The Hotel End
April 16, 2024, 10:17:15 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
  Home Help Search Arcade Downloads Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register Chat  

Northampton Town v High Barnet (LIVE)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Northampton Town v High Barnet (LIVE)  (Read 5281 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
GillysM8
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 662


View Profile
Badges: (View All)
« Reply #80 on: February 05, 2011, 17:43:52 pm »

That was as poor a 90 minutes of football as you're ever likely to witness,  shocking.  So bereft of ideas and seemingly resorting to hoofball tactics when the conditions were crying out for the ball to be played on the deck.  Quite what we've been doing on the training ground when it some to free kicks escapes me: the tactics seems to be to hoof it somewhere between the back of the 6 yard box and the edge of the area.  As for Paul Rodgers and Ryan Gilligan...words fail me.

As to how how Rodgers was 1 of our best players? I dare say weather conditions didnt help & the ref was as poor as you're likely to see at football league level. I'd have took draws against a Oxford and Crewe with a win against Barnet when i looked at these fixtures so 7 points from 9 is no disaster.
Report Spam   Logged
Tyler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1636


Back when we were good...


View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Combination Topic Starter Poll Voter
« Reply #81 on: February 05, 2011, 17:48:08 pm »

That was ******* abysmal.

Exactly. Absolutely s***. No difrection at all. Apart from going close twice in the second half, did we have any proper shots on goal?

Ref was whistle happy but he cant be blamed for that
Report Spam   Logged
NTFC Nut
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4183


View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Windows User Combination Topic Starter
« Reply #82 on: February 05, 2011, 18:38:56 pm »

That was as poor a 90 minutes of football as you're ever likely to witness,  shocking.  So bereft of ideas and seemingly resorting to hoofball tactics when the conditions were crying out for the ball to be played on the deck.  Quite what we've been doing on the training ground when it some to free kicks escapes me: the tactics seems to be to hoof it somewhere between the back of the 6 yard box and the edge of the area.  As for Paul Rodgers and Ryan Gilligan...words fail me.

Really? I though we overcomplicated it at times, as did Barnet, which is why passes from both sides kept going astray in the wind and out for throws etc. On too many occasions we didn't get the ball into the box quickly enough and attacks were snuffed out.

It was also painfully obvious today that McKay/Harrad is not going to work. We still need a target man because Leon is not going to be able to play every week and when he isn't in the team we're as toothless as ever. No physical presence at all = no goals, no matter how clinical the strikers are when they're presented with a chance. Harrad and McKay are both good at doing what they do but they will finish the chances rather than create them, and they both ideally need a big man up front to feed off.
Report Spam   Logged

EastNpton
Guest

Badges: (View All)
« Reply #83 on: February 05, 2011, 18:49:35 pm »

We definately missed our injured players. I'd have liked to have seen Wedderburn in the middle and given Walker a free role to try and unpick their defence. The problem was we lacked any creativity and the game was calling out for a Thornton.

Laurent was a dissapointment, it doesn't look like he'll bleed for the cause lets put it that way. Gilligan was the most unispiring substitution I've seen for a long while.
Report Spam   Logged
wrigleys
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1723



View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Combination Topic Starter Poll Voter
« Reply #84 on: February 05, 2011, 19:06:04 pm »

We definately missed our injured players. I'd have liked to have seen Wedderburn in the middle and given Walker a free role to try and unpick their defence. The problem was we lacked any creativity and the game was calling out for a Thornton.

Laurent was a dissapointment, it doesn't look like he'll bleed for the cause lets put it that way. Gilligan was the most unispiring substitution I've seen for a long while.

Hmm I can't remember specifically but mid way through the first half Laurent made a massively decisive run that split the Barnet defence completely - I was actually rather impressed - agree about the Gilligan substitution though...!
Report Spam   Logged

Intravenous real ale at Sixfields. Make it happen
guest216
Guest

Badges: (View All)
« Reply #85 on: February 05, 2011, 19:17:53 pm »

Really? I though we overcomplicated it at times, as did Barnet, which is why passes from both sides kept going astray in the wind and out for throws etc. On too many occasions we didn't get the ball into the box quickly enough and attacks were snuffed out.

I agree.

Anyone who thinks playing short intricate passing is the way to defeat windy conditions has clearly never played football. It's no coincidence that our more technically skilled players such as Walker struggled today, the fact is in a sharp wind first touches and simple passes will go array regardless of how good you are.

The only viable strategy would be route one, and that was going to be impossible with Harrad and Billy upfront. It's just one of those games where you need to graft and battle and unfortunately there wasn't enough of it. I wouldn't use it as barometer to judge how capable the team is though.
Report Spam   Logged
Mark-JB
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 714


View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Combination Topic Starter Poll Voter
« Reply #86 on: February 05, 2011, 19:43:30 pm »

It really wasn't very good at all.

Nothing to take from it other than a clean sheet.

Onwards and (hopefully) upwards
Report Spam   Logged
NTFC Nut
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4183


View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Windows User Combination Topic Starter
« Reply #87 on: February 05, 2011, 19:47:47 pm »

Onwards and (hopefully) upwards

Expecting a loss at Port Vale next weekend but we ought to be taking 10 points from the following four games. That should put us in the top half as we move into the business end of the season.
Report Spam   Logged

GillysM8
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 662


View Profile
Badges: (View All)
« Reply #88 on: February 05, 2011, 22:28:59 pm »

Has anyone else noticed everytime we dont win a couple of numptys put it down to Rodgers,Gilly or Dunn? without taking anything else in to consideration. I wish i had such limited football knowledge  Grin
Report Spam   Logged
Power Football
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1393



View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Windows User Combination Topic Starter
« Reply #89 on: February 05, 2011, 22:55:34 pm »


The only viable strategy would be route one, and that was going to be impossible with Harrad and Billy upfront. It's just one of those games where you need to graft and battle and unfortunately there wasn't enough of it. I wouldn't use it as barometer to judge how capable the team is though.

Absolutely. We really missed Holty today, not just for his aerial ability and graft but also for the long throws which would have caused chaos in those conditions....
Report Spam   Logged
Insider
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1965



View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Combination Topic Starter Poll Voter
« Reply #90 on: February 06, 2011, 08:50:47 am »

I reckon I must live on another planet. Calls for a big target man?  It may be part of the problem - I agree that McKay and Harrad isn't looking like a winning combination - but our real problem remains in midfield.   Walker hardly completed a single pass in 90 minutes, and all too often when balls are played up to either of a front two, our midfield is way too slow to support, which inevitably means the ball has to be held up and ultimately played back to a defender and often to Chris Dunn.  Jacobs ran into defenders all afternoon, and I didn't see any of our midfield capable of getting the ball and carrying it 10-20 yards to open up options.  Osman on Tuesday was a rare exception to that.  As for calling for route 1, I thought that's what I witnessed for nearly the whole of the second half.  If you're playing into a strong wind as we were the ball needs to be kept on the deck; problem yesterday was that we were totally incapable of playing a 5 yard pass to feet.  I lost count of the number of shin high passes.  No wonder the surface at Sixfields is in such good nick, the grass hardly saw any wear and tear from the ball.  Gilligan?  Absolute s***e again. And a poor tactical substitution on Sammo's part, as he's hardly like to come on and crack open a defence in a game we really needed to win.  Rodgers?  He made two or three good saving tackles, but at least two of them came from his own mistakes where he'd allowed his striker to get goal side of him.  As a defender he's going backwards - in every sense - and I've rarely seen a worse throw-in from a pro footballer.  Laurent?  Agreed he made one good run, and one headed flick on, but that was the sum total of his contribution; yet another 6'3 player who can only jump 6'1 !
Report Spam   Logged
MK_Cobbler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2725


View Profile
Badges: (View All)
« Reply #91 on: February 06, 2011, 09:05:20 am »

I see Sampson has blamed the bad display on the wind, its amazing how every other team managed to a adapt to yesterdays conditions... there was goals all over!
Report Spam   Logged
EastNpton
Guest

Badges: (View All)
« Reply #92 on: February 06, 2011, 10:13:24 am »

Can't see the point yesterday of keeping Wedderburn on the bench. He would have been more useful in midfield and allowed Walker a bit more room to pick passes out.
Report Spam   Logged
HertsCobbler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2359


View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Combination Topic Starter Level 5
« Reply #93 on: February 06, 2011, 11:29:14 am »

At half time I would have taken off Laurent and brought on Weddeburn and gone 4-3-1-2 with Jacobs in the hole.
Report Spam   Logged
Erith_Cobbler
Guest

Badges: (View All)
« Reply #94 on: February 06, 2011, 13:03:07 pm »

No Holt, Hinton or Gilligan yesterday. Who took the captain's armband?
Report Spam   Logged
Tyler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1636


Back when we were good...


View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Combination Topic Starter Poll Voter
« Reply #95 on: February 06, 2011, 13:08:16 pm »

Deano
Report Spam   Logged
NTFC Nut
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4183


View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Windows User Combination Topic Starter
« Reply #96 on: February 06, 2011, 14:13:18 pm »

I could swear Hall was wearing the armband?
Report Spam   Logged

Marvo
Guest

Badges: (View All)
« Reply #97 on: February 06, 2011, 14:24:33 pm »

I could swear Hall was wearing the armband?

That was in memory of the pace he's lost.  Tongue
Report Spam   Logged
Tyler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1636


Back when we were good...


View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Combination Topic Starter Poll Voter
« Reply #98 on: February 06, 2011, 14:25:48 pm »

I could swear Hall was wearing the armband?

You could, you might be wrong though.

All i remember is Deano coming out with the armband and doing all that photo and presentation stuff, might;ve changed at half time
Report Spam   Logged
guest216
Guest

Badges: (View All)
« Reply #99 on: February 06, 2011, 14:46:31 pm »

I reckon I must live on another planet. Calls for a big target man?  It may be part of the problem - I agree that McKay and Harrad isn't looking like a winning combination - but our real problem remains in midfield.   Walker hardly completed a single pass in 90 minutes, and all too often when balls are played up to either of a front two, our midfield is way too slow to support, which inevitably means the ball has to be held up and ultimately played back to a defender and often to Chris Dunn.  Jacobs ran into defenders all afternoon, and I didn't see any of our midfield capable of getting the ball and carrying it 10-20 yards to open up options.  Osman on Tuesday was a rare exception to that.  As for calling for route 1, I thought that's what I witnessed for nearly the whole of the second half.  If you're playing into a strong wind as we were the ball needs to be kept on the deck; problem yesterday was that we were totally incapable of playing a 5 yard pass to feet.  I lost count of the number of shin high passes.  No wonder the surface at Sixfields is in such good nick, the grass hardly saw any wear and tear from the ball.  Gilligan?  Absolute sh*te again. And a poor tactical substitution on Sammo's part, as he's hardly like to come on and crack open a defence in a game we really needed to win.  Rodgers?  He made two or three good saving tackles, but at least two of them came from his own mistakes where he'd allowed his striker to get goal side of him.  As a defender he's going backwards - in every sense - and I've rarely seen a worse throw-in from a pro footballer.  Laurent?  Agreed he made one good run, and one headed flick on, but that was the sum total of his contribution; yet another 6'3 player who can only jump 6'1 !

Not being nasty, but have you ever played football before? Expecting bottom tier players to play a short intricate passing game in those conditions is utter madness. A strong wind will send even the most simplest of passes array, will make control of simple balls difficult, and generally makes retention of possession impossible. Even in the Premiership yesterday most goals were the result of long thumps up the pitch, the flight of the ball becomes so unpredictable your best chance is to hope defences misjudge them.
Report Spam   Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Parental guidance is urged as this messageboard may not be suitable for all persons especially those under the age of 16 as the forums may contain words, phrases and expressions not considered appropriate for a younger audience so please express caution. If any posts in the forums offend you, please let us know and we will look at them and if we agree with your complaint, we will remove them. You are personally responsible and potentially liable for the contents of your posting and may be sued should your posting contain content of a defamatory or other illegal nature. Every message posted leaves a traceable IP number. We check the forums at various times of the day and remove offending posts. Other supporters are welcome but abusive or silly posts will be removed and the offenders potentially barred from future access to the site. We advise that you never reveal any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example: telephone number, home address or email address), and please do not include postal addresses of any kind. This messageboard is not endorsed or in any way affiliated with Northampton Town FC. All postings on this board become copyright of The Hotel End & may not be reproduced without the permission of the board administrator. By signing up to this message board you agree to this. The Hotel End cannot be held liable for the actions or postings of its members. The Hotel End reserve the right to edit, delete, move or close any thread for any reason. The Hotel End may disclose user information to government authorities at their discretion or when required by law. The Hotel End may also disclose user information when The Hotel End has reason to believe that someone is causing injury to or interference with its rights or property, other The Hotel End users, or anyone else that could be harmed by such activities. By registering for The Hotel End, you agree to indemnify The Hotel End its representatives, and agents, and hold them harmless from any and all claims (including claims for legal fees) which may arise from your participation on the The Hotel End. You also agree that The Hotel End is not responsible for the materials posted by users of The Hotel End. In addition, you grant The Hotel End and its affiliates, worldwide, royalty-free perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive right and license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display any message or content posted on The Hotel End and/or e-mail sent by you to The Hotel End (in whole or in part). The Hotel End reserves the right to make the rules up as it goes along. Thank you - The Hotel End I love Quidco
Bookmark this site!
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy