Ah I see - that makes sense! I guess for me after all this stuff the trust has lost my benefit of doubt, so I’m going to assume that most of what was shown was done with a similar intent as the more obvious stuff when it comes to the not so trustworthy trust.
No worries. Don't get me wrong, I've been done with the Trust's current board for a long while! In the interests of balance though I think KT might have gone slightly over the top in his presentation. The bits he specifically highlights as lies are ambiguous while, as you rightfully point out, there is plenty of evidence of mendacity elsewhere in the slides so why overstretch your reach?
I've long believed there’s an agenda there around the desire for fan ownership, something the Trust fervently deny to the point I've accepted I'm probably wrong about it. A good few of the slides back this up though (specifically the FOI correspondence between the Trust and the council) but then he's gone too far in including the "Fan Ownership" section on the Trust Website because this isn't really about seizing control of the club and more about looking at options (which I'd argue is legitimately within their remit).
I get why KT went to town and actually support him in doing so, but I do think in a couple of areas he's laboured the point and in doing so given the Trust some points to bat back, which will undermine the credibility of the many valid points he made!
