Good point, i had forgotten about that article. My take on it was that we may now be looking at hotel/conference centre again and possible expansion of other stands to include more facilities, but still nowhere near the amount of land originally earmarked for development. Which included several hundreds of houses, did it not?
The whole lease situation and what exactly the club have proposed remains unclear. I think Beds is jumping to conclusions at the extreme end of the spectrum. I think the lack of information from the club/council is not helping things.