Thank you for the detailed explanation and maybe I’m being thick and whilst I see that in the newer proposal the land changes hands unequivocally and immediately without the 5 year risk but despite that clearly being a better offer for the council ( and why the judicial review almost certainly not find against WNC) I still don’t see why a NSNL clause cannot be applied as a pre requirement on the sale.
Don't think you are being thick at all and it's actually nice to have a sensible conversation about this.
Explain to me how you would apply a NSNL clause to the current deal on the table. Also I don't totally understand what you mean by pre requirement on the sale.