'To repeat'? ffs.
Well, 'to repeat', Cornell was dropped in the second game for the new 'keeper and it is debatable whether he would even be in the side now if Arnold hadn't got injured. Cornell is the most replaceable player of the team that's played since Arnold's injury and I doubt there's more than a couple of first team 'keepers in this division who are worse than him.
Cornell is the clubs most saleable player? Arf!
At times you resort to damn Cornell with faint praise. The truth is that your stance on Cornell was cemented last year with your stats formulated to suit your opinion. There is no way back for you other than the apathetic opinion above. Most Cobblers supporters go along with Cornell true we could do better and perhaps Arnold will prove to be the better. At the moment they are both Cobblers players so I merely support both. Frankly I don’t understand your stance on the player and neither can I understand why you have engineered your self into this uncompromising position.