Unfortunately I think views have become so entrenched the scenario for some will simply shift from suggestions of KT/DB running off with all the money and not completing the stand to, well they have completed it but not to the standard we deserve/wanted - seemingly forgetting that the inadequacies of the East Stand are a Cardoza legacy and not of the current owner's creation.
Personally for me, if it happens completion of the stand as per the old plans and a much improved training facility is the most progress we have made in decades and I would view it as glass half full but I'm sure others will disagree.
As I've stated in the past, if we complete the stand as it is, I think it would be a big, missed opportunity to build on the back, the full length of the stand, so we have some function rooms of our own. But even if we just complete it, as it is, it doesn't explain why the "No stand, no land" clause was removed from the deal at the instance of NTFC?
Why go to the trouble of removing that clause if you are, 100%, going to complete the stand? There is no logic in that whatsoever, is there? It was nothing to do with "like for like" with the Cilldara bid, as their bid never included the running track, CDNL's did. Maybe someone on here can come up with an explanation, have I missed something?
