I meant since the presentation went to WNC
By your logic we should ask to see all the invoices when KT says he spent £500k more than income
The documents have been seen by solicitors, they are real and true
It’s obviously something you don’t want to believe. Fine that’s up to you
Contrary to what you might think I happy to believe things but I like to see evidence/proof and hear the whole story from both sides rather than just taking the word of an inidvidual or an single organisation.
In fairness the Trust Board and it's foot soldiers have history in delivering partial truths or presenting facts in a way that omits key information to paint a picture. I think it's a fair question to ask what exactly the evidence is, how it was obtained and why only certain individuals have the priviledge of seeing or knowing about this information. I mean it's almost like you are acting in the same secretive way as the very owners you detest.
In my view the Trust should be the shining example of openess and transparency because if they do they set the standard that can be expected from all others. Members/supporters should be able ask and have answered anything. They should be able to view any correspondence, read minutes from any meeting and so on. Complete transparency should surely be the goal and that then enables all supporters to have all the information they need to form an opinion. Imagine how freeing it would be for everyone involved. Actually trusting the membership/supporters to form their own opinion and galvanise support.
As the Trust have been at pains to point out on many occasions regarding our club ownership the moment someone won't answer a question or provide evidence/information you start to wonder why that is and if there is something to hide.
So going back to my original question what is the evidence, what does it show, how was it obtained and why are only certain individuals allowed to see it?
