The big game changer on Saturday was when they brought Adam Buxton on. Primarily a full back but all of a sudden everything went through him on their left, he upped their tempo playing simple football.
Fortunate with his deflected goal but the game changed when he came on in the 53rd, which was recognised by KC who put on H-J to counter him.
Buxton was given MotM by Morecambe.
Maybe the query needs to be about the effectiveness of the substitutions the opposition make, and how our onfield XI counter their threat?
It's obvious that KC gives them detailed plans before the game on how the opposition will likely set up etc, but I just wonder if that then extends to "in-game" tactical knowledge being passed on.
Alternatively, as mental fatigue sets in, are the players able to grasp the change made by the opposition, and should be able to adapt their defensive tactics to suit?
I personally think bringing on Warburton for McWilliams in both recent matches has exposed his lack of FL experience.