OK Deepcut you win, I apologise. Would 'acceptance' be better than 'support' then.
As I can't recall you posting anything against it. Please point to your posts if i'm wrong.
You are very quick in your nit-picking of myself and others yet very very slow at posting anything that could remotely be negative as far as KT is concerned.
Shame, your first sentence satisfied my request, then you continued with a couple of unsubstantiated allegations and/or attributions that ruined it.
You assume that because I do not comment against something, it means that I endorse or accept it?
You accuse me of nit picking of yourself and 'others'?
I call it constructively criticising or providing my opinion about posts where I believe that something or someone, purely in my opinion, is wrong.
I normally fire and forget if my comment does receive a response and/or doesn't attract a response that requires further pursuance.
I do respond and/or comment about posts or information provided by those associated with those posts/information that can I believe can have an effect with those who post on here. You do not know if I provide comment or opinion on other forums or medium?
If KT/DB posted on here and I disagreed or felt the need to question or disagree with them, I would. They don't, so I don't have the opportunity to post anything negative that would affect their work through this medium.
I choose my 'battles' in order to give me the best effect or method of success to win the 'war'. Criticising KT/DB on here is not one of those battles.
I am a life member of The Trust, The Trust have that opportunity and are asking the questions that need to be asked (and answered) of them on my and the other Trust members behalf. I have never criticised the intent, I have however criticised the method of achieving that intent, in a constructive way. If you and the Trust Board do not acknowledge that, then there is a problem with The Trust Board and it's perceived/believed representation of it's members.
I do not know if my constructive criticism has had an effect, but I do know that the latest Trust Board response to the notice of a fan being elected to the NTFC Board was a definite improvement on what has gone before and I did acknowledge that on here.
I acknowledge your enthusiasm and declared motivation but criticise/comment on your continual one sided and repetitive posts that, in my opinion, are damaging the support of The Trust to the wider (within this message boards limitation) fan base. You need to stop posting from the hip, repeating the same mantra, assuming that anyone who doesn't necessarily agree with you is pro KT/DB.
You would probably be surprised at how many agree with your basic message, but are put off by your aggressive and repetitious method of hi-jacking the majority of conversations, with dubious 'factual' statements which has now become background or white noise to me, if not the many more.
Allow others to have an opinion and listen to them without aggressively telling them that they are wrong. Be more frugal and succinct with your contributions, responding directly in a balanced way to the concern(s) that are expressed and you might have greater success.
Your contribution, performance and statements on here, as a co-opted member of The Trust Board, isn't encouraging anyone to join or even get back on board with The Trust, I believe that you are actually doing more harm than good in that respect.
I am a Trust member and like the majority want the best for NTFC. If that is through The Trust or by utilising other methods then so be it. Banging on what is currently a closed/locked door doesn't deploy resources to the best effect. That door needs to be opened or at least unlocked. The current methods deployed by The Trust do not appear to be achieving that minimum.
This is constructive criticism, not nit picking, just so that you do not confuse the two again.