West ham should have followed the spurs plan as its clearly must better for the tax payer and for the whole "legacy" crap.
'The whole "legacy" crap' was a big part of us being awarded the games to begin with. Dont think either option is/was viable. Spurs knocking the place down and making it purpose built for football, plus moving from one part of London to another was never going to work, and i dont think an athletics track around the pitch, plus the extra events the pitch has to cater for, is a good idea either