But any dialogue is actualy between the owners and the Trust, not the Trust board.
Replace those who currently represent the Trust with others who KT likes, and he will enter a dialogue is what you're saying, but until when?
Until someone gets elected to the Trust board that he doesnt like and the present status quo is resumes.
That's not how the Trust should be forced to operate.
If the Board of the Trust made decisions with the full active endorsement of the membership that is a far more dangerous strategy than upsetting 6 people acting in isolation against the apparent wishes of the majority of the membership. It’s about controlling what you can and forgetting about what you can’t. The current strategy has failed spectacularly in case you haven’t noticed. I would suggest the best option is to try a different approach, rather than repeating the same mistakes and presumably getting the same results.