The cull list...

[guest2487]

It will be..

Duke.
Alfei.
Langmead.
Robertson.
Ravenhill.
O'Toole.
Hackett.
Tozer.
Sinclair.
Nicholls.
Carter.
Toney.
Cresswell.

[JamieNTFC]

It will be..

Duke.
Alfei.
Langmead.
Robertson.
Ravenhill.
O'Toole.
Hackett.
Tozer.
Sinclair.
Nicholls.
Carter.
Toney.
Cresswell.

Cresswell?!?

[NaggerPagger]

Bit harsh on langers he's still coming back after a long spell.

Langmead's performance on Saturday was up there with his one against Shrewsbury all those years ago.

[Dr Feelgood]

It will be..

Duke.
Alfei.
Langmead.
Robertson.
Ravenhill.
O'Toole.
Hackett.
Tozer.
Sinclair.
Nicholls.
Carter.
Toney.
Cresswell.

might as well get rid of everyone

[Ryan Amoo 14]

It will be..

Duke.
Alfei.
Langmead.
Robertson.
Ravenhill.
O'Toole.
Hackett.
Tozer.
Sinclair.
Nicholls.
Carter.
Toney.
Cresswell.

Sure it'll only be 13 players? 

[bri77]

Langmead's performance on Saturday was up there with his one against Shrewsbury all those years ago.

As fans we are an odd bunch, because we like Langers we look for reasons why he had a bad game, I was thinking because he'd been originally dropped he was probably annoyed which affected his play (such a lame reason) if it had been Cresswell we would just be saying how crap he'd been. Just goes to show theres no such thing as impartiality when it comes to football 

[Ryan Amoo 14]

As fans we are an odd bunch, because we like Langers we look for reasons why he had a bad game, I was thinking because he'd been originally dropped he was probably annoyed which affected his play (such a lame reason) if it had been Cresswell we would just be saying how crap he'd been. Just goes to show theres no such thing as impartiality when it comes to football 

+Alex Nicholls.

[bri77]

Agree in general, but taking bias out, who would we rather have, Sinclair or Nicholls? That's not bias that's common sense.

[brickowski]

Agree in general, but taking bias out, who would we rather have, Sinclair or Nicholls?

The one who is under contract?

[everbrite]

Agree in general, but taking bias out, who would we rather have, Sinclair or Nicholls? That's not bias that's common sense.

Sorry but I would chose Sinclair who does occasionally have a reasonable game. As for Nicholls I have a feeling that many on here would chose him purely based on sympathy and moral support. I have seen him play in all his games this season and he has imo been largely ineffective...bit like Ollie Banks. Great goal against AFCW but Sinclair's two against Torquay was hugely influential last season.

[JamieNTFC]

Sorry but I would chose Sinclair who does occasionally have a reasonable game. As for Nicholls I have a feeling that many on here would chose him purely based on sympathy and moral support. I have seen him play in all his games this season and he has imo been largely ineffective...bit like Ollie Banks. Great goal against AFCW but Sinclair's two against Torquay was hugely influential last season.

It will take Nicholls a while to come back to the player he was from a broken leg, look at Aaron Ramsey at Arsenal, it took him two years or so to become the player he is today, I just think Sinclair is useless at the moment, couldn't hit a barn door.

[A view from the east]

It will take Nicholls a while to come back to the player he was from a broken leg, look at Aaron Ramsey at Arsenal, it took him two years or so to become the player he is today, I just think Sinclair is useless at the moment, couldn't hit a barn door.

Neither of them are the future, we should get rid and move on.

[Deepcut Cobbler]

CW: "I've made players available for loan and I'd be worried if I was some of them, because there have been hardly any enquiries."
Sounds like those he intends to cull eventually from their contracts have already been informed....

[NaggerPagger]

CW: "I've made players available for loan and I'd be worried if I was some of them, because there have been hardly any enquiries."
Sounds like those he intends to cull eventually from their contracts have already been informed....

He's been quite open about the players who have been made available. Nicholls and O'Toole have managed to sort them selves out.
We'll probably never know if Langmead and Sinclair have been offered anything or not.

[Saint Cobbler]

CW: "I've made players available for loan and I'd be worried if I was some of them, because there have been hardly any enquiries."
Sounds like those he intends to cull eventually from their contracts have already been informed....

Why would you use the phrase 'and I'd be worried if I was some of them' to castigate players such as Langmead and Nicholls (these are a couple in the list suggested by some), who have gone through grief recently?

[TbananaG]

Do you know what, for all that I'm really frustrated at how this season is going, I think the only player who's really taken the piss, and the pay for nothing, is JJ. Some of the loan players maybe shouldn't be here in the first place (their fault they were signed?) and maybe some of the contracts shouldn't have been offered (Sinclair, Ravenhill...) but again, whose fault is that? I think that CW is in danger of alienating himself from the players, who are the people whose respect he most needs.

[clarkeysntfc]

Well we've got until May 2016 to find out if Sinclair is staying or going!

[Coblerzz]

Well we were made aware Langmead was available for loan, and no-one came in for him.

But due to injuries he has to start, and we wonder why we are struggling with a big wage bill?