bri77
|
Beat Blackburn on Saturday and we have got more points against the top half than the bottom half after half a season. Meaning this easier games to come bulls*** is even more irrelevant than it is now.
Thank god Bristol Rovers and Oldham were two of the easier games this season, phew.
|
|
|
|
Cobbler78
|
Beat Blackburn on Saturday and we have got more points against the top half than the bottom half after half a season. Meaning this easier games to come bulls*** is even more irrelevant than it is now.
Thank god Bristol Rovers and Oldham were two of the easier games this season, phew.
Did we beat Blackburn this coming Saturday?
|
|
|
|
|
Cobbler78
|
29 pages of this utter bulls***.
ridiculous
Luckily this post has really improved the content 😂
|
|
|
|
Shoemaker
|
29 pages of this utter bulls***.
ridiculous
This is the most factually correct posting yet.
|
|
|
|
bri77
|
Did we beat Blackburn this coming Saturday?
Nicely done, completely ignoring the fact that are two heaviest defeats have come in some of the easier games. So IF we beat Blackburn are you going to end your constant trolling and pointless banality?
|
|
|
|
WasRambo
|
Really? You’d think it would be more accurate judging a teams strength based on alphabetical order or after 1 game. It’s a point of view I suppose.
You really are an arrogant so and so aren't you? Anyway, I think it would have as much value as your method tbf. You still haven't grasped the FACT that an average can't move about like yours does and a game can only be judged as easy or hard based on a teams position at the time they are played. By your method (any you need to own up to this unless you're too scared) a game can be played in October and be deemed to be hard but then that teams form dips and when you're doing your calculations in December, you are re-assessing the same game that was hard as now easy. Surely even you can see that once an event has passed, its difficulty cannot change? Its physically impossible! To respond to your arrogant "it's a point of view I suppose" remark: Clearly, you need a a reasonable number of games to have been played before there is sufficient data to base any opinion on, regardless of the method. The larger the population of results, the more accurate predictions are likely to be. I don't recall how you worked out the possible outcome of the Shrewsbury game... Seriously, you think you know what you're talking about but you don't, you're clueless. GCSE Grade 4 in Maths at best....
|
|
|
|
Cobbler78
|
Nicely done, completely ignoring the fact that are two heaviest defeats have come in some of the easier games.
So IF we beat Blackburn are you going to end your constant trolling and pointless banality?
It’s “our” two heaviest defeats.
|
|
|
|
Cobbler78
|
You really are an arrogant so and so aren't you?
Anyway, I think it would have as much value as your method tbf.
You still haven't grasped the FACT that an average can't move about like yours does and a game can only be judged as easy or hard based on a teams position at the time they are played. By your method (any you need to own up to this unless you're too scared) a game can be played in October and be deemed to be hard but then that teams form dips and when you're doing your calculations in December, you are re-assessing the same game that was hard as now easy. Surely even you can see that once an event has passed, its difficulty cannot change? Its physically impossible!
To respond to your arrogant "it's a point of view I suppose" remark: Clearly, you need a a reasonable number of games to have been played before there is sufficient data to base any opinion on, regardless of the method. The larger the population of results, the more accurate predictions are likely to be. I don't recall how you worked out the possible outcome of the Shrewsbury game...
Seriously, you think you know what you're talking about but you don't, you're clueless. GCSE Grade 4 in Maths at best....
This has nothing to do with Maths, it’s about common sense, so I understand why you’re struggling. Just read the other, simpler, threads and ignore this one if it’s confusing you or causing you stress.
|
|
|
|
WasRambo
|
This has nothing to do with Maths, it’s about common sense, so I understand why you’re struggling. Just read the other, simpler, threads and ignore this one if it’s confusing you or causing you stress.
Another response scoring 10 out of 10 on the Tw@t scale It's entirely about maths, you quote average points and then multiply out to project a year end total. You really are making yourself look sillier by the post. And still dodging the issue...
|
|
|
|
slabtish
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 17
Badges: (View All)
|
when a team is beaten tis an easy game, when we lose its a hard game, and when we draw i just cannot cope !
|
|
|
|
Cobbler78
|
Another response scoring 10 out of 10 on the Tw@t scale
It's entirely about maths, you quote average points and then multiply out to project a year end total. You really are making yourself look sillier by the post.
And still dodging the issue...
Speaking of dodging the point, you’ll accept the following bet as there is no such thing as easier or harder ganes(no draws) I bet you £50 per game we lose to Blackburn (h), Wigan (h) Blackburn (a) Charlton (h), Peterborough (a), Bradford (a), Sc***horpe (a) and the that we beat Gillingham (H), Plymouth (H), Rochdale (H), MK Dons (h) and Wimbledon (a) Put your money where your mouth is if my theory is rubbish, that goes for anyone.
|
|
« Last Edit: December 21, 2017, 15:03:34 pm by Cobbler78 »
|
Report Spam
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Cobbler78
|
get better odds at the bookies mate
There’s a reason for that, fancy taking a wild guess at what it is? *Clue* read the title of the thread.
|
|
|
|
Shoemaker
|
To add a bit of balance I’m glad I didn’t lump on us to beat Oldham (A)or Wimbledon (H) on the basis they were easy games You can have as much as you want with me on us winning either of those!
|
|
|
|
Tabasco Kid
|
GCSE Grade 4 in Maths at best....
As issued by Kingsbrook School, Deanshanger.
|
Were in the pipe 5 by 5.
|
|
|
Cobbler78
|
Speaking of dodging the point, you’ll accept the following bet as there is no such thing as easier or harder ganes(no draws)
I bet you £50 per game we lose to Blackburn (h), Wigan (h) Blackburn (a) Charlton (h), Peterborough (a), Bradford (a), Sc***horpe (a) and the that we beat Gillingham (H), Plymouth (H), Rochdale (H), MK Dons (h) and Wimbledon (a)
Put your money where your mouth is if my theory is rubbish, that goes for anyone.
No takers I see. I can only assume that you all agree with me now. Shame it took so long for the penny to drop.
|
|
|
|
wrigleys
|
Yes I agree with you now
|
Intravenous real ale at Sixfields. Make it happen
|
|
|
just.reading
|
No takers I see. I can only assume that you all agree with me now. Shame it took so long for the penny to drop.
I seem to remember you didn't want to put money on this earlier this season despite what the stats/projection said?
|
|
|
|
Cobbler78
|
I seem to remember you didn't want to put money on this earlier this season despite what the stats/projection said?
I’d check again if I were you.
|
|
|
|
|