So not agreeing with you sanctions their behaviour...
It's the sort attitude that you deserve. These people will attack because of race, religion, sexual persuassion, culture, gender, our laws, our education values, or any number of things that fail to fit into their ridiculously narrow perspective on what is acceptable. Your naive and simplistic assessment that it is down to bombing them, is no more than a myopic glance at the real issues at play here. And a total and utter simplification of the broader agenda.
I am not sure why you think that the big grin smiles are appropriate here. I am not up for joking about this matter.
You say "these people will attack" but why have we attacked? Why do we think that their lives matter less than ours? How many "people" from the 209.1 million Islamic Indonesian population have come here to attack us? We haven't bombed them yet though have we!
Mr Corbyn is absolutely spot on with his view on this. I agree with him entirely. Is he also naive having spend many years in the thick of it? If you expect to get away scott free after throwing your weight around in the manner that Britain (and others) has it's you that is the naive. We need to reel our neck in and minimise the sadly inevitable continued atrocities by way of retaliation against us. Yes, the individuals committing the attacks are warped but they weren't born that way. We should also stop funding the completely redundant nuclear deterrent and spend the money on something that will save lives like police and soldiers stationed in our own country. Nuclear weapons won't save you if you happen to be in near one of "these people" when they do attack. A policeman investigating a possible radicalised subject might.
I would also like to say that I agree with 606 Parklands_Cobbler on his views above.