The Hotel End
July 17, 2019, 19:37:11 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10
 51 
 on: Today at 12:33:43 
Started by sussexcobbler - Last post by wazzacobbler

My hill top vantage point is looking ever more appealing,  why not come and join me


I'll come and join you Beds. How about we watch the Walsall game up there together. You can then tell me and the listeners of the podcast why you are watching the game from the hill rather than in the "comfort" of one of the stands. Completely free, open platform for you to get your thoughts across and perhaps galvanise some of the support to follow your example of actually doing something in protest to how you see the club is being run.

What do you say? I'm up for it if you are.

 52 
 on: Today at 11:47:51 
Started by Teachers Pet - Last post by Boot and shoe
For the life of me I can't see why people go to them.
I would never normally do a friendly , especially at £14 but I thought I would take a look at some of the new players last night since you would think most of them are fighting for a place and looking to impress.
I wish I hadnít .
Only Lines really came out with any credit and Warburton showed in flashes.
Itís the last friendly I will go to .

 53 
 on: Today at 11:36:56 
Started by Teachers Pet - Last post by Terryfenwickatemyhamster
For the life of me, I do not see the point of friendlies against far superior teams. Particularly when you put out an odd combination of fringe players many in the wrong position. Surely we should be getting a shape to the team and getting first team players match fit. Am I missing the point?

For the life of me I can't see why people go to them.

 54 
 on: Today at 11:35:27 
Started by sussexcobbler - Last post by Terryfenwickatemyhamster
Some of the reasons why I believe these outsider speculators need to be shown the door....

Claiming Sixfields as is, is OK for L1 football then,
Subsequently...
Poor league position, back in L2 without a fight.
Falling gates,
lack of direction, without future planning.
 Historic promises and deadlines made not met.
 Mounting debts  dump on the club of £5m plus and rising.
Overtly demanding of our local council for land they are not entitled to as (in my opinion) they used the club and its desperate plight to get a stand finished as a Trojan horse to aquire a vast amount of council land riches that our club will never see. (Probably they will write off the several Millions in directors loans as being our share?)
Poor Management, to include..
 Appointments,
The Chinese debacle, 
Lack of proper communications by keeping the clubs supporters and trust, second guessing their intentions.
Uncertainty caused by announcing the sale of the club claiming to be returning home to USA, only to do neither a year later.
Alienation of the club with its community,  mainly due to their secretive land aquirement, Supporters trust,  local groups and investors are not welcomed with funding help and organisation.

Had they performed half of the above at Posh, Luton, Watford Oxford, Milton Keynes they would've been shown the door years ago..
My hill top vantage point is looking ever more appealing,  why not come and join me😉


As Cobblerwatch states. Nobody disagrees with a lot of what you say. Whilst being mindful of the fact that there are two, three, or thousands of different sides to this argument.

But at this moment you are just noise, nothing more. Albeit repetitive noise. I have never questioned how fervent you are. You know as well as me that my criticism revolves around activity. I openly admit that I am at a loss when it comes to affirmative action, because I'm not sure that I never expected all of this to manifest the way it has. I stated this at Cheyne walk many moons ago. I have never stopped saying that the surrounding land is just as much a curse as it it a potential gift. And as I stated to you numerous times over. The councils actions have once again landed the future of the club in a precarious position, by allowing certain types to show an interest in the club from a non football perspective. You just wouldn't have it. The problem as I see it, is the lack of experience shown in navigating this type of scenario. I was posting on here many months back the intrinsic pitfalls of dealing with dysfunctional organisations, whilst anticipating a honest response. I'm not even sure that conventional experience exists in this area. It is exceptionally specialist. Effectively you dealing with a customer base, that can lurch from open revolt, to a warm fuzzy feeling of content, based on where we are in the league, or how we performed at our last game.

There is a genuine need for the Trust to gauge the general consensus of the support. At the moment KT believes rightly or wrongly that he has the vast majority of the supports confidence. To challenge that, you need to show him that he is wrong. You are not going to do that from the backroom of a working mens club. You have to get an idea of the size of the support, or at least whether or not you are acting contrary to what is wanted. But once again the inherent risk in that, is that good old constant in football, fickleness (if that word even exists  Grin )  KT knows that he can play strategic trump cards to undermine any concerted effort to discredit him. But that's just business. In my opinion. And it remains the same as it has always been. KT hasn't thrown up anything that shocks me.

Just out of interest. How are your feelings about the Council now? Are you still as happy about them as you repeatedly stated over the last six months?

 55 
 on: Today at 11:24:24 
Started by Teachers Pet - Last post by 606 Parklands_Cobbler
was it really £14 to go last night? Im sure it hasn't been that much before for a friendly, not that i've been to one.

 56 
 on: Today at 11:19:07 
Started by sussexcobbler - Last post by BedsCobb
Beds - most (but not all) of what you say resonates with many supporters but the acid test/$64,000 question still remains - what is the alternative?   
Thomas out and no more profiteering on the back of our club, which we've suffered for 20 years now, which is reflected in every aspect of our clubs current trading position.
What I would like to see is a more community driven club, thats based on local pride, with closer links to the buisness community and working closely with the NBC again.
A club that sees all profits and good fortune from player sales, extra incomes from cup runs, tv revenue , increased gate revenues etc, ploughed straight back into the club to help with continuous growth and pushing to build up the clubs profile.
How do we do this, easy.. get Thomas out.

 57 
 on: Today at 11:16:30 
Started by Teachers Pet - Last post by lordjord
It was nice to be back watching football again, but as has been mentioned there were some really odd decisions in terms of positioning.

Nicky Adams played 72 minutes at RB last year, 3978 at RWB. He played 4113 minutes total in the league, not once did he feature at LWB, so it just seemed like an odd selection.

Likewise Bunney's best attributes quite clearly are going forward, he has good delivery on him. He did his best yesterday but again it seems like an odd fit.

McWilliams struggled positionally i thought, but then again playing against Forestieri and Harris would be a test for anyone.

We saw a lot of unusual tinkering last year, Hoskins at RWB, Waters there, Turnbull in midfield, Powell up front. It would just be nice to have players playing were they are best suited.

Outside of the negatives, I think Lines is going to be really good for us, clearly has a good range of passing and a calmness on the ball. Thought Jay Williams did ok also, hope he sees more game time this year.

We shouldnt expect to be getting a great result against a team of that cailbre, but I just hope we dont see unnecessary tinkering throughout the season. Also I think this side is crying out for some pace. I have not been Hoskins biggest fan in the past but i can see the merits of him just to provide an outlet. Other than the additional two CB's we need, I would like to see us get a pacy winger just to allow us to stretch teams.

 58 
 on: Today at 10:18:39 
Started by Teachers Pet - Last post by Boot and shoe
Well that was awful. I couldn't name you one player that had a decent game.

MacWilliams is not the answer at RWB, he was probably the worst of a bad bunch (just pipping Bunney, Jay Williams and Watson!).

Personal highlight was seeing Hoskins laughing in the stands each time one of the kids got skinned. 
In his absolute defence , I thought Bunney was the best if the centre backs and although I certainly do not advocate him playing there , credit to him because he is miles out of position and did ok .

 59 
 on: Today at 10:12:53 
Started by Teachers Pet - Last post by rebelspawn
I see you are sharpening your hatchett already. Sheffield Wed played like they had been playing together for over a month. We made the mistake of treating it like a training game which of course suited them. The service to Smith and Oliver was very poor and we ended up hoofing it upto them which of course did not work either. I thought the midfield was poor, no bite and no workaholic like their number 10. Things got a little worse when most of the youngsters came on 2nd halfwho were out thought and certainly out tackled. Only Lines played with any sort of conviction in our midfield; he is not a ball winner. We lacked that ability to win the ball on any consistent basis.. Thought the goalkeeper should have done better with Forresteiri(?) goal and also with the penalty. His clearances were just a boot upfield to nobody in particular. Watson was anonymous, Bunny never really showed as an attacking left back. We definitely lacked a Pierre type replacement. The two young players at right back and centreback played ok handling their opposite numbers pretty well. The main problem was that we were so easily outplayed in midfield; we lacked any sort of pace on the right. I can remember the encouraging performance aginst Leicester in season 2015/16 a few years ago who then went onto win the league whilst we won the L2 title. I would say that Curle learned a lot about his teams performance tonight and unless he brings in better (and fit) players in PDQ we may struggle.., again.
Not a very encouraging evening.

Such biased drivel, you have clearly got an agenda, were you even there?

 60 
 on: Today at 10:04:51 
Started by Teachers Pet - Last post by MK_Cobbler
Well that was awful. I couldn't name you one player that had a decent game.

MacWilliams is not the answer at RWB, he was probably the worst of a bad bunch (just pipping Bunney, Jay Williams and Watson!).

Personal highlight was seeing Hoskins laughing in the stands each time one of the kids got skinned. 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10
Powered by EzPortal
Parental guidance is urged as this messageboard may not be suitable for all persons especially those under the age of 16 as the forums may contain words, phrases and expressions not considered appropriate for a younger audience so please express caution. If any posts in the forums offend you, please let us know and we will look at them and if we agree with your complaint, we will remove them. You are personally responsible and potentially liable for the contents of your posting and may be sued should your posting contain content of a defamatory or other illegal nature. Every message posted leaves a traceable IP number. We check the forums at various times of the day and remove offending posts. Other supporters are welcome but abusive or silly posts will be removed and the offenders potentially barred from future access to the site. We advise that you never reveal any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example: telephone number, home address or email address), and please do not include postal addresses of any kind. This messageboard is not endorsed or in any way affiliated with Northampton Town FC. All postings on this board become copyright of The Hotel End & may not be reproduced without the permission of the board administrator. By signing up to this message board you agree to this. The Hotel End cannot be held liable for the actions or postings of its members. The Hotel End reserve the right to edit, delete, move or close any thread for any reason. The Hotel End may disclose user information to government authorities at their discretion or when required by law. The Hotel End may also disclose user information when The Hotel End has reason to believe that someone is causing injury to or interference with its rights or property, other The Hotel End users, or anyone else that could be harmed by such activities. By registering for The Hotel End, you agree to indemnify The Hotel End its representatives, and agents, and hold them harmless from any and all claims (including claims for legal fees) which may arise from your participation on the The Hotel End. You also agree that The Hotel End is not responsible for the materials posted by users of The Hotel End. In addition, you grant The Hotel End and its affiliates, worldwide, royalty-free perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive right and license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display any message or content posted on The Hotel End and/or e-mail sent by you to The Hotel End (in whole or in part). The Hotel End reserves the right to make the rules up as it goes along. Thank you - The Hotel End I love Quidco
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMFServer.com - Create your own Forum

Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy