:19:41 pm
Sammo picks the team-it's as simple as that.Davis made schoolboy errors at Torquay, a game which was effectively over a little after half time.To say that they have learning difficulties is the understatement of the year.

Davis was playing left wing at Torquay you moron and has been v good at left back. Indeed, his performances have been drawing the attention of scouts from higher leagues. This is the last time i'm gonna reply to you because you don't go to games and don't know what your talking about


Title: Re: What was Sammo supposed to do
Post by: Ted on November 20, 2010, 18:23:13 pm
Davis was playing left wing at Torquay you moron and has been v good at left back. Indeed, his performances have been drawing the attention of scouts from higher leagues. This is the last time i'm gonna reply to you because you don't go to games and don't know what your talking about

Obviously you didn't make the long journey to Torquay, otherwise you would have witnessed Davis' inability to tackle, which ultimately cost us the game.You Mong!


Title: Re: What was Sammo supposed to do?
Post by: EastNpton on November 20, 2010, 18:26:10 pm
He played left wing at Torquay. I was there as I have been all season. You don't go to games.Your opinion is irrelevant


Title: Re: What was Sammo supposed to do
Post by: EastNpton on November 20, 2010, 18:30:50 pm
don't play a left-winger at left-back when you have a solid natural left-back available.
don't take off your leading goalscorer and only goal threat and replace him with a kamikaze right-back.
don't take off your strongest midfielder and keep on a complete clueless idiot like Gilligan.
don't play 1 up front when you're chasing a game against the worst team in the football league.
don't wait until you're 3-1 down to bring on your most creative players, and when you do bring them on give them somebody to aim their passes at.

I agree with all those points but Davis is an absolutely crucial player for us and his sending off was disastrous


Title: Re: What was Sammo supposed to do?
Post by: Ted on November 20, 2010, 18:31:38 pm
He played left wing at Torquay. I was there as I have been all season. You don't go to games.Your opinion is irrelevant

Unfortunately, I went to that one, and Davis was subbed and yelled at by Sammo for poor defensive duties.Perhaps you had your claret tinted glasses on.


Title: Re: What was Sammo supposed to do?
Post by: 4everdelayed on November 20, 2010, 18:32:49 pm
I agree that he's a key player but don't think conceding 4 to Barnet is justified by losing one player. If we can hold out for 45 minutes with 10 men against a side the calibre of Port Vale, we should be able to at the very least keep the scoreline respectable against Barnet. Losing 4-1 is inexcusable.


Title: Re: What was Sammo supposed to do?
Post by: EastNpton on November 20, 2010, 18:37:55 pm
I think we'd have lost anyway because that black lad on the left wing was near on unplayable

However, I think it'd have been more sensible to keep McKenzie on (can only think he was injured), bring Hall in at left back, take Gilligan off and perhaps have Rodgers or King right wing.

Gilligan was chasing shadows again. sh*t


Title: Re: What was Sammo supposed to do?
Post by: Ted on November 20, 2010, 18:43:11 pm
I think we'd have lost anyway because that black lad on the left wing was near on unplayable

However, I think it'd have been more sensible to keep McKenzie on (can only think he was injured), bring Hall in at left back, take Gilligan off and perhaps have Rodgers or King right wing.

Gilligan was chasing shadows again. sh*t

Certain Cobblers die hards been put down on this forum for declaring Gilly sh*t.People are catching on, I wonder when/if Sammo will.


Title: Re: What was Sammo supposed to do?
Post by: dodger on November 20, 2010, 18:49:00 pm
Sammo coud have done his homework before the game. Rodgers being left out was one when Barnet had a flyer down the wing. Telling his players not to fanny around with the ball hanging up due to the slope, and having Thornton and Gilligan on the pitch at the end.


Title: Re: What was Sammo supposed to do?
Post by: EastNpton on November 20, 2010, 18:59:46 pm
Gilligan is fine when allowed to fanny around on the wing but when he was needed in more crucial  areas after the sending off he went missing again


Title: Re: What was Sammo supposed to do?
Post by: tcobb on November 20, 2010, 19:15:25 pm
"Eastnpton" what are you talking about, one minute your saying it would have been a different game if the Cobblers had 11 men, the next your saying "i think we would have lost anyway because of that black lad ......" make your mind up.

 Sammo picks the team, its up to him to control them, 5 sending off's would suggest he is failing completely.  He is a piss poor manager, hope everybody who went to Forest Green the other week enjoyed the day, get used to it !!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: What was Sammo supposed to do?
Post by: Marvo on November 20, 2010, 19:19:23 pm
I was there as I have been all season. You don't go to games.Your opinion is irrelevant


Yeah this guy is right, can all you people who don't go to a game stop posting on here as your opinion on the club is irrelevant. Only people who go to every game should be allowed to express an opinion.


Title: Re: What was Sammo supposed to do?
Post by: EastNpton on November 20, 2010, 19:23:01 pm
"Eastnpton" what are you talking about, one minute your saying it would have been a different game if the Cobblers had 11 men, the next your saying "i think we would have lost anyway because of that black lad ......" make your mind up.

 Sammo picks the team, its up to him to control them, 5 sending off's would suggest he is failing completely.  He is a piss poor manager, hope everybody who went to Forest Green the other week enjoyed the day, get used to it !!!!!!!!!!

I was saying that even if we kept Mkenzie on I think we would have lost because the black lad was pulling us all over the place. With McKenzie on it might have been closer


Title: Re: What was Sammo supposed to do?
Post by: RussNTFC on November 20, 2010, 19:51:58 pm
Couldn't make today, my wife was ill and someone had to look after the kids. So maybe I shouldnt comment?!

But it seems that Sammo was going for something similar to last week and tried to contain Barnet and hit them on the break, but it didn't work, clearly.

Thats all I will say, otherwise may be attacked because I don't go to enough games!


Title: Re: What was Sammo supposed to do?
Post by: tcobb on November 20, 2010, 20:01:58 pm
Quite right too' Russ', seems its a case if you dont watch, you cant comment, new policy it seems.!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: What was Sammo supposed to do?
Post by: Mark-JB on November 20, 2010, 21:37:11 pm
What was Sammo supposed to do???

After this many red cards so far this season maybe its his job to remind his players they are more f***ing useful ON the pitch than OFF it.



Title: Re: What was Sammo supposed to do?
Post by: Positively Mad Mark on November 21, 2010, 16:07:29 pm
Hmm, not sure on how to answer the question.  Too many red cards are becoming the bain of our season, last week's was unfortunate but no complaints about the decsion yesterday as in the letter of the law.

Any game when you have to play with ten men for 80 minutes is going to difficult.


Title: Re: What was Sammo supposed to do?
Post by: 4everdelayed on November 21, 2010, 16:12:10 pm
Doesn't excuse conceding 4 to a bottom of the table side.


Title: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: DrillingCobbler on November 21, 2010, 18:31:01 pm
This thread is for those fans who:

-Clap the team off the pitch after its been relegated or thumped 4-1 by the worst team in the football league.
-Are defending a manager who has won 7 of the last 27 games.
-Whilst concerned about our poor discipline, refuse to blame the manager for it and point the blame at the players.
-Fail to see that the current manager has fallen out with at least half a dozen players this year at different points.
-thought the substitution of Seb Harris at Shrewsbury was an example of incisive management.
-Still believes that we are trying our very best to sign a decent striker
-Wants the manager to stay in charge on the basis that a better one cannot be sourced due to the chairman not being prepared to splash out.
-Gets all upset if someone slates the bloke because he's a 'club legend' and is therefore not showing respect.
-Applauds the introduction of Steve Guinan into the game.
-Was happy to see us lose 3-1 in a cup game at Ipswich playing Andy Holt up front on his own for the last 15 minute.
-Thinks Gilligan's inclusion in the team week in week out is justified.
-Thinks it was wise to start the season with only two recognised central defenders at the club, one of which was transfer listed.
-Justifies sticking by the manager because 'he is learning and will continue to learn from his mistakes'

I could of course go on but I probably don't need to.

This thread is for all you muppets who think we have the right manager in charge! Enjoy, Im sure you will all be up at Rotherham because you are 'real supporters' !  ;D ;D


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: Son Of Geoff on November 21, 2010, 18:32:51 pm
so in summary, this is somewhere you'd like everyone who doesn't agree with you to post.


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: Power Football on November 21, 2010, 18:52:21 pm
so in summary, this is somewhere you'd like everyone who doesn't agree with you to post.

He's right though isn't he Geoff?


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: Ralap on November 21, 2010, 19:08:12 pm
I am all for openess and different opinions on here Driller but I am very dissapointed that you have yet to start the balancing thread that lists all the good things David Cardoza has done for the club.

I'll start.

Spent loads of his his hard earned money on the old new badge.


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: Son Of Geoff on November 21, 2010, 19:09:03 pm
it's the arrogance more than the subject Jimbo.


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: barnabas on November 21, 2010, 19:21:14 pm
anybody else reckon that Sammo is Phil Chard mark 2?

- for us a decent player in a decent team.
- a regular in the side, mr reliable and club captain.
- made a shed load of appearances, scored the occassional memorable goal, thereby achieveing legend status
- a thoroughly good bloke and a gentleman off the field
- thrust willingly into management when finances were stretched
- unable to bring in players of the same quality of his predessor
- started found wanting tactically
- brought in an old head to help out
- occassional achieved spectacular results
- and by the look of it ended up about the same place in the league?

what happened after Chard was of course much worse. god forbid we end up like that again.


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: NTFC Nut on November 21, 2010, 20:15:22 pm
Sammo! Sammo! Sammo!

 ;D


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: Deepcut Cobbler on November 21, 2010, 20:19:31 pm
........I could of course go on but I probably don't need to..........

Don't stop now, let us know what you really think........ :P


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: ntfc_dan on November 21, 2010, 20:51:23 pm
SAMMO OUT NOW. Its getting beyond a joke, im sure we will all go over and over this, but what has he done!!!!!  Beat liverpool?
 
WE NEED A PROVEN, FOOTBALL MANAGER!!!! sort it out.  I dont want to see our club down in the conference!!! 


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: MK_Cobbler on November 21, 2010, 20:58:42 pm
I think he should be given as much time as he wants, after all he is a club legend.... Anyone that can't see were moving in the right direction needs to take their tinted glasses off...


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: ntfc_dan on November 21, 2010, 21:00:41 pm
Also since we won 5 games on the trot last season we have played 32 games and won 10. Three of which were in the cup! Also in that time we have lost 14! shocking in my opinion.


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on November 21, 2010, 21:13:05 pm

WE NEED A PROVEN, FOOTBALL MANAGER!!!!
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D We all know it'll go to Dennis Casey or whoever else has been there longest.


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: Efons Happy Feet on November 21, 2010, 21:25:29 pm
anybody else reckon that Sammo is Phil Chard mark 2?

what happened after Chard was of course much worse. god forbid we end up like that again.

No. I think the comparison is well wide of the mark, and insulting to Phil. Management was thrust upon him and he did OK - he achieved his only aim which was to avoid relegation.

The players, the facilities and the funds available are a league apart to what they were then. We should never have been relegated to this tier and we should be at the top challenging. The fact we aren't comes down to one single reason...


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: DustCobb on November 21, 2010, 22:10:37 pm
The fact we aren't comes down to one single reason...

Is it because we're s***?


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: TheBigPicture on November 21, 2010, 22:49:00 pm
This Sammo 'club legend' get out of jail card is running alittle thin don't you think.

It doesnt count for much when our league status starts to hang by a thread...  ::) I know its still only November but you see what im getting at.


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: Trotty on November 22, 2010, 06:43:36 am
Is it okay for me to love sammo and still want a different manager?


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: TbananaG on November 22, 2010, 07:19:45 am
This is the Peter Principle at work. If you keep promoting people within an organisation because they're competent at the job they're doing, they eventually end up with a job that is beyond them further up the ladder - sorry, Sammo. The argument is that if you do that across the board, you end up with a whole series of non-competent people in jobs and it brings the organisation down - therefore, an almost random external appointment can be safer than a whole series of internal promotions.


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: Deepcut Cobbler on November 22, 2010, 08:34:20 am
I was looking at which thread to put this in, realised that there were quite a few but decided this one may attract a better response:
If you look at Sammo's reaction to Saturday's match on the Offy:
http://www.ntfc.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10425~2226367,00.html

He is saying almost exactly what you all are saying on here and if you read the paragraph ref Leons substitution instead of stopping after "Tuesday night" you will see his reasoning behind that (relatively valid) decision and using Paul Rodgers as his replacement.

The problem now is for Sammo to prove that he has influence on the squad/team to improve the performances in accordance with his own assessment of the current situation.  Time maybe short but I believe that he is, or should be, aware of that.  I hope (as the Cobblers legend that he is) that he is able to turn it around but if he is unable the difficult decision(s) need(s) to be made to ensure Football League survival.

Disclaimer:  I am a loyal Cobblers supporter but have not been able to attend ANY matches this season and hope that my slightly 'divorced from non co-habitation' views are not discounted through non qualification.  ;)


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: TbananaG on November 22, 2010, 08:47:13 am
Maybe he and the team should have spent the time before the game with us in the pub up the road watching Arsenal vs Spurs to see how you can respond when you go behind. I don't get this argument about some kind of damage limitation when you're down to ten men and 3-1 down - the damage is done, in that you lose if you play with one up front and try to contain. It would actually have shown a bit more respect to the travelling support to play with three up front and take a chance of getting something from the game, even if it goes wrong and we let in one or two more goals - just give it a go, don't make it the aim to lose by fewer goals!


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: Iest_ntfc on November 22, 2010, 09:02:25 am
The problem we have is that the cracks keep being papered over, only to come back time after time.
 
Time will run out and the cracks will get bigger unless we fix them for good and soon.


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: New Dawn Fades on November 22, 2010, 09:04:50 am
Now is the time for people to stand up and be counted

That includes the chairman,the manager,the players and the supporters

No more excuses,no more passing the buck

Stop the petty arguments

Stand up together as one,and get right behind the club because the thought of Non-League football is f***ing terrifying to me.

I dont give a f*** who is in charge just sort it out.

Cobblers Till I Die

NDF


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: abington_cobbler on November 22, 2010, 09:08:53 am
Now is the time for people to stand up and be counted

That includes the chairman,the manager,the players and the supporters

No more excuses,no more passing the buck

Stop the petty arguments

Stand up together as one,and get right behind the club because the thought of Non-League football is f***ing terrifying to me.

I dont give a f*** who is in charge just sort it out.

Cobblers Till I Die

NDF

I agree, lets get behind the team and ALL ensure we avoid non league football


Title: The Sammo love in thread or has he lost it
Post by: everbrite on November 22, 2010, 11:00:44 am
After Saturday I left Barnet feeling that our performance was so poor that relegation maybe the end result. Sammo's overall record is now very poor -  in fact disasterous. The record speaks for itself. I am bewildered by his team selection when two very skilful players are invariably left out and are only brought on very late in the game. One of the players(Thornton) is consistently brought on so late that there is no chance to even get into the game. Jacobs and Thornton are our two most skilful players so we have to play them. We know Thornton is mercurial player(& person)and is lively off the field as well! We replace them with typical L2 players as they conform to Sammo's sterile work ethic and we pay the price for banality. For those who witnessed Barnet (a crowd of under 2k) I am surprised that the MB is not full of complaints. As the Match summarizers said on the Radio we were outplayed for 85% of the game by the bottom side in L2 and suffered a humiliating defeat.I cannot imagine any Manager holding onto his job when results have been so consistently poor for so long. The table does not lie and we are there because we deserve to be. Finally we have signed on loan a player from Leicester who can run around all day but rarely contributes much to the team; skill or goals. We need a manager brave enough to persevere with Jacobs and Thornton; quality as we all know will come good.


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: TbananaG on November 22, 2010, 11:08:55 am
I thought that Jacobs had a really positive impact when he came on on Saturday, but the first thing he was given to do was be the lone defender at a corner for us when they'd left two forwards up - you could almost see him thinking "what the...?!" Chaos.

And as for Thornton - if you ever wanted to see a player saying "Don't know this lot...nothing to do with me...not my fault" in a cameo display, that was it on Saturday. I can see why he might have lost interest over the last few weeks, but could he not at least pretend a little bit for the fans' sake?


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: Artlenock Cobbler on November 22, 2010, 13:35:09 pm
This thread is for those fans who:

-Clap the team off the pitch after its been relegated or thumped 4-1 by the worst team in the football league.
-Are defending a manager who has won 7 of the last 27 games.
-Whilst concerned about our poor discipline, refuse to blame the manager for it and point the blame at the players.
-Fail to see that the current manager has fallen out with at least half a dozen players this year at different points.
-thought the substitution of Seb Harris at Shrewsbury was an example of incisive management.
-Still believes that we are trying our very best to sign a decent striker
-Wants the manager to stay in charge on the basis that a better one cannot be sourced due to the chairman not being prepared to splash out.
-Gets all upset if someone slates the bloke because he's a 'club legend' and is therefore not showing respect.-Applauds the introduction of Steve Guinan into the game.
-Was happy to see us lose 3-1 in a cup game at Ipswich playing Andy Holt up front on his own for the last 15 minute.
-Thinks Gilligan's inclusion in the team week in week out is justified.
-Thinks it was wise to start the season with only two recognised central defenders at the club, one of which was transfer listed.
-Justifies sticking by the manager because 'he is learning and will continue to learn from his mistakes'

I could of course go on but I probably don't need to.

This thread is for all you muppets who think we have the right manager in charge! Enjoy, Im sure you will all be up at Rotherham because you are 'real supporters' !  ;D ;D

My point in the other thread was that to call some one who has the history that he does with the club 'a clown' is what it is, disrespectful and I wonder if the poster would say it to Sammo's face. To call for Sammo's head or not is up to the individual supporter and I wouldn't criticize anyone one way or the other, but there's a way of doing it so don't use my comment to mark me out as a Sammo apologist because I'm not. Sympathy and respect for the man, yes but that is a different matter from wanting him sacked or not.


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: Cockermouth Cobbler on November 22, 2010, 13:48:58 pm
Maybe a period in the conference is what the club needs. No club has a God-given right to football league status.


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: DustCobb on November 22, 2010, 13:52:38 pm
A period in the conference. It would be a VERY long period, unless we got relegated to the North/South league.


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on November 22, 2010, 13:55:02 pm
Maybe a period in the conference is what the club needs.
Getting relegated can never be what any club needs


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: Cockermouth Cobbler on November 22, 2010, 15:03:46 pm
"Getting relegated can never be what any club needs"

You're absolutely right of course. My post was sent in bitterness and disappointment at the miserable result on Saturday after things were just beginning to look up. I'm starting to feel that I may as well prepare for non-league status and try to look on it as something positive. Clubs with (arguably) bigger names than us have been there and bounced back (Carlisle, Oxford etc).


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: auntie on November 22, 2010, 19:30:51 pm
Yeah, but apart from all that...how's everyone doin'?


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: DavCobbler on November 22, 2010, 19:54:07 pm
Maybe he and the team should have spent the time before the game with us in the pub up the road watching Arsenal vs Spurs to see how you can respond when you go behind. I don't get this argument about some kind of damage limitation when you're down to ten men and 3-1 down - the damage is done, in that you lose if you play with one up front and try to contain. It would actually have shown a bit more respect to the travelling support to play with three up front and take a chance of getting something from the game, even if it goes wrong and we let in one or two more goals - just give it a go, don't make it the aim to lose by fewer goals!

So...just for the discussions sake, would you have then been happier if Sammo had not taken off Mackenzie but instead had taken off say a central defender and bought on someone like perhaps Guinan.....then went on to lose 8-1?

I mean, that would have shown a bit more respect to the travelling support, wouldn't it....


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: tcobb on November 22, 2010, 19:58:49 pm
Artlenock,i would have no problem calling Sammo a clown to his face, Legend or no bloody Legend.


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread or has he lost it
Post by: fatblokecobbler on November 22, 2010, 20:14:25 pm
Quote from: everbrite link=tu`opic=1187.msg23542#msg23542 date=1290427244
After Saturday I left Barnet feeling that our performance was so poor that relegation maybe the end result. Sammo's overall record is now very poor -  in fact disasterous. The record speaks for itself. I am bewildered by his team selection when two very skilful players are invariably left out and are only brought on very late in the game. One of the players(Thornton) is consistently brought on so late that there is no chance to even get into the game. Jacobs and Thornton are our two most skilful players so we have to play them. We know Thornton is mercurial player(& person)and is lively off the field as well! We replace them with typical L2 players as they conform to Sammo's sterile work ethic and we pay the price for banality. For those who witnessed Barnet (a crowd of under 2k) I am surprised that the MB is not full of complaints. As the Match summarizers said on the Radio we were outplayed for 85% of the game by the bottom side in L2 and suffered a humiliating defeat.I cannot imagine any Manager holding onto his job when results have been so consistently poor for so long. The table does not lie and we are there because we deserve to be. Finally we have signed on loan a player from Leicester who can run around all day but rarely contributes much to the team; skill or goals. We need a manager brave enough to persevere with Jacobs and Thornton; quality as we all know will come good.
And what if the quality doesnt come good ??? You`ll start moaning that he wasted time playing "quality" players.
Damned if he does damned if he dont,but its all good un supporting the cobblers isnt it. ;D


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: TbananaG on November 23, 2010, 05:50:00 am
So...just for the discussions sake, would you have then been happier if Sammo had not taken off Mackenzie but instead had taken off say a central defender and bought on someone like perhaps Guinan.....then went on to lose 8-1?

I mean, that would have shown a bit more respect to the travelling support, wouldn't it....

Yes, we could have played with three at the back and two up front for the second half and, just maybe, we could have got something from the game. We had no chance of getting back into it with King alone up front for long periods and, in case you didn't notice, we lost 4-1 so the containment hardly worked. Football's not rocket science - if you let the other team play in your half and penalty area for most of the time, you're a lot more likely to concede than score which is exactly what happened.


Title: Re: The Sammo love in thread!
Post by: TbananaG on November 23, 2010, 05:51:36 am
P.S.

Two questions:

1. Were you there?
2. If yes, did you take any pride or pleasure at all from watching the second half?


Title: Re: What was Sammo supposed to do?
Post by: dazza on November 23, 2010, 06:58:13 am
I didn't go as I'm on holiday so as I'm not allowed an opinion I'll have to wait until after the Stevenage game to say what I think.


Title: Re: What was Sammo supposed to do?
Post by: bri77 on November 23, 2010, 09:45:21 am
What was Sammo supposed to do???

After this many red cards so far this season maybe its his job to remind his players they are more f***ing useful ON the pitch than OFF it.



I can think of a few players that this isn't the case for lol


Title: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: SATURDAY BANANA on December 13, 2010, 15:26:59 pm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/n/northampton_town/9261763.stm

Whatever the ups and downs on or off the pitch....the man deserves a mass of credit for sticking with the Cobblers.

In my lifetime, there is no-one more NTFC loyal than Sammo.

Football is a game generally played by and managed by greedy indviduals out to fleece as much as possible out the the fans.

Say what you like about our gaffer...he might "coom from t'Goole"....but he piddles claret!

Well done on the 17 years Sammo...

Hopefully the results will come and we can celebrate in May!


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Ralap on December 13, 2010, 15:31:56 pm
SAMMO, SAMMO, SAMMO...


And to think so many people want rid of you.


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: NTFC Nut on December 13, 2010, 15:32:50 pm
SAMMO, SAMMO, SAMMO...

Seconded. ;)


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: DustCobb on December 13, 2010, 15:36:28 pm
Another 17 years hopefully!

I still let a little wee out when i watch that goal away at s***boro!



Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: abington_cobbler on December 13, 2010, 15:37:31 pm
Seconded. ;)

Thirded


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Marvo on December 13, 2010, 15:45:47 pm
What a load of bollocks, had he been good enough to attract interest from clubs higher up the football ladder then he'd have gone like a shot. Circumstances have dictated his length of stay at the club, nothing more, nothing less. Loyal my arse!


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Cobbler78 on December 13, 2010, 15:47:04 pm
Yep, if anyone deserves more time in the jobs its Sammo, even if we finish 3rd from bottom he deserves a long shot at it and deserves to at least see out his contract. He has had a decent start to manegerial life (would be interesting to see what his overall records is P W D L F A etc as he has been in the job for a calendar yuear now, I would bet he has won more than he has lost)


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Deepcut Cobbler on December 13, 2010, 15:53:10 pm
Yep, if anyone deserves more time in the jobs its Sammo, even if we finish 3rd from bottom he deserves a long shot at it and deserves to at least see out his contract. He has had a decent start to manegerial life (would be interesting to see what his overall records is P W D L F A etc as he has been in the job for a calendar yuear now, I would bet he has won more than he has lost)

http://www.soccerbase.com/managers2.sd?managerid=2065

Not sure of how up to date that is but.... ;)


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: bungle on December 13, 2010, 15:55:54 pm
What a load of bollocks, had he been good enough to attract interest from clubs higher up the football ladder then he'd have gone like a shot. Circumstances have dictated his length of stay at the club, nothing more, nothing less. Loyal my arse!

I think the point is that he has a genuine affinity with the club. Of course that affinity arose through 'circumstances' as you put it; but then it was a series of 'circumstances' which led me to support the cobblers myself. He arrived during the dark, pre-Sixfields Barnwell days, played twice for us at Wembley, scored a legendary goal against Peterborough and managed us to victory against Liverpool - that's quite a record. As a player he was always committed, whole-hearted and passionate; he's also exhibited those qualities as a manager.  

Personally, although I still have my reservations about his abilities as a manager, I have the highest respect for the man.


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Marvo on December 13, 2010, 15:57:22 pm
I think the point is that he has a genuine affinity with the club. Of course that affinity arose through 'circumstances' as you put it; but then it was a series of 'circumstances' which led me to support the cobblers myself. He arrived during the dark, pre-Sixfields Barnwell days, played twice for us at Wembley, scored a legendary goal against Peterborough and managed us to victory against Liverpool - that's quite a record. As a player he was always committed, whole-hearted and passionate; he's also exhibited those qualities as a manager.  

Personally, although I still have my reservations about his abilities as a manager, I have the highest respect for the man.

Agree entirely but lets leave the loyalty bollocks out of it.


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Marvo on December 13, 2010, 15:59:35 pm
He has had a decent start to manegerial life (would be interesting to see what his overall records is P W D L F A etc as he has been in the job for a calendar yuear now, I would bet he has won more than he has lost)

On the basis of points gained from those available he has almost an identical record to Ian Atkins (but not as good as Kevin Wilson). 


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on December 13, 2010, 16:02:41 pm
There's one twat on this thread and what a surprise who it is


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Deepcut Cobbler on December 13, 2010, 16:06:06 pm
Agree entirely but lets leave the loyalty bollocks out of it.

Has he ever, during those 17 years, had to make the choice between NTFC and someone else?

If not we don't know, if yes, we do.  ;)


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Ted on December 13, 2010, 16:09:57 pm
Yep, if anyone deserves more time in the jobs its Sammo, even if we finish 3rd from bottom he deserves a long shot at it and deserves to at least see out his contract. He has had a decent start to manegerial life (would be interesting to see what his overall records is P W D L F A etc as he has been in the job for a calendar yuear now, I would bet he has won more than he has lost)

Idiotic post from someone old enough to know better.If we were to finish 3rd from bottom I'd expect him to have the decency to admit failure, and either to leave or be demoTED. However, I do believe his 17 year stint at one club deserves recognition and that he has been a loyal servant, when I'm sure that there's been other job opportunities in and outside of the football industry.


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Marvo on December 13, 2010, 16:16:00 pm
Has he ever, during those 17 years, had to make the choice between NTFC and someone else?

If not we don't know, if yes, we do.  ;)

There's a much simpler way of finding out, ask him.

Ask him, if Sheffield Utd were to offer you their vacant job of manager, would you take it?


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Marvo on December 13, 2010, 16:18:01 pm
There's one twat on this thread and what a surprise who it is

and it comes as no surprise that the one person on this thread who has to resort to personal insults is you!

One day you'll have the guts to come and say something to my face.


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: MK_Cobbler on December 13, 2010, 16:18:48 pm
Legend... Lets hope he never gets sacked, no matter how far he takes us down the football league..  ::)


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Deepcut Cobbler on December 13, 2010, 16:21:17 pm
There's a much simpler way of finding out, ask him.

Ask him, if Sheffield Utd were to offer you their vacant job of manager, would you take it?

Yes, for more money, better conditions and professional 'betterment', but this isn't about me.
The original comment still stands, "If not we don't know, if yes, we do." ........................for now  :P


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Son Of Geoff on December 13, 2010, 16:39:43 pm
Legend... Lets hope he never gets sacked, no matter how far he takes us down the football league..  ::)

And here's the next twat.


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on December 13, 2010, 17:03:39 pm
and it comes as no surprise that the one person on this thread who has to resort to personal insults is you!

One day you'll have the guts to come and say something to my face.
The problem with you is that you're actually ok in real life, its just when you get behind a monitor something happens inside your head


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Marvo on December 13, 2010, 17:17:32 pm
Look Karl, Sammo has become a Cobblers legend and his 17 years at the club is something to be celebrated. However you would have to be insane not to acknowledge that had a bigger club come in for him when he was still playing for us he would have gone (and who would have blamed him). Therefore the "loyalty" tag just doesn't wash.

Now that's my opinion and I think a valid one. You may not agree with it but that doesn't make me a twat for saying it!


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: DL2 on December 13, 2010, 18:03:15 pm
Congrats Sammo and long may the relationship continue.

Marvo just drop the critical analysis of people's comments just for this thread please.

All I know is of the best memories I have of this football club Sammo has played apart in a significant number of them.  Regardless of what happens in the future, his choice or ours, I will ALWAYS hold the man in high regard and smile when I recall those memories.


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Marvo on December 13, 2010, 18:23:03 pm

Marvo just drop the critical analysis of people's comments just for this thread please.


Linda, read the original post. It says that Sammo deserves credit for "Sticking by the Cobblers". It says there is no one more "Loyal" than Sammo. It then compares him to other players and managers who "fleece" clubs to get as much out of them as they can.

Linda, you are old and I would imagine wise enough to know that it's circumstances and circumstances alone that has led to Sammo being here for 17 years. If a big club had come a knocking, he wouldn't have "Stuck" with the Cobblers, he wouldn't have shown us "loyalty" and he certainly would have had he could have gone on to "fleece" as much money out of the game as he could.

By all means celebrate the mans 17 years at the club, it's a hell of an achievement in this day and age but don't make him into something he most definately is not.


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: DavCobbler on December 13, 2010, 18:26:56 pm
I would piss myself for days on end if Sammo comes out tomorrow, on his 17th Anniversary, and states that he had offers from other clubs but felt no need to move from the Town as he loved it here.

In fact, forget days....make it weeks.


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Marvo on December 13, 2010, 18:31:59 pm
Oh come on Aidy, don't tell me that you're falling for all this guff too.

As for your post, that statement would only be credible if the "other" clubs were of a higher level than Northampton Town.

Tell you what, the next time he attends a trust meeting I'll bloody ask him.


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: clarkeysntfc on December 13, 2010, 18:51:53 pm
Legend & club stalwart as a player. Jury is very much out as a manager.

Failure to make the top 7 the season would be just that, failure and I'd expect him to come under just as much scrutiny as any other manager.


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: defender on December 13, 2010, 19:35:58 pm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/n/northampton_town/9261763.stm

Whatever the ups and downs on or off the pitch....the man deserves a mass of credit for sticking with the Cobblers.

In my lifetime, there is no-one more NTFC loyal than Sammo.

Football is a game generally played by and managed by greedy indviduals out to fleece as much as possible out the the fans.

Say what you like about our gaffer...he might "coom from t'Goole"....but he piddles clar


I couldn't be at Liverpool, but just look at Ian Sampson when we won, That is a delighted manager AND A FAN! I do hope that he makes it as a manager here, loyalty is indeed a VERY rare comodity in football, remember if you are old enough that Sunderland wanted Dave Bowen as manager in 1965, he turned them down to stay here, we are very lucky to have had two people  to join the likes of Tommy Fowler so dedicated to the cobblers. The only one who didn't seem to rate him was Terry Fenwick!!!!
Well done on the 17 years Sammo...Come on COBBLERS

Hopefully the results will come and we can celebrate in May!


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: sbedscobb on December 13, 2010, 20:05:10 pm
Here's to the next 17 and for the manager of the month award this december ;)


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Gerard_Lavin on December 13, 2010, 20:18:18 pm
What a load of bollocks, had he been good enough to attract interest from clubs higher up the football ladder then he'd have gone like a shot. Circumstances have dictated his length of stay at the club, nothing more, nothing less. Loyal my arse!

Bore off.


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: auntie on December 13, 2010, 20:18:52 pm
Linda, you are old

you've bloody over-stepped the line there Marvo.


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Marvo on December 13, 2010, 20:52:46 pm
Bore off.

If there's one thing that makes my day it's somebody taking the time to register just to have a go at me.  ;D ;D ;D

I should get some sort of bonus.


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Deepcut Cobbler on December 13, 2010, 21:08:13 pm
If there's one thing that makes my day it's somebody taking the time to register just to have a go at me.  ;D ;D ;D

I should get some sort of bonus.

Classic  ;D


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: SATURDAY BANANA on December 13, 2010, 21:13:36 pm
What a load of bollocks, had he been good enough to attract interest from clubs higher up the football ladder then he'd have gone like a shot. Circumstances have dictated his length of stay at the club, nothing more, nothing less. Loyal my arse!

Your maggot has dropped off the line mate... :P


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: SATURDAY BANANA on December 13, 2010, 21:18:15 pm
Look Karl, Sammo has become a Cobblers legend and his 17 years at the club is something to be celebrated. However you would have to be insane not to acknowledge that had a bigger club come in for him when he was still playing for us he would have gone (and who would have blamed him). Therefore the "loyalty" tag just doesn't wash.

Now that's my opinion and I think a valid one. You may not agree with it but that doesn't make me a twat for saying it!

Bloody hell....if I'd known the word loyalty would cause so much banter I'd have said "inability to get a job at another club further up the league with only a years management experience"... :afro


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Dr Feelgood on December 14, 2010, 00:44:30 am
Congrats Sammo...


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: SteveRiches on December 14, 2010, 02:33:39 am
A decent bloke who, as a player always gave 100% and rarely played a bad game, and now a manager who understands the game better than most and is prepared to admit mistakes and learn from them (which most of us are often unable to do) and who is hard enough to make difficult decisions without becoming a nasty piece of work. What else do you want?
Of course, if Real Madrid had come in for him I'm sure he's have left us, as indeed now if they wanted him to be their manager - but so what? Statements like that are true of anyone anywhere.
Obviously, if you look at the system in general, all managers' jobs have a sell-by built into them, so one of these days , detractors of Sammo will be able to say "Told you so", which again will be pointless because that's also true of all of our lives. Nothing lasts forever.


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Marvo on December 14, 2010, 06:40:35 am
A decent bloke who, as a player always gave 100% and rarely played a bad game, and now a manager who understands the game better than most and is prepared to admit mistakes and learn from them (which most of us are often unable to do) and who is hard enough to make difficult decisions without becoming a nasty piece of work. What else do you want?
Of course, if Real Madrid had come in for him I'm sure he's have left us, as indeed now if they wanted him to be their manager - but so what? Statements like that are true of anyone anywhere.
Obviously, if you look at the system in general, all managers' jobs have a sell-by built into them, so one of these days , detractors of Sammo will be able to say "Told you so", which again will be pointless because that's also true of all of our lives. Nothing lasts forever.

Well apart from the first 16 words, never has a post been more wrong.

On what evidence to you make the assumption that Sammo "understands the game better than most"? It can't be on our current league position, tactical nous or results this season. There are 92 managers in the top four divisions. You put him in the top half?

Real Madrid? You could have said Walsall for almost any club that is in a higher division than ourselves would tempt Sammo.

I'd like you to also explain that if Sammo was to be successful here and then someone like Sunderland came in for his services based on that how anybody could say "told you so".

Wrong, wrong and wrong again. You say nothing lasts forever and that may be right but your pompous drivel feels like it does.


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: County Cobbler on December 14, 2010, 11:10:02 am
Marvo struggles to say well done on anything to do with the club. As far as he is concerned his 'pompous drivel' is always right and ones opinion is only right when coinciding with his opinion!


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: DrillingCobbler on December 14, 2010, 11:12:12 am
When any employee reaches certain points in their career, they are usually congratulated on their loyalty and there diligence to a specific employer.

At that point most right minded people will eulogise and praise that individual, regardless of the fact that had sufficient temptation been put their way they would have left. Realising the fact they didn't leave has been for the greater good.

Some occasions in life should be devoid of cynicism and disdain, and should be merited with due praise. As far as I'm concerned it's just good manners to say thankyou sometimes.

So it a huge thankyou from me Sammo......



I will join forces...and its not often I do...with the hamster. And echo this post.

He's a good bloke is Sammo, and whilst I have been wavering on wanting him replaced in recent times..I really hope the team builds on its recent run (bar the Barnet 'blip') and ends any talk of Sammo not having the job going into at least next season.


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Sid on December 14, 2010, 12:03:43 pm
I was brought up in Goole for the first four years of me life... most of my family still reside up there. I find it very con-incidental that Sammo once played for a while at the top of Carter Street...

He is probably as glad as I am he came down south! :)

Keep it up Sammo, there won't be many others who are likely to stick around any club for so long.


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: TheBigPicture on December 14, 2010, 12:22:14 pm
Let's just see how popular this thread becomes when we hit another bad patch.
*tumbleweed*


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: County Cobbler on December 14, 2010, 13:18:06 pm
Hopefully you have a long wait!


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Marvo on December 14, 2010, 14:54:46 pm
Marvo struggles to say well done on anything to do with the club. As far as he is concerned his 'pompous drivel' is always right and ones opinion is only right when coinciding with his opinion!

On this very thread I have agreed wholeheartedly with this:

I think the point is that he has a genuine affinity with the club. Of course that affinity arose through 'circumstances' as you put it; but then it was a series of 'circumstances' which led me to support the cobblers myself. He arrived during the dark, pre-Sixfields Barnwell days, played twice for us at Wembley, scored a legendary goal against Peterborough and managed us to victory against Liverpool - that's quite a record. As a player he was always committed, whole-hearted and passionate; he's also exhibited those qualities as a manager.   

Personally, although I still have my reservations about his abilities as a manager, I have the highest respect for the man.

Whilst I have also said this:

Sammo has become a Cobblers legend and his 17 years at the club is something to be celebrated.


and this:


By all means celebrate the mans 17 years at the club,

Perhaps you could tell everybody which part is "pompous drivel"?

You see, that's the trouble with half the people on here, they read just what they want to read!



Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: abington_cobbler on December 14, 2010, 15:03:20 pm
Linda, read the original post. It says that Sammo deserves credit for "Sticking by the Cobblers". It says there is no one more "Loyal" than Sammo. It then compares him to other players and managers who "fleece" clubs to get as much out of them as they can.

Linda, you are old and I would imagine wise enough to know that it's circumstances and circumstances alone that has led to Sammo being here for 17 years. If a big club had come a knocking, he wouldn't have "Stuck" with the Cobblers, he wouldn't have shown us "loyalty" and he certainly would have had he could have gone on to "fleece" as much money out of the game as he could.

By all means celebrate the mans 17 years at the club, it's a hell of an achievement in this day and age but don't make him into something he most definately is not.

If Sammo had an offer for more money in a higher league as a player of course he would have moved on, and who can blame him. We all would move on if we were offered more money for the same job at another company. Sammo has spent 17 years at NTFC and we should appreciate that and not just say "He only stayed because there were no offers made for him"


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: wazzacobbler on December 14, 2010, 15:14:03 pm
Well I thank Sammo whole heartedly.

Thanks Sammo!


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Marvo on December 14, 2010, 15:52:12 pm
If Sammo had an offer for more money in a higher league as a player of course he would have moved on, and who can blame him. We all would move on if we were offered more money for the same job at another company. Sammo has spent 17 years at NTFC and we should appreciate that and not just say "He only stayed because there were no offers made for him"

I do appreciate it, I just object to the word "loyalty", that has got f*** all to do with it.

PS: I've been in the same job for 33 years. Am I loyal? Am i f***!


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Cobbler78 on December 14, 2010, 16:22:19 pm
We get your point Marvo....as you have mentioned it 20 of so times on one thread. Let the rest of us show our appreciation for Sammo.


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: DL2 on December 14, 2010, 18:13:06 pm
you've bloody over-stepped the line there Marvo.

Too bloody right there auntie  ;D  at least I am not as old as Marvo   :o   :-*


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Grove on December 14, 2010, 19:06:46 pm
Too bloody right there auntie  ;D  at least I am not as old as Marvo   :o   :-*

Really !!                                                   ;D


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Macc Cobbler on December 14, 2010, 19:19:29 pm
Congratulations Sammo ............ a great achievement.



Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Tyro on December 16, 2010, 18:17:13 pm
Marvo & dearest Linda, as the old saying goes many a good tune played on an old fiddle & now inton my forties I smile every time I please the one I love.


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: WFCobbler on December 16, 2010, 19:45:09 pm
Thanks Sammo for 17 years I've enjoyed the ride!

I like that he's totally approachable, open, funny and our young team do love him.  I'm not so sure he would have gone higher if asked, even Walsall! As he loved Duston, he did a lot in community, at schools, with his wife (I think she had a job here and would she get one elsewhere?). And he's repaid us with his devotion. He knows like any manager, he's only a few games from the sack - what a life that must be - many of us will never know. I wonder how he feels this week about Chris Hughton and big Sam?

I've worked for 4 different employers over 30 years and would love to feel I have been a loyal and hard-working to all my employers and in return they've rewarded me. I loved all my jobs, turned down promotions sometimes because I and family were happy and settled, moved on only when contacts ran out or illness - loyalty can count more important than money. I think he's built up a great relationship locally - remember he even played local league with St Margarets which helped forge relationships.



Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Marvo on December 17, 2010, 06:44:18 am
Thanks Sammo for 17 years I've enjoyed the ride!

I like that he's totally approachable, open, funny and our young team do love him.  I'm not so sure he would have gone higher if asked,


I am but you could always ask him.

Incidentally, see as you mention 17 years, do you think this is possibly the worse side we have had in all that time?


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: County Cobbler on December 17, 2010, 07:34:53 am
Not even close!
The defence is adequate.
The correct midfield is good ie Jacobs,Osman, Thornton,Davis.
The attack (apart from McKenzie) totally sh*t, so lightweight.
Some of the teams in the 70's and 80's were embarrasing.


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Marvo on December 17, 2010, 07:58:22 am
Not even close!
The defence is adequate.
The correct midfield is good ie Jacobs,Osman, Thornton,Davis.
The attack (apart from McKenzie) totally sh*t, so lightweight.
Some of the teams in the 70's and 80's were embarrasing.


We're talking 17 years, so back to 1993.

I'm guessing maths isn't your strong point.  ::)


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: DrillingCobbler on December 17, 2010, 08:22:35 am
My take on all this loyalty thing...

Sammo, in my opinion has...unlike virtually every other single player we have had over the years....never played the club about with regards to contracts. He's always signed one straight away and never ever wavered. He's never waited until his deal has ended so that he could 'check the market out' and see what other deals he may have got offered. To be fair, Gilligan and at a push Holt are the only players in our current squad that can be compared with Sammo in similar regards.

Im sure if a club had offered Sammo a deal he 'couldn't refuse' at some point he may well have left us. But he never openly looked about elsewhere and was never ever close to leaving us. At least we didn't know he was if Im wrong on that.

For me, footballs simple when it comes to the level you play at. If your good enough a club will come in for you. Sammo would have really struggled at div2/championship level, he's openly said this himself. Like pretty much every single one of our current players would. So he was happy to get his head down and play for one single club in the lower two leagues for his entire 'active' career. Whereas most players by the time they have got to 33/34 and approaching retirement have played for at least half a dozen and moved across the country in doing so. I think you call them journeymen! Bayo is a classic example of one of these!

I think Marvo's loyalty argument is pretty invalid on this occasion simply because Sammo new his limitations, settled in the area and always always always gave 100% so to ensure continued employment. It was never ever likely that he would move up to a level where he would double his salary etc. But how many of our players in the last 20 odd years can we say the same about? None I can think of. As I say apart from Gilligan and he's only 23 so its far too early to really say that. But he too is showing the same sort of loyalty that few others have ever shown.
 
Sammo is old school and sadly there are very very few of these sort of individuals around in football these days. Its all about money money money for most. Sammo is a great role model for any up and coming footballer - he well and truly maxed his potential and got the most out of his career as a player. And I have no doubt that he will always try to do the same as a manager.


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: SATURDAY BANANA on December 17, 2010, 08:31:57 am
I do appreciate it, I just object to the word "loyalty", that has got f*** all to do with it.

PS: I've been in the same job for 33 years. Am I loyal? Am i f***!

Clearly nobody has "come in for you!"... ;)


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Marvo on December 17, 2010, 08:35:45 am


I think Marvo's loyalty argument is pretty invalid on this occasion

Nothing I say is ever invalid.

How can you say someone is loyal and then in the same breathe say that had they received a better offer then they would have gone?

It's all circumstance. Sammo has been a good servant to the club and I'd even go as far to say that he is a fan. But he wasn't good enough to attract interest from a higher level and knew his own shortcomings so each time his contract came up for renewal he was sensible enough to be content with what he had. Gilligan is almost certainly in the same position.

Why can't you all celebrate his achievement of 17 years with one club which is in itself a fantastic feat without trying to add something to it which simply doesn't exist?


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: SATURDAY BANANA on December 17, 2010, 08:35:59 am
I'm flabbergasted how a simple "Well done on 17 years" thread can turn into such a battle.

Us Cobblers fans would pick holes in a £100million no strings attached cash injection to the club presented by Cheryl Cole and Angelina Jolie wearing nothing but next seasons home and away shorts... ;D


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Marvo on December 17, 2010, 08:44:17 am
I'm flabbergasted how a simple "Well done on 17 years" thread can turn into such a battle.



Now if you'd only just said that instead of adding the "loyalty" crap there wouldn't have been a problem.


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Deepcut Cobbler on December 17, 2010, 10:40:36 am
Who, over the years, has shown a measureable 'loyalty' to NTFC?

Didn't Ian Atkins turn down Wolves when he was our manager?
Unfortunately that didn't help him later down the line.  ::)

Anyone else that is measureable?



Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: Marvo on December 17, 2010, 12:38:36 pm
When I was a lot younger, I heard Paul Stratford turned down Leeds because he wanted to play for his home town club. I don't know if it was true but if it was, that surely would have been a case of loyalty.


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: DrillingCobbler on December 17, 2010, 12:42:13 pm
Peter Gleasure turned down a 175k move to Charlton. There haven't been many!


Title: Re: Sammo - 17 years!
Post by: WFCobbler on December 17, 2010, 12:43:08 pm
When I was a lot younger, I heard Paul Stratford turned down Leeds because he wanted to play for his home town club. I don't know if it was true but if it was, that surely would have been a case of loyalty.

Indeed, I think that is correct.... and is he still a STH in the West stand?


Title: Sammo
Post by: everbrite on January 03, 2011, 22:55:58 pm
We dont half fool ourselves - we all knew before the game that we would struggle with piss poor forwards. Reading all the messages on here about the game and Sammo you do wonder if our brains/reason are in the right place. I thought Lincoln played better than expected. Their defence looked as "solid" as ours!! The 1st half was dire - but we have seen worse this season. 2nd half was better but quality was lacking in our midfield. Jacobs was largely AWOL. It was ironic that Jonners who had a poor game scored a superb goal. It must be very hard for Sammo to endure such performances when the side can do better(Liverpool and Reading). Some of the criticism of Sammo is just plain daft and spiteful.I dont always agree with his tactics but not many managers would do better!
I ask you how many Div 2 clubs are financially sound and managed so that they can afford to buy a player or two. Very few in Div 1 and 2 and probably not so many in the Championship(Crystal Pal,Preston etc are in dire straits). Seems to me that quite a few of us are deluded in our opinions.  For me Cardoza has acquitted himself well over the past few months he may have made a few dodgy managerial appointments but see
Drillings excellent article.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on January 03, 2011, 23:00:52 pm
In all fairness we're only run so well to be able to sign a player due to the luck of the draw and as for signing any players well, ITSOTP.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: everbrite on January 03, 2011, 23:05:02 pm
In all fairness we're only run so well to be able to sign a player due to the luck of the draw and as for signing any players well, ITSOTP.

Sir - that is bollocks. Too most Div 2 clubs a cup run means financial survival.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on January 03, 2011, 23:11:49 pm
I ask you how many Div 2 clubs are financially sound and managed so that they can afford to buy a player or two.
You suggest here that the reason we can buy a player is because we're well run. I'm simply putting it to the jury that it all came down which ball got picked out of a bag. I've also become cynical of the club crowing about bids for players. Talk is cheap which is why I won't believe it until I see the player In The Shirt On The Pitch.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Gen.Disorda on January 03, 2011, 23:14:00 pm
Sir - that is bollocks. Too most Div 2 clubs a cup run means financial survival.

His point that the money is from the cup run is correct , and i think the second point he is making is that you cant really say we are going to actually buy a player with cash because the club said so. I don't  know if you have ever heard the term " irons in the fire" but i wouldnt keep your hopes up.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: guest49 on January 04, 2011, 08:53:45 am
"Sammo demands more from fans"

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/eng_div_3/9313698.stm


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: TbananaG on January 04, 2011, 09:05:22 am
Seeing Sammo trying to rouse the crowd yesterday got me thinking...thinking about why I was being quiet, like most of the people around me...and the simple answer was that I was actually just a bit bored. The manager's job may be to rouse the crowd, but by giving us something to cheer on the pitch, not by waiving your arms around on the touchline - that way, you risk starting to look just a bit 'Delia Smith'.

Yesterday's game was desperate, but for their and Jonno's goals. The first half was almost unwatchably dull. Give us a centre forward, some energy and creativity from the players...just a little bit of fun...and then start to have a go at the crowd if we stay quiet.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: wazzacobbler on January 04, 2011, 09:06:46 am
On Saturday, all I wanted was some fight and some meaningful efforts on goal.

I got neither.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Enya_NTFC on January 04, 2011, 10:28:58 am
Seeing Sammo trying to rouse the crowd yesterday got me thinking...thinking about why I was being quiet, like most of the people around me...and the simple answer was that I was actually just a bit bored. The manager's job may be to rouse the crowd, but by giving us something to cheer on the pitch, not by waiving your arms around on the touchline - that way, you risk starting to look just a bit 'Delia Smith'.

Yesterday's game was desperate, but for their and Jonno's goals. The first half was almost unwatchably dull. Give us a centre forward, some energy and creativity from the players...just a little bit of fun...and then start to have a go at the crowd if we stay quiet.

Trying to get a sound out of the west stand is like trying to get blood out of a stone.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Tyler on January 04, 2011, 11:39:58 am
Without the cup run we'd be short of Tozer and talk of another decent striker coming, which i doubt when we're only prepared to pay 35k for one


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: SATURDAY BANANA on January 04, 2011, 11:50:54 am
We dont half fool ourselves - we all knew before the game that we would struggle with piss poor forwards. Reading all the messages on here about the game and Sammo you do wonder if our brains/reason are in the right place. I thought Lincoln played better than expected. Their defence looked as "solid" as ours!! The 1st half was dire - but we have seen worse this season. 2nd half was better but quality was lacking in our midfield. Jacobs was largely AWOL. It was ironic that Jonners who had a poor game scored a superb goal. It must be very hard for Sammo to endure such performances when the side can do better(Liverpool and Reading). Some of the criticism of Sammo is just plain daft and spiteful.I dont always agree with his tactics but not many managers would do better!
I ask you how many Div 2 clubs are financially sound and managed so that they can afford to buy a player or two. Very few in Div 1 and 2 and probably not so many in the Championship(Crystal Pal,Preston etc are in dire straits). Seems to me that quite a few of us are deluded in our opinions.  For me Cardoza has acquitted himself well over the past few months he may have made a few dodgy managerial appointments but see
Drillings excellent article.



Go easy mate....you'll incur the full wrath of the mercahnts of dooooom!
 ;D ;D ;D


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: threeinabed on January 04, 2011, 11:55:35 am
Seeing Sammo trying to rouse the crowd yesterday got me thinking...thinking about why I was being quiet, like most of the people around me...and the simple answer was that I was actually just a bit bored. The manager's job may be to rouse the crowd, but by giving us something to cheer on the pitch, not by waiving your arms around on the touchline - that way, you risk starting to look just a bit 'Delia Smith'.

Yesterday's game was desperate, but for their and Jonno's goals. The first half was almost unwatchably dull. Give us a centre forward, some energy and creativity from the players...just a little bit of fun...and then start to have a go at the crowd if we stay quiet.

i agree with you, i found it a little bit embarassing when sammo was doing that, there was very little to cheer about during the game and his actions showed to me that he had run out of ideas of how to change it for the better and so decided it was up to the fans to do it

another desperate sign from a manager who despite the win continues to bore fans away from games.



Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: DustCobb on January 04, 2011, 11:57:01 am
I said yesterday at the game, its almost like we start the game accepting a point is a good result, no matter who we play.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: everbrite on January 04, 2011, 12:26:17 pm
You suggest here that the reason we can buy a player is because we're well run. I'm simply putting it to the jury that it all came down which ball got picked out of a bag. I've also become cynical of the club crowing about bids for players. Talk is cheap which is why I won't believe it until I see the player In The Shirt On The Pitch.

You maybe missing the point - which is that "your" club has to be in reasonable good order to buy players. Clubs with big losses generally after a cup run generally make some provision for bad debt.As you know Banks and Shareholders have a major say.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Tyler on January 04, 2011, 12:28:14 pm
I said yesterday at the game, its almost like we start the game accepting a point is a good result, no matter who we play.

Before and after the game, a point would've been awful. Although at half time i thought we'd be lucky to get a point as we were awful going forward


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: everbrite on January 04, 2011, 12:29:45 pm
i agree with you, i found it a little bit embarassing when sammo was doing that, there was very little to cheer about during the game and his actions showed to me that he had run out of ideas of how to change it for the better and so decided it was up to the fans to do it

another desperate sign from a manager who despite the win continues to bore fans away from games.



Jesus - he was trying to keep warm. Dumbo


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: County Cobbler on January 04, 2011, 12:46:42 pm
Sammo- instead of waving your arms at the crowd pre-empt the situation by being more positive in your game plan. The fact that the Cobblers are bottom of the league for the number of shots at goal proves his negativity.
Going to away games at Macclesfield (first shot on target 89 minutes), Stevenage (outplayed by 10 men) and Crewe (NO efforts on target) is the reason fans enthusiasm is so low.
Try entertaining us with attacking football.........a clue.....try playing with two effective League Two strikers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! At present we only have half a striker good enough ie McKenzie.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: EastNpton on January 04, 2011, 13:05:14 pm
I think Sammo has judges things incorrectly there. The reason why people were quiet is because the majority were pissed off with the lack of motivation amongst the players and poor tactical choices...all things he is responsible for


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Monty on January 04, 2011, 13:50:21 pm
I thought Sammo did okay considering what he had at his disposal yesterday - can't complain at the team selection (although I do admit to some trepidation when I saw the team sheet and bench) and the substitutions were logical. To me it simply highlights the lack of strength in depth and the desperate inability to attract players of any note - and the only answer to that, sadly, is the chequebook.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: TbananaG on January 04, 2011, 14:17:08 pm
Completely disagree about the tactics. We could have included Hall and played with three at the back, pushed up Johnson and Davis, left out Holt or Wedderburn, played Herbert and/or King from the start...and then at least we would have had a chance of scoring. Johnson's goal was a (fantastic) freak and most teams will be able to defend Holt's long throw - most days, that set up we had yesterday simply will not score as the front two are left isolated.

Dunn

Beckwith___Tozer___Hall

Johnson___Jacobs___Osman___Wedderburn___Davis

McKay___Herbert/King

and then at least it wouldn't have been so bloody boring and there would have been some pace and movement! Same set of players, different approach...



Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: everbrite on January 04, 2011, 14:27:02 pm
Completely disagree about the tactics. We could have included Hall and played with three at the back, pushed up Johnson and Davis, left out Holt or Wedderburn, played Herbert and/or King from the start...and then at least we would have had a chance of scoring. Johnson's goal was a (fantastic) freak and most teams will be able to defend Holt's long throw - most days, that set up we had yesterday simply will not score as the front two are left isolated.

Dunn

Beckwith___Tozer___Hall

Johnson___Jacobs___Osman___Wedderburn___Davis

McKay___Herbert/King

and then at least it wouldn't have been so bloody boring and there would have been some pace and movement! Same set of players, different approach...



Yu left out Gilligan yu rotter


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: TbananaG on January 04, 2011, 14:35:45 pm
Only because I thought he wasn't available yesterday?

The ideal team would of course be:

Gilligan

Gilligan___Gilligan___Gilligan

Gilligan___Gilligan___Gilligan's dog___Gilligan___Gilligan

Gilligan's nan___Gilligan

with Slowe to come off the bench.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Gen.Disorda on January 04, 2011, 14:36:18 pm
Recently i have found my self having more and more kick abouts in the week and have been considering wether i should start playing football on a saturday rather than going to watch the cobblers.

I found my self starring in disgust at the pie the person next to me had brought , then it dawned on me that there was a game on and i thought to my self "why am i not watching the game" then i watched for about thirty seconds and thought "ohh thats why"

This brought me to think that if a student of my age finds it hard to justify wasting not only money but my time aswel now on the cobblers. Then in the current financial climate it must be really hard for people who goes as a family to justify it , i take my hat off to anyone who does.

The whole experince for me is deterierating , the food , the drinks , the football , the atmosphere are all terrible. I really cant be botherd to make noise anymore , but i dont agree with knocking sammo for trying to do somthing about it. I do agree that without obvious progress being made else where then his arm waving does make him look abit desperate.


Personally this is what i think is needed to boost the atmosphere/experince

a signing (although this could backfire)
goals
more attacking football
better food
players interacting with fans  e.g running over to the fans who actually sing and cheer when they score


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Ted on January 04, 2011, 14:42:21 pm
Recently i have found my self having more and more kick abouts in the week and have been considering wether i should start playing football on a saturday rather than going to watch the cobblers.

I found my self starring in disgust at the pie the person next to me had brought , then it dawned on me that there was a game on and i thought to my self "why am i not watching the game" then i watched for about thirty seconds and thought "ohh thats why"

This brought me to think that if a student of my age finds it hard to justify wasting not only money but my time aswel now on the cobblers. Then in the current financial climate it must be really hard for people who goes as a family to justify it , i take my hat off to anyone who does.

The whole experince for me is deterierating , the food , the drinks , the football , the atmosphere are all terrible. I really cant be botherd to make noise anymore , but i dont agree with knocking sammo for trying to do somthing about it. I do agree that without obvious progress being made else where then his arm waving does make him look abit desperate.


Personally this is what i think is needed to boost the atmosphere/experince

a signing (although this could backfire)
goals
more attacking football
better food
players interacting with fans  e.g running over to the fans who actually sing and cheer when they score


You forgot to mention the abysmal sound system.It may be an age relaTED ear degenerative disorder, but I swear the tannoy is getting worse by the week. I couldn't hear myself think yesterday let alone have a conversation with my accompanying daughter.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: the grumpy old man on January 04, 2011, 15:21:05 pm
I have been watching the Cobblers on and off since the fifties, mostly I have to say on. I have been a season ticket holder for about the last 15-20 years and I now find that whilst I still go to all the home games (after all I have paid !), I find the excitement and enthusiam is no longer there. I do jump up and cheer when we score but that is about all at present.

Years ago once one game was finished I would be looking at the league table to see where we were and who the next oponents were and working out in my head whether we would win or not based on league position, whether they are good at home/away or whatever and then I would think about the game all week and if we were away (I rarely go to away games) I would go through hell wondering whether they were winning or losing. Of course if we won I would get a tremendous boost and if we lost my weekend would be ruined and I would keep well away form the match report.

These days I feel the same win or lose and no longer look forward to the Sixfields experience and I am even prepared to applaud an oposition goal if it is as good as Lincolns' yesterday. For what it is worth I thought Lincoln outplayed us for a good chunk of the first half.

I put down my present disinterest to the fact that we do not have a single player (apart from possibly Davies when he's on form) that can even remotely be described as exciting. I know players like Derek Asamoah and Josh Low had their critics but when they were on the pitch you always felt something 'might' happen even if invariably it didn't, but I don't get that sort of feeling about any of our current forwards. I am not saying they don't try, just that they are not very good. When is McKenzie ever fit/ when did he last score. What is the point of King/Jarvis, they are supposed to be strikers but neither of them have scored. Yes King put's himself about and he may be ok in midfield but he is not a striker.

Hopefully things will turn round and the buzz will come back but it's difficult to see how that is going to happen without a major cash investment and that is clearly not going to happen.

Of course all this could change if we get 7 on Saturday :)


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Gen.Disorda on January 04, 2011, 15:22:20 pm
The PA system is a joke but also who do they think goes to watch football ?  , i feel to have a vote to ask who like beyonce's shocking christmas song or any other of the heart FM pap that they play prior to the game.

Its asif the guy in charge of the PA thought about music just as he walked out the door , so ended up having to nick his daughters cd out of the car

The half time enteratainment is pointless aswel, you cant hear the music and if your not sat in the dugout you cant see it as they are so close together .


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Gen.Disorda on January 04, 2011, 15:29:01 pm
Quote
I put down my present disinterest to the fact that we do not have a single player (apart from possibly Davies when he's on form) that can even remotely be described as exciting. I know players like Derek Asamoah and Josh Low had their critics but when they were on the pitch you always felt something 'might' happen even if invariably it didn't, but I don't get that sort of feeling about any of our current forwards.



I totally agree with this , there wasnt once other than the johnson goal where i got that feeling inside where i thought "Hes gonna have a go"

It was asif i didnt expect us to score , or couldnt see where it would come from. I even said to the guy next to me this is going to end with us bundling it in or giving them a penalty. fair play i was wrong in the end but there wasnt alot in the game to suggest i wasnt going to be right


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: fatblokecobbler on January 04, 2011, 20:50:08 pm
I said yesterday at the game, its almost like we start the game accepting a point is a good result, no matter who we play.
Was only my 2nd game of the season yesterday and i said that we set up not to lose,we didnt set up to win.
As for the front men i feel so sorry for Mckay,he makes very good runs,but weve got
 no one with the abillity to play him the ball where he needs it.
Too many aimless high balls into a 5ft 8in striker being marked by a 6ft centre half and too many balls in the channels where he had no chance of getting it.
Took his goal well though hope it gives the lad some much needed confidence.



Title: Sammo Says....
Post by: Marvo on January 20, 2011, 11:49:05 am
Brief highlights of Sammo's latest interview:

ZOLA!
Played the club a bit, agreed to sign, met the players, then went elsewhere. Wouldn't happen in his day but now "Women wear the trousers".

TRANSFER NEWS:
No new signings before Saturday, our list of targets is now is just about exhausted. Harrad still has an offer on the table.

SQUAD FOR SATURDAY:
McKenzie and McKay both back, new signings Built and Laurent will both be in the squad, though the latter is not match fit. Sammo says of Laurent he will both frustrate and delight in equal measure.


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: DustCobb on January 20, 2011, 11:52:11 am
Brief highlights of Sammo's latest interview:


TRANSFER NEWS:
No new signings before Saturday, our list of targets is now is just about exhausted. Harrad still has an offer on the table.


Great.


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: GrangeParkCobbler on January 20, 2011, 11:57:27 am
Better start looking for some new targets then....quick!!!!  I guess he didnt have all that many "irons in the fire" after all!!


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: DustCobb on January 20, 2011, 11:58:18 am
I guess, as we all suspected, we won't get a striker in permanent now and we'll just get a crap loanee who 'tries'.


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on January 20, 2011, 11:58:55 am

No new signings before Saturday, our list of targets is now is just about exhausted.


Balls  >:(


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: Daffy Duck on January 20, 2011, 12:00:07 pm
Really looking for to Oxford now.  If we lose they will be 10 points clear of us and this season will be over.


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: DustCobb on January 20, 2011, 12:01:32 pm
this season will be over.

Bar the relegation battle..


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: Marvo on January 20, 2011, 12:01:49 pm
Look, I doubt this is the case but maybe just maybe this is a double bluff? After failing after naming our targets perhaps Sammo is doing some business on the quiet and will only let us know AFTER the player signs on the dotted line?


I'm being silly aren't I.  :-[


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: SATURDAY BANANA on January 20, 2011, 12:04:45 pm
Look, I doubt this is the case but maybe just maybe this is a double bluff? After failing after naming our targets perhaps Sammo is doing some business on the quiet and will only let us know AFTER the player signs on the dotted line?


I'm being silly aren't I.  :-[

Spot on John....damned if they tell...damned if they don't!


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: wazzacobbler on January 20, 2011, 12:07:31 pm
In a way I'm glad.

Glad that as we don't seem able to get our targets in we havent just turned to someone for the sake of it.

Sh*t loanees it is then


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: GrangeParkCobbler on January 20, 2011, 12:09:54 pm
Look, I doubt this is the case but maybe just maybe this is a double bluff? After failing after naming our targets perhaps Sammo is doing some business on the quiet and will only let us know AFTER the player signs on the dotted line?


I'm being silly aren't I.  :-[

A bit silly!! After all, they didnt "name" all their targets! Akinde and Zola were not named, Harrad was the only one who was. In this day and age someone will always find out whether they are named or not!


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: 4everdelayed on January 20, 2011, 12:10:52 pm
f**k


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: abington_cobbler on January 20, 2011, 12:11:48 pm
Look, I doubt this is the case but maybe just maybe this is a double bluff? After failing after naming our targets perhaps Sammo is doing some business on the quiet and will only let us know AFTER the player signs on the dotted line?


I'm being silly aren't I.  :-[

I was going to post the same but you beat me to it! Does that make us both silly?


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: DustCobb on January 20, 2011, 12:18:09 pm
Look, I doubt this is the case but maybe just maybe this is a double bluff? After failing after naming our targets perhaps Sammo is doing some business on the quiet and will only let us know AFTER the player signs on the dotted line?


I'm being silly aren't I.  :-[

The club haven't got that sort of cunning in their locker.


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: threeinabed on January 20, 2011, 12:18:57 pm
so as our striking options for the run in we are left with a left back, a town league player, a lightweight workhorse and an unfit goalscorer

sounds exciting


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: supajama on January 20, 2011, 12:23:54 pm
Brief highlights of Sammo's latest interview:

ZOLA!
Played the club a bit, agreed to sign, met the players, then went elsewhere. Wouldn't happen in his day but now "Women wear the trousers".

TRANSFER NEWS:
No new signings before Saturday, our list of targets is now is just about exhausted. Harrad still has an offer on the table.

SQUAD FOR SATURDAY:
McKenzie and McKay both back, new signings Built and Laurent will both be in the squad, though the latter is not match fit. Sammo says of Laurent he will both frustrate and delight in equal measure.

So, Harrad still has an offer on the table eh? Thats all well and good buy seeing as Burton have rejected our offer it's kin' irrelevant!  >:(

So Leon will lead the attack for about 60mins then be out injured for the next 3 weeks!


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on January 20, 2011, 12:25:50 pm
A bit silly!! After all, they didnt "name" all their targets! Akinde and Zola were not named, Harrad was the only one who was. In this day and age someone will always find out whether they are named or not!

Akinde and Zola were not named. That's true. However, the club chose to confirm the rumours when they could have just as easily kept it on the down low


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: DustCobb on January 20, 2011, 12:26:00 pm
Someone is talking bollocks about Harrad because according to Peschisolisoloidosildosioldo Harrad is keen on coming here.....if that was the case surely we'd just stump up the cash and get it sorted.

Maybe Marquis was right, we just go after people as a gesture knowing we won't ever go through with it.


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on January 20, 2011, 12:29:58 pm
Someone is talking bollocks about Harrad because according to Peschisolisoloidosildosioldo Harrad is keen on coming here.....if that was the case surely we'd just stump up the cash and get it sorted.

Maybe Marquis was right, we just go after people as a gesture knowing we won't ever go through with it.

He would say that though wouldn't he. He wants to start a bidding war. By saying that it'll give other interested clubs a kick up the backside to make a bid. Harrad - no chance!



Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: DustCobb on January 20, 2011, 12:31:59 pm
Yeh good point, try and panic others into thinking the Harrad deal is close to going through so they make bids for him.


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: Mark-JB on January 20, 2011, 12:36:04 pm
I for one will wait for the 1st February before I start slating the club.


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: GrangeParkCobbler on January 20, 2011, 12:50:52 pm
Brief highlights of Sammo's latest interview:

SQUAD FOR SATURDAY:
McKenzie and McKay both back, new signings Built and Laurent will both be in the squad, though the latter is not match fit. Sammo says of Laurent he will both frustrate and delight in equal measure.

isnt that "arse about face"??? McKenzie surely isnt match fit as hes hardly played any matches! Likewise Built who has played no matches! At least Laurent has been playing matches, albeit in French League Division 7 or wherever he came from!


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: MK_Cobbler on January 20, 2011, 13:00:16 pm
What happened to the list Cardoza said we had yesterday?


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on January 20, 2011, 13:10:36 pm
What happened to the list Cardoza said we had yesterday?

One signed for Northampton Spencer and the other for Gregory Celtic  ;D


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: 4everdelayed on January 20, 2011, 14:31:11 pm
I'm going to get some criticism here, but IF...and that's a big IF, Harrad signed, I'm not sure I would actually be that chuffed. He's making us look rather desperate, which at this precise moment we are. I'm not sure I want a player here that doesn't want to be here.

Get out.


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: Daffy Duck on January 20, 2011, 15:18:37 pm
Look, I doubt this is the case but maybe just maybe this is a double bluff? After failing after naming our targets perhaps Sammo is doing some business on the quiet and will only let us know AFTER the player signs on the dotted line?


I'm being silly aren't I.  :-[
Not silly after all.
Oh Sammo, you little teaser.


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on January 20, 2011, 15:21:29 pm
Get out.

I'm allowed to change my mind  ;D


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: Mark-JB on January 20, 2011, 16:44:06 pm
I for one will wait for the 1st February before I start slating the club.

 8) :afro


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: lurker on January 20, 2011, 17:05:10 pm
What a load of s*** on this thread. Eh?


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: SATURDAY BANANA on January 20, 2011, 17:56:45 pm
I don't agree.

You don't say? ;D


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on January 20, 2011, 17:58:38 pm
You don't say? ;D

You washed your hands yet Banana?  ;D


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on January 20, 2011, 18:02:29 pm
What a load of sh*t on this thread. Eh?

Eh?


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: lurker on January 20, 2011, 18:06:16 pm
Eh?

If you cannot understand my post, read back over the others on this thread. You know, we pretend to bid, only bid for ones that won't come. That sort of s***. Yeah?


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: Tyler on January 20, 2011, 18:08:39 pm
If you cannot understand my post, read back over the others on this thread. You know, we pretend to bid, only bid for ones that won't come. That sort of s***. Yeah?

I'm fairly certain people weren't being entirely 100% serious with that claim


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: Iest_ntfc on January 20, 2011, 18:09:35 pm
Look, I doubt this is the case but maybe just maybe this is a double bluff? After failing after naming our targets perhaps Sammo is doing some business on the quiet and will only let us know AFTER the player signs on the dotted line?


I'm being silly aren't I.  :-[

The club haven't got that sort of cunning in their locker.

Think they must have found some cunning at the back of the locker  ;D


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on January 20, 2011, 18:13:19 pm
If you cannot understand my post, read back over the others on this thread. You know, we pretend to bid, only bid for ones that won't come. That sort of sh*t. Yeah?

I was joking Lurker. Be young, be foolish and be happy  ;)


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: Grove on January 20, 2011, 18:24:04 pm
I was joking Lurker. Be young, be foolish and be happy  ;)
Years on here says hes neither young nor happy


Title: Re: Sammo Says....
Post by: DustCobb on January 20, 2011, 19:36:07 pm
Think they must have found some cunning at the back of the locker  ;D


Worlds greatest locker clearly resides at Sixfields!


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on February 19, 2011, 17:17:06 pm
Whilst I have stuck by Sammo, through gritted teeth in recent weeks, I have now totally lost faith in his ability to take the club forward. Despite the victories against Oxford and Crewe, performances have got worse.

Can the Sammo "can do no wrong club" please give me a reason for keeping faith, because I've genuinely run out of reasons/answers?


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: clarkeysntfc on February 19, 2011, 17:27:09 pm
I tend to agree but the most important person (DC) won't do anything.

Personally I'd give him until the end of the season.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: County Cobbler on February 19, 2011, 18:35:59 pm
Are we improving?........................NO
Who is paid to improve the side?.....................SAMMO!


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: HertsCobbler on February 19, 2011, 18:40:02 pm
Sammo would make Lionel Messi look League One at best.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Biscuit Barrel on February 19, 2011, 18:47:35 pm
I'm afraid we're rudderless............absolutely RUDDERLESS


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: DustCobb on February 19, 2011, 18:55:03 pm
Sammo Out.

No doubt about it, it has been glaringly obvious he has no tactical nous for aaaaages.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Grove on February 19, 2011, 19:54:25 pm
I still love Sammo............ he da man............   :afro

We can all pass  an emotional judgement sitting at home not seeing the s*** served up  ;D


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on February 19, 2011, 20:50:02 pm
That's exactly the response I was expecting. Nobody has a good reason for him remaining in the job. Nobody has answered my question. I still had faith at half time today. However, during Aldershot's dominant spell I was asked why I still stand by Sammo. I didn't have an answer. By the looks of it, neither do any of you  ???


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Marvo on February 19, 2011, 20:54:42 pm
;D ;D ;D
How very dare you......... I was there in spirit..


You need a bottle of that just to be able to watch the lads at the minute.

PS: Armchair, wait for Loinda to come on, she'll convince you Sammo is the man for the job.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Coolcat on February 19, 2011, 21:03:55 pm
Is it really that McKenzie can't last a whole game? Don't know what the players think when Sammo seems to close up shop at 4.15pm every Sat..Cobblers folded 2nd half...Sammo out? Didn't want Sammo in..in the first place! ::)


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Daffy Duck on February 19, 2011, 21:23:38 pm
It is pointless saying "Sammo out" that isn't going to happen for another year; I was going to say the best thing we can do is offer advice to him regarding team selection and tactics but I think he is too stubborn to listen to advice, so that would be pointless.

I've had a season ticket most seasons for 30 years, but i can honestly say that if we don't make the playoffs and Sammo is still the manager next season then I won't renew my ticket.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on February 19, 2011, 21:27:16 pm
Come on Daffy, do you honestly think Sammo will be sitting there tonight thinking, "I'll log onto the Hotel End website, see what tactical advice the supporters have got for me"  ::)


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: DustCobb on February 19, 2011, 21:28:25 pm
I decided after today i won't be renewing my season ticket.

Couldn't buy it by the current deadline anyway so i just won't renew it.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Ted on February 19, 2011, 21:30:46 pm

I've had a season ticket most seasons for 30 years, but i can honestly say that if we don't make the playoffs and Sammo is still the manager next season then I won't renew my ticket.

Yep, same here. I accept that you're not going to feel adequately entertained every home, but on the whole the performances this season have been dire.Unless things change drastically between now and the end of the season, I'm going to pick and choose the odd game to attend.The rest of my life is too precious to voluntarily partake in a pastime that makes me miserable.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Daffy Duck on February 19, 2011, 21:31:01 pm
Come on Daffy, do you honestly think Sammo will be sitting there tonight thinking, "I'll log onto the Hotel End website, see what tactical advice the supporters have got for me"  ::)
No of course not, I meant as supporters of the club we could offer advice not on this silly forum.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on February 19, 2011, 21:31:49 pm
I decided after today i won't be renewing my season ticket.

Couldn't buy it by the current deadline anyway so i just won't renew it.

My Mrs bought me mine last week for my 30th. My old man said I'd mentioned that I may get one on the day we signed Harrad  :(

I've got a top poker face  >:D


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Marvo on February 19, 2011, 21:36:14 pm
No, I'm not getting one either, the fun has gone and time is a little bit more precious as you get older so you are averse to wasting it. Yes, most of the time has been a waste this season (and the two before).

I'll be at Hereford though.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on February 19, 2011, 21:39:01 pm
No, I'm not getting one either, the fun has gone and time is a little bit more precious as you get older so you are averse to wasting it. Yes, most of the time has been a waste this season (and the two before).



No need to rub it in. I feel totally disempowered  ;D


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: NTFC Nut on February 19, 2011, 21:49:44 pm
At least we're not going to get relegated this season, and back in October that looked like it was on the cards. At least we're now 5 unbeaten, even if 4 of those have been draws against average sides. At least we've got two genuine goalscorers in the side, for the first time in ages, even if they're a little too similar in style for my liking. At least the budget is apparently going up next season, according to a man who has already brought us enough false dawns to last a lifetime. Those things aside, I'm struggling for reasons to be cheerful at the moment. I'm not used to seeing us sit and stagnate in the middle of the League Two table and I don't want to become used to it either. Whether the problem is Sammo, the players, or something deeper, the fun has been sapped out of supporting the Cobblers. It's not the same Cobblers I know and love.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on February 19, 2011, 22:02:32 pm
At least we're not going to get relegated this season, and back in October that looked like it was on the cards. At least we're now 5 unbeaten, even if 4 of those have been draws against average sides. At least we've got two genuine goalscorers in the side, for the first time in ages, even if they're a little too similar in style for my liking. At least the budget is apparently going up next season, according to a man who has already brought us enough false dawns to last a lifetime. Those things aside, I'm struggling for reasons to be cheerful at the moment. I'm not used to seeing us sit and stagnate in the middle of the League Two table and I don't want to become used to it either. Whether the problem is Sammo, the players, or something deeper, the fun has been sapped out of supporting the Cobblers. It's not the same Cobblers I know and love.

But what I asked is, can someone give me a reason to keep faith in Sammo. Nobody has. The trouble is, every supporter I spoke to today says pretty much the same thing. It's either " I hope he proves me wrong" or "I'd love to see him turn it around" or "maybe if he adds a couple more players in the Summer". Nobody has a valid reason. That is why I've lost faith. As much as I hate saying it, the Ted's and his fellow doubters are looking as though they were right all along...If he proves me wrong with 10 wins on the bounce then great, but it's not going to happen is it?! :'(


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: NTFC Nut on February 19, 2011, 22:07:30 pm
I think Sammo's building a talented young team here who are only going to get better with experience. But that team needs to be kept together and there are still a couple of missing jigsaw pieces that need to be uncovered, before we can say "this is a set-up that can get us promoted". We will be stronger next season for the trials and tribulations of this season. I know that sounds like a load of cliche-ridden claptrap but all those cliches are relevant here imo.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Insider on February 19, 2011, 22:10:24 pm
We can always rely on Nut for a pair of rose tinted specs.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on February 19, 2011, 22:14:05 pm
I think Sammo's building a talented young team here who are only going to get better with experience. But that team needs to be kept together and there are still a couple of missing jigsaw pieces that need to be uncovered, before we can say "this is a set-up that can get us promoted". We will be stronger next season for the trials and tribulations of this season. I know that sounds like a load of cliche-ridden claptrap but all those cliches are relevant here imo.

It's your opinion and you're welcome to it Nut. Unfortunately I think you're a little deluded as I once was. He may well have put together a decent young team, but without the tactical nous to add to the talented young squad, we'll never see any improvement


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Tyler on February 19, 2011, 22:21:09 pm
We can always rely on Nut for a pair of rose tinted specs.

In this case, agreed. How anyone can shed any sort of positive light after today is beyond belief


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: clarkeysntfc on February 19, 2011, 22:37:25 pm
Nothing wrong with the squad of players we have, as on the whole they're good enough for the top 7 in this division.

It's how they're being deployed and managed that's so obviously the issue.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: NTFC Nut on February 19, 2011, 22:39:51 pm
In this case, agreed. How anyone can shed any sort of positive light after today is beyond belief

I'm partly playing Devil's Advocate and finding reasons to stick up for Sammo because I want to. If you read my previous post on this thread and a couple of other's I've made tonight, I'm anthing but happy about what we all witnessed today.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Enya_NTFC on February 19, 2011, 23:38:16 pm
In this case, agreed. How anyone can shed any sort of positive light after today is beyond belief

How about..

Well at least we didn't lose...  ;D


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: DustCobb on February 20, 2011, 07:43:59 am
He may well have put together a decent young team, but without the tactical nous to add to the talented young squad, we'll never see any improvement

+1


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: bungle on February 20, 2011, 07:59:30 am
Once again: it's the manager stoopid!

The Cardoza's managerial appointments have shown a chronic lack of judgement and that's why we are where we are. To their credit they made money available to strengthen the team, but I would far rather they had spent the Harrad/Laurent money on paying off Sammo and Crosby and appointing a proper manager with a genuine track-record of success in the lower leagues. 


Good management is what makes the difference at this level.



Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Grove on February 20, 2011, 10:20:12 am
+1

Agree, i know the money was different, but it is a copy of the Wilko era, quality players,lack of results.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Macc Cobbler on February 20, 2011, 14:08:14 pm
No, I'm not getting one either, the fun has gone and time is a little bit more precious as you get older so you are averse to wasting it. Yes, most of the time has been a waste this season (and the two before).

I'll be at Hereford though.

See you there  :)

Probably low season ticket sales will be the driver for the Cardoza's to replace Sammo.

For me Sammo's main challenge is to get the players playing to their full potential over the rest of the season. I seriously believe that we have the makings of a really good team, but for whatever reason it is not working on the pitch. Sammo needs to get this sorted, and quick !



Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: EastNpton on February 20, 2011, 14:45:10 pm
We've been having the same argument for years. Nothing is going to change untill there are new owners of the club.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Daffy Duck on February 20, 2011, 16:00:12 pm
We've been having the same argument for years. Nothing is going to change untill there are new owners of the club.
What a load of rubbish. Unless you have a few million quid you don't mind throwing away at a go nowhere league 2 team how can you begin to have a go at DC.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Tyler on February 20, 2011, 16:16:54 pm
What a load of rubbish. Unless you have a few million quid you don't mind throwing away at a go nowhere league 2 team how can you begin to have a go at DC.

That in itself is s***. Most of the people here aren't good enough to be professional footballers, does that mean they can't criticise the players?


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: cricketside on February 20, 2011, 16:18:56 pm
We've been having the same argument for years. Nothing is going to change untill there are new owners of the club.

I think we all know that nothing is going to change at NTFC untill there is a change of ownership with a brand new vision.

Bit of an echo in here. Yeah?


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: guest49 on February 20, 2011, 16:33:57 pm
It is embarrassing how fickle our fans are, yes worse than most. A few weeks ago some were claiming they would never go again, then there was OTT optimism and expectation, now they are reaching for the pills again. Just accept that it is your fault for having a s*** life and you can stop blaming everything from the food to the stewards. You'll feel better for it and move on. ;D   
     


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on February 20, 2011, 16:34:39 pm
We've been having the same argument for years. Nothing is going to change untill there are new owners of the club.

I don't agree in the slightest. Where's the queue of potential buyers? I've said it so many times and know it's a cliche, but BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Grove on February 20, 2011, 17:00:00 pm
I don't agree in the slightest. Where's the queue of potential buyers? I've said it so many times and know it's a cliche, but BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR

You just never know though do you. if the club was put up for sale at a price not too high (cardoza not wanting his 7plus million back ) then you may just get interest, Cardoza Ellis and co came in didnt they.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: cricketside on February 20, 2011, 17:08:59 pm
...if the club was put up for sale at a price not too high (cardoza not wanting his 7plus million back )

Now it's reasonably financially stable it's very unlikely he would sell cheaply. And, of course, why should he? Business people don't do things like that, do they?


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on February 20, 2011, 17:21:44 pm
You just never know though do you. if the club was put up for sale at a price not too high (cardoza not wanting his 7plus million back ) then you may just get interest, Cardoza Ellis and co came in didnt they.

Yes they did, and if it wasn't for the Cardoza's, Ellis would have had us in the Non-League years ago. You will also remember the the potential takeovers by Fashanu and Di Stefano. My biggest worry is that some crook similar to these two will buy the club. I know Cardoza has made mistakes but some issues are out of his hands, such as the stadium. That has clearly held us back. Yes, he's made some dreadful managerial appointments but I don't think he's a bad chairman/owner compared to a lot of others. Look what happened to Chester City and more recently Mansfield. Yes, Cardoza has made mistakes but I trust him to keep the club in the black, and I honestly think he has the best interests of the club at heart.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: wrigleys on February 20, 2011, 17:23:44 pm
I don't agree in the slightest. Where's the queue of potential buyers? I've said it so many times and know it's a cliche, but BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR

+1, I think is the parlance


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: wrigleys on February 20, 2011, 17:25:46 pm
Yes they did, and if it wasn't for the Cardoza's, Ellis would have had us in the Non-League years ago. You will also remember the the potential takeovers by Fashanu and Di Stefano. My biggest worry is that some crook similar to these two will buy the club. I know Cardoza has made mistakes but some issues are out of his hands, such as the stadium. That has clearly held us back. Yes, he's made some dreadful managerial appointments but I don't think he's a bad chairman/owner compared to a lot of others. Look what happened to Chester City and more recently Mansfield. Yes, Cardoza has made mistakes but I trust him to keep the club in the black, and I honestly think he has the best interests of the club at heart.

Hmm - not sure he has the best interests of the club at heart but I do trust him to keep the club in the black


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Ted on February 20, 2011, 17:36:46 pm
...if the club was put up for sale at a price not too high (cardoza not wanting his 7plus million back )

Now it's reasonably financially stable it's very unlikely he would sell cheaply. And, of course, why should he? Business people don't do things like that, do they?

That all depends on whether the businessman in question can see any progressive future for the business. As the business in question is a Football Club, it is unique, and cannot compare with, let's say, a construction company.Owning and running  a Football Club does not entail sitting by the telephone waiting for orders/jobs to come in, neither does it rely on sales people canvasing to sell the product. The success of a Football club relies almost entirely on a seasonal offering of a product that hopefully produces good results and increases income.

The Cardozas have been content to try to stand still for a number of years, and inevitably  attendances and subsequent income has declined.The recent accounts show that the club is steady and financially stable in the short term, but we all know that in the football industy things can change dramatically and quickly.The Cardozas are no mugs, and I'm sure that they would still accept a resonable offer for others to take over the club.However, I also believe that they have enough emotion tie in with the club not to let it deteriorate too drastically ( lose league status) neither would they sell to any suspect individual or party.

In a nutshell ,If the time came when the present owners were unable to protect the club from falling any further, I do believe that they'd sell and forfeit much of the loan made to the club.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: bungle on February 20, 2011, 17:42:27 pm
Personally, I'm very happy with DC's performance in almost every area apart from managerial appointments. He's spent money on players, improved the youth system (naysayers will disagree with this, but look at the evidence: Jacobs, Chambers, Bunn, youngsters to Premier sides etc versus Lee Colin and Andy Morrow - coincidence?) and kept the club on a relatively even financial keel.

However, his managerial appointments have been consistently rushed, ill-considered and unsuccessful.  As many have said if only we could have got a Ronnie Moore or Steve Tilson in we might have made real progress this season.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: guest216 on February 20, 2011, 18:36:33 pm
Personally, I'm very happy with DC's performance in almost every area apart from managerial appointments. He's spent money on players, improved the youth system (naysayers will disagree with this, but look at the evidence: Jacobs, Chambers, Bunn, youngsters to Premier sides etc versus Lee Colin and Andy Morrow - coincidence?) and kept the club on a relatively even financial keel.

However, his managerial appointments have been consistently rushed, ill-considered and unsuccessful.  As many have said if only we could have got a Ronnie Moore or Steve Tilson in we might have made real progress this season.

100% agree with all of that.

Some of you are delusional if you think a ty**** is likely to swoop in and lift us out of the basement division. At the moment we are very lucky to have someone that's relatively willing to spend, actually listens to the fans (i.e. the retro kit votes and the reverting to the old badge), and most importantly isn't someone who'll bleed the club to it's detriment for their own financial gain.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: DustCobb on February 20, 2011, 18:37:21 pm
Personally, I'm very happy with DC's performance in almost every area apart from managerial appointments. He's spent money on players, improved the youth system (naysayers will disagree with this, but look at the evidence: Jacobs, Chambers, Bunn, youngsters to Premier sides etc versus Lee Colin and Andy Morrow - coincidence?) and kept the club on a relatively even financial keel.

However, his managerial appointments have been consistently rushed, ill-considered and unsuccessful.  As many have said if only we could have got a Ronnie Moore or Steve Tilson in we might have made real progress this season.

Fully agree.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: bungle on February 20, 2011, 18:57:27 pm
It's just so frustrating. The vast majority of us on here could see that Sammo was the wrong man for the job right from day one.
He had a disastrous spell as caretaker manager, so why on earth was he given the job?

TFAMH will say that it was purely a cost-cutting exercise, with DC appointing someone already on the payroll just as he did with Wilkinson.
However, DC has proved very recently that he's prepared to put money in to strengthen the team, offering 'championship wages' plus a transfer fee to entice Harrad. Why oh why won't he spend the money where it would really make a difference: recruiting an experienced manager with a proven track-record in the lower leagues.

   


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Insider on February 20, 2011, 19:18:17 pm
actually listens to the fans (i.e. the retro kit votes and the reverting to the old badge

Really?  And who was it who unilaterally introduced the new badge in the first place?


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: DrillingCobbler on February 20, 2011, 19:21:45 pm
Well I was totally against the appointment when it was made as my 'new broom' thread testified. However, because of his well documented 'status' within the club I have tried my hardest to back him at all times. I have never really believed the appointment would be a success, but hoped it would.

It may be worth noting as well that people are not even able to 'let it out' during games because its Sammo in charge. Its terribly frustrating, if Barnwell had made those changes yesterday the ground would have gone mad. And as for that triple change on Tuesday...

People are just quietly disappearing and its the worst we've been since the move to Sixfield's, apart from the latter games of Barnwell's reign of course. But hey ho, we are where we are and I guess little would be achieved by sacking him at this moment in time. And I didn't say that in the car on the way home after the game! But the longer it goes on, the more painful it will get. He's got over 2 years left on his contract and so has Crosby. And whilst there is still a chance that he can succeed I would think it unlikely that DC will act.

In my opinion, It was a truly terrible appointment and for me the situation we are now in was all very predictable. But a lot of people on this site wanted him in the job so like everything football, its a game of varying opinions. I wanted Calderwood sacked after Southend (well before then to be fair!) yet he took us up the following season. Fingers crossed we will witness a small miracle and the team turns the corner quickly.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: EastNpton on February 20, 2011, 20:19:15 pm
I have nothing against the Cardozas but I think given the money they have pumped into the club (7million and counting) their teams haven't performed well enough.

We had the Terry Fenwick debacle, we had the Gray relegation with all the dressing room divides and bullsh*t and now we have the Sammo era that has been defined (this season) by the bust up at Torquay, rank ill discipline and sendings off (thrashed at Barnet) and now a white elephant striker (Harrad) who makes Torres look like Mr Happy.

Perhaps it's happened because David Cardoza is the opposite of an interfering chairman. perhaps giving his managers too much freedom and then they fail to produce the goods? Whatever the case I don't think you can continually criticize managers without looking slightly higher. Whatever the case, I won't be watching it any more. Best of luck to the die hards!





Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: SteveRiches on February 20, 2011, 21:17:55 pm
I think it matters little at our level who owns a club or who is the manager insofar as message boards like this are concerned because whoever it is they will eventually be pulled to shreds here and on the other boards. That's the general trend wherever you look. That's not to say that criticism is wrong, nor that for a period of time there won't be a honeymoon period of acceptance where fans are briefly optimistic/happy, but it always comes back to the same rabid dis-satisfaction eventually. That's life, that's human nature!


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Insider on February 20, 2011, 21:45:23 pm
I think it matters little at our level who owns a club or who is the manager insofar as message boards like this are concerned because whoever it is they will eventually be pulled to shreds here and on the other boards. That's the general trend wherever you look. That's not to say that criticism is wrong, nor that for a period of time there won't be a honeymoon period of acceptance where fans are briefly optimistic/happy, but it always comes back to the same rabid dis-satisfaction eventually. That's life, that's human nature!

You need to get out more and go and watch football at the Prem level.  Every little mistake even in the context of a masterclass seems to get slaughtered, be it at Arsenal, Chelsea, Man Utd, Villa or Liverpool.  The most recent game I went to was Arsenal v Partisan Belgrade and it seemed to me that the majority (and I stress majority) seemed to crucify the players and Arsene Wenger.  Arshavin had a poor game, but every touch was greeted with an audible groan and howls at Wenger.  I actually think that as a support base we're comparatively tame - go and listen to some of the Luton fans slagging off Richard Money even now.  I remember Burnley fans issuing death threats against Stan Ternent and that hasn't been unique to them.  We are tame.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Ted on February 20, 2011, 21:56:45 pm
You need to get out more and go and watch football at the Prem level.  Every little mistake even in the context of a masterclass seems to get slaughtered, be it at Arsenal, Chelsea, Man Utd, Villa or Liverpool.  The most recent game I went to was Arsenal v Partisan Belgrade and it seemed to me that the majority (and I stress majority) seemed to crucify the players and Arsene Wenger.  Arshavin had a poor game, but every touch was greeted with an audible groan and howls at Wenger.  I actually think that as a support base we're comparatively tame - go and listen to some of the Luton fans slagging off Richard Money even now.  I remember Burnley fans issuing death threats against Stan Ternent and that hasn't been unique to them.  We are tame.

Good post ! I visit many messageboards of other clubs and I can tell you that the criticism that our club gets is  powder puff to some of the vitriol
that's aimed at some chairmen, players and managers, and the higher you go up the leagues the more abusive it becomes .Mind you, I'm disappoinTED nobody's yet put Sammo up for sale on ebay.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Macc Cobbler on February 20, 2011, 22:11:05 pm
I am not going to join the "Sammo out" bandwagon. This season we have seen the ups of Liverpool and the downs of Barnet and everything inbetween.
It is only one week ago that I watched some of the best football for a long time at Port Vale for the first twenty five minutes, but then I watched the performances against Morecambe and to a lesser extent Aldershot. There is no denying that we have missed the presence of Osman,who has been immense all season, in the last couple of games
Yes, Sammo has made mistakes ...... but the players have let themselves and us down too.
Yes, Sammo is ultimately responsible, but I want the players to stand up and be counted over the coming weeks, starting on Tuesday at Hereford !!


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Marvo on February 20, 2011, 22:16:12 pm
You're right about this being a fairly limp board compared with many, I'm training a guy at work from Derby and he has been telling me how volatile their messageboard is at the moment with the fans split down the middle blaming either manager Nigel Clough or the American owners. He feels that if it was naybody else other than the son of a Derby Legend then Clough would have been thrown to the lions ages ago. Sounds familiar.

Anyway, although it appears Sammo's job safe, if we lose or even draw away to Hereford on Tuesday night (they've only won twice at home this season) he'll once again have a worse points taken from those on offer record than Ian Atkins which for me is always the benchmark. You only have to look at the names just below them, Mike Keen, Tom Smith, Tony Marchi, Theo Foley and John Petts to realise it's hardly illustrious company. As I'm going, here's hoping that Hereford proves to be the turning point.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: mbcobbler on February 22, 2011, 16:02:30 pm
Having just read the comments by Sammo in the Chron im not sure what planet he is on?

“The fact that we’re on an unbeaten run hides quite a few things,” said Sampson.

“Because we’re definitely in a bad run of form, it’s just that the draws are masking the problems.


In what way are the draws masking the problems? The problems are there for every man and his dog to see. It really is worrying when he makes comments like this.



Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Son Of Geoff on February 22, 2011, 16:37:51 pm
I can't see what's wrong with those comments. He's admitting that the draws make things look better than they are. I'd rather that than him not realising we're s***.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: abington_cobbler on February 22, 2011, 16:53:01 pm
I'm with Son of Geoff on this. Sammo is clearly saying what most Cobblers fans are thinking ie. We may be on an unbeaten run but we have been lucky not to lose some of the games that ended in a draw.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: mbcobbler on February 22, 2011, 17:02:45 pm
ok maybe it's just me. It's just the comment about the draws are masking the problems. Because they aren't being masked by draws because no one is happy with these draws.

Anyway il leave it at that, lets hope for a result tonight.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on February 22, 2011, 21:06:20 pm
After listening to Sammo during his post match interview, for some reason my faith has been somewhat restored. A young team that's still learning. Not far from being a good side.

Sammo in!


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Ted on February 22, 2011, 21:08:07 pm
After listening to Sammo during his post match interview, for some reason my faith has been somewhat restored. A young team that's still learning. Not far from being a good side.

Sammo in!

I, for once, do agree with.We are not far off from being a good side.However, I just don't have faith in Sammo to be able push us on.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on February 22, 2011, 21:16:30 pm
I, for once, do agree with.We are not far off from being a good side.However, I just don't have faith in Sammo to be able push us on.

Well Ted, my life has been fulfilled  ;)


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Ted on February 22, 2011, 21:19:28 pm
Well Ted, my life has been fulfilled  ;)

Sarky sod !


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: northerncobbler on February 22, 2011, 21:23:46 pm
A young squad of which two are on loan, Jacobs will be off soon as he won't fancy a long stay in league 2 Dunn gets routinely blamed for everything and many want replaces, Herbert, Harris etc don't get a look in even now.

I may be being pessimistic but this isn't a young squad for our future because they are not gelling into one side and will be quickly split up


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on February 22, 2011, 21:26:58 pm
Sarky sod !

 ;D


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on February 22, 2011, 21:29:13 pm
A young squad of which two are on loan, Jacobs will be off soon as he won't fancy a long stay in league 2 Dunn gets routinely blamed for everything and many want replaces, Herbert, Harris etc don't get a look in even now.

I may be being pessimistic but this isn't a young squad for our future because they are not gelling into one side and will be quickly split up

Probably, but I'm going to bed optimistic tonight. Makes a change. After all, I'm stuck with a season ticket next year thanks to my ever thoughtful wife. How I love her  ;)


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: SATURDAY BANANA on February 22, 2011, 21:48:12 pm
I will re-iterate my points from earlier.
Write this season off as a training exercise.... then look forward to glory from August.
Football is cyclical (excuse any spelling errors)....
It's our time again next season...


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Ted on February 22, 2011, 21:50:00 pm
I will re-iterate my points from earlier.
Write this season off as a training exercise.... then look forward to glory from August.
Football is cyclical (excuse any spelling errors)....
It's our time again next season...

All the best players will be going to Crawley next season.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: northerncobbler on February 22, 2011, 21:56:17 pm
 :'(Next season will be like this and last, we will start slow as we will have a high squad turnover and new players will take time to settle in,



Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: ntfc_dan on February 22, 2011, 22:17:56 pm
If he didnt have the club legend status, would he have a job? answer NO!


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Marvo on February 22, 2011, 22:21:47 pm
These players aren't playing for Sammo, they have no respect for him or his sidekick Crosby. We aint going anywhere, this year or anytime soon. If you think this is a promotion squad you're deluded. Flattered to deceive sums is up nicely.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: ntfc_dan on February 24, 2011, 20:57:36 pm
i've had a few days to think about this, is sammo really the man for the job? not for me. we all say he is still learning etc i appreciate that he is a legend, but he is taking us one direction and thats backwards. since he has been incharge, what has he done?

1. Bottle last seasons promotion/play-off push.
2. Beat Liverpool (Although a great and unforgetable night, possibly one of the worst things to happen this season, yes it brought the club some much needed money, but its made the players complacent etc.)
3. Sign a proper striker, Harrad(although not performing yet)
4. Brought Walker back.
5. Got Jacobs on a longer contract.

Other than that, can anyone name anything?

I like the comments on one of the other posts, Let sammo finish the season whilst a new manager is prepared, scouts about etc for next season. I know this is unlikely but it is a good idea.

Maybe he could go with his head held high, get some experience and then return once a success, and learn how to be a manager?!

Go easy on me for this comments! ha


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: CobblerForever on February 24, 2011, 23:47:36 pm
My view (which I know is not in line with most of the comments to date) is as follows;

1. Post the January transfer window Sammo now has a squad more in line with his wishes - some players have left (or have been given clear indications that they are not in his plans for the future) whilst several have been acquired or signed longer term contracts and several are on loan and may possibly be with us next season (pending whether we wish to continue with their services and they are prepared to sign for us).

2. We now need a spell where the team is made up of the majority of the generally agreed best set of players available to us (which certainly includes Osman, Harrad and an in form Davis playing at Left Back). We will then be able to assess the true potential of the side Sammo has put together.

3. If the side in 2 above settles down and starts to both impress and win the greater part of the remaining games I say we leave it to Sammo to strengthen the squad further in the Summer for a significant push for automatic promotion next season. Players out of contract we wish to remain will be more likely to sign on again if the side appears to be going in the right direction and they are offered terms that they are unlikely to improve upon elsewhere.

If the team does not improve clearly DC has to consider his options.

There is still an outside chance of threatening to get in the play offs. You never know.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: jayntfc on February 25, 2011, 01:08:35 am
3. If the side in 2 above settles down and starts to both impress and win the greater part of the remaining games I say we leave it to Sammo to strengthen the squad further in the Summer for a significant push for automatic promotion next season. Players out of contract we wish to remain will be more likely to sign on again if the side appears to be going in the right direction and they are offered terms that they are unlikely to improve upon elsewhere.

If the team does not improve clearly DC has to consider his options.


There is still an outside chance of threatening to get in the play offs. You never know.

We left it to Sammo to improve the squad last summer, and the team hasn't improved. Time to consider the options?


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: CobblerForever on February 25, 2011, 01:38:41 am
We left it to Sammo to improve the squad last summer, and the team hasn't improved. Time to consider the options?

I understand and to a degree agree with your point but he was constrained by both a much tighter budget than the previous season and players on good contracts he had to retain unless offers were made for them from other clubs (which they weren't). The early season preference for Guinan over Purcell does seem baffling in this context.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Ted on February 26, 2011, 12:40:57 pm
I've very recently initiaTED a substantial sponsorship package through NTFC for one of my business interests, and I really have to commend those from the club involved for their conscientiousness and attenton to detail.I have been informed that substantial interest from many companies has been attained, with NTFC even acquiring sponsorship from disatisfied previous patrons of the Saints.This re-enforces my perception that great strides are being taken in respect of the off the field marketing and promotion of the club. However,there is a caveat here that could jeopardise all of the good work that is being undertaken.

 No matter what goes on beihind the scenes, it is the on the pitch performance that dictates the progression, or recession, of the business in question. It is therefore essential for the good of the club that the team management produce a successful side to at least match the success of the off the field activities.So far this season this hasn't happened, and it's an extremely worrying situation for all those with the club at heart.If during this window of opportunity there seems little likelihood of recognised progression, then serious steps have to be taken. Under no circumstances must sentimentality hinder progress !


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Marvo on February 26, 2011, 12:44:01 pm
I'm still confused how Gray was so well supported for failing. Yet Sammo who has half the budget is failing....  ::)

I'm sure that some on here are convinced that since the chairman has gone on a mad 30k spending spree, that we have a right to assume the play offs are the minimum expected.

We are Northampton Town. When in League 2, we do assume the play-offs are the minimum (and so they should be), whether any money has been spent or not!

As for Gray, he was s***e!


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: northerncobbler on February 26, 2011, 13:15:34 pm
I see Bradford have acted this week and Taylor will leave after today's match, Bradford are a club in a very similar place as ours, they are massively underachieving in the league, they are reasonably well run in a business sense, the players are failing to play for the manager (all of these apply to our club) yet we still have not acted even thought its apparent to so many of us that there is now only one choice.

I feel  we need to act now and announce that Sammo will not be in charge for next season and start a well run recruitment process to try and find the right man rather than rushing into a decision, this will give a new manager time to look at the squad and decide who is in his a plans and tie up new contracts for these players and also allow us to identify targets and start talking to them early while many clubs are still concentrating on the league


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Marvo on February 26, 2011, 13:37:43 pm
Well when you start the season EXPECTING to do well, you're hardly likely to go over the top when they do.

You've put yourself slap bang behind Sammo saying he's the man for the job. Let's hope for once in your life you are right.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: guest49 on February 26, 2011, 13:51:53 pm
I see Bradford have acted this week and Taylor will leave after today's match, Bradford are a club in a very similar place as ours, they are massively underachieving in the league, they are reasonably well run in a business sense, the players are failing to play for the manager (all of these apply to our club) yet we still have not acted even thought its apparent to so many of us that there is now only one choice.

Us and Bradford can't really be lumped into the same bracket. They average over 10,500 at home, low prices and bigger ground accepted, although still think we would struggle to get that in a bigger ground if it was a fiver to get in!
They have actually had a pretty major falling from grace in recent history. With one exception we have never had anywhere to fall from, although admittedly we did that rather well!
The point is I would expect Bradford to have higher expectations and a shorter fuse if a so called 'big name' like Taylor doesn't get instant results. One of my Bradford supporting ST friends on facebook has been calling for his head all season!


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: NTFC Nut on February 26, 2011, 15:06:15 pm
We are Northampton Town. When in League 2, we do assume the play-offs are the minimum (and so they should be), whether any money has been spent or not!

This is ridiculous. We're not like Leeds in League One or Bradford in this division, getting twice the crowds of the club with the next highest attendances. We're Northampton Town, an above average sized League Two club, but by no means one of the division's big guns, and by no means do we have a right to expect a top 7 finish every season regardless of the squad/budget.

As it happens I did expect a top 7 finish back in June but that was more to do with signing the likes of Purcell, Johnson and Hall, and keeping Thornton, Osman etc, rather than simply because we are Northampton Town.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: bungle on February 26, 2011, 15:17:33 pm
Agreed. I'm happy with DC's performance as chairman in virtually every area other than the most crucial one: managerial appointments.

In October, during our appalling run of defeats, Jefferson Lake suggested that we simply couldn't afford to sack Sammo and Crosby. However, the January spending spree on Harrad and Laurent suggests that there is money available to improve things.

Sentimentality is a real problem here. I'm convinced that Sammo isn't the man to take us forward but I doubt I could every sing 'sammo out' at Sixfields. I also know that if and when Sammo is sacked I will be extremely sad for him. DC has worked with Sammo for a long time. He's a great bloke - loyal, passionate and Cobblers through and through. I think it would be pretty hard for DC to act with ruthless objectivity in these circumstances, but I think that is ultimately what he needs to do.





Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: MikeNTFC on February 26, 2011, 17:56:22 pm
I seem to remember in early January Sampson talking of bringing a defender in and we (including me) scoffed at that idea and said the clear target should be a new striker.

Our problem, with or without Harrad, isn't scoring goals. Its holding leads. With or agaisnt the run of play the past 3 games we have taken the lead only to concede. Some have blamed the goal keeper, but looking at recent games how many times has Dunn had to stop 1-on-1's when the defence has gone wondering and a striker has got through?

I like Beckwith and Tozer. If you play the ball infront of them they are like a brick wall. Headers or strikers backing in they deal with it. The main problem is when the defence is turned. Neither of them have raw pace and Tozer has the turning circle of the Titanic. But if we drop deep to accommodate this lack of pace we bring too much pressure on ourselves, its happened so often.



Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: bungle on February 26, 2011, 18:10:10 pm
I like Beckwith and Tozer. If you play the ball infront of them they are like a brick wall. Headers or strikers backing in they deal with it. The main problem is when the defence is turned. Neither of them have raw pace and Tozer has the turning circle of the Titanic. But if we drop deep to accommodate this lack of pace we bring too much pressure on ourselves, its happened so often.


But the goals we're conceding are from crosses into the box not players getting in behind. If Beckwith, Tozer et al were organised enough to get goalside of their man then our play-off bid might still be on track.

I know they lack pace but for me their biggest failing is concentration, awareness and organisation around the box.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: guest47 on February 26, 2011, 19:02:05 pm
Assumption is always prey to disappointment unless it is tempered with reality. The fact is the vast majority of sides will not get what they want. And the vast majority of the time we are/have been one of those sides.

Exactly. Every club starts the season expecting to at least get into the play-offs. I don't recall any club's ambition to be staying in this division.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: guest47 on February 26, 2011, 20:19:45 pm
That's an excellent post.
I don't believe there is any ambition within the club to get promotion this year or in the near future. Both Holt and Osman baulked at the reduced contracts they were offered in the summer. Can you imaging where we would be if they had both left?
The dip in results before Christmas was a wake up call for David Cardoza. It's all very well treading water whilst the supposed developments are on hold, it's another thing altogether to be the chairman that took the club out of the football league.
Virtually all our our first team squad are either youngsters or those at the end of their days which to me says one thing: cheap. No-one knows what the players budgets are for the clubs but I would suspect ours are not any way near the top of the division despite what others may claim.
The activity in the transfer window last month seem to be sufficient to placate the fans and avoid a relegation fight, but anyone who thinks we ever had a squad able to push for promotion is deluded.
I don't have a problem with Sammo, he will toe the party line and I bet he's one of the lowest paid managers in the league. Sacking him would simply mean less budget for players and there's little enough already.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: guest49 on February 26, 2011, 21:33:05 pm
The point is not what you expect but what you achieve. If we are to assume that not making the play offs would be a failure then the expectation has to stand up to scrutiny. I expected us to make the play offs at least. But unlike some on here I never based it on fictitious crap about budgets and having a so called better side. I based on what I would like to see, as I have for nearly every season I have supported the cobblers. I dreamt of automatic promotion and a play of final to attend. But I never made it my master. And refuse to allow it to cloud my judgement.

I just don't see this so called fantastic squad. I see a reasonable team that has the odd good player. In my opinion we probably have the backbone of a decent squad. Osman and Jacobs are the only two players in our side that could realistically attract attention from the leagues above. We have players other than them that have a degree of talent. But they are either injury prone, have poor disciplinary records. Or worst still have failed to go on to better things no matter who has managed them. If that doesn't tell you something about them players, and how difficult they are to manage, then you're simply not interested in letting the facts get in the way of a good old managerial lynching.

People bang on about our forwards. Whilst forgetting until Harrad arrived we was using Holt as an ad hoc forward. With the never likely to be prolific Mc Kay, and the ever injured and unfit Mc Kenzie as the best option until Harrad arrived, what made us certs for the play offs? Gilligan underperformed virtually every game. Wedderburn struggled with his weight and fitness. Davis when fit is as inconsistent as a player can be no matter where he is played. If he wasn't he would never be at our level. Lump this together with the lack of pace in the back row, a significantly reduced budget, and a bargain basement management team what really was attainable?

I am not behind Sammo solely because he is a club legend. I am behind him because I believe the momentum that has gained against him is based on flawed logic. I also feel deeply that we will cast aside a man that does actually care and will put his heart into getting it right, just to replace him with another cheap option only to be back where we are now in twelve months. Not only does it happen at nearly every club operating around our budget. But there is the undeniably atrocious track record that DC has at appointing managers.

The combination of too many draws. Too many injuries, and inconsistency has took its toll. But I believe Sammo will get it right with what he has to hand. Or die trying to.... 

Careful Tel, you can't spout common sense like that around these parts. You just know that if we go up next season then some morons will be saying "but yeah, it took him too long to get us up."   


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: NTFC Nut on February 27, 2011, 01:25:44 am
The point is not what you expect but what you achieve. If we are to assume that not making the play offs would be a failure then the expectation has to stand up to scrutiny. I expected us to make the play offs at least. But unlike some on here I never based it on fictitious crap about budgets and having a so called better side. I based on what I would like to see, as I have for nearly every season I have supported the cobblers. I dreamt of automatic promotion and a play of final to attend. But I never made it my master. And refuse to allow it to cloud my judgement.

I just don't see this so called fantastic squad. I see a reasonable team that has the odd good player. In my opinion we probably have the backbone of a decent squad. Osman and Jacobs are the only two players in our side that could realistically attract attention from the leagues above. We have players other than them that have a degree of talent. But they are either injury prone, have poor disciplinary records. Or worst still have failed to go on to better things no matter who has managed them. If that doesn't tell you something about them players, and how difficult they are to manage, then you're simply not interested in letting the facts get in the way of a good old managerial lynching.

People bang on about our forwards. Whilst forgetting until Harrad arrived we was using Holt as an ad hoc forward. With the never likely to be prolific Mc Kay, and the ever injured and unfit Mc Kenzie as the best option until Harrad arrived, what made us certs for the play offs? Gilligan underperformed virtually every game. Wedderburn struggled with his weight and fitness. Davis when fit is as inconsistent as a player can be no matter where he is played. If he wasn't he would never be at our level. Lump this together with the lack of pace in the back row, a significantly reduced budget, and a bargain basement management team what really was attainable?

I am not behind Sammo solely because he is a club legend. I am behind him because I believe the momentum that has gained against him is based on flawed logic. I also feel deeply that we will cast aside a man that does actually care and will put his heart into getting it right, just to replace him with another cheap option only to be back where we are now in twelve months. Not only does it happen at nearly every club operating around our budget. But there is the undeniably atrocious track record that DC has at appointing managers.

The combination of too many draws. Too many injuries, and inconsistency has took its toll. But I believe Sammo will get it right with what he has to hand. Or die trying to.... 

That is the best post I've read on here for a long, long time.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Insider on February 27, 2011, 07:52:42 am
Hamster, your argument has deep flaws.  Your main premise seems to be that Sammo shouldn't be replaced because all we're likely to get instead is another crap manager - who may not have played for the club and therefore have no passion for it.  That's a cop out, a bit like running a car that breaks down everyday simply out of fear that replacing it will actually be less reliable.  I do agree that the squad is in general very, very ordinary (a view which I'm not convinced Nut truly shares).  Where I more fundamentally disagree is in the way that Sammo has spent the budget available: if Soccerbase and our matchday programmes don't lie, we have a first team squad that is about 25% larger than most other teams; we're talking 30-31 players compared with the 25/26 that we commonly see in this division and this looks incongruous when you remember that we don't have a reserve set up of note.  Even Accrington Stanley field a reserve league team with just 26 players.   One could argue that if budgets are comparable (and we're constantly being told by DC that we compete well in this division) then we're spreading our resources too thinly and bluntly getting what we pay for. 

I have consistently said that Sammo should be judged at the end of this season.  It's perverse that after 6 straight draws we could still quite easily threaten the play off positions if (and it's a big if) we win the next two home games.  However if we have failed to have progressed on last season's finish, then it would be a cowardly act not to replace him.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: bungle on February 27, 2011, 07:57:29 am
That's an excellent post.
I don't believe there is any ambition within the club to get promotion this year or in the near future.

Sorry but I just don't buy this at all. If that was the case the why did we bring in Shaun Harrad for 30K and what Paul Peschisolido termed 'championship wages' when nobody else in our division was spending money? Why did we also bring in Laurent and Walker at the same time? Was it really just to 'avoid a relegation fight'? Do you think that's what Sammo and DC said to persuade Harrad and Walker to sign? Do me a favour!

The ambition is there. The money, relative to our competitors, is there. What is not there, I'm afraid, is a manager who can organise, motivate and shape a winning team. Sammo has made some terrible decisions this year and you can not sit there and tell me that the likes of Ronnie Moore or Graham Turner would have done the same. Forget this talk about forwards - we've scored enough goals during this run to win games. The real problems are down to the defence. This run of draws has been largely due to a simple, consistent inability to defend crosses into the box, with defenders failing time and time again to pick up their man and get goalside. This is basic stuff which should be ironed out on the training ground, but apart from a brief post-xmas run last year, our defence under Sammo has been a complete and utter joke. How anyone can defend him on any basis other than his status as 'club legend' is beyond me.



Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Marvo on February 27, 2011, 08:20:11 am
I seem to remember in early January Sampson talking of bringing a defender in and we (including me) scoffed at that idea and said the clear target should be a new striker.

Our problem, with or without Harrad, isn't scoring goals. Its holding leads. With or agaisnt the run of play the past 3 games we have taken the lead only to concede. Some have blamed the goal keeper, but looking at recent games how many times has Dunn had to stop 1-on-1's when the defence has gone wondering and a striker has got through?

I like Beckwith and Tozer. If you play the ball infront of them they are like a brick wall. Headers or strikers backing in they deal with it. The main problem is when the defence is turned. Neither of them have raw pace and Tozer has the turning circle of the Titanic. But if we drop deep to accommodate this lack of pace we bring too much pressure on ourselves, its happened so often.



If you go back to those threads, you'll find it was I saying that a central defender should be the priority. That comes of course as no surprise to me and as usual will be ignored by the majority of you.  ::)


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Marvo on February 27, 2011, 08:46:22 am
I love it when Fenners makes one of his long rhetoric filled posts and the sycophants on here come out in force to heap praise on their chosen one. It's even better when the post is absolute bollocks!

The reason we should expect to be challenging for promotion when we're in the bottom division and conversely wary of relegation when in League 1 is because we have become a yo-yo club. Too big for League 2, not quite big enough to stay in League 1, there are several clubs like that. Sure if you want to talk about 40 years ago then yes we were perennial bottom feeders but things have moved on, our core fanbase is larger, we've moved to Sixfields, everything about the club when in League 2 says promotion. In the last 15 years we have spent 7 seasons in the bottom division, 8 in the one above. We should EXPECT to be challenging when in this division and if we're not, something is wrong!

Fenners likes to talk about our club and the problems within, failing to give the slightest mention to all the other clubs in this division, the ones we are competing with. Who are these giants of the footballing world that have bigger budgets, bigger gates, more experience of promotion from this division? Which teams are they that have spent more time at the next level up than we have in the last 15 years?

Sammo is very fortunate to be manager of this club, his counterparts in this division must look on green with envy at the man who had money to spend in January. He's been manager now for 86 games, more than enough time to get the players he wants in, to stamp his authority on the team, to get the team playing the way he wants them to. He's done a fair to reasonable job and if he were manager at 3/4 of the teams in this division his record would be okay but he's not. We can't accept failure at this level and if/when we miss the play-offs this season that will be failure for our club. Giving him more time like we did with Gray will just put off the inevitable and by next Christmas we could be looking at another season wasted, a season we can't afford for if you do really believe Fenners is right and we should be happy to be a midtable League 2 side then keep supporting Sammo for a better self-fulfilling prophecy is hard to imagine.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: DL2 on February 27, 2011, 09:17:43 am
Or die trying to.... 

Don't underestimate this point .. imo


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: TbananaG on February 27, 2011, 09:41:50 am
Sammo talked before yesterday's game about the need to cut out crosses and how hard they'd been working on it in training. Then their equaliser is scored by a bloody immobile head-on-a-stick centre forward who's unmarked in the box from a corner and has a free header. The coaches have to take some responsibility - the least you would expect given Sammo's background is that he could organise a defence, but he clearly can't.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Marvo on February 27, 2011, 10:14:02 am
We don't need a "Great" manager to get us out of this division, we don't even need a very good one, an average one should do just fine, what with the advantages we have at this club. Look at our last three promotion winning managers, Colin Calderwood, Kevin Wilson and Ian Atkins. None of those could be described as great managers or even very good ones. A great manager would win us the Championship and a good manager would get us up automatically. An average one should ensure a top seven finish. Anything below that and you're looking at a below average manager. Can Sammo make it from below average to average? Possibly. A lot of you are letting sentiment rule your head.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: guest49 on February 27, 2011, 10:21:48 am
"Look Ian, I know you played nearly 400 times for the club, have been here for 16 years and not lost a game for 6 weeks but it is time to let you go. Here is your cheque for £x grand, can you ask Malcolm on the way out if he fancies a go please."




Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Insider on February 27, 2011, 10:37:57 am
Not at all. I understand that Sammo is not doing a perfect job. But I believe he is not far away from hitting a decent run of results, We are not getting hammered by sides. We are leaking silly goals that are resulting in draws instead of wins. I just don't see the emergency. I can't see anything that hasn't happened for years.

Sammo may not be the ideal choice. But he is what you get for the budget and aspiration of our Chairman.

 

Agree again on your last point.  However we may not be getting hammered, but we're hardly dominating games either.  We cannot defend for toffee and this isn't just down to silly defensive errors.  We lack organisation across the park and often fail to create more than a couple of chances all game.  The next two games are probably pivotal.  After what should be 3 points against Burton we have tough games against Shrewsbury and Chesterfield.  5 or 6 points would see us likely creep up a couple of places, but 0-3 points could have us worryingly looking over our shoulder again.  We are fast approaching the first anniversary of the last time we won three league games on the bounce (20th March) and I simply don't see that happening before the 3 games that start at home to Macclesfield.

Here's an idea for DC.  Slim the squad down to 25-26 players and use the wage savings to bring in a decent manager!  Whoops, it will cost £100k to pay off Sammo and Crosby.  I rather expect that Sammo will remain in situ, we'll have an average  start to next season, and by end November/December the debate about Sammo will start in earnest.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: wrigleys on February 27, 2011, 10:42:03 am
"Look Ian, I know you played nearly 400 times for the club, have been here for 16 years and not lost a game for 6 weeks but it is time to let you go. Here is your cheque for £x grand, can you ask Malcolm on the way out if he fancies a go please."



;D


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Marvo on February 27, 2011, 10:44:43 am
"Look Ian, I know you played nearly 400 times for the club, have been here for 16 years and not lost a game for 6 weeks but it is time to let you go. Here is your cheque for £x grand, can you ask Malcolm on the way out if he fancies a go please."




See. Im say some of you let sentiment rule your head and straight away somebody proves the point. Class.

PS: You could say you haven't won a game in six matches but I guess that wouldn't have suited the point you were trying to make.  ::)


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: auntie on February 27, 2011, 11:03:58 am
I really thought we were going up when we beat grimsby on that friday night and went 5th last season. carry on.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Tyler on February 27, 2011, 11:35:47 am
I really thought we were going up when we beat grimsby on that friday night and went 5th last season. carry on.

So did I :(

The frustrating thing is the results are GENERALLY ok, we're not on the bad run that normally see's managers given the boot, its just the way we'replaying which is the concern and its the most basic of errors


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: bungle on February 27, 2011, 11:42:21 am
Sammo may not be the ideal choice. But he is what you get for the budget and aspiration of our Chairman.
 

Again, a chairman who spent 30k plus 'championship' wages for Harrad when no one else in our division was spending money. Now I personally would have rather this money was spent on bringing in a decent manager, but it does at least prove that DC is willing to spend money on improving things.

The budget is there and so is the aspiration IMO. What isn't there is the kind of ruthless objectivity needed to bring in an successful manager.
If as fans we accept mediocrity and underachievement, if as fans we accept sentimentality over objectivtiy, then that is what we will get.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: guest49 on February 27, 2011, 12:06:06 pm
See. Im say some of you let sentiment rule your head and straight away somebody proves the point. Class.

PS: You could say you haven't won a game in six matches but I guess that wouldn't have suited the point you were trying to make.  ::)

 ;D says the man who would spin a stat to try and convince us that the moon was made from cheese  ;D

If you read previous posts then sentiment has very little to do with it. I don't know the guy from Adam. He's been with us a long time, he is new to management and what is the alternative?
I said it yesterday and stick by it, some of our 'fans' would rather we lost every game to have something to moan about, to somehow feel vindicated. It's nothing new and been going on for the 30 odd years I've been going. You can see the distain on their faces when we win. These will be some of the ones trying to oust the manager at the moment but haven't got the balls to do it vocally, or thankfully are still a minority.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: MikeNTFC on February 27, 2011, 12:36:28 pm
If you go back to those threads, you'll find it was I saying that a central defender should be the priority. That comes of course as no surprise to me and as usual will be ignored by the majority of you.  ::)

I never said you didnt  ;D I just said most of us did!


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Marvo on February 27, 2011, 12:59:54 pm

I said it yesterday and stick by it, some of our 'fans' would rather we lost every game to have something to moan about, to somehow feel vindicated. It's nothing new and been going on for the 30 odd years I've been going. You can see the distain on their faces when we win. These will be some of the ones trying to oust the manager at the moment but haven't got the balls to do it vocally, or thankfully are still a minority.

I think that is utter, total, rubbish! No fan wants his side to lose, do you think I bought a season ticket last year in the hope I'd see us fail miserably? What utter tosh!

Do you think there is ANYBODY on here who would pass up the chance of us winning every single game until the end of the season just so they could say "Told you so"?

I'm sorry, you're talking absolute bollocks!


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Grove on February 27, 2011, 13:22:23 pm
There are many that think it is now so dull and predictable , they really dont give a s*** anymore.  ;D


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Insider on February 27, 2011, 13:43:33 pm
If you read previous posts then sentiment has very little to do with it.  He's been with us a long time, he is new to management and what is the alternative?

If thta isn't sentiment I don't know what is!  Taking your argument we should probably appoint him for life.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: guest49 on February 27, 2011, 14:31:27 pm

Do you think there is ANYBODY on here who would pass up the chance of us winning every single game until the end of the season just so they could say "Told you so"?


Absofcukinglutely. Some people are that warped, attention seeking, opinionated and desperate to be proved right that the alternative would probably be taking their own life. They would never admit of course and it will be a subliminal demon nagging away at them. You know, an enhanced varient of when you see that we have lost 6 v 0 away on a Tuesday night and it's OK to feel happy that you never went, as opposed to gutted about the defeat.
I don't know why you are getting defensive, I haven't touched a nerve have I?  ???
 


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: guest49 on February 27, 2011, 14:46:03 pm
If thta isn't sentiment I don't know what is!  Taking your argument we should probably appoint him for life.

OK sentiment counts for something, of course it does and should. We are supposed to be fans, we don't own the business, we should be emotionally attached to the club and the players. Otherwise why name stands after previous players, sod it, why even bother with a minutes silence for someone who hasn't kicked a ball for us for 50 years? Why dislike players who have stitched us up over the years?

I'm not saying we should stick with ANYONE who is not going to take us anywhere. But can any of you identify a suitable alternative? Do you know that DC has the funds to pay off Sammo and get someone else in? Can you name one manager who has been sacked after the same run of results?
If you want him out then you've had a couple of choices. You can voice your opinion at the game to Sammo and DC directly from the stands, you may get a few joining in. You could just as easily start a straight poll with 'Stay' or 'Go now' on here, if you think this board has any influence on the running of the club.
I haven't seen or heard either. Now is that down to sentiment, respect or some other feeling towards Sammo?







Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: bungle on February 27, 2011, 15:11:04 pm
But can any of you identify a suitable alternative? Do you know that DC has the funds to pay off Sammo and get someone else in? Can you name one manager who has been sacked after the same run of results?

DC had the funds to buy Harrad and pay him 'championship' wages. I don't see why money would be such a huge stumbling block, particularly given that we're talking about the single most important appointment/ salary at the club.

If we advertised the position properly we'd get some decent applicants - it's really not a bad set up for this level. Even someone like Paul Trollope, with all his detractors, would be a significant improvement on Sammo. As Marvo has suggested it doesn't take a genius to win promotion at this level - Atkins, Calderwood and Wilson all managed it. All it takes is a competent manager capable of instilling some organisation and discipline - particularly in defence.

As for being 'desperate to be proved right' wake up: we're 15th in League Two. If we continue going like this it'll be our lowest league finish for 15 years. In October we lost five matches in a row. It's not unreasonable to question the ability of the manager in these circumstances.




Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Marvo on February 27, 2011, 16:02:56 pm
Absofcukinglutely. Some people are that warped, attention seeking, opinionated and desperate to be proved right that the alternative would probably be taking their own life. They would never admit of course and it will be a subliminal demon nagging away at them. You know, an enhanced varient of when you see that we have lost 6 v 0 away on a Tuesday night and it's OK to feel happy that you never went, as opposed to gutted about the defeat.
I don't know why you are getting defensive, I haven't touched a nerve have I?  ???
 

You are 100% wrong! No true fan would ever rather lose than win, it's unthinkable. If there is anyone out there who thinks that way might I suggest that they are not a fan in the first place.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Insider on February 27, 2011, 16:16:28 pm
OK sentiment counts for something, of course it does and should. We are supposed to be fans, we don't own the business, we should be emotionally attached to the club and the players. Otherwise why name stands after previous players, sod it, why even bother with a minutes silence for someone who hasn't kicked a ball for us for 50 years? Why dislike players who have stitched us up over the years?

I'm not saying we should stick with ANYONE who is not going to take us anywhere. But can any of you identify a suitable alternative? Do you know that DC has the funds to pay off Sammo and get someone else in? Can you name one manager who has been sacked after the same run of results?
If you want him out then you've had a couple of choices. You can voice your opinion at the game to Sammo and DC directly from the stands, you may get a few joining in. You could just as easily start a straight poll with 'Stay' or 'Go now' on here, if you think this board has any influence on the running of the club.
I haven't seen or heard either. Now is that down to sentiment, respect or some other feeling towards Sammo?

Each of your posts have become progressively more contradictory and perverse.  For starters for the vast majority of supporters, having a go at the manager or players during a game isn't acceptable.  The vast majority of supporters tend to voice their opinion by voting with their feet, which seems to be what has been happening over the last few seasons of Gray and Sampson.  Season ticket sales have gone down year on year (despite the £199 North Stand offer) and if this board is anything to go by there'll even fewer there next season.  As for whether this board has any influence or not is a matter of opinion - the club clearly thinks it does!  Does DC have the funds to dismiss Sammo?  That again is a matter for debate.  Given the size of our squad that could easily be afforded by paring it back in the summer.  There will also be a point at which if Sammo doesn't turn this around DC won't be able not to afford it.  

What on earth sentiment has to do with managerial appointments is beyond me and your argument about a minutes silence for former players is almost beyond the pale.  That is all about basic respect, respect which should be afforded loyal servants of the club, Sammo included.  I respect Sammo's service to this club and don't for one moment question his loyalty, passion and commitment.  But that shouldn't cloud judgement about his managerial ability.  If you read my earlier posts, I am not of the sack him now proponents and think he should be judged at the end of this full season.  DC can re-appoint him or not, we can vote with our vote if we wish.  

As for alternatives, we would only find out when we shake the tree.  When a manager has been unemployed a while, the applications can be surprising.  For that reason we shouldn't rule out a di Matteo, I would personally be supportive of Peter Taylor (whose financial predicament at Bradford has been worse than here), I think Jamie Pitman is doing a great job at Hereford (though still quite inexperienced), Graham Westley at Stevenage (well proven, but seems a bit dour in the Sammo mould), Gary Mills (now at York and who fits the bill of Conference league knowledge), Ian Bogie at Gateshead (who has taken them through two successive promotions and now has them really humming in the BSP.  To say there are no alternatives is plain ridiculous.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: guest49 on February 27, 2011, 16:18:39 pm

I suggest that they are not a fan in the first place.


Agreed, that is why I referred to them as 'fans'. They exist and it's naive to think otherwise. The worst ones are the ones who don't go regularly.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Dr Feelgood on February 27, 2011, 16:23:35 pm
The worst ones are the ones who don't go regularly.
I used to not go regularly but some olive oil helps...


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: guest49 on February 27, 2011, 16:34:58 pm

If you read my earlier posts, I am not of the sack him now proponents and think he should be judged at the end of this full season.   

As for alternatives, we would only find out when we shake the tree.  When a manager has been unemployed a while, the applications can be surprising.  For that reason we shouldn't rule out a di Matteo, I would personally be supportive of Peter Taylor (whose financial predicament at Bradford has been worse than here), I think Jamie Pitman is doing a great job at Hereford (though still quite inexperienced), Graham Westley at Stevenage (well proven, but seems a bit dour in the Sammo mould), Gary Mills (now at York and who fits the bill of Conference league knowledge), Ian Bogie at Gateshead (who has taken them through two successive promotions and now has them really humming in the BSP.  To say there are no alternatives is plain ridiculous.

"If you read my earlier posts, I am not of the sack him now proponents" which are the only ones who are talking rubbish IMO but thanks for also supplying a list of reasons why we are better off sticking with Sammo for now. I sure you'd probably take a chance on Mark Cooper too. Peter Taylor??!  ;D


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: NTFC Nut on February 27, 2011, 17:40:07 pm
I do agree that the squad is in general very, very ordinary (a view which I'm not convinced Nut truly shares). 

I never claimed to agree 100% with everything he said, just that it was a very good post. For what it's worth, I think we have the makings of a good squad. We have half a dozen players in our squad who have the ability to be playing at a higher level and are only being held back by things such as age, fitness, inexperience/inconsistency and attitude problems. We are still a few pieces short of finishing the puzzle (namely a proper target man, a no-nonsense centre-half with a bit of pace who you can trust to do the basics well, a midfielder wo can grab the game by the bollocks when it's not going well, and a bit more consistency from the current crop) but when it's complete, we ought to have a squad who can at least challenge for a play-off spot.


I think the general sentiment of TFAMH's post, which I strongly agree with, is that when we replace Sammo we'll just get another average/unproven manager in, and Sammo has something that his replacement won't have- a genuine affinity with the club spanning nearly two decades (and as such, an inside-out knowledge of the club and its staff/players/board/fans). Continuing to chop and change behind the scenes won't help anyone, and- generally speaking- it's taken two or three years of backroom stability to yield a promotion from this division in the past: often with a few disappointing seasons beforehand as the manager builds his squad.

We know all the appointments DC makes are likely to have their faults and unlikely to get us anywhere in the long term without significant backing, so we may as well give one of them a few years to build a squad and see what he can do- and if we're going to do that, it might as well be Sammo. He may not be a tactical genius but there's a decent motivator in there somewhere (look a this season's Carling Cup run), and very few managers are born with tactical nous, it's something you develop with experience. Sammo is still on a learning curve and I wouldn't write him off as a poor manager just yet.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Marvo on February 27, 2011, 17:49:22 pm
Sammo has something that his replacement won't have- a genuine affinity with the club spanning nearly two decades (and as such, an inside-out knowledge of the club and its staff/players/board/fans).

Has he???

Jeez, so even with that advantage over a new man we're still at our lowest ebb in over a decade!


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Insider on February 27, 2011, 17:59:53 pm
"If you read my earlier posts, I am not of the sack him now proponents" which are the only ones who are talking rubbish IMO but thanks for also supplying a list of reasons why we are better off sticking with Sammo for now. I sure you'd probably take a chance on Mark Cooper too. Peter Taylor??!  ;D

Yep, the same Peter Taylor that has managed to get four clubs promoted and just ten weeks ago turned down the chance to join Alan Pardew as assistant manager at Newcastle.  He has, like many managers experienced the ups and downs, but at least as a manager he's experienced the ups!  I'd far rather Sammo learn his trade as assistant to Taylor (I seem to remember Sammo was never assistant to Gray, that honour fell to the useless Barron, and his position on the bench was only as reserve team manager).  I'm absolutely no fan of Mark Cooper, though he would slot quite quickly into our hoofball style.

As for Nut's inside-out knowledge of the club point, I'd prefer Sammo had an inside-out knowledge of this league and the conference. 


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on February 27, 2011, 18:02:29 pm
I used to not go regularly but some olive oil helps...

So you were full of s***  ;)


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Welly Cobb on February 27, 2011, 18:06:52 pm
Taylor's record doesn't seem that impressive when you consider that since leaving the U21's in 2007 he's not managed to spend more than 1 year at a club. Bradford are about the only team in the league underperforming worse than us really, compared to start of the year expectations and budgets, so how you could possible suggest he'd be a good replacement for Sammo is beyond me.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Grove on February 27, 2011, 18:46:49 pm
What's Harrad on then?

£15k per week FACT  ;D


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: bungle on February 27, 2011, 19:09:54 pm
"He [Harrad] has received an offer from Northampton which would not be out of place at the top of League One or the Championship" - Paul Peschisolido.



Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Macc Cobbler on February 27, 2011, 19:10:58 pm
The point is not what you expect but what you achieve. If we are to assume that not making the play offs would be a failure then the expectation has to stand up to scrutiny. I expected us to make the play offs at least. But unlike some on here I never based it on fictitious crap about budgets and having a so called better side. I based on what I would like to see, as I have for nearly every season I have supported the cobblers. I dreamt of automatic promotion and a play of final to attend. But I never made it my master. And refuse to allow it to cloud my judgement.

I just don't see this so called fantastic squad. I see a reasonable team that has the odd good player. In my opinion we probably have the backbone of a decent squad. Osman and Jacobs are the only two players in our side that could realistically attract attention from the leagues above. We have players other than them that have a degree of talent. But they are either injury prone, have poor disciplinary records. Or worst still have failed to go on to better things no matter who has managed them. If that doesn't tell you something about them players, and how difficult they are to manage, then you're simply not interested in letting the facts get in the way of a good old managerial lynching.

People bang on about our forwards. Whilst forgetting until Harrad arrived we was using Holt as an ad hoc forward. With the never likely to be prolific Mc Kay, and the ever injured and unfit Mc Kenzie as the best option until Harrad arrived, what made us certs for the play offs? Gilligan underperformed virtually every game. Wedderburn struggled with his weight and fitness. Davis when fit is as inconsistent as a player can be no matter where he is played. If he wasn't he would never be at our level. Lump this together with the lack of pace in the back row, a significantly reduced budget, and a bargain basement management team what really was attainable?

I am not behind Sammo solely because he is a club legend. I am behind him because I believe the momentum that has gained against him is based on flawed logic. I also feel deeply that we will cast aside a man that does actually care and will put his heart into getting it right, just to replace him with another cheap option only to be back where we are now in twelve months. Not only does it happen at nearly every club operating around our budget. But there is the undeniably atrocious track record that DC has at appointing managers.

The combination of too many draws. Too many injuries, and inconsistency has took its toll. But I believe Sammo will get it right with what he has to hand. Or die trying to.... 

Well said  :)


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: guest49 on February 27, 2011, 19:45:13 pm
£15k per week FACT  ;D

Don't tell Mckenzie, he is only on £10k and Mckay still has to pay subs.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on February 27, 2011, 20:56:09 pm
£15k per week FACT  ;D

 ;D

Exactly, that's what I love about this forum. Loads of people professing to being in the know about what's going on at the heart of the club, writing long essays based on what others have told them or written, Chinese whispers and general make believe. There's one, maybe two people on here that have the ear of someone at the club. The rest of the s*** spouted on here is based on fantasy, exaggerated opinions and lies.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Tyler on February 27, 2011, 23:10:39 pm
This may have been covered, but any reason he didn't do the post match interview yesterday?


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: SteveRiches on February 28, 2011, 07:57:45 am
I don't see we'd gain anything other than ridicule if we jumped onto the new manager roundabout yet again. They nearly all end up being ditched, whoever they are. Given we all make mistakes, Sammo is the same as the rest of us, but there is no logical groundswell of agreed opinion here or anywhere else that I can discern which logically sets out what he should be doing that he isn't doing. It's all just a disparate list of individuals with differing opinions on who should be in the team, which tactics we should employ, which substitutes should be brought on, etc. etc. - nothing wrong with opinions, they're great fun, but none of them point to any single agreed conclusion that is a sacking offence. In the past we had Gray's fixation with selecting a striker who couldn't strike, week after week (Constantine) and his illogical continued selection of a goalkeeper (Dunn) who was having a dreadful time between the sticks, and most of us would agree that just these two "blind spots" were what got us relegated into the mess we now are in when it was totally avoidable. However,  "Sammo out" isn't an agreed conclusion, it's just an opinion based on us underperforming, which most of us agree we are without being able to say without contradiction precisely where it's going wrong. Up front we have our great hope Harrad who stupidly gets a 3-game ban for a daft red card just when we needed him to be hitting the net, McKenzie who is so injured that his contribution is small, Purcell who is long-term injured, and McKay whose performances have become increasingly lightweight. His lack of progression worries me. On Saturday at Southend once again it was a defender's goal, Johnson's, that earned us the point, while at Hereford it was a makeshift striker, Holt, who did the same. Meantime our specially talented midfielders like Thornton and Jacobs are off the boil, and we really missed Osman while suspended. I'd agree we are currently a deeply irritating side to follow, but I'm still prepared in all this to back Sampson to pull it all together, without saying that I agree with everything he does - I certainly don't. I do agree with those who say we're not getting in behind opponents' defences to supply crosses to our strikers, and I'd agree that Sammo needs to look closely at it, however until Saturday we have to limp along anyway with hardly anyone in the forward line who can reasonably be called a striker. If we can grind out a win tomorrow against Burton (with maybe a brief appearance from McKenzie to get a goal) then we can get to Saturday with a more balanced side. A load of draws on the trot isn't a sacking offence, it's a worrying underperformance. What would truly put Sammo in the firing line is 5 defeats on the trot, and as far as I know no manager has survived 7 in succession. So for all the opinions you and I may spout, that's what it comes down to in the end, not our opinons but results.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Marvo on February 28, 2011, 08:09:06 am
So if any chairman said to any manager given the circumstances at any given club, the least I expect this season is a top half finish and the club in question didn't achieve that, despite not losing 7, 6 or even 5 matches on the bounce, you think that would mean that the Chairman wouldn't replace the manager or that the manager wouldn't expect to be replaced?

There has to be reasonable targets set and met, that happens in almost all walks of life and just because you're not the worst performer in your field doesn't mean you are doing as well as you might or could be reasonably expected. Sammo isn't and it's a question of how long he is given to show he can up his game.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: DustCobb on February 28, 2011, 08:18:37 am
This may have been covered, but any reason he didn't do the post match interview yesterday?

My guess would be he was bored of doing the same interview 5 times in a row so thought he would give Mad Malc a go for the 6th interview.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Marvo on February 28, 2011, 08:56:49 am
I just want to make my position on Ian Sampson completely clear.

Do I want Sammo sacked?

No. I can't see the point at this stage and anyway while there is still the faintest flicker of hope we might squeeze into the play-offs then there still is the chnace that Sammo might turn it round.

Do I want Sammo replaced at the end of the season?

Now this is the crux of the matter.

Yes: If we have shown no improvement to where we are now and keep on in the same vein, which would mean we'd finish with about 57-58 points then yes, I do. Giving a failed manager yet another summer of wheeling and dealing only to find ourselves in the same mess come October with yet another season wasted would be a criminal decision.

No. If we make the play-offs or fall just short and there is a marked improvement in performances (there would have to be) then okay, give Sammo the benefit of the doubt. "I was gonna say", you don't have to be great manager to get a team out fo this division.

At the end of the season is the time to make the decision. I don't suppose any of you have realised but the final game at Morecambe will be Ian Sampson's 100th in charge. Surely that is enough time to know whether we have the right man at the helm or not?


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: bungle on February 28, 2011, 14:23:15 pm
As I thought......... Not a clue..  ;D ;D

And there was me thinking Peschisolido would have said....."we are letting him go for a song because he wants out"...  ::)


Oh yes, that's right. I forgot that the real reason Harrad signed was to work with the world-renowned tactical genius that is Ian Sampson.
In fact I heard that he was so desperate to sign for us that he agreed to take a pay cut.  ::)

I'm not going to sit here speculating about Harrad's precise weekly wage - that's irrelevant. My point is that we clearly spent a significant ammount of money on him and that money might more usefully have been used to hire the one person who could truly make a huge difference to the team: a new manager.

You contend that DC can't afford to sack Sammo and Crosby, and that if he did he'd just replace them with a cheap option. My point is that the Harrad signing, coupled with Laurent and Walker, shows that money is available.   

 


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: bungle on February 28, 2011, 14:34:55 pm
1. but there is no logical groundswell of agreed opinion here or anywhere else that I can discern which logically sets out what he should be doing that he isn't doing...

2.What would truly put Sammo in the firing line is 5 defeats on the trot

1. We've conceded a ridiculous number of goals this season due to an inability to defend simple balls into the box. Sammo's failure to address the problem has effectively cost us a play-off place.

2. Do you remember, October, Steve?


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Insider on February 28, 2011, 17:37:37 pm
I just want to make my position on Ian Sampson completely clear.

Do I want Sammo sacked?

No. I can't see the point at this stage and anyway while there is still the faintest flicker of hope we might squeeze into the play-offs then there still is the chnace that Sammo might turn it round.

Do I want Sammo replaced at the end of the season?

Now this is the crux of the matter.

Yes: If we have shown no improvement to where we are now and keep on in the same vein, which would mean we'd finish with about 57-58 points then yes, I do. Giving a failed manager yet another summer of wheeling and dealing only to find ourselves in the same mess come October with yet another season wasted would be a criminal decision.

No. If we make the play-offs or fall just short and there is a marked improvement in performances (there would have to be) then okay, give Sammo the benefit of the doubt. "I was gonna say", you don't have to be great manager to get a team out fo this division.

At the end of the season is the time to make the decision. I don't suppose any of you have realised but the final game at Morecambe will be Ian Sampson's 100th in charge. Surely that is enough time to know whether we have the right man at the helm or not?

Spot on, Marvo.  But isn't it hard work sometimes?


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: dodger on February 28, 2011, 18:06:03 pm
Dont forget we also got Guinan off the wage bill , he was probably on good money compared to some of the others


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: NTFC Nut on February 28, 2011, 18:35:11 pm
Dont forget we also got Guinan off the wage bill , he was probably on good money compared to some of the others

When we first signed Guinan and he was presented as some sort of marquee signing, we were also told he was on "League One wages". Considering he was given a two-year deal I'd imagine he was on the same terms this season. Another costly mistake on the part of Gray, that.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: auntie on February 28, 2011, 20:30:34 pm
I just want to make my position on Ian Sampson completely clear.

Do I want Sammo sacked?

No. I can't see the point at this stage and anyway while there is still the faintest flicker of hope we might squeeze into the play-offs then there still is the chnace that Sammo might turn it round.

Do I want Sammo replaced at the end of the season?

Now this is the crux of the matter.

Yes: If we have shown no improvement to where we are now and keep on in the same vein, which would mean we'd finish with about 57-58 points then yes, I do. Giving a failed manager yet another summer of wheeling and dealing only to find ourselves in the same mess come October with yet another season wasted would be a criminal decision.

No. If we make the play-offs or fall just short and there is a marked improvement in performances (there would have to be) then okay, give Sammo the benefit of the doubt. "I was gonna say", you don't have to be great manager to get a team out fo this division.

At the end of the season is the time to make the decision. I don't suppose any of you have realised but the final game at Morecambe will be Ian Sampson's 100th in charge. Surely that is enough time to know whether we have the right man at the helm or not?

Marvo got all the above from a look I gave him after harrad got sent off. He is so intuitive.

Well said Marvo. And for the record, despite my knee-jerk reaction after every dropped point / missed opportunity...I still believe the play-offs are possible. Its why I go. Obviously once its mathematically impossible I still go cos...well, it's just f***in habit.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: JollyCobbler on February 28, 2011, 20:50:52 pm
When we first signed Guinan and he was presented as some sort of marquee signing, we were also told he was on "League One wages". Considering he was given a two-year deal I'd imagine he was on the same terms this season. Another costly mistake on the part of Gray, that.

Wouldn't have been Gray that agreed the financial terms with the player.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: JollyCobbler on February 28, 2011, 20:54:24 pm
Oh yes, that's right. I forgot that the real reason Harrad signed was to work with the world-renowned tactical genius that is Ian Sampson.
In fact I heard that he was so desperate to sign for us that he agreed to take a pay cut.  ::)

I'm not going to sit here speculating about Harrad's precise weekly wage - that's irrelevant. My point is that we clearly spent a significant ammount of money on him and that money might more usefully have been used to hire the one person who could truly make a huge difference to the team: a new manager.

You contend that DC can't afford to sack Sammo and Crosby, and that if he did he'd just replace them with a cheap option. My point is that the Harrad signing, coupled with Laurent and Walker, shows that money is available.   

 

So just to clarify, are you saying you'd rather any available monies had been spent replacing the management team, rather than improving our depleted forward line?


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: JollyCobbler on February 28, 2011, 22:15:05 pm
No...... What he's saying is: Fcuk the fact that copious thousands of pounds was saved on Guinan, Bayo, Gilligan and Sammo has had to endure injuries and inconsistency throughout the squad.. I still want my pound of flesh.

He wants him sacked a few weeks after the chairman replaces what he took away in the first place.

Yeah, sort of thought that was what he meant :-\


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Marvo on March 01, 2011, 08:03:20 am
Oh, so now it's all the Chairmans fault.  ::)

You dimwitted f***ers are unbelievable. Next thing you'll be claiming is that Cardoza picks the team.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: JollyCobbler on March 01, 2011, 10:13:32 am
Oh, so now it's all the Chairmans fault.  ::)

You dimwitted f***ers are unbelievable. Next thing you'll be claiming is that Cardoza picks the team.

No, not saying that it's ALL the chairman's fault. However, the two major reason's we were relegated into this s#&t division were, Gray's persistance of sticking with Dunn in goal, and a couple of season's of the playing assets being stripped to the bare minimum, by Cardoza. Even with players being moved on, and inferior/cheaper replacements being bought in, we should have been more than capable of staying up, and the fact that we didn't will rest on the shoulders of Stuart Gray, primarily I believe, because of the goalkeeping situation.
All that being said, we have had the quality of playing staff steadily downgraded for seasons now. That is down to the chairman. Finally, in a ditch effort to try and rescue this season he has made the decision to free up some funds, which has allowed Sampson to bring in the players he wanted. If the manager fails now, it is his fault alone. But to talk of making a change at this stage of the season would be/is ludicrous. Not least because of Cardozas track record on making appointments in this department.
We are not performing, and on paper given the squad we now have we should be doing a hell of a lot better, but there is still a chance, albeit a slim one, that we can find some form and squeak into the play-offs. So for now we stick with Sammo, and what happens over the coming weeks will determine his future.
But make no mistake, David Cardoza is just as culpable as Stuart Gray for our being in this division.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Marvo on March 01, 2011, 10:55:47 am
No, not saying that it's ALL the chairman's fault. However, the two major reason's we were relegated into this s#&t division were, Gray's persistance of sticking with Dunn in goal, and a couple of season's of the playing assets being stripped to the bare minimum, by Cardoza. Even with players being moved on, and inferior/cheaper replacements being bought in, we should have been more than capable of staying up, and the fact that we didn't will rest on the shoulders of Stuart Gray, primarily I believe, because of the goalkeeping situation.


Actually I think the fans (me excepted) should shoulder their fair share of the blame. I said on here and told everyone that listened that Stuart Gray was going to take us down, that was in the January BEFORE our dismal run-in. Just like posters are doing now with the Sammo situation, I was ridiculed and told I was talking rubbish by the smug bastards on here that pass themselves off as experts but in truth no f*** all, some don't even attend many games and even have the audacity to gloat about missing them, especially if it's a bad performance/result. No, the groundswell was on here we should stick with Gray and even when we were relegated the same old "Give him 10 games into the new season" tripe was being brandished about. Who can blame a chairman for listening to his fans and sticking by their chosen one. He'll do exactly the same with Sammo.

Cardoza is at fault for sticking by Gray and will be at fault for sticking by Sammo but how on earth can you all be so hypocritical as to blame the man who is actually putting HIS money where his mouth is when all of you think he is/was doing the right thing at the time?


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: NTFC Nut on March 01, 2011, 15:23:24 pm
I think Jolly's point, Marvo, was that by selling the likes of Bunn, Gyepes, Johnson, Chambers and McGleish, without giving Gray either the adequate funds or enough notice to get a proper replacement in, the board played a significant role in weakening the side and getting us into this mess. It was heartening to see them finally start putting a bit of money back into the playing side of the club in January. Shaun Harrad is the first player we've paid a fee for in around four years.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: JollyCobbler on March 01, 2011, 15:36:45 pm
Actually I think the fans (me excepted) should shoulder their fair share of the blame. I said on here and told everyone that listened that Stuart Gray was going to take us down, that was in the January BEFORE our dismal run-in. Just like posters are doing now with the Sammo situation, I was ridiculed and told I was talking rubbish by the smug bastards on here that pass themselves off as experts but in truth no f*** all, some don't even attend many games and even have the audacity to gloat about missing them, especially if it's a bad performance/result. No, the groundswell was on here we should stick with Gray and even when we were relegated the same old "Give him 10 games into the new season" tripe was being brandished about. Who can blame a chairman for listening to his fans and sticking by their chosen one. He'll do exactly the same with Sammo.

Cardoza is at fault for sticking by Gray and will be at fault for sticking by Sammo but how on earth can you all be so hypocritical as to blame the man who is actually putting HIS money where his mouth is when all of you think he is/was doing the right thing at the time?

The way in which the playing assets were being stripped, even if Gray had kept us up, I very much doubt we'd have still been up there now. I know you like a good debate, but seriously take a look at the squad we had three years ago and then compare it to the one which started this season. If a manager is working with one hand tied behind his back, then you are going to struggle. Regardless of who is managing the team.
Don't get me wrong, i'm far from convinced Sammo is the man for the job. However, he was given his chance, and with the additions that have been made to the squad there needs to be a massive improvement. True, no sign of it yet, but surely it is better to see how we do on the run in, rather than make changes at this stage. It's a mute point anyway. DC isn't going to replace him while we are still in with a shout at the play-offs. Or do you honestly think he would if it wasn't for his popularity with the fans?
Sammo could yet become a very good manager. I hope he does. He now has a very decent looking squad (for this level) which should be flying. It isn't I know, but he was given a target for this season which at the moment is still in reach, so why would the chairman choose to sack him now?


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Marvo on March 01, 2011, 15:57:28 pm
I think Jolly's point, Marvo, was that by selling the likes of Bunn, Gyepes, Johnson, Chambers and McGleish, without giving Gray either the adequate funds or enough notice to get a proper replacement in, the board played a significant role in weakening the side and getting us into this mess. It was heartening to see them finally start putting a bit of money back into the playing side of the club in January. Shaun Harrad is the first player we've paid a fee for in around four years.

The club gambled when Calderwood arrived in an effort to get us Championship football, the infamous 3 year plan (or was it 5?). Anyway, that sort of investment was unsustainable once that plan failed, surely you can see that, so the spending had to be reined back. Anybody who thinks deiifferently is deluded and had we kept spending money like it was going ouit of fashion then I seriously doubt we'd still be around now.

As for Bunn, Gyepes, Johnson and Chambers, do you wanty to tell me how we were supposed to keep them given what was on offer, Blackburn, Cardiff, Leeds and Forest.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Trotty on March 01, 2011, 16:03:56 pm
I think this continued talk of playoffs is just silly at this point.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: NTFC Nut on March 01, 2011, 16:10:42 pm
As for Bunn, Gyepes, Johnson and Chambers, do you wanty to tell me how we were supposed to keep them given what was on offer, Blackburn, Cardiff, Leeds and Forest.

Jolly's point wasn't that not enough was done to keep them, it was that they weren't replaced adequately, be it through lack of funds made available to Gray (in the case of Johnson, for instance), or not giving Gray enough notice (eg Bunn and Gyepes who were both sold towards the end of August as I recall). We needed to rein in the spending but the haphazard way in which it was done was not helpful to our League One survival.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: JollyCobbler on March 01, 2011, 16:41:49 pm
The club gambled when Calderwood arrived in an effort to get us Championship football, the infamous 3 year plan (or was it 5?). Anyway, that sort of investment was unsustainable once that plan failed, surely you can see that, so the spending had to be reined back. Anybody who thinks deiifferently is deluded and had we kept spending money like it was going ouit of fashion then I seriously doubt we'd still be around now.

As for Bunn, Gyepes, Johnson and Chambers, do you wanty to tell me how we were supposed to keep them given what was on offer, Blackburn, Cardiff, Leeds and Forest.

The money was being thrown about even prior to Calderwood's arrival, and you are right about it only ever being a short term option. It should have been balanced investment from the start. It wasn't. Again, a mistake on the part of the owners. The point being, we have sold on some bloody good players without re-investing anything, and yet up until recently we were all being told to get excited about picking up a gem from the UCL.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: SteveRiches on March 01, 2011, 16:54:47 pm
Look, it IS Cardoza's fault! If only he had got registered as a player, forced Sammo to pick him as a striker and then scored a hat-trick in every game, we wouldn't be in our silly mid-table position.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Marvo on March 01, 2011, 17:49:42 pm
Jolly's point wasn't that not enough was done to keep them, it was that they weren't replaced adequately, be it through lack of funds made available to Gray (in the case of Johnson, for instance), or not giving Gray enough notice (eg Bunn and Gyepes who were both sold towards the end of August as I recall). We needed to rein in the spending but the haphazard way in which it was done was not helpful to our League One survival.

Wasn't replaced adequately you say. Let's cut to the chase shall we.

Cardoza brought in Frank Fielding on loan when Dunn was found wanting. Dunn had to be given his chance, the chairman/Gray acted as soon as it became obvious he wasn't ready.

Chambers & Gyepes? Mark Hughes was a straight replacement for Chambers and a bloody good one too. Gray was also allowed to bring in on loan Andy Todd, Mark Little and the superb Kyle Walker. We were hardly bereft of decent defenders.

For Bradley Johnson read Luke Guttridge.

Listen NUT, you really do need to do some research before you spout off for what turns out to be a load of hot air!


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: bungle on March 01, 2011, 18:27:55 pm
Agree 100%, Marvo. We are where we are due to poor management, simple as. The resources have been more than adequate to stay in League One/ mount a promotion challenge. Think about that last season in league one. We needed one point from two games - we didn't get it because Gray couldn't motivate the team.

Look at what a difference good managers like Eddie Howe and Keith Hill have made at clubs with resources far inferior to ours.

DC is ultimately responsible for those poor managers - he appointed them after all. However, to say we're struggling due to resources is patently rubbish.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: ntfc_dan on March 01, 2011, 20:44:38 pm
Anyone else had enough? 6 points out of 21.. Enough said. I'm fed up.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Dr Feelgood on March 01, 2011, 20:45:57 pm
Anyone else had enough? 6 points out of 21.. Enough said. I'm fed up.
and s*** loads of bookings


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: MK_Cobbler on March 01, 2011, 20:47:56 pm
Iv been fed up and wanted him out in October, in fact I never wanted him in in the first place.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: TbananaG on March 01, 2011, 20:55:22 pm
We added to the squad in Jan and results have only got worse. Did we think Harrad and Walker were poor players? Buck has to stop somewhere...


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: DustCobb on March 01, 2011, 20:55:35 pm
Proved tonight that he needs sacking.

Get rid of the man, now. Legend or not. Time to go. Do it now. f*** waiting, what is the point.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Dr Feelgood on March 01, 2011, 20:58:00 pm
Get Atkins back


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: GrangeParkCobbler on March 01, 2011, 20:59:17 pm
Trouble is I bet there are still far too many people who come on here later/tomorrow saying it was a good fightback and about how unlucky we were and how we deserved a draw, too many people saying it's our first defeat in 9 games rather than saying no win in 7.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: HertsCobbler on March 01, 2011, 21:00:08 pm
We have three options

i) Sack Sammo and Crosby
ii) Blame Crosby and appoint someone above Sammo
iii) Do nothing


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: ntfc_dan on March 01, 2011, 21:01:14 pm
Keep him I can see us getting dragged into something we don't get dragged into ;) Sammo out, and out now. Walker n harrad great signings, but Sammo dunno what he is doing it would seem!


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Shoemaker on March 01, 2011, 21:03:03 pm
I'd be surprised if he lasts the season.
In football money talks and we are currently getting ever decreasing attendances due to the fact that any casual fans I've talked to have said that it's a complete waste of time and money as the football under ian sampson is absolutely terrible.
When attendancies drop and the money isn't coming into the club then the cause is looked at and changes made.
The cause is obvious ian sampson is a poor football manager who doesn't command the respect of the players.
I turn up never knowing whose going to play where anymore that says a lot.
The discipline of the team is terrible and getting no better.
The signings have been at best adequate some terrible.
If ian sampson thinks josh walker is a better player than Ryan gilligan god help us!!!
With the chairman hoping fans will renew season tickets he must know in his heart of hearts that people aren't going to shell out to watch another season unless there are changes at the top.
Thanks sammo for your years of service as a player you were fantastic but like many great players you will never be a good manager grab your coat and go and take Malcolm Crosby with you before the fans turn and in the north stand tonight and leaving the game they have.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: MK_Cobbler on March 01, 2011, 21:10:18 pm
Get rid now; give a new manager a bit of time to work with the squad and asses the situation in regards to contracts in the summer.

Anyone that buys a striker like Harrad and plays him as a target man should not have a managerial job in football.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: DustCobb on March 01, 2011, 21:11:10 pm
Get rid now; give a new manager a bit of time to work with the squad and asses the situation in regards to contracts in the summer.

Anyone that buys a striker like Harrad and plays him as a target man should not have a managerial job in football.


Exactly.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Ted on March 01, 2011, 21:13:02 pm
Where are all the deluded mongs now who have been sticking up for Sammo all through this abysmal season. Sammo is now in real danger of costing the club all that was made in Carling cup. People will not pay to watch absolute s***e, and that's what's on offer, and has been on offer for the most of this season.It's been plain to see for anyone with half an ounce of football knowledge that he is simply not good enough to manage at this level.I don't want to get personal, but at the moment I loathe Sammo. It's just a shame that the Cobblers career of a great stalwart  has to come to an end for the good of the club.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Lanky Cobbler on March 01, 2011, 21:19:22 pm
The defence is crap end of. Has sammo done anything about this.... no. The players aren't good enough but thats not their fault. Sammos had long enough to bring someone in at the back for ages as the problems have been there for everyone to see for god knows how long


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: clarkeysntfc on March 01, 2011, 21:19:35 pm
I wasn't there tonight, despite my season ticket (which I have renewed) I frankly decided to do something else instead.

I had serious reservations about Sampson getting the job, not least because it was off the back of one of the worst caretaker spells I've ever seen.

For a while I've been thinking that we should allow him the summer and a last chance to make a good fist of next season.

However, I'm rapidly beginning to think that we should get rid as soon as possible. Things aren't improving and I don't see anything to suggest that they will at the moment.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on March 01, 2011, 21:20:21 pm
Get Atkins back

 ;D


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: jayntfc on March 01, 2011, 21:23:41 pm
One less season ticket sold for next season.

I was going to do a long rant about how s**t tonight was but the truth is I can't be bothered, now I'll leave it to NTFC nut to come in and tell as a loss was a decent result cos Burton are in good form and that Sammo is learning from his experiences. So am I, and that's why I'm not renewing.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: MK_Cobbler on March 01, 2011, 21:23:43 pm
I wasn't there tonight, despite my season ticket (which I have renewed) I frankly decided to do something else instead.

I had serious reservations about Sampson getting the job, not least because it was off the back of one of the worst caretaker spells I've ever seen.

For a while I've been thinking that we should allow him the summer and a last chance to make a good fist of next season.

However, I'm rapidly beginning to think that we should get rid as soon as possible. Things aren't improving and I don't see anything to suggest that they will at the moment.
Allow him the summer?  :o are you mad

We need a manager in ASAP with more experience, at least half a footballing brain  and more contacts. 


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: bigcitylights on March 01, 2011, 21:24:53 pm
After sitting on the fence, I am firmly in the Sampson Out camp after tonight's debacle. Not a f***ing clue.

Why the f*** would you take one of our best headers of a ball off (Tozer) when we have a dangerous attacking free-kick and we're losing 3-2 in injury-time (that's without mentioning we threw on Courtney 'f***ing goal machine' Herbert!)?


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: EastNpton on March 01, 2011, 21:25:44 pm
What manager worth his salt is going to want and come and manage us?

The set up we've got leaves a lot to be desired. No reserve team, training in some school in the middle of nowhere, bizzarre signing of the likes of Alistair Slowe...

We've been here before. We had a go at Stuart Gray and probably would have had a go at Calderwood had he not walked.

The problems on the pitch stem from bigger issues than just Ian Sampson. Cardoza had the chance for a fresh start when Gray went but instead employed someone from within Gray's regime...hardly a clean break.

If someone with the passion for the club of Ian Sampson can't sort out it's problems than we have a major issue on our hands...


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: dannygntfc on March 01, 2011, 21:26:55 pm
I've wanted sammo out since his first game. Tonight wasn't a surprise at all. Poor tacticts again in the first half, it was so easy for burton. We didn't pressure them at all and they just walked into our box on countless occasions. To be fair it was a good second half from us, but u can't only turn up for just 45 mins every game. It's so depressing watching this team, individually we have a decent squad who should be competing at the top of this league. We just need a management team who can gel them all together. Sammo and Crosby are not the ones to do it.
If you really love this club sammo, please do the right thing and walk away now.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on March 01, 2011, 21:31:11 pm
For the first time in 26 years of supporting the club, I actually turned on the team and manager tonight. Enough said. I've never watched such consistent crap as that and I definitely won't be there against Shrewsbury on Saturday. Embarrassing  >:(

The worst thing is Sammo really believes the team are trying to play the right way when we are watching the same old s*** every week. I actually pity the bloke because he's so out of his depth  :(


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Daffy Duck on March 01, 2011, 21:31:24 pm
Less than 3,500. Enough said.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: DustCobb on March 01, 2011, 21:34:31 pm
I've got a season ticket but seriously thinking about not going on Saturday.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Daffy Duck on March 01, 2011, 21:35:18 pm
I've got a season ticket but seriously thinking about not going on Saturday.
+1


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: County Cobbler on March 01, 2011, 21:35:29 pm
Forget opinions, Sammo was given the job to get us promoted with a minimum of the play-offs. After 2 years he has failed! The table says it all. FACT!
DC please appoint a manager who has put together a promotion winning team in the league not coaches like Gray, Wilkinson and Gorman.
Bye bye Sammo.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Insider on March 01, 2011, 21:37:14 pm
I brought along a mate for the game tonight for his first ever Cobblers match, and we spent the first half pissing ourselves laughing.  When it reaches those depths then you know something has to be done.  The funniest moment wasn't Dunn's own goal, but the sight of Johnson leathering the ball out for a throw in.  The first goal once again came from a cross from our right full back position (Johnson), the second we stood static while the Burton player was given the freedom to set himself up for what was actualy one of the best strikes you're ever likely to see at Sixfields, As for their third, well words fail me.  Worst of all I could tell immediately by Dunn's body position that he was going to drop it over his line.  However the scene was set when in the first minute or so we had a two man break with Leon and Jacobs and the Cobblers midfield four simply watched and ambled up in support, and then ambled back again:  Holt, Osman, Walker, Laurent - you were all a bloody disgrace.  It happened throughout the first half, both too slow to support and too slow to cover. Tozer and Beckwith, I'd fine them a week's wages every time they take a ball wide and then hoof the ball across the field to Holt (or Jacobs or McKenzie).  Those were the clueless tactics of a manager who has run out of ideas.  


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Daffy Duck on March 01, 2011, 21:37:28 pm
Aren't you over reacting?  That's one defeat in 7 games!  ;D


Title: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: ntfc_dan on March 01, 2011, 21:37:45 pm
whos joining?

I will be member number 1







*sorry for starting a new threat but i think the exclusive club deserves its own ;) ha


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Shoemaker on March 01, 2011, 21:38:55 pm
All joking aside if you had ian atkins back as manager you would have.
Four 6 foot defenders one probably an experienced centre half playing in their correct positions every week.
A midfield that although not the most creative would close the ball Down chase lost causes and battle to the last minute.
Wide players who would get crosses into the area every opportunity rather than faf about trying to beat players twice and losing possesion.
A couple of decent strikers to hoof the ball up to at least one being a proper target man to cause disruption in the opponents penalty area and put himself about as opposed to playing people like michael Jacobs who is a winger learning his trade being stuck up front and marked by six foot four darren Moore while we continually kick the ball in the air to him!!!
Sure atkins was found out at a higher level but Christ he knew how to build a team from fcuk all to get out of the basement division.
I'm sure there wernt many fans tonight who wouldn't have rather had an atkins team on the pitch.
Yes as a manager he had limitations but in my opinion getting a team straight out of league two wasn't one of them.
He'd have a field day with some of the decent players we have at the club just by playing them in their right positions and he'd also enjoy weilding the axe on several who are not good enough to play professionally!!!
I'm not saying he should get the job but I am saying he knew how to build a team that played to the best of their abilities something ian sampson has not got.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Ted on March 01, 2011, 21:40:00 pm
Less than 3,500. Enough said.

I certainly wouldn't read too much into the attendance. Ours was still the 3rd biggest in League 2 and Torquay, who are a much better side than us, managed 1500.Then there's Rushden, again probably a better side than us, managed 800.To manage to get 3500 on a cold night to watch absolate crap from the bottom division, with Chelsea v Man Utd on the box as well, and with the current economic climate, is certanly commendable.What worries me, is the damage to the potential season ticket sales.People turn up to be entertained, not to be made to feel miserable and dejecTED.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: PepesProdigy on March 01, 2011, 21:40:06 pm
swear word.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: EastNpton on March 01, 2011, 21:40:26 pm
Were you also in the Gray out club? Can't just focus on the manager... its unrealistic. There's a culture of mediocrity that pervades in this club from top to bottom and everywhere in between


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: ntfc_dan on March 01, 2011, 21:41:24 pm
Aren't you over reacting?  That's one defeat in 7 games!  ;D


 or 2 in 8?


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on March 01, 2011, 21:43:07 pm
All joking aside if you had ian atkins back as manager you would have.
Four 6 foot defenders one probably an experienced centre half playing in their correct positions every week.
A midfield that although not the most creative would close the ball Down chase lost causes and battle to the last minute.
Wide players who would get crosses into the area every opportunity rather than faf about trying to beat players twice and losing possesion.
A couple of decent strikers to hoof the ball up to at least one being a proper target man to cause disruption in the opponents penalty area and put himself about as opposed to playing people like michael Jacobs who is a winger learning his trade being stuck up front and marked by six foot four darren Moore while we continually kick the ball in the air to him!!!
Sure atkins was found out at a higher level but Christ he knew how to build a team from fcuk all to get out of the basement division.
I'm sure there wernt many fans tonight who wouldn't have rather had an atkins team on the pitch.
Yes as a manager he had limitations but in my opinion getting a team straight out of league two wasn't one of them.
He'd have a field day with some of the decent players we have at the club just by playing them in their right positions and he'd also enjoy weilding the axe on several who are not good enough to play professionally!!!
I'm not saying he should get the job but I am saying he knew how to build a team that played to the best of their abilities something ian sampson has not got.

That's all well and good but I remember how virtually the whole stadium turned on the bloke and also sang Atkins is a wanker when he was commentating on our game against Man Utd a few seasons ago. Our fans are an absolute embarrassment sometimes, especially when considering what he did for us  ::)


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: MK_Cobbler on March 01, 2011, 21:44:09 pm
There's a culture of mediocrity that pervades in this club from top to bottom and everywhere in between
Agreed but having a manager that knows a little bit about football is bound to help...

Count me in the club  ;)


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Daffy Duck on March 01, 2011, 21:44:54 pm
That's all well and good but I remember how virtually the whole stadium turned on the bloke and also sang Atkins is a wanker when he was commentating on our game against Man Utd a few seasons ago. Our fans are an absolute embarrassment sometimes, especially when considering what he did for us  ::)
Virtually the whole stadium?  Did your alarm clock go off soon after?


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: EastNpton on March 01, 2011, 21:45:25 pm
Would Atkins come and manage the club the way it is being run at the moment. No fu*king way!


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: ntfc_dan on March 01, 2011, 21:46:59 pm
Were you also in the Gray out club? Can't just focus on the manager... its unrealistic. There's a culture of mediocrity that pervades in this club from top to bottom and everywhere in between

Can u pipe down?! so you are happy with the state of our club? this year we have played 13, won 3, drew 7, lost 3. wow we are in top form! Sammo has been backed by DC, given money to spend. so since we "improved" the team with SAMMO's signing we have  won 1 drew 6 and lost 1.

Sammo has had his chance and can fook off!


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: New Dawn Fades on March 01, 2011, 21:47:58 pm
Feel genuinely sorry for the guy,I will never turn on a manager just for the sake of a thread.Whatever your feelings towards sammo are,Is their any need for this thread?


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: bigcitylights on March 01, 2011, 21:49:39 pm
I absolutely love the bloke but from the evidence of what we've seen recently I can only see us going one way under his continued stewardship.



Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: HertsCobbler on March 01, 2011, 21:49:41 pm
I feel gutted for Sammo.  But I never thought he was up for it.  Norwich appointed a man of similar stature in Bryan Gunn - they quickly realised their error and he left. 

If we want to get to L1 ever again, he ain't capable. Sorry to say.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: PepesProdigy on March 01, 2011, 21:49:47 pm
Can the MODs please delete this thread.
No matter how poor you think sammo is doing, it does not earn the right for people to start a thread which can split this forum into a sammo out club, or sammo in club.
Rise above it, support the club and what will be will be.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: DustCobb on March 01, 2011, 21:51:01 pm
Delete a thread because someone has an opinion?


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Tyler on March 01, 2011, 21:51:49 pm
Do not employ Ian f***ing Atkins. ::)

Somebody completely new is needed. new thoughts ideas and vision. Somebody please, please come on here, or come to me and tell me he has a clue about where he's taking this team? Potential for a good side? Yes there is but three quarters of them will probably f*** off in June and we're back to square one. Im turning up every home game and spending the first 5 minutes working out who's playing and in what position because it's become a f***ing lottery at the minute. Herbert was going to do the square root of f*** all tonight when we;re pumping crosses into the box for the entire second half. I wont be at all surprised if he's still here at the weekend. The most surprising thing thing will be where are the players playing?


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on March 01, 2011, 21:51:55 pm
Delete a thread because someone has an opinion?

Christ, that's Marvo fcuked  ;D


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Ted on March 01, 2011, 21:52:15 pm
Were you also in the Gray out club? Can't just focus on the manager... its unrealistic. There's a culture of mediocrity that pervades in this club from top to bottom and everywhere in between

Of course you can focus on the manager.He's the most important person, apart from the owner of course, at the football club. If there is a culture of mediocrity,and I believe there is regarding the playing side, then Sammo is the main culprit.Great strided are being taken off the pitch to promote this football club in the local and wider community, but all the good work is totally futile if you don't do the business on the pitch.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: EastNpton on March 01, 2011, 21:52:40 pm
Can the MODs please delete this thread.
No matter how poor you think sammo is doing, it does not earn the right for people to start a thread which can split this forum into a sammo out club, or sammo in club.
Rise above it, support the club and what will be will be.

I am just about in the Sammo in club because I think his heart his in the right place. We could have a crap manager who doesn't give a monkeys. Debate is healthy


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Tyler on March 01, 2011, 21:53:37 pm
Can the MODs please delete this thread.
No matter how poor you think sammo is doing, it does not earn the right for people to start a thread which can split this forum into a sammo out club, or sammo in club.
Rise above it, support the club and what will be will be.

Never stopped people doing it for Gray.

I feel really bad for him. I'll never openly shout 'Sammo Out' i have way too much respect for the guy but it isnt working


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: jayntfc on March 01, 2011, 21:53:43 pm
I think all Cobblers fans appreciate the work Sammo did for us as a player and don't begrudge him the chance at management but to be quite honest, we've been underachieving for a while now and he is clearly not the man to turn that around, and it's very depressing turning up each week watching a bloke you consider NTFC through and through f**k it up consistently.

Norwich did the right thing with Gunn last season, put sentiment aside and got rid. Grimsby did it recently with Woods. If they're not up to the job, and taking us backward, they've got to go.

Honestly, it's horrible listening to Sammo get abused from the stands but fans frustrations are completely understandable, we're going nowhere. Something has to change.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: EastNpton on March 01, 2011, 21:55:28 pm
What progressive, half talented manager is gonna wanna come here? because our falling league position shows that we are going backwards!


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Ted on March 01, 2011, 21:55:37 pm
Can the MODs please delete this thread.
No matter how poor you think sammo is doing, it does not earn the right for people to start a thread which can split this forum into a sammo out club, or sammo in club.
Rise above it, support the club and what will be will be.

People like you make me puke, and I hope you and all the other twats that put up with mediocrity go the same way as our incompetent manager.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Dr Feelgood on March 01, 2011, 21:55:46 pm
who would you get in if Samp gets s***canned?


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: MK_Cobbler on March 01, 2011, 21:56:54 pm
People like you make me puke, and I hope you and all the other twats that put up with mediocrity go the same way as our incompetent manager.
;D


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: bri77 on March 01, 2011, 21:57:40 pm
I wouldn't lay the blame at Sammos feet for tonight. How unbelievably shocking were the players in that first half. I know the saying that they "play" for the manager etc but we just about got all the basics wrong in that first half. That is the players and not the manager. Just imagine where everybody would be if the players were dispensed of in the same way as mangers are?


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: PepesProdigy on March 01, 2011, 21:58:27 pm
Delete a thread because someone has an opinion?

This isn't an opinion, if you have an opinion post it in the other sammo threads we have.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: PepesProdigy on March 01, 2011, 22:00:35 pm
People like you make me puke, and I hope you and all the other twats that put up with mediocrity go the same way as our incompetent manager.

haha! i love the fact you dont know who i am and i can get under your skin, i dont care for your personal insults ted. as far as i see it, im going to support the manager who ever he is, untill DC decides to act.



Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: CobblerForever on March 01, 2011, 22:00:51 pm
I brought along a mate for the game tonight for his first ever Cobblers match, and we spent the first half pissing ourselves laughing.  When it reaches those depths then you know something has to be done.  The funniest moment wasn't Dunn's own goal, but the sight of Johnson leathering the ball out for a throw in.  The first goal once again came from a cross from our right full back position (Johnson), the second we stood static while the Burton player was given the freedom to set himself up for what was actualy one of the best strikes you're ever likely to see at Sixfields, As for their third, well words fail me.  Worst of all I could tell immediately by Dunn's body position that he was going to drop it over his line.  However the scene was set when in the first minute or so we had a two man break with Leon and Jacobs and the Cobblers midfield four simply watched and ambled up in support, and then ambled back again:  Holt, Osman, Walker, Laurent - you were all a bloody disgrace.  It happened throughout the first half, both too slow to support and too slow to cover. Tozer and Beckwith, I'd fine them a week's wages every time they take a ball wide and then hoof the ball across the field to Holt (or Jacobs or McKenzie).  Those were the clueless tactics of a manager who has run out of ideas.  

Laurent was at fault with their first goal as he failed to put in any tackle at all on his man which left Johnson high and dry. I thought the 2nd half fight back was very good and we were unlucky to not get a share of the points.

Generally speaking, the first half performance was very bad and Dunn's eye to ball coordination goes really awry from time to time (he came close to conceding in a similar fashion earlier in the half).

I enjoyed the game as a spectacle - I hope your mate did.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Ted on March 01, 2011, 22:01:38 pm
I wouldn't lay the blame at Sammos feet for tonight. How unbelievably shocking were the players in that first half. I know the saying that they "play" for the manager etc but we just about got all the basics wrong in that first half. That is the players and not the manager. Just imagine where everybody would be if the players were dispensed of in the same way as mangers are?

Then why did Sammo admit on the raidio that it was his fault and he takes sole responability.? You obviously didn't hear is interview. Well, I can tell you now that it didn't inspire me at all, in fact, I'd go as far as to say it was defeatest, and from a man who knows he ain't up to the job.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: The Hask on March 01, 2011, 22:02:01 pm
I wouldn't lay the blame at Sammos feet for tonight. How unbelievably shocking were the players in that first half. I know the saying that they "play" for the manager etc but we just about got all the basics wrong in that first half. That is the players and not the manager. Just imagine where everybody would be if the players were dispensed of in the same way as mangers are?

Well Sammo disagrees with you as he said he was responsible for the 1st half - that formation was never going to work, that was clear to see after 10 minues, waiting 45 mins to change it is inexcusable in my opinion


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: MK_Cobbler on March 01, 2011, 22:03:02 pm
We will beat Shrewsbury on Saturday, which will only painfully prolong Sampson’s stay.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: DL2 on March 01, 2011, 22:06:43 pm
Christ, that's Marvo fcuked  ;D

 ;D  Thank you for my chuckle of the day ... brilliant  ;D

I am still in the Sammo in club, although my patience was somewhat tested today but ....  I very much doubt even he thought we would be as crap as we were in the 1st half and he clearly did what he needed to do to spur them on and change it about a bit in the 2nd.

It wasn't just Sammo's formation.  Too many players were s***e and lazy today in the first half, MCKENZIE, DUNN, JOHNSON (apart from the goal) and LAURENT should be digusted with themselves.   Even if the disallowed goal had stood I would still be bitter about the crap shift they put in for that first 45 mins. 

As for the ref ... don't get me started ....  we didn't lose the game because of him but nonetheless ....  a disgraceful performance how the hell is anyone supposed to have any respect for refs when THAT is a good enough standard to cover league football.




Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: DustCobb on March 01, 2011, 22:11:27 pm
Just read Sammo's interview on the official site...

He says if we can get all the players we signed in January on the pitch at the same time it will help........!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: jayntfc on March 01, 2011, 22:11:44 pm
All two of them?


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on March 01, 2011, 22:18:54 pm
People like you make me puke, and I hope you and all the other twats that put up with mediocrity go the same way as our incompetent manager.

There was me thinking you were a gent Ted. Shame on you  ;D


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Ted on March 01, 2011, 22:26:51 pm
There was me thinking you were a gent Ted. Shame on you  ;D

I'm afraid to say that some people bring out the worst in me.For the life of me I just don't know why they follow football. For me it's a game of passion, a will to win ,a desire to be the best. Otherwise, you might as well take up Line dancing or have your friends round for come dine with me.Perhaps I'm wrong, and my time is past, but I honestly despair at what's going on.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: CobblerForever on March 01, 2011, 22:33:15 pm
I'm afraid to say that some people bring out the worst in me.For the life of me I just don't know why they follow football. For me it's a game of passion, a will to win ,a desire to be the best. Otherwise, you might as well take up Line dancing or have your friends round for come dine with me.Perhaps I'm wrong, and my time is past, but I honestly despair at what's going on.

There's room for everyone's opinion. This is a forum. I've followed this club for over 40 years now and have learned to take the rough with the smooth. The first half was really bad. The second hald was really good. There are more important things in life than the Cobblers winning. I was richly entertained tonight. That is my opinion.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on March 01, 2011, 22:35:06 pm
I was richly entertained tonight. That is my opinion.

Oh dear, that's really sad


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: NTFC Nut on March 01, 2011, 22:35:44 pm
Sammo seemed quite put out about the final question in the post-match interview ("are the fans losing faith in you?", or words to that effect) and it sounded like he slammed the microphone down at the end. Clearly not a happy bunny. He let himself down with his tactics tonight but all of the players who started were woeful and should be ashamed of that gutless first half perfomance. Still in the 'Sammo In' camp but my patience was tested in the first half tonight.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Marvo on March 01, 2011, 22:40:46 pm
I still say keep Sammo for the same reason as I have stated over and over again...

Yes, you keep telling us, we wouldn't get anybody better. Let me ask you something, how likely is it we'd get anybody worse?


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Enya_NTFC on March 01, 2011, 22:41:17 pm
Sammo seemed quite put out about the final question in the post-match interview ("are the fans losing faith in you?", or words to that effect) and it sounded like he slammed the microphone down at the end. Clearly not a happy bunny. He let himself down with his tactics tonight but all of the players who started were woeful and should be ashamed of that gutless first half perfomance. Still in the 'Sammo In' camp but my patience was tested in the first half tonight.

Sounded miserable to me.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on March 01, 2011, 22:44:03 pm
I'm afraid to say that some people bring out the worst in me.For the life of me I just don't know why they follow football. For me it's a game of passion, a will to win ,a desire to be the best. Otherwise, you might as well take up Line dancing or have your friends round for come dine with me.Perhaps I'm wrong, and my time is past, but I honestly despair at what's going on.

I felt exactly the same when a few idiots actually decided to applaud the team off the field. I was gobsmacked  ::)


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Daffy Duck on March 01, 2011, 22:45:02 pm
Sammo seemed quite put out about the final question in the post-match interview ("are the fans losing faith in you?", or words to that effect) and it sounded like he slammed the microphone down at the end. Clearly not a happy bunny. He let himself down with his tactics tonight but all of the players who started were woeful and should be ashamed of that gutless first half perfomance. Still in the 'Sammo In' camp but my patience was tested in the first half tonight.
The only reason to be in the Sammo in camp is down to sentiment and that is not a reason.  Please TFAMH don't repeat the garbage about not being able to find better.  This season has been littered with poor decisions (crap players being picked over new signings because they looked good in practise games, players being played out of position, formations wrong and not changed quickly enough when it becomes apparent, being out thought by opposing managers etc etc) and tonight it was evident yet again that he has not learnt a blessed thing and we are no further forward than when he got the job.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on March 01, 2011, 22:46:21 pm
The only reason to be in the Sammo in camp is down to sentiment and that is not a reason.  Please TFAMH don't repeat the garbage about not being able to find better.  This season has been littered with poor decisions (crap players being picked over new signings because they looked good in practise games, players being played out of position, formations wrong and not changed quickly enough when it becomes apparent, being out thought by opposing managers etc etc) and tonight it was evident yet again that he has not learnt a blessed thing and we are no further forward than when he got the job.

Tell us something we don't already know  ::) You sound like a broken record  ;)


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Daffy Duck on March 01, 2011, 22:48:53 pm
Tell us something we don't already know  ::) You sound like a broken record  ;)
Now just cause I disagreed with you on a previous post don't get your feathers ruffled.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: DrillingCobbler on March 01, 2011, 22:50:55 pm
Well having been on the line for a while (I was very much against his appointment btw) I have moved into this 'club' - tonights performance, tactics...everything...being the last straw for me.

I wont however come on here tomorrow rambling on about it because I don't really have much to add. I really like the bloke, 'hoped' that we would do well...but it hasn't and I don't think it ever will work. I also think that theres a chance that we could play with relegation a bit if a change isn't made with immediate effect.

Trollope or the dustbins gaffer for me. Trollope's a free agent and well within our grasp. Get him in for Saturday and let him use the last few games to assess the squad before sorting things out in the summer. He's very young and has taken a similar sized club as ourselves from this league and established it at the next level for a few seasons. Ticks all the boxes in my view.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Insider on March 01, 2011, 22:51:04 pm
I didn't actually see Sammo enter the technical area tonight until about the 20th or 25th minute when he got up to bollock Laurent.  I'm not saying that Laurent didn't deserve it, but he could have equally bollocked any one of the others.  It looked for all the world like Ian Atkins in his bad old bullying days when he picked on certain players.  It's up to Sammo to motivate the players and have them all psyched up for the job in hand from the off.  The constant apologies are becoming wearing, he comes across as dour and uninspiring in his interviews, and I no longer believe he can turn this around.  However I don't think I need to sign up for this club, I have a sneaky feeling he has a lot of pride and will walk, but if he doesn't DC can make the decision at the end of the season in the cold light of falling season ticket sales.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Ted on March 01, 2011, 22:51:10 pm
There's room for everyone's opinion. This is a forum. I've followed this club for over 40 years now and have learned to take the rough with the smooth. The first half was really bad. The second hald was really good. There are more important things in life than the Cobblers winning. I was richly entertained tonight. That is my opinion.

Richly entertained ? You've had one hell of a boring life.I hope for goodness sake that you're in the miniority otherwise the human race is doomed let alone the Cobblers.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: sxcobbler on March 01, 2011, 22:51:39 pm
I'm in.....and include Crosby as well.

That 3 year contract will crucify us !


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Daffy Duck on March 01, 2011, 22:52:32 pm
Based on DC's previous form and the fact that the budget has been reduced every year, I'd say we will be where we are now or just above it at best this time next season. 
Interesting, and where do you think we will be next season if we keep with Sammo?


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: guest47 on March 01, 2011, 22:53:22 pm
Based on DC's previous form and the fact that the budget has been reduced every year, I'd say we will be where we are now or just above it at best this time next season. 

Exactly, and that's optimistic. I seem to remember it being announced the budget was cut by 25% last year. There's no logical reason we should expect to be above where we are now, and nothing to suggest we will improve next year. Except blind faith.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: DrillingCobbler on March 01, 2011, 22:53:45 pm
Richly entertained ? You've had one hell of a boring life.I hope for goodness sake that you're in the miniority otherwise the human race is doomed let alone the Cobblers.

He must have had 'something' waiting for him when he got home!  ;D


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on March 01, 2011, 22:55:12 pm
Now just cause I disagreed with you on a previous post don't get your feathers ruffled.

Good memory, you got me there  ;D


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: NTFC Nut on March 01, 2011, 22:55:14 pm
We will beat Shrewsbury on Saturday, which will only painfully prolong Sampson’s stay.

It says something when you're implying you hope we lose to Shrewsbury on Saturday in order to put another nail into Ian Sampson's coffin.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Daffy Duck on March 01, 2011, 22:59:50 pm
Roughly the same place as we are now... Unless as I suspect there is an even bigger budget cut.

I said last season that within five years we would be in the conference.... I stand by it.
So you say keep with Sammo and we will be below mid table this time next year, I agree by the way, but if he was one of my sales reps and was not performing and I thought he would still not be performing in 12 months then I would take the decision to change him now.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Daffy Duck on March 01, 2011, 23:02:53 pm
Where did I say we won't be able to find better?

here "Sammo might not be ideal for the job. But who ever we get they will be the same, or worse"


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: barnabas on March 01, 2011, 23:05:17 pm
Roughly the same place as we are now... Unless as I suspect there is an even bigger budget cut.

I said last season that within five years we would be in the conference.... I stand by it.

So dont you think we need to gamble and try and find a manager who can make the collective more than the sum of the individuals. Sammos had (roughly) the equivalent of two seasons worth of games in charge, with an average seasons worth of points around about the mid fifties mark (marvo will soon let me know if this isnt correct). To me that suggests he's at best mediocre.

I take the point about budgets and the recent track record of appointments, and don't disagree, but still think its time to roll the dice.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Daffy Duck on March 01, 2011, 23:05:25 pm
Good memory, you got me there  ;D
For what it's worth, I agree with you most of the time.  :)


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: DrillingCobbler on March 01, 2011, 23:06:44 pm
Roughly the same place as we are now... Unless as I suspect there is an even bigger budget cut.

I said last season that within five years we would be in the conference.... I stand by it.

To be fair to DC, he has openly stated on a few occasions since the back end of last year that next seasons budget will be bigger than this seasons. So bearing that in mind, surely now is the time to bring in somebody with the right level of experience and credentials to spend it wisely? Assuming of course that intention hasn't changed - the mini spending spree in January would suggest that it hasn't...


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Daffy Duck on March 01, 2011, 23:09:55 pm
But my opinion is from a supporters perspective. If I'm as confident as I am that we are resigned to an inevitable fate I might as well like the bloke serving it up... ;D
Now I understand........ you are beyond help.



 


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Marvo on March 01, 2011, 23:17:01 pm
Yeah he should go. It's a bloody shame, I think we all wanted him to be a success however it isn't going to happen. Maybe we could start the Reserve team up again and let him manage that?


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: guest47 on March 01, 2011, 23:19:27 pm
Why does this keep coming up...

The money spent in January was generated by three of the top earners disappearing off the books.



The Carling Cup run helped too.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Marvo on March 01, 2011, 23:21:41 pm
Roughly the same place as we are now... Unless as I suspect there is an even bigger budget cut.

I said last season that within five years we would be in the conference.... I stand by it.

Ah, now I get it. First you want Sammo to remain manager for five years, then you say you expect us to be a conference side within five years. It all makes perfect sense and you know if you get what you want, I agree with you.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: MikeNTFC on March 02, 2011, 00:24:39 am
At the moment i'd say go. But if he stays ill be very interested in his summer signings. If hes actually learned and seen we a) need a target man, b) some experience and character and c) need to stop this 'passing' game which the players cant do.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Dr Feelgood on March 02, 2011, 01:13:12 am
Give him a couple more games if we win the next 3 everything changes again..


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: bigcitylights on March 02, 2011, 07:01:08 am
At the moment i'd say go. But if he stays ill be very interested in his summer signings. If hes actually learned and seen we a) need a target man, b) some experience and character and c) need to stop this 'passing' game which the players cant do.

Got to say, I haven't seem them do much of this passing game you speak of in last 6/7 matches.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: bungle on March 02, 2011, 07:34:41 am
TFAMH's only argument for keeping Sammo is that the alternative would be a cheaper, inferior option. That's the kind of defeatist attitude which leads teams to the conference.

I know I'm repeating myself, but IMO, DC should have spent the Harrad/Laurent money on sacking Sammo and Crosby and replacing them with a decent, experienced manager. A decent manager would have made far more of a difference to our long term future than a fox-in-in-the-box striker. Anyway, so much for this season.

As fans all we can do is put pressure on DC to hire a manager with genuine tactical nous, man-management skills and ability in the transfer market. The local media need to do their part too - Jefferson Lake et al need to be far more critical of DC's appointment record. Things will not change until DC realises the importance of recruiting a competent manager; if he doesn't then TFAMH's bleak conference prophecy might just be realised. 


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: threeinabed on March 02, 2011, 07:44:30 am
sammo out


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Marvo on March 02, 2011, 07:45:58 am
We are in serious danger of finishing in our lowest position in 17 years, in fact if Barnet start picking up a few wins we could be mentioning the terrible "R" word again. How likely is it really that a new man could do any worse?


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: threeinabed on March 02, 2011, 07:47:17 am
sammo out


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: bungle on March 02, 2011, 07:52:37 am
The Bryan Gunn analogy is an excellent one. Local legend, great player, poor manager. Look at the difference appointing someone with the class, professionalism and intelligence of Paul Lambert did for Norwich. There is no room for sentiment.

Paul Trollope might not be perfect but he would be a vast, vast improvement on what we have at the moment and, being a free agent, I don't think he'd cost a fortune. He won promotion from this level before, kept Rovers in League One for a decent stretch and even guided them to the FA cup quarter finals. Not a bad record at all.





Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: guest49 on March 02, 2011, 07:58:50 am

I just want to make my position on Ian Sampson completely clear.
Do I want Sammo sacked?
No.


F*ck me, you change your mind more than my missus. Will you change it again if results go our way at the weekend?  ;D


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Marvo on March 02, 2011, 08:07:29 am
Paul Trollopes record as a manager is 284 games in charge, 106 wins, 71 draws, 107 defeats. Fairly average I'm afraid but in fairness a lot of those games would have been at league 1 level and if Sammo's record was such as it is in league 1 instead of the basement division most of us would be reasonably happy, at least with results if not performances.

Having said that Trollope wouldn't be my choice and to be honest this next appointment will be absoluely crucial in to which direction this club is heading so I wouldn't want that choice to be influenced by financial considerations or whether a manager was already unemployed or not. We've got to get it right and if it means paying compensation and stealing a manager from another club so be it.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Mark-JB on March 02, 2011, 08:09:29 am
Don't see much point in making any changes until the end of the season.

We aren't going up, we're very unlikely to go down.

Do I think the guy is the right man for the job now?  :-\


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Monty on March 02, 2011, 08:10:40 am
Have to agree with most on this thread - It doesn't look likely that Sammo will lead us to a higher league. I've never been one to knee-jerk but unfortunately this one doesn't seem likely to have a happy ending, as much as the majority of our fans desperately want it to. I would still hope there's a graceful way for Sammo to transisition out - in my opinion he deserves that much.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: DustCobb on March 02, 2011, 08:12:07 am
I think we will end up in the Blue Square Prem, not this season as we are probably safe, but can see us dropping next season.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: rollerballrocco on March 02, 2011, 08:12:09 am
I hadn't seen a game in an age but took in the Southend game whilst i was in London.

From just going on this site i assumed that we had a good bunch of players and that we had been unlucky and as we had a young team we were making mistakes whilst they grew and learnt their roles.

What i got from watching a proper 90 minutes was that the team look rudderless and don't appear to have a gameplan. Whilst we have skillful players they appeared to worry on the ball and punt the ball to McKay (i was shocked about how inneffectual and lightweight he looked) or McKenzie (who looked ready to go off after 15 minutes)

I would be happy if it looked like the team had a semblance of what they were trying to do but i'm afraid from this old supporter i saw none of this.


Title: Re: Sammo
Post by: Marvo on March 02, 2011, 08:14:37 am
F*ck me, you change your mind more than my missus. Will you change it again if results go our way at the weekend?  ;D

You have a strange idea of how people form opinions. When you appoint a new manager, almost everybody has there say and then the vast majority backs the chairmans choice, even if they had misgivings in the first place. By the time a manager is sacked that vast majority have formed the opinion that he isn't the man. That's a complete reversal of opinion but one based on experience, something they didn't have to go in the initial assessment. Therefore my dimwitted friend at some point their opinions changed. Now this will be the THIRD time I've said the same thing so hopefully this time it will get through your thick skull. I WAS WILLING TO GIVE SAMMO THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT WHILST THERE WAS STILL A POSSIBILITY WE COULD MAKE THE PLAY-OFFS. THAT CHANGED LAST NIGHT!

Any chance you understand now?


Title: Re: Sammo (In or) Out Club...
Post by: Macc Cobbler on March 02, 2011, 08:15:10 am
Thought I would give the thread a bit more perspective ........ even though we already have another Sammo thread running.
The main criticism that can be levelled against Sammo last night was that he did not change things earlier when it was obviously not working - this is not the first time this season this has happened.
The team lacks consistency with too many players blowing hot and cold. Ultimate responsibility lies with the manager but the players need to take a long hard look at themselves.
Look at our performances in the last seven games, we were shocking against Morecambe and again last night, but have put in not unreasonable performances in other games.
Lack of discipline (and poor refereeing decisions) have cost us dearly losing both Osman and Harrad for three games each.
There are likely to be a number of players leaving at the end of the season, as their contracts will not be renewed, and therefore there needs to be a rebuilding exercise over the summer.
At the moment the pressure on Sammo is becoming untenable, with people sniping at him on a match by match basis.The main question facing DC is does he believe that Sammo is  the right person to build a new team next season.
Is Sammo the man for next season ......... I will put my head on the block and say "yes".
Will he be the manager next season, unfortunately in my opinion the answer is "no".
 


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: DustCobb on March 02, 2011, 08:19:34 am
I think it is the other way around Macc....

Is he the man for next season? No.

Will he be manager next season? Yes.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Marvo on March 02, 2011, 08:20:04 am
I'm ready for you Macc.....................

(http://halloween.wizard.org/images/axeman.gif)


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Marvo on March 02, 2011, 08:21:00 am
I think it is the other way around Macc....

Is he the man for next season? No.

Will he be manager next season? Yes.

We've been assured by Steve Riches that will be the case.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: County Cobbler on March 02, 2011, 08:36:38 am
If playing legends made good managers then stars like Bobby Moore, Bobby Charlton and Alan Ball would not have been so disasterous.
Personally I think the next appointment is massive. We require a manager who has achieved promotion. Graham Carr had learnt the art of management and moulded promotion teams at Weymouth, Dartford and Nuneaton before his success at the Cobblers.
Thank you Sammo but the team, after two years, is not improving. Goodbye!


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: DustCobb on March 02, 2011, 08:43:03 am
We need a manager, not a coach or a number 2 trying to become a manager.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: cox23jam on March 02, 2011, 08:48:21 am
Maybe we could look at someone from non-league who's achieved promotion or turned a club around...
AFC Wimbledon - don't know who the manager is?
Could probably help find some good cheap gems aswell.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Marvo on March 02, 2011, 08:52:10 am
It's difficult isn't it? Two names available that spring to mind are Phil Parkinson who did the business at Colchester and Gary Johnson who had a marvelous record at Yeovil. Both clubs similar size to us. If you want a real way out there name, Ray Wilkins? He doesn't have to worry about money, as stacks of contacts and just maybe wants to get back on the footballing ladder. At least worth a phone call to test the water?


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Mark-JB on March 02, 2011, 08:57:22 am
Maybe we could look at someone from non-league who's achieved promotion or turned a club around...
AFC Wimbledon - don't know who the manager is?
Could probably help find some good cheap gems aswell.

Terry Brown is the name you're looking for.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Daffy Duck on March 02, 2011, 09:00:07 am
It's difficult isn't it? Two names available that spring to mind are Phil Parkinson who did the business at Colchester and Gary Johnson who had a marvelous record at Yeovil. Both clubs similar size to us. If you want a real way out there name, Ray Wilkins? He doesn't have to worry about money, as stacks of contacts and just maybe wants to get back on the footballing ladder. At least worth a phone call to test the water?
Two great shouts, one just plain daft.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: cox23jam on March 02, 2011, 09:02:31 am
Terry Brown is the name you're looking for.

Thanks - now looked up on wikipedia above 50% win percentage at last two clubs, if AFC don't go up we could offer league football - maybe he could bring a few players with him


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Marvo on March 02, 2011, 09:03:07 am
Two great shouts, one just plain daft.

I'm pretty sure you're right but you don't get anything if you don't try. What would it cost, 10p?


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: DustCobb on March 02, 2011, 09:03:37 am
Either Parkinson or Johnson would be fantastic.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: cox23jam on March 02, 2011, 09:06:37 am
I'm pretty sure you're right but you don't get anything if you don't try. What would it cost, 10p?

In that case maybe Martin Oneil would like a challenge or alan curbishley?


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Marvo on March 02, 2011, 09:26:19 am
In that case maybe Martin Oneil would like a challenge or alan curbishley?

Trouble is, they are still continuosly linked with "big" managerial jobs. I haven't seen Wilkins name mentioned anywhere? Also they are both managers whilst Wilkins has been mainly the coach.

Anyway I did say the name was way out there, you never know for sure until you try, who thought Paul Ince would start out at Macclesfield?


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: clarkeysntfc on March 02, 2011, 09:33:47 am
Is Justin Edinborough at the Dims any good?


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: DustCobb on March 02, 2011, 09:42:08 am
Problem is going to be attracting anyone to the job....that is if DC ever sacks Sammo.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Marvo on March 02, 2011, 09:48:56 am
Problem is going to be attracting anyone to the job....that is if DC ever sacks Sammo.

They reckon everytime a football managers jobs advertised, they get on average about 500 applicants. Attracting people wont be a problem, sorting out the chaff from the dross might be.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: sxcobbler on March 02, 2011, 10:31:25 am
 Don't worry about attracting interest.....we would be inundated with applications and many would be household names.

We couldn't do any worse for sure, and a new broom is needed drastically.

A good finish to this season is essential even tho' it's become purely academic.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Monkey on March 02, 2011, 11:26:02 am
A bold move would be for DC to sack Sammo now and give the new manager a chance to cast an eye at the squad ready for next season. Theres nothing to play for now (and dont think theres any chance of relegation) so get a new man bed in so he can really see where we need to strengthen over the summer.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: DustCobb on March 02, 2011, 11:32:37 am
I suspect DC will stick with Sammo now and through the summer, then we'll start s*** again and he'll sack him but the new manager will be stuck with an unwanted squad till next January.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: SATURDAY BANANA on March 02, 2011, 12:35:54 pm
People like you make me puke, and I hope you and all the other twats that put up with mediocrity go the same way as our incompetent manager.

Internet warrior


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: wazzacobbler on March 02, 2011, 12:39:36 pm
DC needs to learn from his mistakes (ie Gray). Don't leave it too late DC I beg you


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on March 02, 2011, 12:58:09 pm
Reading Sammo's comments in todays Chron portrays a truly desperate man, clinging on to his job.

"We won't write them (play-offs) off until it's mathematically impossible"

"we're 9 points off the top seven but we could still put a run together"

The final quote is the one that does it for me:

"You can't throw the towel in, if you do that then there's no point people coming to watch the team"

Surely he can see by the recent attendances that people have already realised there's no fcuking point  :(

I hate to say this, but please Sammo, resign for yourself, the good of the club and the fans that adored you


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: TbananaG on March 02, 2011, 13:43:16 pm
What's really painful about the Sammo situation is that if we sack him as manager then he's probably long-term unemployed. He can't go back down the ladder to coach within the club (can he?) and I can't see another club giving him a job after all those years and mixed record with us. This is real life - paying the mortgage and the other bills - not like Mark Hughes or Sam Allardyce getting sacked and not having a money care in the world. It's exactly what's wrong with internal promotion - eventually, you promote someone to a job where they're out of their depth, and then whose fault is that?

All that aside, I really like the Gary Johnson idea. Good years at Yeovil and Brizzle Cidy, and you can't really hold the Peterborough thing against him. What you know you would get with him is organisation. It might not be pretty, but you wouldn't have the current sense of uncertainty about which is the best team, which is the best formation, clutching at straws...


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Realale on March 02, 2011, 14:48:05 pm
He's been sacked, just got the text from the club!


Title: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Power Football on March 02, 2011, 14:51:43 pm
Sampsons gone, Crosby in temporary charge.

http://www.ntfc.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10425~2306137,00.html


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: DustCobb on March 02, 2011, 14:57:11 pm
Well done DC.

Best of luck in the future Sammo, you're still a legend.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: 1 for the team on March 02, 2011, 14:59:37 pm
CROSBY in charge of next game


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Enya_NTFC on March 02, 2011, 15:01:42 pm
I wish Sammo luck in the future, I wish him well.

But the correct move by DC.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: WFCobbler on March 02, 2011, 15:02:10 pm
This will please a few on here and should bring a few fans in for Shrews? I wonder if Crossers did the H/T talk last night?


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: sven on March 02, 2011, 15:02:50 pm
Feel a bit sad for the man himself, really wanted him to succeed despite not thinking he was the correct appointment in the first place. But, as said above bang on decision from DC - now, lets not take the cheap option please!


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Power Football on March 02, 2011, 15:03:09 pm
I wish Sammo luck in the future, I wish him well.

But the correct move by DC.

Here here....


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Deepcut Cobbler on March 02, 2011, 15:03:43 pm
DC's statement includes a piece that is almost word for word what someone had posted on here!  ::)


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: TbananaG on March 02, 2011, 15:03:56 pm
It's very sad, such a shame, had to happen.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: TNFSpeed on March 02, 2011, 15:04:09 pm
Time to get Rafa Benitez!  ;D


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: bigcitylights on March 02, 2011, 15:08:46 pm
I'll always love you Sammo, but this was the best for the football club.

Thank you for everything you have done since you stepped through those County Grounds doors 17 years ago. Thank you for Wembley, thank you for Rotherham, thank you for Anfield.

Good luck in the future.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Marvo on March 02, 2011, 15:09:54 pm
That's an expensive decision, going to cost me a season ticket.


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: WFCobbler on March 02, 2011, 15:10:22 pm
A bold move would be for DC to sack Sammo now and give the new manager a chance to cast an eye at the squad ready for next season. Theres nothing to play for now (and dont think theres any chance of relegation) so get a new man bed in so he can really see where we need to strengthen over the summer.

Very similar wording to DC's statement!! Are you DC?


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: The Hask on March 02, 2011, 15:11:42 pm
Really strange because although I expected this and believe its the right decision, it was not a thank goodness moment because of the fact that he comes across as a nice chap.

But alas as is always said by managers its a results driven business and we have not had any results this season except the legendry cup run.

A chance maybe for someone to come in and be a hero, we will see.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: St Edmundsbury Cobbler on March 02, 2011, 15:12:12 pm
Genuinely gutted for Sammo. Thank you for the good times, THAT goal against Boro and all the best for the future.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Enya_NTFC on March 02, 2011, 15:12:43 pm
That's an expensive decision, going to cost me a season ticket.

Bet you wish you had done it yesterday  ;D

I like others are in the postion of thinking that this is for the best, but still like him!


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Marvo on March 02, 2011, 15:13:50 pm
Right decision but a tough one to take for Cardoza. Fair play to him.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: clarkeysntfc on March 02, 2011, 15:14:17 pm
Ian Sampson the player will always be held in the highest regard by me. The winner in front of our fans at London Road will always live with me.

Ian Sampson the manager, an amazing night at Anfield aside, just hasn't cut it.

I'm very sorry to see him go. However I believe it's the right call for this club.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: The Real Stevie G on March 02, 2011, 15:16:11 pm
Cobblers legend - yes

Manager - no.

Unlucky Sammo, best of luck for the future.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Poggy on March 02, 2011, 15:16:26 pm
Right decision in the end. The new manager should get a chance to re-build the squad over the summer.

Let the speculation for the new manager commence.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: County Cobbler on March 02, 2011, 15:17:13 pm
Correct decision DC but a strange feeling. Never have supporters wanted a Manager to succeed like Sammo but there was not any improvement and results talk.
The next Manager is a major major decision. Please Mr Cardoza appoint a proven manager NOT a coach!


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Cobbler78 on March 02, 2011, 15:18:29 pm
Gutted for Sammo, was not happy when Gray left either but this far outweighs that. Hopefully he goes on to manage a local non-league team has some success and comes back with a bit of experience. In my opinion we were not going up this year, I would have given him until 5 or 6 games to go (see how his new signings worked out) then if still the same get someone in then, assess the squad in last few games and move on from there.

All the best Sammo.....LEGEND.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: bigcitylights on March 02, 2011, 15:18:43 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqG3HhjN3Ww

Legend.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: wazzacobbler on March 02, 2011, 15:19:36 pm
That's an expensive decision, going to cost me a season ticket.

Thought you wanted this, John?


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: bigcitylights on March 02, 2011, 15:20:10 pm
Thought you wanted this, John?

Read it again Charlie boy!


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: DavCobbler on March 02, 2011, 15:21:29 pm
It isnt often a Manager leaves the club after such a poor run of performances but with such backing and consideration from the supporters. Good luck Sammo....you always will be a legend in my eyes.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Macc Cobbler on March 02, 2011, 15:21:42 pm
Personally, I think DC is kidding himself about the strength of the squad. He has been trying to run the club on the "cheap" for a while now.
Yes, DC gave funds to Sammo to strengthen the squad in January, but since then Sammo has probably only been able to field his "best team" on two occasions ....... due to suspensions to Osman and Harrad and injuries.
There is no doubting that the players have under-performed .......... how much this is down to Sammo, or their lack of ability, again only time will tell, but the players need to take a long hard luck at themselves.
Good luck to Sammo in the future !
 


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: wazzacobbler on March 02, 2011, 15:22:12 pm
I have... and now I feel dumb.

In reghards to that video... LEGEND


Title: Re: Sammo Out Club...
Post by: Monkey on March 02, 2011, 15:24:42 pm
Very similar wording to DC's statement!! Are you DC?

No, Im obviously just a influencing figure. deepcut cobbler (dc) however...


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: New Dawn Fades on March 02, 2011, 15:25:24 pm
Agree with the majority on here to be honest.
Fantastic player,Club legend but unfortunately not quite good enough to turn it round
Best of luck in the future Sammo.
Will never forget your tears at wembley.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: dustoncobb on March 02, 2011, 15:33:44 pm
This decision may be for the best, but I am genuinely gutted.

Sammo, you're my hero and always will be. You gave us my best ever night as a cobblers fan at Anfield, and that is what I will remember about your time in charge.

I pray for you the best of luck in future enterprises.

I am 100% gutted and shocked and haven't got any more words in me on the matter.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Marvo on March 02, 2011, 15:35:38 pm


Sammo, you're my hero and always will be. You gave us my best ever night as a cobblers fan at Anfield, and that is what I will remember about your time in charge.



You know what mate, because he's gone now before things got really nasty, that's exactly how he'll be remembered.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: bungle on March 02, 2011, 15:37:43 pm
Although I have been one of Sammo's most vehement critics on here, this is still an incredibly sad day to be a cobblers fan.

I have the utmost respect for Sammo as a player and as a man. He has always been the eptiome of loyality, passion and commitment. I don't blame him for one second for accepting the challenge of managing us. He had to test himself at that level sooner or later, and a new incumbent might have got rid of him as number two. He gave everything to the cause and will always be remembered for Anfield, aswell as countless great victories in his playing days.

Football management is an incredibly hard job, and we shouldn't think any the less of Sammo for not quite getting there with us. I'd love for him to return to work at the club in some capacity, perhaps as a football ambassador in the vein of Ian Taylor at Villa.

DC has made the right decision, but I don't think even Sammo's harshest critic will be celebrating much tonight.



Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Sid on March 02, 2011, 15:39:56 pm
Crikey. I'm a bit stunned!

Good luck Sammo, you will always get the support of the Cobblers faithful in whatever you do.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: jayntfc on March 02, 2011, 15:40:47 pm
Well done to DC for making the right decision at the right time.

Sammo, you did your best and that's all we could ever ask for.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Bog Paper on March 02, 2011, 15:41:35 pm
Sounds like a wake on here.

I didn't think he should have been given the job in the first place and I find the timing of the decision a pretty strange one. It should have happened last year around the time of the Ipswich game when we were on that abysmal run. He got money for Harrad - yes. But from what we've seen so far, Harrad doesn't look all that. His performance against Crewe was ok, but since then he hasn't shown much and the game he had against Aldershot was a shocker. You can argue he hasn't had the bext of service, but witness the difference in McKay's game last night. He was all over the place and I wasn't surprised he got the MoM award despite only having played one half. He ought to keep his place IMO when Harrad has served his ban.

Anyway, back to the manager: I wouldn't go getting your hopes up. Let's face it: DC's track record, is, shall we say, rather disappointing. No reason to think it will be any different this time.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on March 02, 2011, 15:42:48 pm
This decision may be for the best, but I am genuinely gutted.

Sammo, you're my hero and always will be. You gave us my best ever night as a cobblers fan at Anfield, and that is what I will remember about your time in charge.

I pray for you the best of luck in future enterprises.

I am 100% gutted and shocked and haven't got any more words in me on the matter.

You know what, I've been sitting here since the news broke and been unable to write anything. Dust, spot on mate.

I said it a few days ago, but when my old dear used to do the catering for the away games I used to help deliver it to Sixfields. Sammo was always friendly and invited me on the team coach to have a chat with the players. It makes it all the more difficult that he's a really decent, nice bloke.

Good Luck Sammo and all the best to you and your family.



Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: NTFC Nut on March 02, 2011, 15:43:12 pm
Gutted for him. Thought he could have been a decent manager given time. He could clearly do the motivational side of things well (eg Carling Cup run) but it was the tactical nous he was lacking. Very few managers are born with it and it's something that comes with experience. Whether the tactical side of Sammo's game would have deeloped over time, we'll never know.

Good luck to Sammo in whatever he does next, as a manager or otherwise. That brilliant run towards the end of last season and the cup run this season may well be enough for him to swing it in an interview and land himself a job at BSP level or something. I don't think his managerial career is over yet somehow.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Grove on March 02, 2011, 15:53:44 pm
The correct decision, but genuinely saddened by the news, mixed emotions. Good luck, Sammo still a legend


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Whytewell on March 02, 2011, 15:57:56 pm
Agree with almost all the comments.

Had to happen, but so sad to see the man gone, and hope that he finds a good berth somewhere - maybe as a Number 2.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Mark-JB on March 02, 2011, 16:06:12 pm
Agree with most things said on here.

Disappointed it didn't work out for him, and wish him all the best for the future in whatever he ends up doing.

Although I expected this decision not to take place until the end of the season, now that it has been made I think the right call has been made.

Saturday could be a quite cathartic experience for us all.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: PepesProdigy on March 02, 2011, 16:07:30 pm
i canny believe it  :o

All the best sammo, thankyou for what you achieved as a player here, thankyou for liverpool, i really hope you go on and become a succesful manager.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: TheBigPicture on March 02, 2011, 16:12:12 pm
Poor motivation skills amongst other things i'm afraid. Doubt he'll get a managerial appointment elsewhere. All the very best though.

The right decision, DC has shown that poor results against the likes of Morecambe and Burton are not acceptable, not forgetting all the other debacles notably Hereford earlier in the season. Some supporters need to realise what is tolerable and what isnt, it has become more than apparent of late that clearly this isnt getting through to certain elements of our support. Results this season have hit an all time low against sides we'd normally handle without too many problems, standards have inexcusably dropped and the direction we were heading certainly wasnt in an upwardly fashion - talk of given Sammo more time this, more time that, enough is enough, more time? more time to prove what?


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: MK_Cobbler on March 02, 2011, 16:12:50 pm
Absolutely delighted although this should have happened a hell of a long time ago. In fact he should of never been appointed in the first place.

Thanks for what you did for the club as a player Sampson, but you really were a hopeless manager!


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: MK_Cobbler on March 02, 2011, 16:13:58 pm
Could this be the end of Slowes football career?


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Marvo on March 02, 2011, 16:14:41 pm
Poor motivation skills amongst other things i'm afraid. Doubt he'll get a managerial appointment elsewhere. All the very best though.

The right decision, DC has shown that poor results against the likes of Morecambe and Burton are not acceptable, not forgetting all the other debacles notably Hereford earlier in the season. Some supporters need to realise what is tolerable and what isnt, it has become more than apparent of late that clearly this isnt getting through to certain elements of our support. Results this season have hit an all time low against sides we'd normally handle without too many problems, standards have inexcusably dropped and the direction we were heading certainly wasnt in an upwardly fashion - talk of given Sammo more time this, more time that, enough is enough, more time? more time to prove what?

You're so right Ben, I was sick of hearing people on here saying why should we expect to beat the likes of Morecambe and Burton. Well now they know!


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Grove on March 02, 2011, 16:16:32 pm
Could this be the end of Slowes football career?

What career , signings like this should not be tolerated, even if there was financial gain,makes a joke of the club.
A return of gilligan and hinton to the side could be on though


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Enya_NTFC on March 02, 2011, 16:17:06 pm
Could this be the end of Slowes football career?

Or just the start  ;)


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: sxcobbler on March 02, 2011, 16:22:24 pm
 I echo most of the comments on here.

Good Luck in the future Sammo, still a legend, as witnessed on here, which is important. Much longer and that could / would have been tarnished.



Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: guest49 on March 02, 2011, 16:37:59 pm
All the best Sammo, thanks for the service over the years and Anfield in particular, one of the best nights any supporter could ever wish for.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: fatblokecobbler on March 02, 2011, 16:38:32 pm
Good luck Sammo echo most of whats been said already.



Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Artlenock Cobbler on March 02, 2011, 16:45:13 pm
All the best Sammo, thanks for the service over the years and Anfield in particular, one of the best nights any supporter could ever wish for.

There's not too many ex players who will live long in the memory for all the right reasons as Sammo. Even though though his managerial career wasn't any where near as good as we supporters were willing it to be, in 20 years time one of the highlights of our time supporting NTFC will be that night at Liverpool and Sammo can be proud that he was in charge on that brilliant night.

Good luck Sammo, and thanks for some fantastic memories.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Mark-JB on March 02, 2011, 16:47:43 pm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/n/northampton_town/9412023.stm

For those that want to hear David Cardoza's and Ian Atkins' opinions they are in the link above.


Title: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: SATURDAY BANANA on March 02, 2011, 16:57:24 pm
OK, so he didn't deliver.
However, the bloke gave us 15 years great service. Regardless of the "well he was getting paid" brigade.... I personally will always remember Sammo as a great servant to NTFC and a bloody nice bloke as well.

This thread (should the thread police allow it) is to state your favourite moments Sammo gave you in his time here!

I'll start you off...

Claret and yellow kit.
Moyes Rd Terrace.
Sammos winner and knee sliding celebration at Pish...

Never to be forgotten.
Cheers Sammo...


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: EastNpton on March 02, 2011, 16:59:42 pm
The whole thing is a sad mess and not very fitting for someone who had served the club so well.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: TheBigPicture on March 02, 2011, 17:01:51 pm
You're so right Ben, I was sick of hearing people on here saying why should we expect to beat the likes of Morecambe and Burton. Well now they know!

Spot on, all but the bit about Ben, ...not me.


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: Daffy Duck on March 02, 2011, 17:04:25 pm
Re: Tributes to Sammo

Who?


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: Enya_NTFC on March 02, 2011, 17:05:32 pm
Liverpool.

He will always be remembered fot that.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Enya_NTFC on March 02, 2011, 17:05:56 pm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/n/northampton_town/9412023.stm

For those that want to hear David Cardoza's and Ian Atkins' opinions they are in the link above.


Meow!


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: clarkeysntfc on March 02, 2011, 17:06:44 pm
He isn't dead!

Pish away and Liverpool for me.


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: EastNpton on March 02, 2011, 17:07:38 pm
I hope Sammo gets a nice stress free coaching job with someone. Sure he'll make a fine job of it


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: bigcitylights on March 02, 2011, 17:09:34 pm
Spot on, all but the bit about Ben, ...not me.

I think he thought he was referring to me to be honest buddy.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Trotty on March 02, 2011, 17:10:58 pm
Best wishes and good luck to Sammo. He is and always will be club legend.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Lanky Cobbler on March 02, 2011, 17:11:49 pm
Sammo you are a Cobblers legend and always will be. He should never have put in this position by DC in the first place as it was always going to end in tears. I feel so sorry for sammo but it had to be done. Everything in this club needs a lift especially the depressing sods on this board and its up to DC to make the right appointment and we ALL need to start off on a fresh foot get behind the new gaffer and the players more than ever if we want to get out of this poxy division.


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: Lanky Cobbler on March 02, 2011, 17:13:50 pm
His goal at Pish, Liverpool away and our most solid centre back pairing with razor i have seen since going to the cobbs.

Sammo don't let this get you down..... you are Mr Cobblers and no-one will ever achieve what you have at this club ever again.


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: dustoncobb on March 02, 2011, 17:23:37 pm
Sammo, you're my hero, and I'd bet I was almost upset as you were today.

Liverpool will never be forgotten


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: TheBigPicture on March 02, 2011, 17:26:35 pm
I think he thought he was referring to me to be honest buddy.

Yeah thought so, same thing a few months ago... He can't miss me, i'm the one with the frame!  :P


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: FezNTFC on March 02, 2011, 17:31:24 pm
Well, what can I say. Next time I manage to head up to a game from Uni I will venture into Sixfields and Sammo will not be there. Every game I have been too since I started in 1997, Sammo has been part of the furniture. When I was growing up he was always great, would take the time to chat to you and always said it how it was. I remember meeting him in the club shop in December and he took the time out to have a chat with us. Very rare in todays game. So all it leaves is to say this:

Thanks for Wembley.
Thanks for Torquay.
Thanks for nutmegging me when I played against you at Sixfields!
And most importantly, thanks for Liverpool.

You are and always will be a club legend, and good luck to your and your family in the future.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Cobbler_Paul on March 02, 2011, 17:33:19 pm
Agree with most posts on this thread. Shame it's come to this, Sammo's a top bloke, so good luck to him in the future, but it's the right decision for the club.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Macc Cobbler on March 02, 2011, 17:33:54 pm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/n/northampton_town/9412023.stm

For those that want to hear David Cardoza's and Ian Atkins' opinions they are in the link above.


Ian Atkins comments are spot on !!
 
David Cardoza was his usual uninspiring contradictory self.

Sammo (unfortunately) is better off out of it.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: DL2 on March 02, 2011, 17:54:28 pm
Pathetic (in the real sense) and reactionary decision.  Some people have no bloody bottle for the long haul.  How long and how much cash did it take Calderwood to get us out of this division.

As for the future ... merry-go-round again ... back where we started this time next year.

I agree with the comments that Sammo is better off out of it and now wish I hadn't renewed my season ticket yesterday.  If Hinton gets the job, caretaking or otherwise, I'm going to ask for my money back.

Good luck Sammo you deserve better, nothing but positive memories.



Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: BackOfTheNet on March 02, 2011, 17:54:52 pm
I'm desperately sad to see him go, I can't recall a manager I've wanted to succeed so much.  Obviously, I want any manager of ours to do well as that means the side is doing well too, but with Sammo there was an extra level to it since you knew how much it meant to him as well.  He was and always will be one of us, but despite everything it just wasn't to be for him as manager.

Looking at it logically (and taking the performances and league position into account) DC has made the right decision, but it doesn't make it any less of a shame to see Sammo's long association with the club come to an end.

So long Sammo, thanks for all the happy memories, best of luck for the future and hopefully it won't be too long until we see you back at Sixfields in some capacity, even if it is with another club.  The place won't be the same without you.


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: DL2 on March 02, 2011, 17:57:27 pm
Sammo for just being Sammo.

A player, manager and all round genuinely nice bloke who always had the time, passion and commitment who deserves nothing but respect from everyone associated with the Cobblers over the last 15 years.



Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: DL2 on March 02, 2011, 18:03:01 pm
All this crap about it being the right decision ... I just call it a reactionary, gutless decision.  FFS Cardoza has supposedly said he was happy with the players he brought in ... (money he'd put in) ... but Sammo could do sod all about the fact that Harrad got himself red carded almost as soon as he arrived.  For the majority of his time as manager Sammo had one of the worst budgets to work within in a very long time.  Then when he is finally given some extra money in to bring people in he has been given no time whatsoever to embed those players.

Did I read someone ask Who sacks the Chairman? ... let me know when you find out will you!



Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: jayntfc on March 02, 2011, 18:05:17 pm
Are you a Cobblers fan or an Ian Sampson fan?


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: guest216 on March 02, 2011, 18:08:44 pm
For the majority of his time as manager Sammo had one of the worst budgets to work within in a very long time. 

You don't seriously believe that do you?


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: SATURDAY BANANA on March 02, 2011, 18:10:57 pm
Sammo for just being Sammo.

A player, manager and all round genuinely nice bloke who always had the time, passion and commitment who deserves nothing but respect from everyone associated with the Cobblers over the last 15 years.



Spot on Linda... A huge shame to lose the guy.
In my opinion THE nicest pro-footballer I've ever met.
That maybe why he didn't quite make the grade... just too nice perhaps?

All the very best to you Sammo.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: TheBigPicture on March 02, 2011, 18:13:24 pm
All this crap about it being the right decision ... I just call it a reactionary, gutless decision.  FFS Cardoza has supposedly said he was happy with the players he brought in ... (money he'd put in) ... but Sammo could do sod all about the fact that Harrad got himself red carded almost as soon as he arrived.  For the majority of his time as manager Sammo had one of the worst budgets to work within in a very long time.  Then when he is finally given some extra money in to bring people in he has been given no time whatsoever to embed those players.

Did I read someone ask Who sacks the Chairman? ... let me know when you find out will you!



Ask yourself this, why is it you are clearly in the minority with your opinion?  - I take it you were the one who got in touch with BBC Radio Northampton to say blah blah blah... ::)


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: DL2 on March 02, 2011, 18:16:25 pm
You don't seriously believe that do you?

Yes I do believe that!  I' sure it must be in the public accounts somewhere.

and Yes I am a Cobblers fan and this bloody merry-go-round of managers is both expensive and reactionary.

However, I don't deny for one minute that I am also and always will be a Sammo fan.  I genuinely feel that Sammo would have left of his own accord if and when he felt that was the right decision for the club as he could do no more.

Bottom line is I find it crazy that he is sacked within weeks of finally being given some money to bring the likes of Harrad and Walker in with no time to prove the difference they could make particularly as most of that time 2 key players for Sammo in Osman and Harrad were not available.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on March 02, 2011, 18:16:37 pm
I woui
Ask yourself this, why is it you are clearly in the minority with your opinion?  - I take it you were the one who got in touch with BBC Radio Northampton to say blah blah blah... ::)
I wouldn't say 'clearly in the minority', apart from about a dozen kids and fishermen on here I heard nothing against Sammo at Sixfields and I think we'd all agree that there are more people that go to Sixfields than post on here.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: DL2 on March 02, 2011, 18:17:36 pm
Ask yourself this, why is it you are clearly in the minority with your opinion?  - I take it you were the one who got in touch with BBC Radio Northampton to say blah blah blah... ::)

No I wasn't I found out from a text this afternoon and have only just had chance to read the offish site let alone anything else.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: DustCobb on March 02, 2011, 18:30:12 pm
It is hardly a reactionary decision, that would have been sacking him after the 5 straight defeats earlier in the season.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Power Football on March 02, 2011, 18:33:42 pm
Pathetic (in the real sense) and reactionary decision.  Some people have no bloody bottle for the long haul.  How long and how much cash did it take Calderwood to get us out of this division.

I have to ask, other than sentimental reasons, what have you seen this season to suggest Sammo was right for the long haul?


 


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: TheBigPicture on March 02, 2011, 18:34:59 pm
I think we'd all agree that there are more people that go to Sixfields than post on here.

Only just.  ;D


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Exe on March 02, 2011, 18:38:03 pm
Pathetic (in the real sense) and reactionary decision.  Some people have no bloody bottle for the long haul.  How long and how much cash did it take Calderwood to get us out of this division.

As for the future ... merry-go-round again ... back where we started this time next year.

I agree with the comments that Sammo is better off out of it and now wish I hadn't renewed my season ticket yesterday.  If Hinton gets the job, caretaking or otherwise, I'm going to ask for my money back.

Good luck Sammo you deserve better, nothing but positive memories.



How much bottle for the long haul is a chairman supposed to have when the manager he has put in place is clearly not progressing? Like many on here Ian Sampson is one of my heroes and I sincerely wish he had been able to succeed as a manager at this club, but with your hand on your heart can you really say that he has shown signs of improving as a manager? Has there been any indication that we had a budding young manager with talent for the role? No. Samo has been given enough time, enough chances and enough patience, unfortunately he's demonstrated quite clearly that he simply isn't a very good football manager. An objective decision had to be taken based on the work done so far with the resources available and it has to be said that he underperformed, despite all the other s*** that's happening at NTFC.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: TheBigPicture on March 02, 2011, 18:51:27 pm
Marquis, be serious... the majority agree with the decision, the majority (more than 50%). DL2 falls into the the minority bracket, an opinion most don't agree with, theres a reason for that, because it's an error of judgement which they can't see is actually right and untenable.


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: GillysM8 on March 02, 2011, 18:53:13 pm
I hope he went home tonight booked a holiday with his family and has real good P*ss up then sorts himself a job either local media or developing local youth possibly. All the best to him  :)


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: DL2 on March 02, 2011, 19:02:22 pm
How much bottle for the long haul is a chairman supposed to have when the manager he has put in place is clearly not progressing? Like many on here Ian Sampson is one of my heroes and I sincerely wish he had been able to succeed as a manager at this club, but with your hand on your heart can you really say that he has shown signs of improving as a manager? Has there been any indication that we had a budding young manager with talent for the role? No. Samo has been given enough time, enough chances and enough patience, unfortunately he's demonstrated quite clearly that he simply isn't a very good football manager. An objective decision had to be taken based on the work done so far with the resources available and it has to be said that he underperformed, despite all the other sh*t that's happening at NTFC.

Yes hand on heart I think he had shown signs.  As soon as he had some money he plugged the gaps in the squad he himself had been saying for some time he knew we needed.  Just a few weeks ago you were all applauding him for brining in the likes of Walker and Harrad.  We played quite well overall against Southend, even after the dire 1st half on Saturday he recognised the formation wasn't working and it was much better 2nd half.  His error was in making the changes too late, that is not a sackable offence.  I am told that on the radio DC himself said had we won last night he wouldn;t have been having the conversation, so overall he must have thought if we won he still had time to leave any decision a while.  Smacks of .. he was as p'd off as the rest of us last night, unlike the rest of us when he reacts badly to a game he is in a position to wield a reactionary sword.

As I said, he should have been given half a dozen more games with Harrad back and then decide.  If it was still nothing but draws and losses then there would still have been tome to change things before the close season.

In reverse you tell me why you think he has had enough chances since he was finally given money to spend rather than be asked to work on a significantly reduced budget from his predeccessors.  


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: DustCobb on March 02, 2011, 19:11:24 pm
He was already using Harrad all wrong though...


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on March 02, 2011, 19:18:38 pm
Marquis, be serious... the majority agree with the decision, the majority (more than 50%). DL2 falls into the the minority bracket, an opinion most don't agree with, theres a reason for that, because it's an error of judgement which they can't see is actually right and untenable.
I am being serious. If the majority so believe it to be right, how come I never heard anybody ever call for his head at a match?


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Mad Dog on March 02, 2011, 19:19:29 pm
Well I actually agree with most of what DL2 has said so maybe it isn't that small a minority?

Realistically what is this going to achieve? A new manager is coming in with around 10 games left in the season depending on how quickly an appointment is made. Sammo had a long contract, he was building a team (granted one that should be doing better than it is). Yes the results are unacceptable and the buck stops with him, but this is going to cause major disruption. How do you think the players are feeling, I hardly think this is going to give them a major morale boost and kick them into action? I would have given him the remainder of this season and the first ten games of the next.

Sentiment and emotion does come into it I am not going to deny that but I have to deal with that as part of my job, and even by putting that aside, I still come to same conclusion as above.

It has crossed my mind for a few weeks now that this might happen but presumed because of his standing at the club he would be given more of a chance. I don't believe Cardoza is a compulsive 'sacker' by any means anyway, he does tend to give managers a chance.

As for Sammo himself he is the only remaining player/coach that was still at the club from when I started watching 93 or 94 or whenever it was (unless Warburton is still a coach) and I do feel genuinely sad. My thoughts go out to him and how he must be feeling tonight, as well as his family. I know this word is used often very lightly (and to be honest it makes me cringe) but you are in my eyes and I would hope every Cobblers supporter, a Northampton Town Legend. Thank you for your loyalty, passion and dedication. I wish you all the very best for the future.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Bog Paper on March 02, 2011, 19:22:40 pm
Ok, let me have a stab at it, DL.

I'd say this: Harrad has shown little or nothing since he's been here. There were a few odd flashes against Crewe and he scored of course, but since that - zilch. The performance against Aldershot was appalling and McKay did more in 5 minutes than Harrad had done in his time on the pitch. Not Sammo's fault he got sent off, no of course not - but Sammo's selection as a player and so far there hasn't been much to be impressed about.

Walker: Again - good first game, but since then, passing has been wayward and hasn't provided much in the way of service to the front 2, or front 1, depending on which of the ever-changing formations we play. I'd venture that he doesn't provide, or hasn't provided, an upgrade on Gilligan so far.

Laurent: Doesn't look to me like he fancies the defensive side of things and doesn't look that pacy either. Furthermore his first touch has been mostly disappointing. Josh Low was a more committed defender than this bloke.

Bottom line: 3 new signings that were supposed to turn our season around and one in particular that we chased and chased - and frankly has let Sammo down. Bottom line also is that these were Sammo's selections; I expect Sammo persuaded DC to put his hand in his pocket because these were the missing pieces of the jigsaw and were the links that would propel us to the playoffs. They haven't and they won't.

However, on the other hand, I agree I am surprised by the timing. As I said elsewhere, I would have done this around the time of the Ipswich game when we were on that appalling run. I firmly believe that had our "equaliser" stood last night that we would have gone on to win the game. But when you look at the record overall, we are 16th. We were supposed to be challenging for promotion. DC doesn't think it's good enough. Neither do most of us. But do I think better times are around the corner? No, I don't, because DC has repeatedly appointed thw rong man and will probably do it again. I hope that the law of averages says that he's due to strike gold - and I hope he does.

The fact is DL, that the minute Sammo stepped across that line to take the big job, you knew it would end this way eventually. It nearly always does. You said in another post that you think he would have walked away - well when he was under pressure earlier in the season he quite categorically said he wouldn't, as he had a mortgage to pay etc. And I don't blame him for that. Chances are he won't ever get another league job because he's still an unknown. He has to hope he can get a non-league job, make a good go of it and get noticed again. I hope he does.



Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Exe on March 02, 2011, 19:24:45 pm
I don't think you can label this as reactionary, if DC was the kind to wield the sword after a depressing result Samo would have been sacked after the Hereford debacle in the autumn. You mention Samo's change of formation as a sign of him improving, well I'm afraid it isn't given that he continues to revert to formations and tactical schemes that have been proven to fail in previous games. Jacobs playing in the hole hasn't worked before yet he went back to it last night, and there are many more examples of similar ineptitude.

"Half a dozen more games" or similar has been the mantra of a certain section of our support for quite some time now. I don't post as regularly as I used to but I read the board regularly and it's a familiar theme. The attitude is very Northamptonian; let's give it time, let's wait a little longer, let's not change anything. In the meantime the competition has sailed ahead because they've shown some ambition.

I've only seen two games from the new signings but so far they've hardly warranted the investment, Laurent looks a waste of space, Harrad has joined in with the rampant indisicipline in the side from the off meaning he's out of action and Josh Parker by all accounts has been thoroughly disappointing after a promising display against Crewe. That's not to say they won't come good but you can hardly say Samo's brought the best out of the existing side. It's very easy to ask for a little more time every time things are going wrong, but it's a Pandora's box situation, you're clinging on desperately to hope despite everything that has gone before because with Samo that's all there is/was, a vague hope that he may one day have come good.  


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: 942er on March 02, 2011, 19:32:39 pm
Good player, decent bloke, great memories.  Unfortunately didn't quite cut it as a manager.  Correct decision at right time DC.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Coolcat on March 02, 2011, 19:54:23 pm
While a lot of you wallow in sentimentality..I'm rejoicing! The first paragraph from DC in the prog from last night speaks volumes. I do wish Sammo (a good guy I'm sure) all the best, truly..but sorry I'm a Cobblers fan ahead of Sammo - or his family, (as cited a reason for not stepping down earlier in the season). A parting legacy..with a couple of minutes left last night, with everyone up for the final push..he takes off a heavyweight Tozer..and brings on Mr. Lightweight Herbert on!

Season ticket renewed! ;)


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Marvo on March 02, 2011, 20:07:48 pm
I am told that on the radio DC himself said had we won last night he wouldn;t have been having the conversation, so overall he must have thought if we won he still had time to leave any decision a while.  Smacks of .. he was as p'd off as the rest of us last night, unlike the rest of us when he reacts badly to a game he is in a position to wield a reactionary sword.



No it doesn't, it smacks of.... if we had beaten Burton the play-offs were still a possibility so he still had a chance to succeed. When we lost, that chance and his along with it had gone. I'm very proud of Cardoza tonight, not many chairman would have been brave enough to make the decision and sack a Cobblers legend knowing the flak he was going to get. He's done the right thing, the new manager will have plenty of time to see what we have here already and what he will need during the summer. We'll start next season with fresh imputus, fresh ideas and a clean slate. leaving it until the end of the season or 10 games into the next would have meant yet another season wasted.

As for Sammo, he desperately wanted the job, he got it when perhaps he shouldn't and he knew it was a results based business. He didn't get them and has paid for it. His initial appointment was a case of hearts ruling heads which is exactly the same problem with those on here that say he should have been given longer.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: DustCobb on March 02, 2011, 20:11:34 pm
I'm honestly stunned people can still find reasons to keep Sammo on, other than the fact that it is Sammo.

Short end of the matter is, he hasn't improved as a manager since he took over. Legend or no legend it was time for him to go as clearly not up to management.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: HertsCobbler on March 02, 2011, 20:12:50 pm
Indeed.  If it was a complete outsider like Fenwick, he would have been hung, drawn, and quartered by now.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Marvo on March 02, 2011, 20:18:18 pm
How do you think the players are feeling, I hardly think this is going to give them a major morale boost and kick them into action?



Seriously?   Delighted. That's the only conclusion you can make from the recent performances.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Bog Paper on March 02, 2011, 20:18:43 pm
No it doesn't, it smacks of.... if we had beaten Burton the play-offs were still a possibility so he still had a chance to succeed. When we lost, that chance and his along with it had gone. I'm very proud of Cardoza tonight, not many chairman would have been brave enough to make the decision and sack a Cobblers legend knowing the flak he was going to get. He's done the right thing, the new manager will have plenty of time to see what we have here already and what he will need during the summer. We'll start next season with fresh imputus, fresh ideas and a clean slate. leaving it until the end of the season or 10 games into the next would have meant yet another season wasted.

As for Sammo, he desperately wanted the job, he got it when perhaps he shouldn't and he knew it was a results based business. He didn't get them and has paid for it. His initial appointment was a case of hearts ruling heads which is exactly the same problem with those on here that say he should have been given longer.

Hmm...I don't seem to recall that being your opinion at the time. I do recall questioning the appointment when it was made (on the old board) and being roundly panned - including by you. Easy to be wise after the event though.

I thought we showed passion in the 2nd half last night that was sadly missing in the 1st - and still feel that had that equaliser stood we would have gone on to win the game. And like I have said elsewhere, I'd have done it back around the Ipswich game. Not now.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: paul_ntfc on March 02, 2011, 20:31:56 pm
It makes me mad that people are still thinking he could succeed - really? did you not see how totally and utterly inept we were last night? There was nothing, zero, zilch, nada that implied Sammo was able to turn things around. He was a terrible manager!

I *loved* him as a player and coach, but his head went on the block when he became our manager, he knew that and he'll be the first to admit that. Since Gray was sacked in September 2009 we're now in a worse league position and look less likely to get into the play-offs.

Easy decision and I would shake DC's hand at Sixfields on Saturday IF I thought he was able to appoint someone to make a difference... but that's another story!


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Marvo on March 02, 2011, 20:37:12 pm
Hmm...I don't seem to recall that being your opinion at the time. I do recall questioning the appointment when it was made (on the old board) and being roundly panned - including by you. Easy to be wise after the event though.



As I don't know who you are, I have no idea if what you're claiming is true. I wasn't against Sammo getting the job, he either had to or leave, his time had come. That doesn't mean I endorsed it. Like most people, I "hoped" for the best.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Ted on March 02, 2011, 20:40:39 pm
I just wonder how many of those that are bemoaning Sammo's sacking  actually run businesses.I know Linda doesn't, and can understand her naivety in the comments that she has made on this thread.Let me explain.Sammo put DC in a corner after  last night, and the only choice left for the chairman was to make today's decision.Yes, it's a costly exercise, but the cost of Sammo's sacking pales into insignificance if the decision hadn't been taken.The club relies on season ticket sales and corporate sponsorship to keep it afloat. Both of these incomes would have been severly depleTED if Sammo had been allowed to continue.As mentioned on aprevious thread,I have an interest in a substantial sponsorship of the club, and I don't want my business interest compromised by being associaTED with an abject failure. Yes, we enjoyed the positive publicity of the Carling Cup campaign  and especially the superb victory at Anfield. However, you can't rest on your laurels in business, and you most certainly can't rest on your laurels in football.Carling Cup up besides, the season has been a disaster. The bread and butter is the league, and it's imperative that we are at least challenging for the playoffs.Sentiment kills businesses, and thank goodness DC has the business acumen to realise this.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Bog Paper on March 02, 2011, 20:54:02 pm
As I don't know who you are, I have no idea if what you're claiming is true. I wasn't against Sammo getting the job, he either had to or leave, his time had come. That doesn't mean I endorsed it. Like most people, I "hoped" for the best.

Well let me tell you Marvo, so you can remove the gloves. It's taken me a while to register, but unfortunately I couldn't get "The Artist formerly known as DoD" on the new site as it was too long. So now you know.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: DustCobb on March 02, 2011, 20:55:28 pm
I think you made a poor choice with 'Bog Paper' thought. s*** Rag would have been a better angle.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Ted on March 02, 2011, 20:56:26 pm
I think you made a poor choice with 'Bog Paper' thought. sh*t Rag would have been a better angle.

 ;D


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Bog Paper on March 02, 2011, 20:57:26 pm
I'm quite happy with it thanks - and the great debate continues........


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Marvo on March 02, 2011, 21:13:47 pm
And I'm being told Sammo is the problem.......

yeah but you never listen.


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: guest48 on March 02, 2011, 21:16:32 pm
Part of the best centre backs we've had in the last 20 years , a geat competator and a really genuine bloke. I've known Sammo personally for over 10 years and he is just a top man , honest as the day is long and always does his job to the best of his ability. Just so sad it's ended like this , but Sammo was , is and always will be a Cobblers legend. Good luck for the future Sammo.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: DrillingCobbler on March 02, 2011, 21:19:15 pm
I just wonder how many of those that are bemoaning Sammo's sacking  actually run businesses.I know Linda doesn't, and can understand her naivety in the comments that she has made on this thread.Let me explain.Sammo put DC in a corner after  last night, and the only choice left for the chairman was to make today's decision.Yes, it's a costly exercise, but the cost of Sammo's sacking pales into insignificance if the decision hadn't been taken.The club relies on season ticket sales and corporate sponsorship to keep it afloat. Both of these incomes would have been severly depleTED if Sammo had been allowed to continue.As mentioned on aprevious thread,I have an interest in a substantial sponsorship of the club, and I don't want my business interest compromised by being associaTED with an abject failure. Yes, we enjoyed the positive publicity of the Carling Cup campaign  and especially the superb victory at Anfield. However, you can't rest on your laurels in business, and you most certainly can't rest on your laurels in football.Carling Cup up besides, the season has been a disaster. The bread and butter is the league, and it's imperative that we are at least challenging for the playoffs.Sentiment kills businesses, and thank goodness DC has the business acumen to realise this.

Just to add to this...

I said to my 14year old step son on the way home last night that the best thing DC could do in the morning would be to 'sack' the manager and announce that the deadline for season ticket sales was being put back by 2 weeks...I then explained the reasons why.

By the way, the use of the word 'sacked' as a headliner on the official site I thought was rather crass. Am I the only person who thought that was a tad disrespectful?


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Marvo on March 02, 2011, 21:21:30 pm
My headline says "Sammo leaves Sixfields". Have they changed it?


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Power Football on March 02, 2011, 21:24:15 pm
I do wonder if an extension on the £200 ST offer will be announced in the next couple of days, it would make a lot of sense....


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Bog Paper on March 02, 2011, 21:25:06 pm
Personally I have no idea. I rarely go on the club's website - better to get the news off here, without the spin.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: WadeyCobbler on March 02, 2011, 21:25:19 pm
Sammo was a great servant to the Cobblers for 17 years, and Sixfields won't be the same without him. He is a genuinely nice man, loved and cared passionately for the club and we all wanted him to be as successful a manager as he was a player, sadly this wasn't to be. He worked under an extremely tight budget, with much less resource than previous managers had and for the most part had a lightweight squad. He was trying to develop young players into a team that would be around for years to come. These things take time, but you rarely get time in football to do this as we all want instant success. Had we beat Burton David Cardoza says he wouldn't have been sacked - indeed our recent record would have been unbeaten in 9 games! Had that disallowed Jacobs goal been allowed to stand as it should have been and the two efforts that hit the woodwork gone in or had Dunn not fallen over the line with the ball Sammo would probably still be in a job so it is a fine line between keeping a job or not. Only time will tell if Cardoza is right. The next appointment is a big one as the pressure to get out of League Two instantly will be immense. Mistakes have been made at the club over the last few years to put us where we are, at least there will be time for the new manager to assess the current players before the end of the season. Thanks for the memories Ian Sampson, many as a player and of course many thanks for giving us one of the most memorable nights in our history on 22nd September 2010 when we defeated Liverpool at Anfield.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: HertsCobbler on March 02, 2011, 21:26:43 pm
It still says sacked in the story!  Normally they get mutual consent or relieved of duties.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Air-Dan on March 02, 2011, 21:27:24 pm
It still says sacked in the story!  Normally they get mutual consent or relieved of duties.

Well... he was sacked... so they've said he was sacked.  ;)


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Marvo on March 02, 2011, 21:28:16 pm
Only time will tell if Cardoza is right.


Well it's been 3 minutes since you made that post so let me put you out of your misery. Yes he was.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: DrillingCobbler on March 02, 2011, 21:30:02 pm
I'm sure the reason for this will out soon....

Im sure it does have something to do with employment law etc, no need to go into any more detail on here. Even so, a toned down version of the word would have been more in place I feel.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Marvo on March 02, 2011, 21:32:19 pm
Im sure it does have something to do with employment law etc, no need to go into any more detail on here. Even so, a toned down version of the word would have been more in place I feel.

Relieved of his duties?

Had his contract terminated?

How about nipped out for a packet of fags and hasn't been seen since?


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: guest49 on March 02, 2011, 21:36:22 pm
I don't know why so many are so optimistic at the prospect of someone, anyone, who is 'not Sammo', when you know who he is going to be chosen by. He hasnt even got TC anymore to help with the 'Ip, dip, do' game. He is certainly a guy who likes to pay two managers at a time.
Danny Wilson would be perfect. He's without a win in 11.      


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: DrillingCobbler on March 02, 2011, 21:38:16 pm
Relieved of his duties?

Had his contract terminated?

How about nipped out for a packet of fags and hasn't been seen since?

"Sacked" is an almost slang word. Its playground talk. Or pub talk. I employ a few people...on the odd occasion that I have had to 'make a decision' on someones employment I would never describe the move as sacking them. Unless it had of been for theft, sexual harassment or something equally as serious. A general under-performance issue should be treated differently in my view. Whoever wrote that article must be a 'Sir' Alan Sugar fan. And what a total cock that bloke is!


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: memyhead on March 02, 2011, 22:56:04 pm
Correct decision. Thanks for the Boro goal and night at Anfield Sammo. Just not good enough as a manager i'm afraid. All the best!


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: MCHammer on March 02, 2011, 23:04:59 pm
I'm gutted for Sammo as I don't believe for one minute there will be any other manager out there that will want to succeed in the role as much as he did.  I've had the pleasure of meeting him many times in the past and know his family well and it meant so much to him and his family on both a professional and personal level.

Having said that the signs had been starting to show of a manager in decline.  Poor on field discipline, desperate/hopeful tactic changing from game to game, post match interviews starting to sound more desperate.  In my opinion he hadn't lost the dressing room like some previous managers had, as last nights near comeback shows.  I think he had though lost the ability to affect the players performances to any great degree.

He had failed to adequately address basic defending deficiences.  We were basically being out played by weaker/poorer opponents despite being told constantly that we play football the right way.  There was a massive amount of naievty in out play and he didn't seem to be able to instill any backbone in the team which has cost us badly particularly in our away form this season.

Having said that there were rare glimpses at times of what he was trying to do and for those brief moments the football was a joy to watch.

I have to give credit to DC for making the decision when he has.  I agree with a lot DL (Linda) has to say but this is by no means a knee-jerk reaction from DC who in actual fact has probably given managers more time than they deserved.  For once it's the correct decision at exactly the right time if we are to get setup correctly for next season.  New contracts need to be arranged, players assesed in training and match situations and weaknesses addressed with new players in the summer.  I had a fear DC would give Sammo up to 10 games of next season but he seems to have learnt from the harsh lesson under Gray.

Finally good luck Sammo.  As someone who's been made redundant on a couple of occasions I believe these things happen for a reason and most of the time something better comes out of it if you learn the lessons of the past.  Sometimes you have to go backwards to go forwards again and maybe a change will actually revitalise and bring fresh ideas.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Mrs Macc Cobbler on March 03, 2011, 00:09:53 am
I agree with Linda, in my opinion her comments on this thread have been absolutely spot on.
I don't think Sammo was given long enough to do the job that he set out to do, he should have at least been given the opportunity to see if the recent signings were going to have any impact.
Good luck to Sammo - thank you and I would like to wish you all the best for the future.


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: Mrs Macc Cobbler on March 03, 2011, 00:35:01 am
Thank you Sammo, your contribution to this club has been absolutely immense.
I would like to take this opportunity to wish you all the best for the future.
Thank you for all that you have done for the Cobblers.


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: Dr Feelgood on March 03, 2011, 01:49:21 am
Thanks for your years at NTFC Samp...


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on March 03, 2011, 06:27:56 am
He ought to write a book on his near 20 year time here, a lot has happened in that time. I'd buy it.


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: guest49 on March 03, 2011, 06:46:47 am
The pic on my wall of me next to Sammo (both much younger!) presenting the match day ball. It's a long time to work for any employer and (sacking aside!!) I hope he left on good terms with a healthy severence package, as given the choice of another s***ty midfielder, misfiring striker etc, I'd rather it lined his pockets.
All the best for your next adventure.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Ted on March 03, 2011, 07:22:47 am
I agree with Linda, in my opinion her comments on this thread have been absolutely spot on.
I don't think Sammo was given long enough to do the job that he set out to do, he should have at least been given the opportunity to see if the recent signings were going to have any impact.
Good luck to Sammo - thank you and I would like to wish you all the best for the future.


Perhaps you and Linda could  job-share to do his ironing for him. I'm sure it'd make you both feel a lot better.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Semilong Old Boy on March 03, 2011, 07:40:21 am
Really sad to hear this Sammo was a great servant to the club and should have never been appointed as Manager, the fear on my part that this would have happened at some point, if DC had appointed a Manager from outside from the club Sammo could have remained for many years amongst the backroom staff doing a fine job. But I am sure Sammo would have known of the risks after his appointment if there was no success for the club. But like others thanks for the Liverpool result the happiest night of my life in the 41 years that I watched the Cobblers. And as for the winner at Boro, I was in the city but otherwise engaged!!!.   Cheers Sammo and Best Wishes for the future... ;)   


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: sxcobbler on March 03, 2011, 07:57:25 am
 A true Legend.

I'll remember the good things.

Good Luck for the future Sammo.


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: abington_cobbler on March 03, 2011, 08:36:50 am
Thank you for 15+ years of service to NTFC and all the best for the future, a true Cobblers legend!


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: Mark-JB on March 03, 2011, 08:43:45 am
The only guy that has fully earned the term 'legend' at the club in the last 20 years.

I think that says it all.


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: JohnFrainInThe93rd on March 03, 2011, 09:39:57 am
He ought to write a book on his near 20 year time here, a lot has happened in that time. I'd buy it.

Was thinking this too.  Would be a good read, let slip a few NTFC untold stories. 

What about a 2nd Testimonial in the summer? Highest attendance of the season  :D



Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: wazzacobbler on March 03, 2011, 10:10:46 am
Legend.

For me it will always be that goal at Boro and that night at Anfield.

A personal memory is of after the Accrington Stanley away game at the beginning of last season. Sammo was still Gray's assistant and was running the rule over the squads' post game warm down. I'd been waiting for my dad to be ready to leave and stood by the advertising boards by the pitch. I called over to ask why Sammo wasn't joining in to which he responded with a big grin and offered me the chance to hop over and have a run about. I declined the offer saying that my belly wouldn't carry me far. After a couple more laughs Sammo and I had a really nice chat for about 15 mins. Top bloke and I for one am sad to leave the club completely. I know its not a realistic expectation but I hoped if he did leave as manager he would stay on in some other capacity such as youth coach or club ambassador. 


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: GreenleysCobbler on March 03, 2011, 12:00:35 pm
Same as everyone else I guess.  A true legend and genuinely nice bloke!

I am angry at what's happened but completely in agreement that he had to go!  I blame DC in part for taking the cheap option and subjecting Sammo to this in the first place.  He should have been allowed to drop down to the conference or lower and learn his craft.  He’ll end up doing that and probably being a success.

Good luck Sammo and thanks for the memories!


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: Marvo on March 03, 2011, 13:12:59 pm
All the more sad when you consider Sammo apparently did not want the job in the first place.


Eh?

Where did you get that from?


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: Monkey on March 03, 2011, 13:14:35 pm
All the more sad when you consider Sammo apparently did not want the job in the first place.


Did they put a gun to his head?? (believable if it was R+D, not cobblers)


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: Madrid Cobbler on March 03, 2011, 13:27:29 pm
The very best of luck to Sammo whatever he does in the future.

A great player for us and refreshingly honest as a manager whatever anyone thinks of his management ability. I don't think I've ever wanted a manager to succeed so badly. I agree with DC's decision, but an immensely sad day nonetheless. We'll never have a manager for whom the club means more.


Title: Ian Sampson Statement
Post by: ntfcash92 on March 03, 2011, 13:59:55 pm
From the LMA Website:

The LMA can confirm that Ian Sampson was dismissed as Manager of Northampton Town Football Club on Wednesday 2nd March.

Ian Sampson said: “Given the budget at my disposal at the beginning of the season and our plan for the development of younger players, I thought our mid-table position at the turn of the year was about right.  In January, the club made a financial investment in the playing staff and for one reason or another, with injuries and suspensions, we haven’t been able to field our strongest team over the last two months which has resulted in us drawing too many matches.  There is a fine line between winning, drawing and losing and we have lost only 3 of the last 16 league games.

“I am deeply saddened to be leaving a club which has played such a significant part in my life for over 17 years.  I have a lot to be grateful about and have many very happy memories.  I wish everyone connected with the club all the best for the future and that my successor will achieve great things going forward”.

I for one feel he has conducted himself with a lot dignity and will always have respect from NTFC fans!


Title: Re: Ian Sampson Statement
Post by: Marvo on March 03, 2011, 14:02:46 pm
Didn't expect any different from the man. He knew it was coming.


Title: Re: Ian Sampson Statement
Post by: ntfcash92 on March 03, 2011, 14:11:01 pm
Sad to think that this is what rewards loyalty in football these days!


Title: Re: Ian Sampson Statement
Post by: NTFC Nut on March 03, 2011, 14:12:09 pm
He sounds like he feels he has some unfinished business.


Title: Re: Ian Sampson Statement
Post by: The Real Stevie G on March 03, 2011, 14:17:14 pm
He sounds like he feels he has some unfinished business.

I got that impression aswell...especially from the first paragraph...


Title: Re: Ian Sampson Statement
Post by: CobblerForever on March 03, 2011, 14:18:57 pm
A very gracious statement from one of the "greats" of NTFC of the last 30 years. He makes some very fair points about recent results that some of us had also been making on these forums.


Title: Re: Ian Sampson Statement
Post by: Marvo on March 03, 2011, 14:20:15 pm
Sad to think that this is what rewards loyalty in football these days!

Listen mate, no offence but you've signed up for this board just to post this thread, I always find that a little bit suspicious. You got an axe to grind?


Title: Re: Ian Sampson Statement
Post by: MK_Cobbler on March 03, 2011, 14:26:00 pm
In January, the club made a financial investment in the playing staff and for one reason or another, with injuries and suspensions, we haven’t been able to field our strongest team over the last two months which has resulted in us drawing too many matches. 
I don’t think that would have made too much difference to be honest. He would have still played everyone out of position with hoof ball tactics up to Harrad expecting him to work wonders.


Title: Re: Ian Sampson Statement
Post by: ntfcash92 on March 03, 2011, 14:27:57 pm
Not at all pal. And I haven't signed up to this forum just to post this thread, in fact if the board think this is the best move to take the club forward then I fully support it. No axes to grind, no grudges to bear.

Just thought other "fans" might like to have a look at something I found, if that's alright?


Title: Re: Ian Sampson Statement
Post by: Marvo on March 03, 2011, 14:29:37 pm
Not at all pal. And I haven't signed up to this forum just to post this thread, in fact if the board think this is the best move to take the club forward then I fully support it. No axes to grind, no grudges to bear.

Just thought other "fans" might like to have a look at something I found, if that's alright?

Yep, no problems mate. No offence.


Title: Re: Ian Sampson Statement
Post by: ntfcash92 on March 03, 2011, 14:32:17 pm
Yep, no problems mate. No offence.

None taken mate, I know how it must have looked. But as much as I support the board's decision, I didn't really feel 19 months was long enough for Sammo to turn the club back around. Everyone has their own opinion though I suppose :)


Title: Re: Ian Sampson Statement
Post by: DustCobb on March 03, 2011, 14:34:07 pm
27 months wasn't it?


Title: Re: Ian Sampson Statement
Post by: Macc Cobbler on March 03, 2011, 14:34:18 pm
Listen mate, no offence but you've signed up for this board just to post this thread, I always find that a little bit suspicious. You got an axe to grind?

All he has done is post the statement from the LMA website, which I am sure most of us would like to see.

You are getting a complex in your old age  :)


Title: Re: Ian Sampson Statement
Post by: honcho on March 03, 2011, 14:34:29 pm
Good luck Sammo and thanks for the many years of service that you have given Northampton Town, it seems to be a basic truth of football management that there is a fine line between success and failure. To a club like lets say Rushden or Kettering mid table would have been good enough but the cobblers fans and directors obviously expected more.


Title: Re: Ian Sampson Statement
Post by: Marvo on March 03, 2011, 14:34:59 pm
Everyone has their own opinion though I suppose :)

Too true, I hope we get to see you voicing yours regularly on here.


Title: Re: Ian Sampson Statement
Post by: dustoncobb on March 03, 2011, 14:36:23 pm
27 months wasn't it?

No, the BBC said that I think, but 27 months ago we were in league 1


Title: Re: Ian Sampson Statement
Post by: ntfcash92 on March 03, 2011, 14:36:42 pm
Well he took over in September 2009 so I think it was 19 months in actual charge


Title: Re: Ian Sampson Statement
Post by: Marvo on March 03, 2011, 14:36:51 pm

You are getting a complex in your old age  :)

Yeah maybe. I have apologised.


Title: Re: Ian Sampson Statement
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on March 03, 2011, 14:38:19 pm
Yeah maybe. I have apologised.

 :o

You're mellowing too Marvo  ;)


Title: Re: Ian Sampson Statement
Post by: ntfcash92 on March 03, 2011, 14:40:32 pm
Too true, I hope we get to see you voicing yours regularly on here.

Thanks mate, I've been a regular reader on here so I thought why not start posting? I respect everyone's opinons, no matter how mad!


Title: Re: Ian Sampson Statement
Post by: Marvo on March 03, 2011, 14:44:46 pm
Thanks mate, I've been a regular reader on here so I thought why not start posting? I respect everyone's opinons, no matter how mad!

Well to be honest I suppose if you just normally just read the board it is only to be expected that it would take a major incident to make you take the plunge to post.

Anyway, welcome.


Title: Re: Ian Sampson Statement
Post by: ArmchairCobbler81 on March 03, 2011, 14:45:18 pm
I'm must admit to feeling a little bit aggrieved that he doesn't mention the fans. Maybe he's been reading this board  :(


Title: Sampson's Ranking
Post by: Bog Paper on March 03, 2011, 15:07:49 pm
Some interesting stats in today's Chron. It turns out that Sammo was, as the Americans would say, our 5th winningest manager in percentage terms since 1985 with a 35% win ratio. Beating him were Calderwood (48%), Carr (41%) Wilson (41%) and Atkins (36%).

Apart from being mildly surprised at this, the stats that really surprised me were Kevin Wilson's. I wonder what his record was within those stats when he had Broadhurst as his assistant, because I seem to recall that our form went south rather rapidly after Broadhurst departed, signalling the end of the "2 Kevs" reign. I am hoping Marvo might be able to help out here, even though the word "winningest" will doubtless cause at least some mild irritation  ;D


Title: Re: Ian Sampson Statement
Post by: dustoncobb on March 03, 2011, 15:11:08 pm
I'm must admit to feeling a little bit aggrieved that he doesn't mention the fans. Maybe he's been reading this board  :(

To be honest, I assumed we came under the category of "everyone associated with the club"


Title: Re: Sampson's Ranking
Post by: Marvo on March 03, 2011, 15:11:32 pm
If you click on "Cobblers Stats" at the bottom of my post, you'll find a full list of Cobblers managers and how they rate. Although I use Points gathered from those available I think you'll find the lists are pretty much the same. As for Wilson, I was gonna say he was the manager, Broadhurst the assistant.


Title: Re: Ian Sampson Statement
Post by: Marvo on March 03, 2011, 15:12:20 pm
Do you reckon Linda has stopped crying yet?


Title: Re: Ian Sampson Statement
Post by: DustCobb on March 03, 2011, 15:12:49 pm
Cheers for clearing the months query up.


Title: Re: Sampson's Ranking
Post by: bigcitylights on March 03, 2011, 15:17:35 pm
Interesting to note on your stats that we've only won 6 more games than we've lost in nearly 5000 fixtures.

How long before that's a negative? :-[


Title: Re: Sampson's Ranking
Post by: Marvo on March 03, 2011, 15:19:26 pm
Interesting to note on your stats that we've only won 6 more games than we've lost in nearly 5000 fixtures.

How long before that's a negative? :-[

I'm trying to remember Ben but I belieev it's been like that for some time or almost throughout our history. There's only a couple of times we've been in the "negative" as you put it. I'll get back to you.


Title: Re: Sampson's Ranking
Post by: Bog Paper on March 03, 2011, 15:20:20 pm
That Chapman chappie looked a good sort. Maybe we should bring him back.


Title: Re: Ian Sampson Statement
Post by: Grove on March 03, 2011, 16:21:33 pm
Do you reckon Linda has stopped crying yet?

 ;D


Title: Re: Sampson's Ranking
Post by: Marvo on March 03, 2011, 17:10:47 pm
Okay Ben, here goes.

Total wins against defeats.

In our entire history and aif you take any given point of time we've been "ahead" with wins over defeats after 4,460 games.
The totals have been level ater 64 games,  whilst defeats have outnumberd wins after 325 games.

The furthest we've been ahead is 131 wins, not surprisingly in April 1965.
The furthest we've been behind is 21 games, that was in October 2003.

The longest period of time we've been ahead was from 11th September 1909 to 7th January 1995.

Thta's the best I can do at short notice.


Title: Re: Sampson's Ranking
Post by: JollyCobbler on March 03, 2011, 17:26:39 pm
Some interesting stats in today's Chron. It turns out that Sammo was, as the Americans would say, our 5th winningest manager in percentage terms since 1985 with a 35% win ratio. Beating him were Calderwood (48%), Carr (41%) Wilson (41%) and Atkins (36%).

Apart from being mildly surprised at this, the stats that really surprised me were Kevin Wilson's. I wonder what his record was within those stats when he had Broadhurst as his assistant, because I seem to recall that our form went south rather rapidly after Broadhurst departed, signalling the end of the "2 Kevs" reign. I am hoping Marvo might be able to help out here, even though the word "winningest" will doubtless cause at least some mild irritation  ;D

The trouble is, you can do anything with statistics. Does anyone seriously believe that Willo was one of the best managers we've had? Without Broads to sort out the tactics, he was shockingly poor.


Title: Re: Sampson's Ranking
Post by: Bog Paper on March 03, 2011, 17:45:38 pm
I agree, which is why I wondered what his win % was when Broadhurst was there with him. I'm sure it would be a lot better than 41% - maybe even better than Calderwood's 48%. Unfortunately I don't have that information and I don't think marvo does either. Also, the stats are a bit harsh on the likes of Phil Chard, who obviously took over after 10 players and the manager had been sacked by the administrators and had to work with YTS players and suchlike. Similarly, Broadhurst on his own couldn't even make a loan signing for ages yet managed to keep us up.

Lies, damned lies and statistics, as they say.



Title: Re: Sampson's Ranking
Post by: Marvo on March 03, 2011, 17:54:36 pm
I agree, which is why I wondered what his win % was when Broadhurst was there with him. I'm sure it would be a lot better than 41% - maybe even better than Calderwood's 48%. Unfortunately I don't have that information and I don't think marvo does either. Also, the stats are a bit harsh on the likes of Phil Chard, who obviously took over after 10 players and the manager had been sacked by the administrators and had to work with YTS players and suchlike. Similarly, Broadhurst on his own couldn't even make a loan signing for ages yet managed to keep us up.

Lies, damned lies and statistics, as they say.



I could but then so could you. It would looking up Broadhurst record, see when he came and lkeft and then take them off Wilsons record.

I would do it for you but..............................

Well to be honest one of the greatest managers of all time was surely Brian Clough. There are an awful lot of people in the know who believe he would have been nothing without Peter Taylor. Therefore, what would be the point, it's all conjecture?


Title: Re: Sampson's Ranking
Post by: JollyCobbler on March 03, 2011, 17:58:22 pm
I agree, which is why I wondered what his win % was when Broadhurst was there with him. I'm sure it would be a lot better than 41% - maybe even better than Calderwood's 48%. Unfortunately I don't have that information and I don't think marvo does either. Also, the stats are a bit harsh on the likes of Phil Chard, who obviously took over after 10 players and the manager had been sacked by the administrators and had to work with YTS players and suchlike. Similarly, Broadhurst on his own couldn't even make a loan signing for ages yet managed to keep us up.

Lies, damned lies and statistics, as they say.



Don't have the stats. All i remember is that we were in the top eight when Broadhurst was forced out, and ended up staying up by the skin of our teeth (goal difference I think?)
The next season, Willo was sacked after eight defeats in his first ten games.


Title: Re: Sampson's Ranking
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on March 03, 2011, 17:58:35 pm
& also you hated Kevan Broadhurst so wouldn't want to put up anything that may suggest he actually knew what he was doing


Title: Re: Sampson's Ranking
Post by: bigcitylights on March 03, 2011, 18:09:10 pm
Okay Ben, here goes.

Total wins against defeats.

In our entire history and aif you take any given point of time we've been "ahead" with wins over defeats after 4,460 games.
The totals have been level ater 64 games,  whilst defeats have outnumberd wins after 325 games.

The furthest we've been ahead is 131 wins, not surprisingly in April 1965.
The furthest we've been behind is 21 games, that was in October 2003.

The longest period of time we've been ahead was from 11th September 1909 to 7th January 1995.

Thta's the best I can do at short notice.

Much appreciated Marvo.


Title: Re: Sampson's Ranking
Post by: Marvo on March 03, 2011, 18:17:42 pm
& also you hated Kevan Broadhurst so wouldn't want to put up anything that may suggest he actually knew what he was doing

If that's aimed at me it's total bollocks!

It took me an hour to sort out those stats for Ben, if I did these for you, you wouldn't appreciate it. All mouth and no trousers, that's you pal.


Title: Re: Sampson's Ranking
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on March 03, 2011, 18:30:18 pm
Well as I didn't ask for any stats you're right, I wouldn't appreciate them. All I know is that you didn't rate Broadhurst so if you looked into it and found out that he did actually have something about him, knowing you and what you're like, I'd imagine you'd be loathe to put them up on here.


Title: Re: Sampson's Ranking
Post by: Marvo on March 03, 2011, 18:39:05 pm
Well as I didn't ask for any stats you're right, I wouldn't appreciate them. All I know is that you didn't rate Broadhurst so if you looked into it and found out that he did actually have something about him, knowing you and what you're like, I'd imagine you'd be loathe to put them up on here.

You are totally wrong, I have no feelings towards Broadhurst one way or another, why should I? I have no idea where you've garnered that opinion from.  ::)

Oh hang on, perhaps you're going to tell everybody you remember me being against him back in 1999. Have you still got the post?  ::)

What a prize prick you are!

If I was looking up stats to prove a point then you're right, if they weren't in my favour then I wouldn't publish them, why should I undermine my own argument? However if somebody asked me for stats that I possess they can have them whatever they appear to show.


Title: Re: Sampson's Ranking
Post by: Marvo on March 03, 2011, 18:47:43 pm
I've just looked up Kevan Broadhurst stats as a manager. They are pretty poor. He was in charge at three clubs over 94 games. His record:

Managed 94, Won 30 - Drew 20 - Lost 40

Not very impressive in his own right and they are not the figures to suggest he was the power behind the throne of Kevin Wilson. Perhaps they just worked well together?

If anybody wants my opinion on the two Kev's, well like I've said when we've discussed Sammo in times gone by, I don't think you have to be a great manger to get a team of our standing up from this division, just a reasonable one. I guess the two Kev's just about reached that standard as a duo, on their own neither looked capable.


Title: Re: Sampson's Ranking
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on March 03, 2011, 18:49:02 pm
You never rated Broadhurst so don't lie Marvo, I thought you were better than that. Remember when he got the job at Walsall? I remember you saying how he wouldn't last there because he was no good. In the event, he didn't last but that isn't the point. The point is you didn't rate him.


What a prize prick you are!



As soon as people resort to insults, you know you've won the argument.
:-\ Disappointing, really disappointing.


Title: Re: Sampson's Ranking
Post by: Marvo on March 03, 2011, 18:55:58 pm
That wasn't an insult, it was a fairly accurate description.


Title: Re: Sampson's Ranking
Post by: DrillingCobbler on March 03, 2011, 19:02:51 pm
Is it just me who takes absolutely nothing from this particular stats analysis?

I would honestly say that Sammo is/was a better manager than Wilson. And this inspite of the fact that Wilson got us promoted. The team that Wilson inherited from Atkins was far too good for this league and just needed a big group hug after Atkins had 'lost them'.

Likewise I would rate Atkins far far higher than Calderwood, if he'd had upped sticked just prior to things getting a bit tough his stats would have been fantastic!

Best manager in the last 30 years? I would say (for us) Carr, followed by Atkins. The rest of the decent ones are much of a muchness and I would include the lorded up CC in that bracket.


Title: Re: Sampson's Ranking
Post by: JollyCobbler on March 03, 2011, 19:10:08 pm
Is it just me who takes absolutely nothing from this particular stats analysis?

I would honestly say that Sammo is/was a better manager than Wilson. And this inspite of the fact that Wilson got us promoted. The team that Wilson inherited from Atkins was far too good for this league and just needed a big group hug after Atkins had 'lost them'.

Likewise I would rate Atkins far far higher than Calderwood, if he'd had upped sticked just prior to things getting a bit tough his stats would have been fantastic!

Best manager in the last 30 years? I would say (for us) Carr, followed by Atkins. The rest of the decent ones are much of a muchness and I would include the lorded up CC in that bracket.

Good post.


Title: Re: Sampson's Ranking
Post by: Bog Paper on March 03, 2011, 19:23:13 pm
I've just looked up Kevan Broadhurst stats as a manager. They are pretty poor. He was in charge at three clubs over 94 games. His record:

Managed 94, Won 30 - Drew 20 - Lost 40

Not very impressive in his own right and they are not the figures to suggest he was the power behind the throne of Kevin Wilson. Perhaps they just worked well together?

If anybody wants my opinion on the two Kev's, well like I've said when we've discussed Sammo in times gone by, I don't think you have to be a great manger to get a team of our standing up from this division, just a reasonable one. I guess the two Kev's just about reached that standard as a duo, on their own neither looked capable.

Yes, but if you recall, he inherited us after Wilson left us bottom of the league and around 9 or 10 points adrift of safety. As I recall, we hadn't repaid some PFA loans or something like that which meant Broadhurst couldn't even sign a loan player. Yet somehow, he managed to keep us in League 1, or whatever is was called at the time. That was before the takeover and the following year he had us in 14th place, but only lasted a few weeks because the new regime were itching to get in a certain Terence Fenwick. I consider what Broadhurst managed to achieve as remarkable and he will always have my respect for how he managed to make something out of nothing.

However, that wasn't what I was talking about in the first place. What I was after was what Wilson's record was with Broadhurst (and what it was after Broadhurst left).


Title: Re: Sampson's Ranking
Post by: DrillingCobbler on March 03, 2011, 19:54:29 pm
Good post Mr Bog and one I happen to agree with. Broads was 'half decent'...

But I was in favour at the time of his sacking, not knowing of course at the time that we were about to appoint successive managerial imbeciles!

I guess its for these reasons why a fair number of people still 'supported' the continued employment of Sammo in the role. As has been stated on numerous occasions by virtually everybody who uses this website, DC has a very very big decision to make. Because another one that will 'split the fans' would prove disastrous and he could well lose the fan base. And along with that, lose any chance of resurrecting the property deal that he craves for so many reasons.



Title: Re: Sampson's Ranking
Post by: Marvo on March 03, 2011, 20:27:08 pm
I didn't like Atkins, he was a one trick pony. He also bored me to tears. I don't discount what he did for us, he was probably what we needed at the time and who can forget the first trip to Wembley. Trouble is, whio can forget the second trip to Wembley? We'd just destroyed Bristol Rovers at home in stiill one of the best performances I've witnessed by a Cobblers side. Atkins had at last let them off the leash, he had to in the ciircumstances and boy did they respond. Brilliant stuff. So what did Atkins do when we faced up to Grimsby in the final? Went back to type, tried to bore the pants off the opponents and like Nigel said on another thread earlier in the  week, turned the game into one of the most one-sided 1-0 games you are ever likley to see. Couple that with the FACT that he was prepared to see the club go to the wall just so he could get his pound of flesh after he was rightly sacked means Atkins will never be forgiven in this supporters eyes.

As for what you had to say BOG, I accept he did a very good job when he first took over with little resourses but when he was finally sacked, our current form was won 1, drawn 2, lost 6. The final defeat of that little lot a 0-5 hammering by Wycombe at Sixfields. When he ended up a Walsall he won once in eleven games in charge.


Title: Re: Sampson Sacked
Post by: Mrs Macc Cobbler on March 03, 2011, 20:31:32 pm
Perhaps you and Linda could  job-share to do his ironing for him. I'm sure it'd make you both feel a lot better.
Thanks Ted, that is a brilliant idea.
Linda, I'm game if you are  ;D


Title: Sammo's best signing?
Post by: Wolvo on March 04, 2011, 00:27:13 am
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/paulfletcher/2011/03/from_northampton_town_to_real.html#284297

Interesting article about the clubs fitness coach, Glen Thurgood, always good to see a coaches good work recognized


Title: Re: Sammo's best signing?
Post by: PepesProdigy on March 04, 2011, 01:07:47 am
Good read that.


Title: Re: Sammo's best signing?
Post by: threeinabed on March 04, 2011, 08:41:09 am
was a good read when i posted it about 3 days ago as well


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: Positively Mad Mark on March 04, 2011, 10:30:51 am
He ought to write a book on his near 20 year time here, a lot has happened in that time. I'd buy it.

I may have a word with him actually, offer my publishing services.

He is and always will be a true Cobbler.  We always feared that it would end this way.

Liverpool, London Road goal, towering headers, play off celebrations, playing against him at Sixfields in the fans games, beinga nice bloke, smiling, having time for the fans... they don't make them like that anymore.


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: abington_cobbler on March 04, 2011, 10:35:31 am
Maybe DC could offer Sammo a defensive coach role at the club although this would obviously depend on the new manager wanting to bring his own team in!


Title: Re: Sampson's Ranking
Post by: Positively Mad Mark on March 04, 2011, 10:42:51 am
Okay Ben, here goes.

Total wins against defeats.

In our entire history and aif you take any given point of time we've been "ahead" with wins over defeats after 4,460 games.
The totals have been level ater 64 games,  whilst defeats have outnumberd wins after 325 games.

The furthest we've been ahead is 131 wins, not surprisingly in April 1965.
The furthest we've been behind is 21 games, that was in October 2003.

The longest period of time we've been ahead was from 11th September 1909 to 7th January 1995.

Thta's the best I can do at short notice.

Marvo, I've gotta say, that is some impressive stats finding.   ;D


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: GreenleysCobbler on March 04, 2011, 10:44:36 am
Maybe DC could offer Sammo a defensive coach role at the club although this would obviously depend on the new manager wanting to bring his own team in!

That'd be a bit like leaving your wife for a new woman but then moving your ex wife in as a cookery coach!!  ;D


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: everbrite on March 04, 2011, 10:54:59 am
Was thinking this too.  Would be a good read, let slip a few NTFC untold stories. 

What about a 2nd Testimonial in the summer? Highest attendance of the season  :D



Cant help thinking that a lot of this is sanctimonius clap trap. Whilst I did not think Sammo was ideal for the job I certainly aired my support for him whilst he was. He just lost too many games against ex non league sides. Morecombe and Burton et al - for Chist's sake!!


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: memyhead on March 04, 2011, 11:00:42 am
Maybe DC could offer Sammo a defensive coach role at the club although this would obviously depend on the new manager wanting to bring his own team in!

Whilst manager, he could not sort out the shambolic defence, so no thanks!


Title: Re: Sampson's Ranking
Post by: Marvo on March 05, 2011, 09:34:59 am
You never rated Broadhurst so don't lie Marvo, I thought you were better than that. Remember when he got the job at Walsall? I remember you saying how he wouldn't last there because he was no good. In the event, he didn't last but that isn't the point. The point is you didn't rate him.



Sorry for the delay in responding to this, to be honest I missed it.

That isn't the point at all, you never said anything about how I rated Broadhurst, you said I "hated" him (Check the post, it's on this thread) which is completely untrue. No, I didn't rate him and the fact that I was totally correct in my prediction that he wouldn't last long at Walsall (11 games) shows I know what I'm talking about, so thanks for bringing peoploes attenbtion to that.

Just because I don't rate somebody, doesn't mean I hate them. I don't rate your opinion much (that's on the rare occasion you have one) but I don't hate you.

You have a problem. You complain about me continuously, even threaten to ban me from time to time, but you still can't resist trying to wind me up whenever the opportunity arises. You don't like me, that's fine but you know as well as everyone else that my posts provoke thought and reaction and lead to an increase in usage on this, your board. You're a very mixed up boy.


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: MK_Cobbler on March 05, 2011, 11:25:19 am
It would have been good if Sampson and Cardoza came to an agreement that after the Shrewsbury game the club and Sampson parted company (a bit like Taylor at Bradford last week) to give the fans a chance to show their appreciation for what he was done for the club over the years.


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: defender on March 05, 2011, 16:38:33 pm
The very best of luck to Sammo whatever he does in the future.

A great player for us and refreshingly honest as a manager whatever anyone thinks of his management ability. I don't think I've ever wanted a manager to succeed so badly. I agree with DC's decision, but an immensely sad day nonetheless. We'll never have a manager for whom the club means more.
           Well said Madrid Cobbler, I'll bet most cobblers fans would agree with that. you don't get many managers who think like that, we have had two, Ian Sampson and Dave Bowen.


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: DL2 on March 05, 2011, 16:48:01 pm
It would have been good if Sampson and Cardoza came to an agreement that after the Shrewsbury game the club and Sampson parted company (a bit like Taylor at Bradford last week) to give the fans a chance to show their appreciation for what he was done for the club over the years.

I agree someone sort of public recognition and opportunity to show our appreciation would have been appropriate but to be honest right now I would probably tell DC to shove it up his backside to be honest.


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: Ted on March 05, 2011, 16:55:11 pm
I agree someone sort of public recognition and opportunity to show our appreciation would have been appropriate but to be honest right now I would probably tell DC to shove it up his backside to be honest.

For goodness sake woman, move on !

Sammo wanted the manager's job,stupidly got it and then failed miserably.

I've got no time for losers.


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: DL2 on March 05, 2011, 17:01:17 pm
Sod off Ted, go back to lounging arrogantly on the sofa while the slave wife wipes your a*se.   :-*  >:D


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: Dr Feelgood on March 05, 2011, 17:02:45 pm
Cyber spat



Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: DL2 on March 05, 2011, 17:04:29 pm
Well honestly  :D the old sod deserves it every now and again  ;)


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: SeanODonovan on March 09, 2011, 09:09:13 am
He has applied for the Grimsby job - good luck Sammo !
http://www.thisisgrimsby.co.uk/sport/Sampson-confirms-application/article-3305934-detail/article.html


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: memyhead on March 09, 2011, 09:17:21 am
He has applied for the Grimsby job - good luck Sammo !
http://www.thisisgrimsby.co.uk/sport/Sampson-confirms-application/article-3305934-detail/article.html

Yeah, Good luck Sammo. If you get it please come back a take a few of your old players with you.....


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: sxcobbler on March 09, 2011, 10:27:29 am
Maybe DC could offer Sammo a defensive coach role at the club although this would obviously depend on the new manager wanting to bring his own team in!

God help us.

A great man Sammo but organising the defence has been our downfall this season.

I wish Sammo all the best for the future and I am glad that the timing ensures he will always be a legend.


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: Marvo on March 09, 2011, 13:11:22 pm
I heard about the Grimsby application last night, also heard he was up for the Cambridge job as well. I do hope he gets one of them, I like Sammo, it would have been so much better had he learnt his trade elsewhere.

It would help some on this board with their heartache if they knew their man was back on the gravy train so soon.


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: EastNpton on March 09, 2011, 13:13:53 pm
Quick question Marvo. What and when was Sammo's first game for the club?

Was he on the pitch for the Chesterfield game 1994 (riot)?

Cheers


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: Macc Cobbler on March 09, 2011, 13:16:57 pm

I heard about the Grimsby application last night, also heard he was up for the Cambridge job as well. I do hope he gets one of them

Totally agree .......... good luck Sammo  :)


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: Forest on March 09, 2011, 14:56:29 pm
samo has not applied for either job marvo. He is spending time with family and see what happens in the summer


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: Marvo on March 09, 2011, 15:03:15 pm
samo has not applied for either job marvo. He is spending time with family and see what happens in the summer

Okay.  ???

I'm not in the know (you obviously are), I've just repeated what I was told last night.


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: Air-Dan on March 09, 2011, 15:10:15 pm
samo has not applied for either job marvo. He is spending time with family and see what happens in the summer

So the article in which he is interviewed and says than he has applied for the Grimsby job is BS, is it?

 ::)


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: DustCobb on March 09, 2011, 15:13:37 pm
Seems odd that Sammo would do an interview saying he has put his CV in for the Grimsby job.

Still, in Forest we trust.  ;)


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: Power Football on March 09, 2011, 15:39:39 pm
Who's Samo?


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: NTFC Nut on March 09, 2011, 15:42:59 pm
Good luck to the guy, although it'll feel a little weird if Grimsby come to Sixfields in a couple of years time and Sammo is sat in the opposition dugout.


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: Forest on March 09, 2011, 16:48:46 pm
well as sampson was in the que in front of me this morning at a petrol  station i thanked him and asked what he is doing and that is  what he said so it came from  him


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: Marvo on March 09, 2011, 16:50:56 pm
well as sampson was in the que in front of me this morning at a petrol  station i thanked him and asked what he is doing and that is  what he said so it came from  him

That's weird.

When strangers approach me in the street and ask me what I'm doing I give them every detail of my private life.  ;D


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: DustCobb on March 09, 2011, 16:51:27 pm
That's weird.

When strangers approach me in the street and ask me what I'm doing I give them every detail of my private life.  ;D

 ;D


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: NTFC Nut on March 09, 2011, 16:51:48 pm
If the right opportunity came up, Sammo would be silly to turn it down for the sake of not wanting to start another job until the summer. Good positions don't come up that often and Grimsby is a very good position. Their budget dwarfs that of every club in the Conference bar Crawley and Luton (both of whom will quite possibly be League Two clubs next season) and it shouldn't take that much to get them up.


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: abington_cobbler on March 09, 2011, 16:53:31 pm
well as sampson was in the que in front of me this morning at a petrol  station i thanked him and asked what he is doing and that is  what he said so it came from  him

Are you sure it was Sammo? It was probably someone who looks like him and thought... 'Who is that nosey f***er?'


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: Forest on March 09, 2011, 17:28:10 pm
lol was defo him i asked him what  plans he has and said  he wants to put football  on back burner and spend time with his family dunno why he would  say that you must  know  he has applied or maybe someone is making up storys he said quite clearly he wanted a break but obviously some of you know  more than him ::)


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: Forest on March 09, 2011, 17:31:20 pm
;D
aka stigntfc :)


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: abington_cobbler on March 10, 2011, 13:52:36 pm
well as sampson was in the que in front of me this morning at a petrol  station i thanked him and asked what he is doing and that is  what he said so it came from  him

I repeat what I said yesterday, are you sure it was Sammo you were talking to and not a look a like who thought you was a random weirdo  :P

http://www.thisisgrimsby.co.uk/grimsbytownnews/Sampson-confirms-application/article-3305934-detail/article.html


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: MK_Cobbler on March 10, 2011, 14:14:42 pm
God help Grimsby!!  :o


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: Marvo on March 10, 2011, 14:44:11 pm
Anybody know whether Linda has her stripped black and white top yet?  ;D


Title: Re: Tributes to Sammo!
Post by: Forest on March 10, 2011, 14:55:10 pm
lol.it was him just repeating what he said and as that interview said he aint conferdent he will get it. He may of been told that already? :P


Title: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: NTFC Nut on March 12, 2011, 18:32:57 pm
He substituted a defender for a defender in the last few minutes when we were a goal down.

He signed a new striker and then brought him on in midfield when we were struggling to put away chances.

He played a back four composed entirely of full backs, at least two of whom can't actually defend.

He pulled everyody back for corners, leaving no-one to get onto the inevitable punts up field.

He made a string of new signings that are no better than what we've already got, on first viewing (and perhaps worse).

He started with one out and out striker at home.

He waited until early on in the second half to change anything when it evidently wasn't working after about 10 minutes.

He lost three games on the spin.

He allowed us to be given a footballing masterclass at home to f***ing MACCLESFIELD.

And you may be able to add more.

Now don't get me wrong, I do like Johnson. His honesty and enthusiasm are refreshing, and you can't argue with his track record. But he's not the f***ing messiah. Not everything he touches is going to turn to gold, he is more than capable of getting things wrong and when he does, we need to let him know. Some people on here are well and truly up his arse already and he hasn't actually achieved anything here yet. That result today was completely and utterly unacceptable and the finger can only be pointed in one direction (and no, I don't mean at the players, although some of them need a rocket up their backside on today's showing).


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Welly Cobb on March 12, 2011, 18:34:36 pm
Point it at the f***ing fans for not making a single noise all game other than to tell their own players to f*** off.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: jayntfc on March 12, 2011, 18:34:55 pm
To use your oft-repeated argument re: Sammo

'Give him time'


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: towcestercobbler on March 12, 2011, 18:35:25 pm
Top post, so far Gary Johnson has signed some new players but not done anything extra ordinary with this club


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: dazza on March 12, 2011, 18:37:10 pm
AND YOUR POINT IS???


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: FezNTFC on March 12, 2011, 18:39:39 pm
Top post, so far Gary Johnson has signed some new players but not done anything extra ordinary with this club
You were expecting extraordinary things in 8 days?


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: NTFC Nut on March 12, 2011, 18:42:01 pm
You were expecting extraordinary things in 8 days?

No, but the fact he has only been here for 8 days shouldn't make him immune to criticism after today's disaster, as some of you on here seem to think.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Bog Paper on March 12, 2011, 18:45:00 pm
You were expecting 3 straight defeats?

Good post Nut: don't agree with everything you say but refreshing to see the alternative "I'm not sucking the new manager's cock just yet" viewpoint.

At times like this, factions will dig in. I expect this board is going to get quite lievely. Expect this to be magnified even further if we return from Bradford with nothing.

I don't think anyone is anti-Johnson. They just want to start seeing some results. I'd quite like to as well. And right now is a good time for me......


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Welly Cobb on March 12, 2011, 18:45:43 pm
I expected 2 defeats. Didn't expect to lose against Macclesfield, but s*** happens, we lost the reverse as well.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: NTFC Nut on March 12, 2011, 18:50:56 pm
I've got another one for the list!

If Sampson was in charge, you would never, ever have seen a comment like this...

Didn't expect to lose against Macclesfield, but sh*t happens,


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Cobblersmad on March 12, 2011, 18:53:04 pm
I thought that Tozer should of gone upfront for the last few minutes instead of Johnson in the hope of winning a few headers.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Welly Cobb on March 12, 2011, 18:57:17 pm
I've got another one for the list!

If Sampson was in charge, you would never, ever have seen a comment like this...

That's true, but if it had been under Sammo recently it would have been seen under the context of 'a loss against Macclesfield after drawing with a lot of other league 2 minnows below us in the league' rather than 'a loss against Macclesfield after losing to two of the better teams in the division'. He's still effectively got Sammo's team, regardless, and hasn't been able to use our top-scorer at all since coming in.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: FezNTFC on March 12, 2011, 19:00:04 pm
You were expecting 3 straight defeats?

Good post Nut: don't agree with everything you say but refreshing to see the alternative "I'm not sucking the new manager's cock just yet" viewpoint.

At times like this, factions will dig in. I expect this board is going to get quite lievely. Expect this to be magnified even further if we return from Bradford with nothing.

I don't think anyone is anti-Johnson. They just want to start seeing some results. I'd quite like to as well. And right now is a good time for me......
Don't kid yourself, we would have lost them if Sammo was still in charge as well. We lost to them earlier in the season can I remind you.

The fact is we have a squad low in confidence, and Johnson is still getting to learn about them. It will take a while to sort out, hopefully it won't be too late.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Tyler on March 12, 2011, 19:01:28 pm
He substituted a defender for a defender in the last few minutes when we were a goal down.

He signed a new striker and then brought him on in midfield when we were struggling to put away chances.

He played a back four composed entirely of full backs, at least two of whom can't actually defend.

He pulled everyody back for corners, leaving no-one to get onto the inevitable punts up field.

He made a string of new signings that are no better than what we've already got, on first viewing (and perhaps worse).

He started with one out and out striker at home.

He waited until early on in the second half to change anything when it evidently wasn't working after about 10 minutes.

He lost three games on the spin.

He allowed us to be given a footballing masterclass at home to f***ing MACCLESFIELD.

And you may be able to add more.

Now don't get me wrong, I do like Johnson. His honesty and enthusiasm are refreshing, and you can't argue with his track record. But he's not the f***ing messiah. Not everything he touches is going to turn to gold, he is more than capable of getting things wrong and when he does, we need to let him know. Some people on here are well and truly up his arse already and he hasn't actually achieved anything here yet. That result today was completely and utterly unacceptable and the finger can only be pointed in one direction (and no, I don't mean at the players, although some of them need a rocket up their backside on today's showing).

Of course Sampson would've been slaughtered. Reason being is that Sammo put that side together and had just under 100 games. Not 8 days and 2 games previously. Johnson may have got things slightly wrong today, but i think given the s***e he has picked up, he can be forgiven for it.


Also, i thought Bauza was playing kind of behind the front two, which is one of his positions? Stupid manager!


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Patmore on March 12, 2011, 19:02:38 pm
Top post, so far Gary Johnson has signed some new players but not done anything extra ordinary with this club

He has 8 days and nothing extra ordinary yet? What is he playing at?  :'(


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: NTFC Nut on March 12, 2011, 19:03:16 pm
He's still effectively got Sammo's team

I wondered how long it would be before someone trotted out that old excuse.  3 of the players who featured today were Johnson's signings. That's roughly a quarter. And all of them failed to impress.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: jayntfc on March 12, 2011, 19:04:50 pm
 ::) god i hate some of our supporters


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: NTFC Nut on March 12, 2011, 19:05:45 pm
Johnson may have got things slightly wrong today

All I am looking for, Tyler, is the acknowledgement of precisely that.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Air-Dan on March 12, 2011, 19:08:05 pm
I wondered how long it would be before someone trotted out that old excuse.  3 of the players who featured today were Johnson's signings. That's roughly a quarter. And all of them failed to impress.

In my opinion Bauza looked good when he came on.

Though having said that 2 of the other 3 players who put in a decent shiftr (Gilligan, Holt, Dunn) were taken off.  ???


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: DustCobb on March 12, 2011, 19:09:16 pm
I honestly don't know how Holt gets so much wanking over him.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: jayntfc on March 12, 2011, 19:10:28 pm
I honestly don't know how Holt gets so much wanking over him.

he was fooking useless today.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: FezNTFC on March 12, 2011, 19:10:48 pm
All I am looking for, Tyler, is the acknowledgement of precisely that.
I can see the point you are trying to make. The problem is that Sammo kept making the same mistakes, and thats ultimately why he lost his job. Johnson has a squad that he largely doesn't know and is simply trying to find a way for us to win. I think we can all forgive him for making a couple of mistakes in charge of his 3rd match with a squad he has yet to fully understand.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: DustCobb on March 12, 2011, 19:11:59 pm
he was fooking useless today.

Agreed. It's ok though because he tries his best  ::)

The problem is he is not mobile enough, yes he can head the ball but he is so one paced and lacking of mobility. Harrad had to do all his running for him.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: NTFC Nut on March 12, 2011, 19:12:32 pm
::) god i hate some of our supporters

I was unhappy with the set-up today and I feel it cost us the game. That is my personal opinion. I'm irritated to see so many people not only refusing to criticise Johnson, but openly ridiculing those who do, when he clearly got some things wrong and had a role to play in one of the worst NTFC performances we've been subjected to in a long time.

Who do you hold accountable then? Or is it just "one of those things"? ::)


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Cobblerslegend on March 12, 2011, 19:14:38 pm
i have to say hes deffo not a striker get him on the left wing he creates  chances for us and works hard were i like jacobs but he dont perform regularly enough put him on the right gilly and osman in the middle


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Tyler on March 12, 2011, 19:16:38 pm
I honestly don't know how Holt gets so much wanking over him.

Been saying this for months. Trouble is when i do i get shot down because i 'have it in for him' ::)


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: jayntfc on March 12, 2011, 19:17:45 pm
I was unhappy with the set-up today and I feel it cost us the game. That is my personal opinion. I'm irritated to see so many people not only refusing to criticise Johnson, but openly ridiculing those who do, when he clearly got some things wrong and had a role to play in one of the worst NTFC performances we've been subjected to in a long time.

Who do you hold accountable then? Or is it just "one of those things"? ::)

Sorry mate I'm not referring exclusively to you it's just it took about 10 minutes before the first cretin around me to have a moan about our players. Fair enough they were rubbish but it does them no help whatsoever. Some knobhead shouts 'WHERE THE F**K DID YOU GET THIS RIGHT BACK FROM JOHNSON?' 10 minutes into his debut. For the next 80 minutes even before we went behind there were moans coming from every direction, it was the same under Sammo, moaning, always moaning. It just makes me want to stop going.

GJ got a lot of things wrong today, I'm still sure that he'll turn it around though. But he needs support, he's been here 8 days and there are already some dickheads in the West baying for his blood.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: towcestercobbler on March 12, 2011, 19:18:39 pm
I was unhappy with the set-up today and I feel it cost us the game. That is my personal opinion. I'm irritated to see so many people not only refusing to criticise Johnson, but openly ridiculing those who do, when he clearly got some things wrong and had a role to play in one of the worst NTFC performances we've been subjected to in a long time.

Who do you hold accountable then? Or is it just "one of those things"? ::)

Have you seen the Shaun Harrad topic and the bollocking i'm getting over saying the stuff in that?


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: DustCobb on March 12, 2011, 19:18:58 pm
Sorry mate I'm not referring exclusively to you it's just it took about 10 minutes before the first cretin around me to have a moan about our players. Fair enough they were rubbish but it does them no help whatsoever. Some knobhead shouts 'WHERE THE F**K DID YOU GET THIS RIGHT BACK FROM JOHNSON?' 10 minutes into his debut. For the next 80 minutes even before we went behind there were moans coming from every direction, it was the same under Sammo, moaning, always moaning. It just makes me want to stop going.

GJ got a lot of things wrong today, I'm still sure that he'll turn it around though. But he needs support, he's been here 8 days and there are already some dickheads in the West baying for his blood.

Same in the North mate, bunch of muppets most of our 'fans'


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: NTFC Nut on March 12, 2011, 19:23:41 pm
Have you seen the Shaun Harrad topic and the bollocking i'm getting over saying the stuff in that?

Personally I feel Harrad will be a success here if given the right service, but admittedly he's been disappointing here so far. I don't agree he's useless, but I won't call you a cock for thinking so.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: NTFC Nut on March 12, 2011, 19:50:39 pm
In my opinion Bauza looked good when he came on.

I thought he was ineffectual. Can't really remember him doing anything of note apart from one half-decent cross.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Exe on March 12, 2011, 20:01:45 pm
I was unhappy with the set-up today and I feel it cost us the game. That is my personal opinion. I'm irritated to see so many people not only refusing to criticise Johnson, but openly ridiculing those who do, when he clearly got some things wrong and had a role to play in one of the worst NTFC performances we've been subjected to in a long time.

Who do you hold accountable then? Or is it just "one of those things"? ::)

There were no doubt aspects of Johnson's decision making today that left a lot to be desired; my personal opinion is that allowing Courtney Herbert onto a football pitch is in itself a sackable offence. However, I won't be directing expletive filled abuse towards a man who has only been in his job for 8 days. The fact that he hasn't had a full week of uninterrupted training with his new squad to date should allow Johnson a substantial amount of leeway. We're all entitled to voice doubts about how he handled today's lineup, subs, tactics etc. but it should be done away from the ground, not in the bolshy manner it was today which can only be counter-productive.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: sxcobbler on March 12, 2011, 20:05:41 pm
that has got to be one of the worst performances.....

and the substitutions were crazy....as for walker is he colour blind ???


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Coolcat on March 12, 2011, 20:14:06 pm
Top post, so far Gary Johnson has signed some new players but not done anything extra ordinary with this club

No it isn't...it's retrospective bllx...as if the 'Legend' Sammo that Nut will defend to his dying day was/is indeed the Messiah himself ffs! ::)

..oh..and extraordinary is one word!


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: NTFC Nut on March 12, 2011, 20:19:01 pm
No it isn't...it's retrospective bllx...as if the 'Legend' Sammo that Nut will defend to his dying day was/is indeed the Messiah himself ffs! ::)

..oh..and extraordinary is one word!

I'm pointing out that if Sammo had made the catalogue of mistakes Johnson made today, and we'd been outclassed at home to f***ing Macclesfield, he'd have been lynched (and yes, I would have been critical of him if he were in charge of that shambles today). With Johnson though, because he is proven elsewhere and new to the position, the view of the Hotel End messageboard (by and large) seems to be that he is some sort of all-knowing power and must be right, in some roundabout way, about everything, even where he is so evidently getting some things wrong. Why should he be immune to criticism?


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Son Of Geoff on March 12, 2011, 20:19:08 pm
Too many amateur football managers 'round here these days. I cannot believe that people kid themselves into believing they'd have done it better than Johnson today.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: CodCobbler on March 12, 2011, 20:24:26 pm
You were expecting extraordinary things in 8 days?

Not miracles, but at least a point from THREE games? I'm more disappointed with the players than any manager. I'm pretty sure I myself couldn't do worse that Johnson or Sammo.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: NTFC Nut on March 12, 2011, 20:28:45 pm
Too many amateur football managers 'round here these days. I cannot believe that people kid themselves into believing they'd have done it better than Johnson today.

Again, that's not the point I'm making. I'm simply saying that I don't understand why Sammo makes mistakes, costs us a game and gets slaughtered, and then Johnson makes mistakes, costs us a game and those who try to criticise are themselves slaughtered.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: jayntfc on March 12, 2011, 20:29:52 pm
it's not that hard, one was making those mistakes after a year of being in the job, the other has had 3 games.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Exe on March 12, 2011, 20:34:20 pm
Again, that's not the point I'm making. I'm simply saying that I don't understand why Sammo makes mistakes, costs us a game and gets slaughtered, and then Johnson makes mistakes, costs us a game and those who try to criticise are themselves slaughtered.

I think there's an important distinction between making criticisms on here and abusing the guy at the ground. The noise emanating from the West Stand today was nothing but counter-productive for the manager and players.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: NTFC Nut on March 12, 2011, 20:36:36 pm
It's to do with reputation, I suppose. Most people had formed almost set-in-stone opinions that Sammo wasn't up to the task as far back as October, when we had that 5 game losing streak. Any mistakes he made thereon in vindicated their views, so he was roundly panned. Johnson however has a good track record at other clubs and is widely viewed as an intelligent, knowledgeable and astute manager. He can therefore make match-turning mistakes and the same people who criticised Sammo will find excuses for him.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: jayntfc on March 12, 2011, 20:37:25 pm
Nut accusing other people of searching for excuses  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: GillysM8 on March 12, 2011, 20:39:04 pm
GJ has my backing and dare say he knows a bit more about football than us lot. The players need a size 10 where the sun dont shine as that was a shambles, If only it hurt them as much as it hurt us when we lose. wknd ruined and the cats hiding upstairs  :'(


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Exe on March 12, 2011, 20:39:56 pm
It's to do with reputation, I suppose. Most people had formed almost set-in-stone opinions that Sammo wasn't up to the task as far back as October, when we had that 5 game losing streak. Any mistakes he made thereon in vindicated their views, so he was roundly panned. Johnson however has a good track record at other clubs and is widely viewed as an intelligent, knowledgeable and astute manager. He can therefore make match-turning mistakes and the same people who criticised Sammo will find excuses for him.

FFS, that's because his tenure's barely started. If he's still making the same mistakes a few months down the line that really would be cause for concern.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: FezNTFC on March 12, 2011, 20:55:59 pm
Not miracles, but at least a point from THREE games? I'm more disappointed with the players than any manager. I'm pretty sure I myself couldn't do worse that Johnson or Sammo.
He had the grand total of one training session for the first two games, and has probably had about three in total. Why exactly should we expect at least a point from him when we had already lost to those three teams earlier on in the season? Face it, we are crap and it will take a long, long time for Johnson to sort it out.

To start having a go at him after three games is completely farcical.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: bungle on March 12, 2011, 21:01:19 pm
GJ has a proven track record and all the creditentials to be a success in the job. I was very pleased when he was appointed. I still very much think he's right man to lead us forward.

However, Nut is correct: he made mistakes today and he shouldn't be immune to criticism, even this early into the job. I feel he's actually trying to change things too quickly, particularly at the back. Trying to convert JJ into a centre half at this stage of this season, with pressure on to get points is asking for trouble IMO. Tozer isn't great, but to start with a back four composed entirely of full backs is clearly not the answer.

We need to keep things simple: 4-4-2 with players in their natural positions. Winning games at this level isn't rocket science; you just need to be solid and grind some results out. We desperately need to keep a clean sheet: if I were Johnson I'd make this my number one priority.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Tiki-Taka on March 12, 2011, 21:20:28 pm
Nut, given your tender age let me patronise you give you an analogy...

NTFC is a big shiny racing car (brrmm-brrrmm)

Sammo was a popular but risky choice to drive the car as he had not long passed his driving test.

After a few good laps and one great lap in Liverpool (Thanks Sammo x) he started to skid round corners and lose control

Eventually he crashed the car (bang!) The engine caught fire, the windscreen smashed, there were huge dents in it and two of the tyres burst.  

The car can still be driven but no longer goes very fast (boooo!)

The owner of the car was very upset by the crash and decided to find a new driver.  

Gary Johnson is the new driver. He has driven in lots of races and won many of them (hurrrah!)

The engine is no longer on fire. The windscreen is still broken. The owner has put some new tyres on it. Gary must now drive the car to the garage to get it properly repaired. He has to drive slowly as the car is still broken and he knows he must avoid another crash, else the car will be a write-off.

Once we get to the garage, it will take a long time to get the car fixed but it should be fine by August 2011, when we all hope Gary will drive the car very fast for 46 laps and we will finish 1st in the race (yeeess, get in there you beauty!)

You are upset with Gary as he is driving very slowly to the garage in the battered and damaged car which he has just inherited. Despite the new tyres, today our racing car was overtaken by a fully working lorry - no one likes it but we understand why.

Once Gary gets us to the garage (which he will do with 3 more wins) we can all relax, look at the nudie girl calendars on the wall and sit in the waiting room dreaming of what August will bring.  ;D


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: BackOfTheNet on March 12, 2011, 21:38:38 pm
Nut, given your tender age let me patronise you give you an analogy...

NTFC is a big shiny racing car (brrmm-brrrmm)

Sammo was a popular but risky choice to drive the car as he had not long passed his driving test.

After a few good laps and one great lap in Liverpool (Thanks Sammo x) he started to skid round corners and lose control

Eventually he crashed the car (bang!) The engine caught fire, the windscreen smashed, there were huge dents in it and two of the tyres burst.  

The car can still be driven but no longer goes very fast (boooo!)

The owner of the car was very upset by the crash and decided to find a new driver.  

Gary Johnson is the new driver. He has driven in lots of races and won many of them (hurrrah!)

The engine is no longer on fire. The windscreen is still broken. The owner has put some new tyres on it. Gary must now drive the car to the garage to get it properly repaired. He has to drive slowly as the car is still broken and he knows he must avoid another crash, else the car will be a write-off.

Once we get to the garage, it will take a long time to get the car fixed but it should be fine by August 2011, when we all hope Gary will drive the car very fast for 46 laps and we will finish 1st in the race (yeeess, get in there you beauty!)

You are upset with Gary as he is driving very slowly to the garage in the battered and damaged car which he has just inherited. Despite the new tyres, today our racing car was overtaken by a fully working lorry - no one likes it but we understand why.

Once Gary gets us to the garage (which he will do with 3 more wins) we can all relax, look at the nudie girl calendars on the wall and sit in the waiting room dreaming of what August will bring.  ;D
;D ;D ;D


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Enya_NTFC on March 12, 2011, 21:47:00 pm
Nut, given your tender age let me patronise you give you an analogy...

NTFC is a big shiny racing car (brrmm-brrrmm)

Sammo was a popular but risky choice to drive the car as he had not long passed his driving test.

After a few good laps and one great lap in Liverpool (Thanks Sammo x) he started to skid round corners and lose control

Eventually he crashed the car (bang!) The engine caught fire, the windscreen smashed, there were huge dents in it and two of the tyres burst.  

The car can still be driven but no longer goes very fast (boooo!)

The owner of the car was very upset by the crash and decided to find a new driver.  

Gary Johnson is the new driver. He has driven in lots of races and won many of them (hurrrah!)

The engine is no longer on fire. The windscreen is still broken. The owner has put some new tyres on it. Gary must now drive the car to the garage to get it properly repaired. He has to drive slowly as the car is still broken and he knows he must avoid another crash, else the car will be a write-off.

Once we get to the garage, it will take a long time to get the car fixed but it should be fine by August 2011, when we all hope Gary will drive the car very fast for 46 laps and we will finish 1st in the race (yeeess, get in there you beauty!)

You are upset with Gary as he is driving very slowly to the garage in the battered and damaged car which he has just inherited. Despite the new tyres, today our racing car was overtaken by a fully working lorry - no one likes it but we understand why.

Once Gary gets us to the garage (which he will do with 3 more wins) we can all relax, look at the nudie girl calendars on the wall and sit in the waiting room dreaming of what August will bring.  ;D

That was quite good  ;D


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: TNFSpeed on March 12, 2011, 21:54:04 pm
Point it at the f***ing fans for not making a single noise all game other than to tell their own players to f*** off.

Yeah, the fans really make a big difference. ::)

What are we meant to to, everytime we mis-pass the ball, applaud them?

The atmosphere is s***, yeah but there's a reason for that.. and that's because we're playing like a Blue Square team.

I think they should be thankful at this stage, there are still 4k+ still actually going to the games.

6 Draws, 4 loses over the past 10 games.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: TheBigPicture on March 12, 2011, 21:57:44 pm
Nut, given your tender age let me patronise you give you an analogy...

NTFC is a big shiny racing car (brrmm-brrrmm)

Sammo was a popular but risky choice to drive the car as he had not long passed his driving test.

After a few good laps and one great lap in Liverpool (Thanks Sammo x) he started to skid round corners and lose control

Eventually he crashed the car (bang!) The engine caught fire, the windscreen smashed, there were huge dents in it and two of the tyres burst.  

The car can still be driven but no longer goes very fast (boooo!)

The owner of the car was very upset by the crash and decided to find a new driver.  

Gary Johnson is the new driver. He has driven in lots of races and won many of them (hurrrah!)

The engine is no longer on fire. The windscreen is still broken. The owner has put some new tyres on it. Gary must now drive the car to the garage to get it properly repaired. He has to drive slowly as the car is still broken and he knows he must avoid another crash, else the car will be a write-off.

Once we get to the garage, it will take a long time to get the car fixed but it should be fine by August 2011, when we all hope Gary will drive the car very fast for 46 laps and we will finish 1st in the race (yeeess, get in there you beauty!)

You are upset with Gary as he is driving very slowly to the garage in the battered and damaged car which he has just inherited. Despite the new tyres, today our racing car was overtaken by a fully working lorry - no one likes it but we understand why.

Once Gary gets us to the garage (which he will do with 3 more wins) we can all relax, look at the nudie girl calendars on the wall and sit in the waiting room dreaming of what August will bring.  ;D

Loved that!  ;D - So spot on, sometimes you've got to put it in a language they'll understand.  ;D


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Welly Cobb on March 12, 2011, 22:01:34 pm
Yeah, the fans really make a big difference. ::)

What are we meant to to, everytime we mis-pass the ball, applaud them?

The atmosphere is sh*t, yeah but there's a reason for that.. and that's because we're playing like a Blue Square team.

I think they should be thankful at this stage, there are still 4k+ still actually going to the games.

6 Draws, 4 loses over the past 10 games.

You're deluded if you think it doesnt make a difference. I remember Hall asking in the Chron a few weeks back to raise the noise up, because when they played at Vale it was the Vale fans that lifted them near the end. Gilligan made some remarks about not particularly liking the fans who have a go at him week in, week out. Every other team in this league can at least rely in 30 or 40 fans making some noise somewhere in the ground. We're the s***test fans in this league by a mile, and we deserve the team performaces we are getting recently because of it.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Daffy Duck on March 12, 2011, 22:08:55 pm
Nut. The difference is we fans have watched this shower all season and we have our own views on their abilities. GJ doesn't know them yet and has had to rely on advise from Crosby. I am confident that GJ will soon work out who to keep and who to replace, including Crosby.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: TNFSpeed on March 12, 2011, 22:12:53 pm
I think the fans do what they really have to do. We applaud them when se get a string of passes together, and when it's tight in the middle and we manage to get it out wide, everyone applauds.. but then within the next few passes of play, we're sloppy and give it back to the opposition.

When the team is playing shi-, it affects the atmosphere, and alot of fans are just so depressed that they just give up hope, unless we score.

I remember the Burton game a few weeks back. 3-1 down at half time, and the crowd spurred them on so much after we scored out 2nd goal, we outplayed Burton pretty much the whole 2nd half.. but we just fail to capitalize in finishing. All we do is hoof the ball in the air, and hope that we get either a lucky header, or the opposition mess up.

Today, we didn't even try to win the 2nd ball, and alot of the time we just didn't press. When WE get pressed.. we get nervous and get all sloppy. We need to learn to do that to the opposition, but we don't.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: guest47 on March 12, 2011, 22:13:29 pm

 I'd imagine between now and the end of the season Johnson will see every game as an opportunity to experiment with different players and formations.


That might actually make the remaining games marginally more interesting.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: MikeNTFC on March 13, 2011, 04:04:36 am
Somethings that annoyed me today.

- Playing a back four of four full backs.

- Leaving a CB out. I understand that one change was forced but playing players out of position is a HUGE no. Ok Tozer might not be the best defender but I think hes a dam sight more assured than Johnson + Hall.

- Signing Nana. Not gunna lie i'd rather see Rodgers and use the loan place for a CB or CF. RB was not our problem area Johnno was doing fine and Rodgers was back up.

- Putting on Herbert. I understand he needs to see players, but why oh why take off Holt, bring on Herbert and continue to lump balls up. Might as well have put Tozer up.

Positives?

- Reckord looks ok. Once he has some games under his belt and plays with a constant team I can see him being a decent player, no better than Davis though. Cheaper option? certainly.

- The reaction to going 1-0 down. Went for the game. I liked his spirit and hopefully with his own players it might be succesful.

- We did, by hook or by crook get more service to Harrad. That lad should have had a hattrick today. But he gets into the position yada yada yada.

I think thats my thoughts today.

Thing is I guess you can't slate a man who is a week into a job. Of course Sammo would have been slated if that was him today, as he'd have had a year+ to make his own squad. If Sammo had done this game one everyone would have reacted the same way.

I have alot of faith in Johnson. Time will tell.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Dr Feelgood on March 13, 2011, 04:31:18 am
I'll give him 2 more weeks.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Insider on March 13, 2011, 04:47:15 am
Somethings that annoyed me today.

- Playing a back four of four full backs.

- Leaving a CB out. I understand that one change was forced but playing players out of position is a HUGE no. Ok Tozer might not be the best defender but I think hes a dam sight more assured than Johnson + Hall.

- Signing Nana. Not gunna lie i'd rather see Rodgers and use the loan place for a CB or CF. RB was not our problem area Johnno was doing fine and Rodgers was back up.

- Putting on Herbert. I understand he needs to see players, but why oh why take off Holt, bring on Herbert and continue to lump balls up. Might as well have put Tozer up.


Hall regularly played as a centre back at Coventry, and when he did play as a left back, Coventry often played a back three.  My issue with Hall is that I don't think he's very good, and certainly isn't a voice or a solution to that lack of pace.  As for right back not being a problem position, I would argue that it is and has been especially since Christmas when we've leaked goals like a sieve from that position.  

The substitutions were baffling.  At 1-0 down, Wedderburn/Thornton/Rodgers would have been a better switch for Holt/Gilligan/Walker.  The one thing that I reckon GJ needs and quick is a settled core of starters.  If we have wholesale changes every week in a desperate effort to find a magic winning formula, then we could well be doomed.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: County Cobbler on March 13, 2011, 04:58:59 am
At some stage the players have to look in the mirror and take responsibility for the 10 games without a win. I can accept lack of skill but never lack of application. They will be unemployed next season if they do not change their attitude but I believe they nievely think they will automatically be signed elsewhere if released by they Cobblers.

WAKE UP ALL OF YOU TO REALITY!


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: EastNpton on March 13, 2011, 11:34:21 am
This season is about avoiding relegation now. Nothing more nothing less. What Johnson has to do is to play his best 11 in their right positions as Bungle as said. If he doesnt like a player he can get rid at the first opportunity but playing Nana for instance if he is no better than Rodgers and throwing the baby out with the bathwater by benching Tozer is silly


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: SmithyNTFC on March 13, 2011, 11:38:22 am
To be fair, I dont think Johnsons going to make an impact until next season. A long summer for the players to have a very hard look at themselves and really think 'Do I want to be stuck in this s*** awful league season after season, when my team mates ARE capable of doing good things?.'

Pre-season organisation, signings, training, fitness sessions, tour???? and friendly games under Johnson will plan out the season and prepare for a promotion chase.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Lanky Cobbler on March 13, 2011, 11:49:09 am
I cant be arced to trawl through 4 pages of what looks like the most pointless thread ever. He's been here 8 days ffs. All it does prove is this current group of players is s*** beyond belief and they ALL need to go (except jj, harrad and one or 2 others) Blaming GJ for this is ludicrous!!


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: oop_north on March 13, 2011, 12:59:50 pm
If Sammo's run of draws had continued (bar the Burton 'gone for' game), we'd be 3 points better off, and above Macc & Bradford......


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Mark-JB on March 13, 2011, 13:51:44 pm
Even Sir Alex Ferguson couldn't turn this around in 8 days. Bottom line is we have a team extremely low on confidence and a large number of them simply aren't good enough.

We have to be patient on this one and try to stick together. Everyone infighting in the terraces is just going to make the situation completely cancerous. Then we truly would get what we deserve...


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: sxcobbler on March 13, 2011, 14:08:05 pm
I thought that when appointed GJ would be able to experiment ready for next season....that luxury has now gone and it's a dog fight for survival.

A different mind set...grind out results ! The teams below are picking up points. The nightmare is now a reality.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: NTFC Nut on April 23, 2011, 17:29:20 pm
Hate to bring up an old thread, but- many people said when I originally made this thread, "he's only been here 8 days, he doesn't know the squad yet, he will do soon though and once he does, he'll stop making the poor team selections, it's stupid to criticise him, he knows exactly what he's doing", etc etc etc.

Six weeks down the line and he's still playing players out of position (Tozer in central midfield), he's still chopping and changing every compartment of the team every game, he still seems to have no idea what his best side is, and the continual chopping and changing has put our league status in harm's way. For f***'s sake GJ, pick your most solid XI and STICK WITH IT!


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: jayntfc on April 23, 2011, 17:32:43 pm
To use your oft-repeated argument re: Sammo

'Give him time'

He has now had quite some time...

and....

We're still in the s**t.

It's like Sammo never left, I don't know what's wrong with this club. The downward spiral continues.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: NTFC Nut on April 23, 2011, 17:37:07 pm
He has now had quite some time...

and....

We're still in the s**t.

It's like Sammo never left, I don't know what's wrong with this club. The downward spiral continues.

If Sammo hadn't left (or, more to the point, the boat hadn't been rocked), we'd be fine. I firmly believe that.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: dazza on April 23, 2011, 17:39:44 pm
If Sammo hadn't left (or, more to the point, the boat hadn't been rocked), we'd be fine. I firmly believe that.


It must be right then if you believe it.  ::)


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: jayntfc on April 23, 2011, 17:41:00 pm
If Sammo hadn't left (or, more to the point, the boat hadn't been rocked), we'd be fine. I firmly believe that.

I disagree, but I don't think we'd be quite as deep in the s**t as we are at this point if he had stayed, I'll say that.

This start to GJ's reign is, unfortunately, just a continuation of a downward spiral that we've been in for years.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: MikeNTFC on April 23, 2011, 17:57:21 pm
If Sammo hadn't left (or, more to the point, the boat hadn't been rocked), we'd be fine. I firmly believe that.

What a stupid thing to say.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: TK Cobbler on April 23, 2011, 18:01:54 pm
What a stupid thing to say.


How can you say that!!!!!!!! ( With the benefit of hindsight of our performances over the last 7 weeks or so ).


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: MikeNTFC on April 23, 2011, 18:04:45 pm
Ok then, PROVE to me it would have been better.

Prove that having Courtney f***ing Herbert, Francis Laurent and Craig Hinton would have saved us. We were on the slide with Sammo, whats to say we wouldn't have lost EVERY game from when Sammo was sacked to the end of the season under Sammo.

Hes gone, get over it.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: jayntfc on April 23, 2011, 18:06:20 pm
don't forget Ali Slowe


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Tyler on April 23, 2011, 19:10:55 pm
You need to remember that Sampson's winless games were all against the s*** of this division. Most of Johnsons opposition has been against top 7/top half teams. Infact the only side we haven't faced under him in the top 7 is Stevanage. His run has come agaist much better sides than you're legend who could do no wrong.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: dazza on April 23, 2011, 19:13:03 pm
You need to remember that Sampson's winless games were all against the **** of this division. Most of Johnsons opposition has been against top 7/top half teams. Infact the only side we haven't faced under him in the top 7 is Stevanage. His run has come agaist much better sides than you're legend who could do no wrong.


Burton, Bradford and Macclesfield.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Tyler on April 23, 2011, 19:24:53 pm

Burton, Bradford and Macclesfield.

Correct, they are 3 teams we've failed to beat in the bottom half.

Shrewsbury - 3rd
Chesterfield - 1st
Macclesfield - 16th
Bradford - 19th
Torquay - 6th
Accrington - 5th
Burton - 17th
Wycombe - 4th
Bury - 2nd
Rotherham - 9th

Barnet - 23rd
Port Vale - 10th
Morecambe - 15th
Aldershot - 14th
Hereford - 20th
Southend - 12th
Burton - 17th

Games in bold are against teams currently in the top half. Johnson's record first then Sampsons since the Crewe game. Shows how more difficult Johnson's run has been so i dont buy all this 'Sammo would've won games for us'


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: DrillingCobbler on April 23, 2011, 19:54:24 pm
Well my view hasn't changed...too many changes, destroying the dressing room in the process. Net result = a shambles. 10 games without a win now under his stewardship, yet people still blame Sammo!! Playing defenders in midfield seems to be the way forward now. And telling all and sundry on Radio Northampton that Webster was withdrawn because he wasn't imposing enough! KEEP IT IN THE DRESSING ROOM FFS...

And another thing. He talks alot about mental strength being our weakness. Now considering that over 1/3 of the team is his, why has this not been addressed to a degree? The body language of all the players when we conceded yesterday was terrible, they are a bunch of bloody girls with no back bone. We have a team of jellyfish.

BUT at least the team is now trying to a degree. I gave it a bloody good go from the stands as well, a few Delia Smith moments from me! I changed my mind and went yesterday because we gave it a go at Wycombe. After the Bury debacle I assumed that we had thrown the towel in but there is now a flickering hope.

But what cannot be denied is the reason we are 22nd is entirely down to the current incumbent. 99% of the time when a manager joins a club is because the previous manager had been sacked. Because the team was playing crap! Yet people are defending GJ on the basis that he inherited a bad team. Well Sammo didn't take 10 games to win after he inherited Grays team. And Gray himself didn't take 10 games to win after he took over from Gorman. Even Wilkinson didn't take 10 games. Or Barnwell. Or Atkins. Or Wilson. Or Carr. Or any other fcuking manager in the history of our fcuking club! Wake up and smell the bloody coffee and look no further than Gary Johnson if you are looking for a scapegoat as to why we are on the verge of becoming non-league!


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: guest48 on April 23, 2011, 20:08:19 pm
Correct, they are 3 teams we've failed to beat in the bottom half.

Shrewsbury - 3rd
Chesterfield - 1st
Macclesfield - 16th
Bradford - 19th
Torquay - 6th
Accrington - 5th
Burton - 17th
Wycombe - 4th
Bury - 2nd
Rotherham - 9th

Barnet - 23rd
Port Vale - 10th
Morecambe - 15th
Aldershot - 14th
Hereford - 20th
Southend - 12th
Burton - 17th

Games in bold are against teams currently in the top half. Johnson's record first then Sampsons since the Crewe game. Shows how more difficult Johnson's run has been so i dont buy all this 'Sammo would've won games for us'
The thing is ,we played all these teams in the first half of the season ,so why not compare Sammo and GJ on that basis,I think I know who would come out on top


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: DrillingCobbler on April 23, 2011, 20:13:21 pm
Your not wrong their hamster...luck it is now. We need a dodgy penalty after 10 minutes coupled with a red card for the offending defender. I actually made that point post Bury myself, that is the only way we will win. And of course it could easily happen. Sods law, the goal we conceded yesterday after 5 minutes was terribly unfortunate. Then we hit the post twice before conceding the 2nd. We are clearly not getting the rub of the green. We are certainly due some!


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Tyler on April 23, 2011, 20:34:20 pm
The thing is ,we played all these teams in the first half of the season ,so why not compare Sammo and GJ on that basis,I think I know who would come out on top

Out of Johnson's winless games from the first half of the season we only beat Bradford. The rest were draws/defeats


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: guest48 on April 23, 2011, 20:39:33 pm
Out of Johnson's winless games from the first half of the season we only beat Bradford. The rest were draws/defeats
But who got the most points , with a budget restricted by having big earners Guinan & Hinton ,who we couldn't get rid of .


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Tyler on April 23, 2011, 20:47:49 pm
But who got the most points , with a budget restricted by having big earners Guinan & Hinton ,who we couldn't get rid of .

Sampson gained 1 extra point. Hardly a massive difference


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Monty on April 23, 2011, 20:56:14 pm
Sampson gained 1 extra point. Hardly a massive difference
I'm with Tyler on this one - 7pts v 6 pts in a sequence of 10 games is relegation form, and not a conclusive way of determining a Sammo vs Johnson debate. It's all conjecture really as we have no way of knowing how Sammo would have fared for the last 10 games.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: DrillingCobbler on April 23, 2011, 21:03:15 pm
Lets look for a minute in the direction of Martin Allen.

He arrived at Barnet, a team that was on a terrible run and far worse than the one which GJ inherited. He made no more than a couple of signings and won 2 and drew 1 from his first 3 games.

He then leaves and goes to Notts County; a team that had lost I think 6 or 7 on the bounce. He loses his first match in charge and then wins the next 2. With the same players as when he arrived.

Stop bloody defending him! He's royally fcuked things up since he came here and does not have a defence. There is no real mitigation. 10 games without a win is absolutely shocking.



Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: guest49 on April 23, 2011, 21:30:32 pm
I think some people are arguing against pretty much no one as I haven't seen anyone still blowing smoke up GJ's arse. Even his number one fan left this forum. For me Sammo should've got to the end of the season but GJ should have been the dream appointment. I still like GJ as he talks a good game and quite a likeable character, although his lack of accountability is becoming tiresome. I would love him not to be responsible for giving us a taste of non league football. If we do go down I'm more surprised at those saying he had better stay. Stay up and as said previously, we'll see by Christmas if there's any mileage in him. 




 


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: TK Cobbler on April 23, 2011, 21:43:52 pm
Lets look for a minute in the direction of Martin Allen.

He arrived at Barnet, a team that was on a terrible run and far worse than the one which GJ inherited. He made no more than a couple of signings and won 2 and drew 1 from his first 3 games.

He then leaves and goes to Notts County; a team that had lost I think 6 or 7 on the bounce. He loses his first match in charge and then wins the next 2. With the same players as when he arrived.

 






And thats where we f**ked up. We should have signed him before Notts County did. It would have been a double whammy.........  i.e. stopped Barnet dead in their tracks whilst propelling us to safety. Hindsight is a wonderful thing........... in any case time for me to hit the sack and sleep off todays beers. ;D ;D ;D ;D


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: ntfc_dan on April 24, 2011, 01:05:26 am
Pointless thread I think. Johnsons signings, collis, nana, bauza, reckford, Webster, uzina (however it's spelt) are alot better than the crap sampson would of bought in.

You can't expect Johnson to turn a crap squad with a crap attitude, crap players, and crap form into world beaters in such a short time, the situation is not great, granted. But considering the crap he has taken on, chopped and added to, he is doing a good job.

I have no doubt were be okay. Next season I can only think of 10/11 who will be here next season and to be honest 3 of the are on loan now. Collis, nana and Webster. The others would be harrad, gilligan, bauza, Johnson, Jacobs, McKay, Davis, osman. and some of them we've gotta silly try keep.

JOHNSON IS THE MAN FOR THE JOB, so get behind him. next season the squad will be his and sampsons crap/deadwood will be gone.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Grove on April 24, 2011, 06:29:38 am
I dont get it Dan, add Johnsons players to the ones youd keep out of Sampsons , that gives you 13 or 14 players, all these and McKenzie have been available since Johnson arrived, yet he hasnt won a game !!


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: guest49 on April 24, 2011, 07:25:29 am

he is doing a good job.


I refuse to join the negativity train but that made me LOL.  ;D


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Air-Dan on April 24, 2011, 07:34:55 am
Didn't Johnson have a really bad start at Bristol City too? It's still far, far too early to judge him IMO. He shouldn't have replaced Sammo until the end of the season, and it that respect, it's Cardoza's fault if we go down (which I'm still sure that we won't).
 :)


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: HertsCobbler on April 24, 2011, 07:45:45 am
Didn't Johnson have a really bad start at Bristol City too? It's still far, far too early to judge him IMO. He shouldn't have replaced Sammo until the end of the season, and it that respect, it's Cardoza's fault if we go down (which I'm still sure that we won't).
 :)


Not quite right.

City won their first game the day after GJ was appointed, then went LWLLLLLLLLL

I just have this feeling if we win one game, we will the next.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: ntfc_dan on April 24, 2011, 09:36:34 am
I dont get it Dan, add Johnsons players to the ones youd keep out of Sampsons , that gives you 13 or 14 players, all these and McKenzie have been available since Johnson arrived, yet he hasnt won a game !!

I'm not saying keep all his signings only 2/3 making about 10 players. Leaving 8-10 additions to come in. So pretty much a new squad.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: NTFC Nut on April 24, 2011, 11:51:44 am
Pointless thread I think. Johnsons signings, collis, nana, bauza, reckford, Webster, uzina (however it's spelt) are alot better than the crap sampson would of bought in.

Sampson wouldn't have brought in 6 or 7 players at a crucial time of the season and upset the balance of the squad. Cardoza wouldn't have given him the funds to, obviously, but even if those funds had been available, I still doubt he'd have made the kind of wholesale changes GJ has made.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on April 24, 2011, 11:57:26 am
If we go down I'm renaming this forum www.itsgaryjohnsonsfaultsimplytoomanychangeshemadewewere16thand10ptsclearwhenheturnedupbuthef***edthatalloverseeyouatbraintree.co.uk

Granted, it's a bit wordy but thats what'll be happening.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Tyler on April 24, 2011, 12:00:16 pm
Sampson wouldn't have brought in 6 or 7 players at a crucial time of the season and upset the balance of the squad. Cardoza wouldn't have given him the funds to, obviously, but even if those funds had been available, I still doubt he'd have made the kind of wholesale changes GJ has made.

I wouldn't have trusted Sammo with the money. Ryan Jarvis and Craig King?  ;D


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on April 24, 2011, 12:06:23 pm
I wouldn't have trusted Sammo with the money. Ryan Jarvis and Craig King?  ;D
Depends on what he was allowed to spend really though doesn't it? Pay peanuts, get monkeys


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: jt on April 24, 2011, 12:09:29 pm
The simple fact is samo should've been sacked after oxford away, when anyone with half a brain cell could see where we were headed. Think it was late october? Then a new manager could've come in, looked at the squad and had the transfer window to deal in. The facts are, samo's dross was bought in, when he had time and a long list of players to look at. Johnson's had to feed off scraps in an attempt to 'freshen things up' loans + unattached players were all he could look at,you look at the players he's bought in, collis-steady keeper, nana-don't rate him myself,good energy though, webster-seems to be struggling after a good start,reckord-i'd actually say he's better than davis, bauza-good signing, over-rated by some though,comparing him with martin smith?? Uwezu-not seen enough, but looks a lot better than park footballer herbert. Have I forgotten one? Pr he could've had the entire january window and bought 1 decent player, a s***e frenchman, +a player whose biggest problem, is being used to playing with better players +then keeps getting caught on the ball,due to a lack of movement,josh walker,the new eoin jess. Whose fault is it were in this mess, the chairman's for acting 5months to late, + samo who according to a load of numbnuts had the club at heart(how many times did he need to say he was a hull fan),yet refused to fall on his sword. Johnson, no doubt could've done things differant, maybe even better, but in my opinion, +i said this when he got the job, if he keeps us up, he's performed a miracle with the state +attitudes the club/players were left in/with.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: NTFC Nut on April 24, 2011, 12:10:51 pm
I tell you what, King was s***, but he ran his f***ing socks off for the team and you wouldn't have guessed he was a loan player, given how much he put in. We actually need players like that now. Too many spineless f***ers in the current team.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: jt on April 24, 2011, 12:17:09 pm
Ntfc nut, talks ou his butt. Bought to you from the karl pilkington school of poetry.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: MikeNTFC on April 24, 2011, 12:28:52 pm
I tell you what, King was ****, but he ran his ****ing socks off for the team and you wouldn't have guessed he was a loan player, given how much he put in. We actually need players like that now. Too many spineless ****ers in the current team.

If you think players like Craig King would keep us up you're a f***ing idiot. You'd rather have than Bauza?!


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: NTFC Nut on April 24, 2011, 12:30:26 pm
If you think players like Craig King would keep us up you're a ****ing idiot. You'd rather have than Bauza?!

Not Craig King specifically, I never said that. Players with his kind of attitude and work rate.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Winslow Lee on April 24, 2011, 12:33:14 pm
Sammo was told that if he wanted to bring in anymore players he had to get rid of existing players. Hence the cheaper, but better Harrad turning up after Guinan going.

According to the Burton manager Harrad is on crazy money.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: NTFC Nut on April 24, 2011, 12:36:43 pm
According to the Burton manager Harrad is on crazy money.


Compared to what Burton can afford to pay, he probably is. Hinton and Guinan were both on 'League One' wages. With both of those now off the wage bill, I'd imagine the money saved more than equates to Harrad's wages.


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: MikeNTFC on April 24, 2011, 12:38:42 pm
Not Craig King specifically, I never said that. Players with his kind of attitude and work rate.

So players like King, but not King? right.

I'd rather have players like Bauza than King any day of the week. You could stick me out on that pitch and i'd run around for 60 minutes like King being ineffective and not scoring goals. If you were at Wycombe you'd see why players like Craig King will not keep us in this division, and players like Bauza will. You say he worked his socks of but I don't recall one incident where that running lead to a mistake or us winning the ball.



Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Tyler on April 24, 2011, 19:00:45 pm
I tell you what, King was ****, but he ran his ****ing socks off for the team and you wouldn't have guessed he was a loan player, given how much he put in. We actually need players like that now. Too many spineless ****ers in the current team.

f***ing hell you don't half talk some s***e. Players like Craig King are never good enough but they try. Try hard for limited results and thats what we need is it? I don't care if we have the s***test game tomorrow with 11 players who don't give a s*** but if they win that's all i care about


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: jayntfc on April 24, 2011, 19:03:08 pm
Sammo was told that if he wanted to bring in anymore players he had to get rid of existing players. Hence the cheaper, but better Harrad turning up after Guinan going. He was supposed to get a replacement for Bayo but had to wait until half way through the season and a goal drought to get one. And then only after he negotiated his arse off to dump Guinan. 

You're dead fcuking right that Sammo wouldn't have brought in the players you name above. Because he would never have been given the budget to do it. He was limited to nobodies or players who's clubs didn't demand too much cash in return. This is a last throw of the dice by a desperate chairman, that in my opinion pulled the carpet from under Gray and Sammo, and realised all too late, that what I had said from the start could actually happen.   

This is a really good post IMO


Title: Re: Sampson would have been slaughtered if...
Post by: Deepcut Cobbler on April 24, 2011, 19:08:32 pm
Sammo was told that if he wanted to bring in anymore players he had to get rid of existing players. Hence the cheaper, but better Harrad turning up after Guinan going. He was supposed to get a replacement for Bayo but had to wait until half way through the season and a goal drought to get one. And then only after he negotiated his arse off to dump Guinan. 

You're dead fcuking right that Sammo wouldn't have brought in the players you name above. Because he would never have been given the budget to do it. He was limited to nobodies or players who's clubs didn't demand too much cash in return. This is a last throw of the dice by a desperate chairman, that in my opinion pulled the carpet from under Gray and Sammo, and realised all too late, that what I had said from the start could actually happen.  

Not much wrong with the above either, in my opinion.  ;)


Title: Super Sammo
Post by: guest49 on May 01, 2011, 08:35:35 am
How ironic that we get our first win since he left, at the first game he turns up to, if what was reported is true.
Great to see him celebrating as a fan, which of course he is, after getting dismissed.
If I was ever sacked by my employer I doubt I'd want anything to do with them again.
Hopefully the scars have healed and we'll be seeing his £19 a lot more often.  ;D


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: Luton Cobbler on May 01, 2011, 08:40:25 am
Agree with the sentiment but after all he's done for the club I bl**dy hope he's not paying £19 to get in!


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: SeanODonovan on May 01, 2011, 16:30:55 pm
It was great to see Sammo there. He looked very relaxed and happy and took time to chat to everyone.
 
I am sure he was joining with the Gary Johnson's Barmy Army chant (with the emphasis on Barmy  ;) )
And Sammo you could wore a replica shirt, scarf and bobble hat - get down the Club Shop for next time   ;) ;)


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: Dr Feelgood on May 01, 2011, 18:41:36 pm
It wouldn't suprise me if he came back as Manager...


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: NTFC Nut on May 01, 2011, 21:04:12 pm
It wouldn't suprise me if he came back as Manager...

It wouldn't surprise me if he got back into management but I don't think it will be here.


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: defender on May 01, 2011, 21:05:22 pm
It wouldn't suprise me if he came back as Manager...

  Atkins manager, Sampson as asistant? Could be great team.


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: Shoemaker on May 01, 2011, 21:39:41 pm
To be fair to sammo the man is a legend.
That took some balls to come back and watch us after he got us right in the s***.
He was on a hiding to nothing by coming back as it wouldn't have been good if we had lost.
I bet there won't be many sammo signings here next season!!
As I said though he built one of the worst teams I have ever seen got sacked for it and still had the courage to come back as a fan in our hour of need.
Fair play to you ian sampson crap manager but still a cobblers legend!!!


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: DL2 on May 01, 2011, 21:42:31 pm
It was lovely to see him  :)


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on May 01, 2011, 21:45:08 pm

He was on a hiding to nothing by coming back as it wouldn't have been good if we had lost.
Why is this then? He left two months ago, it's hardly his fault anymore that the current regime isn't all it was advertised as by some on here


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: Shoemaker on May 01, 2011, 21:58:25 pm
Yes I can see your point marquis but if the worst had of happend this season then it would have been hard to know who to have blamed more.
GJ for making one of the worst starts to a career of any cobblers manager.
Or sammo for putting together one of the worst squads ever.
I suppose GJ would say he inherited a load of rubbish and sammo would say the team was ten points off the drop when he left.


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: BackOfTheNet on May 01, 2011, 22:30:11 pm
Yes I can see your point marquis but if the worst had of happend this season then it would have been hard to know who to have blamed more.
GJ for making one of the worst starts to a career of any cobblers manager.
Or sammo for putting together one of the worst squads ever.
I suppose GJ would say he inherited a load of rubbish and sammo would say the team was ten points off the drop when he left.


To be fair, they'd both be right.  Personally I blame GJ more for the mess we ended up in as under Sammo we'd have kept plodding along and probably been more comfortable towards the end of this season. Probably, but who can say with any certainty; that's just my gut feeling.  Ultimately though, I think that's all we'd have done under Sammo. I love the bloke to bits but under him I don't think we'd have really got anywhere beyond plodding along.  Under GJ I think we'll push on and make some decent progress.

I don't disagree we needed changes to improve as a side and GJ made those changes to the best of his ability, given the limited moves he could make when he came in.  He just changed too much, too quickly at the sharp end of the season and it nearly bit us on the behind.  With a pre season to shape the side and do the trial-and-error tinkering that nearly sent us down I still have every confidence that GJ will live up to our initial expectations.

Regardless of all that, I'm thrilled Sammo is still about and following us. I really, really wanted it to work out for him with us.  When he went for the job I was in two minds.  On the one hand, I wanted him to get it and do well but on the other I feared him getting it and not doing well.  Ultimately, I guess the second of those came to pass but we'll always have Anfield, and for that I'll never forget Sammo's reign. 

Cheers for that night and all the great memories of you as a player, Sammo, and here's hoping you get another manager's position before too long.  You deserve it.


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: syd puddefoot on May 02, 2011, 06:59:31 am
and do the trial-and-error tinkering that nearly sent us down

Most of that has already been done.

They say anything that doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Surely having survived we and Gary Johnson in particular are in a much stronger position, he'll know exactly who to keep and who to ditch now and he'll know exactly what he needs to make our side strong enough to challenge near the top of this division. That was the benefit of him arriving when he did and not coming in pre-season or 6 weeks into the next campaign. Cardoza got this one spot on.


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: syd puddefoot on May 02, 2011, 09:00:05 am
You missed the point. Changing managers when he did was when Cardoza got it right, I'd hate to be still stuck with Sammo now waiting for the inevitable self implosion in the autumn when a new manager would have arrived and been stuck with a set of players contracted by his predecessor.

In other words, yet another wasted season.

We'll be at the right end of the table next season and you're going to love every minute of it.


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: HertsCobbler on May 02, 2011, 09:09:13 am
The only way you can say that, is if you assume that either he or Johnson was in control at any point. And that clearly isn't the case. We stayed in this league by luck, and not by design.

Had we played Stevenage at their place I'd confidently predict the goal that hit the line would have been allowed, and I doubt the sending offs would have been so easy for the ref without 5000 shouts for them. Johnson and Cardoza did fcuk all to keep us up. It was a baying crowd at Sixfields that did it. When Johnson does something that deserves credit, don't worry. He will get it.



Er, Stevenage had a similar shout for a goal at the Lamex and had a red card!


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: sxcobbler on May 02, 2011, 09:11:57 am
Still a legend (as a player).....I hope he does get another football post soon.....


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on May 02, 2011, 10:05:16 am
Most of that has already been done.

They say anything that doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Surely having survived we and Gary Johnson in particular are in a much stronger position, he'll know exactly who to keep and who to ditch now and he'll know exactly what he needs to make our side strong enough to challenge near the top of this division. That was the benefit of him arriving when he did and not coming in pre-season or 6 weeks into the next campaign. Cardoza got this one spot on.
No. It couldn't be? Could it?!
Quite how you can consider anything at all about the past 2 months to be 'spot on' is beyond me.


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: syd puddefoot on May 02, 2011, 10:11:15 am
Okay, when do you think the change should have been made?

a) earlier than it was
b) when it was
c) At the end of this season
d) Six weeks into the new campaign
e) Not at all


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: The 12th Marquis of Sixfields on May 02, 2011, 10:31:24 am
Perhaps the change should have happened when it did, it was the completley unprofessional, arrogant, naieve, no man management skills, bull in a china shop, passing the buck, complete lack of taking stock of the situation before making any changes actions that followed


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: syd puddefoot on May 02, 2011, 10:41:17 am
Perhaps the change should have happened when it did, it was the completley unprofessional, arrogant, naieve, no man management skills, bull in a china shop, passing the buck, complete lack of taking stock of the situation before making any changes actions that followed

I actually agree with that to an extent, a large extent, however like I've said elsewhere, nobody but nobody thought we were in any danger whatsoever of being relegated when the change was made, including our chairman and manager. In hindsight they were wrong and so was everybody else but hindsight is a wonderful thing that allows the person using it to be right every time.

There was a thread on here (since locked) that raised the question, What if Johnson fails? Reread it again, you'll see posters on here lining up to say how silly it was and how it would never happen.


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: syd puddefoot on May 02, 2011, 10:43:08 am
Hardly what you was saying... You said that Cardoza got it spot on. I'm pretty confident that even Cardoza was seriously doubting that prior to Stevenage... The whole season has been a disaster. And the appointment of Johnson and his comments were nearly the icing on the cake.

Some of the so called big cheeses on this board even fcuked off rapidly once they thought they thought we was doomed. Rats leaving a sinking ship indeed. 

I'm sure they will be back as brash as ever now we have escaped by the skin of our teeth.. Proclaiming that it was never in doubt. There are people that fickle yo know...  8)

No I'm sorry, you mustn't try to change what people have said. The only thing that I implied was "spot on" was the timing of the change. The rest is all in your head.


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: syd puddefoot on May 02, 2011, 10:49:58 am
Who said it was never in doubt?

Could you bring the post up?

I'm wondering whether there might have been one of these  :P  at the end of it.


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: Lanky Cobbler on May 02, 2011, 10:52:04 am
Some of you are like your still in love with and ex girlfriend and cant let go. Nows the time to. GJ IS the man to take us forward


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: guest49 on May 02, 2011, 11:42:06 am
Abso... bloody..lutely...

Let's just pray the new girlfriend sorts herself out.. She's been worse than the last so far..  ;D ;D ;D

Johnson as my full backing as long as he's good for the team..

Or to be more specific, it's been like leaving Jordan for Kate Middleton, only to find out she was Jodie Marsh in disguise.


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: wazzacobbler on May 02, 2011, 14:05:24 pm
Now if Jodie Marsh was disguised as Pippa Middleton... well, I'd be well f*cked off!


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: Madrid Cobbler on May 03, 2011, 14:59:27 pm

Sign of a true fan that Sammo turned up. A real shame it didn't work out for him as we all would have wanted as a manager. I agreed with the change of manager, like so many, but let's not be silly and blame Sammo for the almost disaster of relegation nor compare his side to whatever GJ builds, as it looks like the latter is going to be given a lot more financial support than Sammo was.


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: oop_north on May 03, 2011, 15:11:21 pm
To be fair, they'd both be right.  Personally I blame GJ more for the mess we ended up in as under Sammo we'd have kept plodding along and probably been more comfortable towards the end of this season. Probably, but who can say with any certainty; that's just my gut feeling.  Ultimately though, I think that's all we'd have done under Sammo. I love the bloke to bits but under him I don't think we'd have really got anywhere beyond plodding along.  Under GJ I think we'll push on and make some decent progress.

I don't disagree we needed changes to improve as a side and GJ made those changes to the best of his ability, given the limited moves he could make when he came in.  He just changed too much, too quickly at the sharp end of the season and it nearly bit us on the behind.  With a pre season to shape the side and do the trial-and-error tinkering that nearly sent us down I still have every confidence that GJ will live up to our initial expectations.

Regardless of all that, I'm thrilled Sammo is still about and following us. I really, really wanted it to work out for him with us.  When he went for the job I was in two minds.  On the one hand, I wanted him to get it and do well but on the other I feared him getting it and not doing well.  Ultimately, I guess the second of those came to pass but we'll always have Anfield, and for that I'll never forget Sammo's reign. 

Cheers for that night and all the great memories of you as a player, Sammo, and here's hoping you get another manager's position before too long.  You deserve it.

Agree 100%.

It would be great if Sammo came back as assistant, until finding something better.  Only trouble is, would everyone (including GJ), blame him for ever slight hiccough?


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: oop_north on May 03, 2011, 15:17:46 pm
Perhaps the change should have happened when it did, it was the completley unprofessional, arrogant, naieve, no man management skills, bull in a china shop, passing the buck, complete lack of taking stock of the situation before making any changes actions that followed

Maybe it would have been better if the money given to GJ to get in the extra loan players had been given to Sammo to properly strengthen the team?  Despite the number of injuries lately, GJ has been able field a strong bench.  Remember under Sammo - so many times he had to field a bench full of the crocked, kids and Alistair Slowe......which basically meant he had no real options to change the team.  Anyone who could bend down to tie their bootlaces started. 



Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: EastNpton on May 03, 2011, 16:33:07 pm
Sammo was ok with accepting mediocrity and slowly working to change things

GJ is a superior coach with better contacts and won't accept mediocrity. You think Slowe would have been anywhere near the club under Johnson. The answer is no and quite rightly so


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: Cockney Cobbler on May 03, 2011, 16:35:43 pm
Maybe it would have been better if the money given to GJ to get in the extra loan players had been given to Sammo to properly strengthen the team?  Despite the number of injuries lately, GJ has been able field a strong bench.  Remember under Sammo - so many times he had to field a bench full of the crocked, kids and Alistair Slowe......which basically meant he had no real options to change the team.  Anyone who could bend down to tie their bootlaces started. 



In fairness Sammo did spend money in the January transfer window and then didn't really deliver any uplift in fortunes.  That being said I'm not really sure if it was right to sack Sammo when we did, sure we were going nowhere fast but bringing in Johnson only accelerated our demise.  I get the sentiment about giving the new guy pre-season and the retention period to get the club right, but surely the right time to have made such a change was when our league position was safe or when it was clear we were being sucked in to the relegation dogfight and not when we're flirting 10 points ahead of the drop zone and pissing distance of the play-offs which was the case with Sammo.

Don't get me wrong, I hope GJ gets us moving in the right direction and I think he is a good appointment but as far as I'm concerned he needs to build bridges after his disaster start which was entirely down to his own making.  Had we been relegated I'd have been pointing the finger squarely at GJ


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: clarkeysntfc on May 03, 2011, 21:01:13 pm
Ian Sampson was a super player for NTFC, and rightly is regarded as a club legend.

However, he was a poor manager who should never have been appointed in the first place.

I have every confidence that Gary Johnson will recover from a sticky start and deliver a successful top 7 team next season.


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: syd puddefoot on May 03, 2011, 21:39:43 pm
We've lost twice in the last 9 games.


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: Power Football on May 03, 2011, 21:55:10 pm

It would be great if Sammo came back as assistant, until finding something better.

That has to be the single most stupid thing anybody has ever said on this forum.


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: syd puddefoot on May 03, 2011, 22:08:32 pm
That has to be the single most stupid thing anybody has ever said on this forum.

You're right, that beats Ted's "Rushden/Kettering/Cobblers merger" and.....



Steve Riches saying Sammo will still be manager next season.  >:D ;D ;D


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: SteveRiches on May 04, 2011, 06:17:50 am
You're right, that beats Ted's "Rushden/Kettering/Cobblers merger" and.....



Steve Riches saying Sammo will still be manager next season.  >:D ;D ;D
Absolutely right. He'll be manager of that corner shop near you.


Title: Re: We Love Sammo!
Post by: Wolvo on June 18, 2011, 14:30:21 pm
Merging these two topics has made this thread very confusing to read!


Title: Re: Super Sammo
Post by: Montgomery Eypoke III on June 18, 2011, 21:36:53 pm
Abso... bloody..lutely...

Let's just pray the new girlfriend sorts herself out.. She's been worse than the last so far..  ;D ;D ;D

Johnson as my full backing as long as he's good for the team..
]

Yeah, but as long as you are still holding a torch for the ex, the newbie has realistically got no f8cking chance whatsoever.

Some people are interminably drawn back to bad relationships. Sad, but a fact of life.



Title: Re: We Love Sammo!
Post by: Tom on June 19, 2011, 13:55:35 pm
Merging these two topics has made this thread very confusing to read!

Yeah getting a bit silly now, seems if something similar is mentioned it gets thrown into a 70 page thread...much easier  ::)

This thread is a perfect example, anyone finding this and reading would just be confused. We're talking about an evening with Sammo while having a poll at the top & the first 70 odd pages about if he should be sacked. Yet we have to have 2 separate threads for transfer rumours and who we'd like to see.

Hey everyone heres talking about the cobblers, lets just merge it all into one thread.  ;)


Title: Re: We Love Sammo!
Post by: Montgomery Eypoke III on June 20, 2011, 20:56:53 pm
 ;D ;D ;D