So the Trust Board shouldn't do or say anything without a referendum of the membership? Is that what you are saying?
No, the original point many moons ago was the trust was trying to establish the feasibility of community ownership. Perhaps it would have been an idea to canvas the entire membership to establish the true enthusiasm for the concept and perhaps ask some other relevant questions such as would you be willing to purchase a shareholding, and by how much? By way of an answer I believe it is perhaps the best way forward, yes and a couple of grand. I then suggested that it was a source of frustration for me that the trust wasn’t being more proactive with the membership and instigating more input. I conceded at the time I was guilty of not making an effort to engage myself, but the point was the Trust appears to be struggling a little bit with membership and the launch of the forum demonstrated they were trying to address this. I thought it a nice and simple solution that was really made with the best intentions by someone who happens to be fond of the trust. However, it has not gone as well as I had hoped?