What point are you trying to prove here? That I'm related to one of the board members of the Trust? You haven't unearthed anything that most people didn't know anyway.
In essence though, your argument seems to be that due to my family connections, I might be privy to more information and that I'm therefore misleading people about what ownership models the Trust is looking into.
This is despite the fact that the Trust says in its public statement that it's looking into different models, including community ownership and also a fan partnership with private investors.
It's actually impossible to mislead anyone when the Trust has literally said it's looking into all of the different options.
It's a pathetic argument when you think about it really.
I didn’t realise there was any argument. I’m not too sure what’s got you all revved up.
As I said.. It is all tongue in cheek.. Clearly I have said something incendiary that I didn’t realise.
I can’t say anymore than I've already said. I am more than happy to accept your honest version, that you haven’t had any conversation about it at all.... I can’t see what more I can say. Try to take things in the spirit they are meant and not read between the lines too much James.