Once again Beds with all due respect you have read both me and my stance incorrectly. I am no advocate for things to continue as they are. I think that any structure that allows an ownership that serves the interests of the board more than those of the supporters is misguided and flawed at best. Sixfields is far from ideal and I felt totally underwhelmed with it from the day it was built. From day one there was a crushing disappointment and sense of an opportunity missed. However, my point is that the proposals you have put up on here are unworkable and occasionaly nothing more than ridiculous jargon. The problem is that any sensible debate that could be had about possibilities for change gets hijacked with barmy rhetoric and any credibility that the debate might have, however small gets destroyed in the process. What you fail to realise is that you are actually assisting people like KT and Cardoza because many people may see the alternative as a bunch of lunatics in charge of the asylum. Even now despite laying my cards on the table and revealing that I own and operate multi million pound businesses that by the way were entirely self financed which you claim is the goal has done nothing to temper your opinion. Just perhaps I might have something valuable to offer, after all I belong to the group that you claim to want to influence and attract to the club. A lifelong supporter and owner of multi million pound businesses one with a registered office in Northampton no less. However, god forbid you acknowledge that someone may have a credible alternative based on experience and track record, you miss the opportunity and continue blindly on and on turning most intelligent people off the debate and forcing them to believe that the current arrangement is the only credible one. Ironically it turns out that you are probably the greatest asset KT and his cronies have on here. No offence.
No offence taken, but I see for the first time you now have actually proposed your preferred way forward as opposed to pour cold water on any ideas put forward without offering an alternative solution.
So you like the German 51% ownership method, great, but now show how it would work within our structure?