To clear this up once and for all and to give C78 the gram of credit his "theory" deserves...
When he looks at the table he makes a judgement using the most simple form of information available to him (no comment on ability to process more complex data). A team in the bottom half is easier to get a result against than a team in the top half. At face value and ignoring form, injuries, suspensions and all the other variables that can affect a game, this is a normal expectation.
However, C78s PROJECTIONS are 100% inaccurate and a total NON-FACT because he does not use a true basis for that projection and that last statement is the only FACT in the whole of this thread. Despite having it made clear a thousand times over, you can't change the status of a fixture from easy to hard or vice versa, once it has taken place.
C78, you've become the David Icke of this message board over this single "theory". I admire doggedness up to a point but this is verging on insanity now.
I'm retiring from this now as I'll start meeting the definition of mad if I keep using the same explanation and expecting a different outcome.....
Correct, it really is a very simplistic, basic, non scientific theory, anything more than that would confuse most on here (no offense to you)
The fact it's still proving accurate must clearly just be a coincidence.