As a matter of interest, in your opinion what would that fattening up entail. Additionally wouldn't it be a bit counter productive to get someone in to fatten something up whilst committing to giving 25% away at the same time. That is of course unless you are going to fatten it up by considerably more than 25%, which would be impressive.
Whilst I'm sure this is not the case in this example, I read and hear a lot of what are on face value nonsensical demands, assumptions and statements around the clubs financial plans generally. So given the usual standard of hysterical bòllocks, I'm just a bit intrigued on your thoughts on how this may play out?
I could flip the question around , why do you think Nigel has bought 25%? Let me tell you it’s not because he’s a keen Spurs fan and has alway wanted a football club.
It’s to increase the value of the land / club, with a nice juicy ROI using his high net worth clients.
His funds under management is very impressive, do you also think it’s a coincidence in the timing of his arrival is literally weeks after the land deal was signed.