Fûck the BBC

[Manwork04]

Can I suggest you go back to your post and re read it.  "the skill is interpreting the information from all sources then using critical thinking to come to a verified conclusion and understanding.
I have followed this process and have to to a conclusion".

If you ingested verified data and the n make a decision what would it be based on ?

[Omega]

Red point one, the implifications of losing this current conflict also affects "millions of people"

Yellow point two, "not the wider global population?  Are you fcuking serious, there are protests worldwide about this issue. Or can you not see this through the walls of your Helvetian castle? Thats either a Freudian slip, or a wind up. My moneys on option two, cos you aint that fcuking stupid. Or at least you werent, before your recent self imposed hiatus.

Thanks for getting the crayons out - not really necessary but if it helps you articulate a point no problem.

You asked me a question to which I replied along with my reasons, in what I thought a polite manner - I also paid you the compliment of engaging in sensible discussion - whilst you may not agree on my opinions that some general global protests, some unpleasent anti jewish actions and halfhearted calls for boycotting Israel do not have the same impact as losing WW11 that is your absolute right - however instead of insulting people why don't you consider cultivating a less rude and condescending tone

One last point here one lives in a Chateau not a castle here.

[Tabasco Kid]

So some general protests, some unpleasent anti semetic actions and halfhearted calls for boycotting Israel - all undesirable but if you think they have the same implication as losing WW11 you have a very strange take on the comparisons..

So instead of insulting people why don't you actually express an view

OK. Unpleasent, halfhearted, and undesirable are your choice of euphemism, not mine. My choice of words would be presented in a much more strident manner. There would be no ambiguity in the matter.
The next world war in my opinion will start in this area, courtesy of Iran, and the US and ourselves will be dragged in. Meanwhile, China looks on with interest and predictably observes that the US is preoccupied, and duly invades Taiwan.
Putin, flush from his success of pulling the wool over everybodys eyes, and securing a "deal" over the occupied parts of Ukraine, turns his attention to the Baltic states, thus dragging NATO into the conflict. North Korea, seizes the opportunity to travel south of the border and further occupy the US attention.  And Turkey invokes the Montreux Convention.  VOILA  WWIII.    And it all started in the Middle East, because everybody knows it.

Losing (or winning) any war has serious implications, both financially and territorially, but I am sure that you did not need that explaining.
Or maybe not..

[U.T.C]

I’m very disappointed by the calibre of guest on Who Do You Think You Are.

[Omega]

OK. Unpleasent, halfhearted, and undesirable are your choice of euphemism, not mine. My choice of words would be presented in a much more strident manner. There would be no ambiguity in the matter.
The next world war in my opinion will start in this area, courtesy of Iran, and the US and ourselves will be dragged in. Meanwhile, China looks on with interest and predictably observes that the US is preoccupied, and duly invades Taiwan.
Putin, flush from his success of pulling the wool over everybodys eyes, and securing a "deal" over the occupied parts of Ukraine, turns his attention to the Baltic states, thus dragging NATO into the conflict. North Korea, seizes the opportunity to travel south of the border and further occupy the US attention.  And Turkey invokes the Montreux Convention.  VOILA  WWIII.    And it all started in the Middle East, because everybody knows it.

Losing (or winning) any war has serious implications, both financially and territorially, but I am sure that you did not need that explaining.
Or maybe not..

It’s interesting an exchange with someone else on this topic and he politely says one of my comments is a bit simplistic- fair point and we go on to have a discussion, exchange and confirm a bit of information. You on the other hand have to include insults in your posts, imply you are intellectually superior and favour strident over considered. It speaks volumes.

[Tabasco Kid]

It’s interesting an exchange with someone else on this topic and he politely says one of my comments is a bit simplistic- fair point and we go on to have a discussion, exchange and confirm a bit of information. You on the other hand have to include insults in your posts, imply you are intellectually superior and favour strident over considered. It speaks volumes.

I did not intend to imply that I am intellectually superior, that was your interpretation of my words. I am just someone who favours straight talking, thats all.

[U.T.C]

Nigella Lawson is a tad embarrassing on her new( to me) cookery show

[DavCobb]

Nigella Lawson is a tad embarrassing on her new( to me) cookery show

Have you just woken from a coma? 

[U.T.C]

Have you just woken from a coma? 

I’ve just started watching TV again, I had an extended break from it.

[Omega]

I did not intend to imply that I am intellectually superior, that was your interpretation of my words. I am just someone who favours straight talking, thats all.

Ok - let’s leave it there then.

[Manwork04]

Ok - let’s leave it there then.

Tabasco 1 Omega 0.

[Omega]

Tabasco 1 Omega 0.

Gary Lineker said it was a score draw 😉

[Manwork04]

Gary Lineker said it was a score draw 😉

Yeah but he shît himself to be fair 😉