I've read your answers in red Sing and the funny thing is, you and Random do not disagree about anything arising from his nine points.
You accept every single one.
Your assertion that the Trust couldn't do any better is irrelevant.
The question is, could and should the clubs owners be doing so if they have the best interests of the club at heart?
We all agree they should be doing better, to varying degrees. Hence the reason it makes Randoms points actually POINTLESS. It’s the fact that we disagree on the path to achieving those things.
The owners certainly do have long term plans for the club. They’re just a total contrast to what was originally said, and not in line with some peoples thoughts. They see a sustainable model through enabling development. At the moment, regardless of countless attempts happy some to highlight their concerns on this, it appears to have fallen on deaf ears.