Youre asking me a question so its only polite of me to answer? So here goes.. Darlington catchment is a quarter of the size of Northamptons and they build a massive 25000 seater stadium that was too big and unsustainable, a redeveloped Sixfields as suggested above would be an excellent stadium in which to attract new supporters from our large catchment, something that little Darlo couldn't.
Beds, you’ve given that response before, once again the lines of communication seems to have failed? Your argument as I understand it, is a bigger better ground would automatically result in attracting more support and revenue as you have alluded to above? Therefore the catchment area of a given club is irrelevant in the context of this particular question. Whether the catchment area is 50,000 or 50,000,000, according to your argument the redevelopment you’re proposing should still result in attracting more punters to the ground? The catchment area becomes relevant with regards to sustainability of the size of the development constructed as you touched on. In the case of Darlington the redevelopment didn’t affect the gate which appears to contradict your argument regarding the attraction of a quality stadium? It’s a genuine point, my main concern would be that the club would over expose itself financially. If it does then we would possibly go down the toilet, and neither of us want that? I know there’s been a bit of leg pulling on this, but I do find the different positions supporters take on this really interesting. Don’t get me wrong, there obviously is a need for stadiums of the type you call for, but I believe these should be a natural consequence of the performance of a club. It seems your proposal is that the stadium is the catalyst of success and that is a very different proposition?