guest3667
|
|
« Reply #20 on: February 15, 2024, 11:50:46 am » |
|
Did you read the final paragraph? Especially the “ongoing” part?
|
|
|
|
guest3667
|
|
« Reply #21 on: February 15, 2024, 11:57:51 am » |
|
“Why Milankovitch (orbital) Cycles Can’t Explain Earth’s Current Warming” NASA Climate Change 27/02/2020 🧐
|
|
|
|
MCHammer
|
|
« Reply #22 on: February 16, 2024, 16:27:22 pm » |
|
https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/Scientists have had evidence for some time there is a natural warming and cooling. It's the cause which is being debated in the article you link not whether it's true. Man made global warming is something different entirely as per the article above from the same website you used. It's about the speed and levels on top of the norm that people should be concerned about. Of course it will be the same as every other major political challenge where those in power will only wake up when it's too late and they have to deal with the consequences. P.S. Can you provide a link for the original article you mention in your first post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
southofthecounty
|
|
« Reply #25 on: March 07, 2024, 10:53:27 am » |
|
https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/Scientists have had evidence for some time there is a natural warming and cooling. It's the cause which is being debated in the article you link not whether it's true. Man made global warming is something different entirely as per the article above from the same website you used. It's about the speed and levels on top of the norm that people should be concerned about. Of course it will be the same as every other major political challenge where those in power will only wake up when it's too late and they have to deal with the consequences. P.S. Can you provide a link for the original article you mention in your first post. https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
|
|
|
|
Manwork04
|
|
« Reply #26 on: March 07, 2024, 12:09:37 pm » |
|
NASA they faked the moon landings FFS FACT.
|
Rule Britannia
|
|
|
Tabasco Kid
|
|
« Reply #27 on: March 07, 2024, 15:45:17 pm » |
|
NASA they faked the moon landings FFS FACT.
Manny says it never happened, Tabasco says it did. Who do you believe? Mind you, Manny also claims to have been involved in massive stadium construction projects, fine dining with the elite, guest of Sheik Mansour at city games, and rounds of golf with Jimmy Tarbuck and Brucie. hmm...
|
Were in the pipe 5 by 5.
|
|
|
southofthecounty
|
|
« Reply #28 on: March 07, 2024, 16:16:54 pm » |
|
NASA they faked the moon landings FFS FACT.
OK. I do wonder why the all the hundreds and hundreds of folk involved in the project, not one of them has ever come forward to tell the story of how they were faked. They would make a fortune. And yet, nothing.
|
|
|
|
southofthecounty
|
|
« Reply #29 on: March 07, 2024, 16:24:42 pm » |
|
I'm not quite sure what all these climate scientists are getting out of their effort to control "The Masses"? Do they find some weird sexual satisfaction watching folk sort their recycling? Can they only orgasm in an electric car? Do they find the sight of a wind turbine overly erotic?
However, I think we all know the motivation of climate science deniers linked to the fossil fuel industry.
A Venn diagram of climate deniers, flat earthers and anti vax freaks would be a near perfect circle.
|
|
|
|
Tabasco Kid
|
|
« Reply #30 on: March 07, 2024, 16:35:57 pm » |
|
OK. I do wonder why the all the hundreds and hundreds of folk involved in the project, not one of them has ever come forward to tell the story of how they were faked. They would make a fortune. And yet, nothing.
More like a hundred thousand involved, with regard to the involvement of the supply chain, the parts manufacturers, the broadcasters, Stanley Kubricks team, the film studios, every media outlet in the world, Kettering grammar school physics lecturer, the list is endless. But as you correctly say, NOTHING. They have all got Diamonds are forever in their wankbank. I wonder what effect Project Artemis will have on the simpletons opinions?
|
Were in the pipe 5 by 5.
|
|
|
MCHammer
|
|
« Reply #31 on: March 07, 2024, 16:43:18 pm » |
|
NASA they faked the moon landings FFS FACT.
I mean you literally quoted a NASA article to support your argument earlier in this thread! As for the latest link you supplied. An article posted in 2011 about a known climate change denier, who has no Scientific background whatsoever and has been proven wrong on countless occassions. That's the best you got? Your'e not even trying anymore are you.
|
|
|
|
Manwork04
|
|
« Reply #32 on: March 07, 2024, 16:49:16 pm » |
|
OK. I do wonder why the all the hundreds and hundreds of folk involved in the project, not one of them has ever come forward to tell the story of how they were faked. They would make a fortune. And yet, nothing.
So why do they need to send an unmanned mission to land on the moon, surely it’s all been done before, back in 1968, absolute bôllox, they put men in lower orbit, like the ISS but that’s the furthest a human has ventured off the planet.The radiation would kill them probably before the extreme temperatures. https://www.space.com/33948-van-allen-radiation-belts.htmlhttps://www.space.com/18175-moon-temperature.html
|
Rule Britannia
|
|
|
Tabasco Kid
|
|
« Reply #33 on: March 07, 2024, 17:22:50 pm » |
|
What made you arrive at this opinion then? Personally, I laugh at people who believe this sort of thing. Or ever had a round of golf with Willard Whyte. Its all a bit cheesy.
|
Were in the pipe 5 by 5.
|
|
|
singcobb
|
|
« Reply #34 on: March 07, 2024, 17:35:05 pm » |
|
OK. I do wonder why the all the hundreds and hundreds of folk involved in the project, not one of them has ever come forward to tell the story of how they were faked. They would make a fortune. And yet, nothing.
Thousands of people including contractors etc. However the biggest tell of all is the USSR. Its 1969, the height of the Cold War and you can be sure that the KGB had assets within NASA and if they could have found the tiniest piece of evidence that it was staged Brezhnev would have been shouting it from the top of the Kremlin and the Socialist Worker would have had it as a headline.
|
|
|
|
Bingers
|
|
« Reply #35 on: March 07, 2024, 18:55:23 pm » |
|
Manny says it never happened, Tabasco says it did. Who do you believe?
Tabby every time. Never believe a Manny FACT, they are all made up, mannyfactured, I reckon.
|
The Hotelend Grand National Sweepstake Champion 2015
|
|
|
Tabasco Kid
|
|
« Reply #36 on: March 07, 2024, 19:35:23 pm » |
|
Tabby every time. Never believe a Manny FACT, they are all made up, mannyfactured, I reckon.
Mannyfactured? Another little Bangers gem.
|
Were in the pipe 5 by 5.
|
|
|
Bingers
|
|
« Reply #37 on: March 07, 2024, 20:22:40 pm » |
|
Mannyfactured? Another little Bangers gem. One tries.
|
The Hotelend Grand National Sweepstake Champion 2015
|
|
|
southofthecounty
|
|
« Reply #38 on: March 07, 2024, 21:43:04 pm » |
|
The Van Allen belt boondoggle. The Apollo capsule was shielded against radiation though in fact it hardly needed to be. The speed and trajectory of the vehicle meant that the astronauts were exposed to about as much radiation as you would expect to get from a chest x-ray. The Van Allen belts are not a huge, concentrated sphere of deadly radiation surrounding the whole planet, they form a figure of eight shape and have weaker and stronger areas as well as convergence points where the radiation levels are minimal. Traversing them is not a problem as long as you don’t hang around, and the Apollo vehicles didn’t. As for the risk of the crew being wiped out by an unpredictable solar flare, well, tough cookies if they were. These men were ex-test pilots. They were used to taking risks. It did not have a temperature as on Earth , as there is no air to heat up! So this answer basically refers to the lunar surface, It was lunar morning so it was not as hot as it could get, between the 180 degrees C in the sun and the -160 degrees in shadow . The lunar surface temperature was about 110 C in the sun, where the LM landed. But you have to remember they were wearing suits designed to deal with this ,and because there is no atmosphere it is not like being in an oven. The only way they could get hot was radiant heat from the sun which takes time to heat things up and contact with something warm like the lunar surface. Just a simple thing like having a bright white space suit mean that most of the heat was just reflected away. They also had air conditioning in the suits that could be adjusted as needed. Their boots consisted or an inner boot and an external thickly insulated outer boot. We also have to remember some of the other thigs you have told us. Hoskins is awful. Liz Truss is bound for greatness etc. With a track record like yours, I'm fully expecting Brough to be our first million pound player soon.
|
|
|
|
southofthecounty
|
|
« Reply #39 on: March 07, 2024, 21:45:29 pm » |
|
As to why unmanned? Cheaper, safer, and there's no Cold War competition now.
|
|
|
|
|