Cornell 'haters'? Why such childish language? Not rating a player doesn't mean you 'hate"
Agree with you on the term 'hater' used by Boots.
But that should not deflect from his salient point that you have conducted an indepth critical analysis of Cornell going to extreme lengths to prove your views are correct. Almost a case of paranoia? If Cornell had made those two or three
errors yesterday you would be amongst the first to voice your disapproval?