Keith,
I asked this at 1640hrs yesterday, in amongst the others, it appears that you missed responding?
Thanks...
In fairness DC I think Keth answered more or less the same question when I asked it.
So, if I'm reading this correctly, essentially you've seen evidence of the initial sale, but not of any subsequent transactions that may or may not have followed in the fallout from the breakdown of the deal?
Correct. It's unknown to all but those involved.
So neither the Trust nor anyone else outside KT, DB, 5USports and any intermediaries have any evidence of what happened subsequent to the original transaction. This makes certain accusations made by some people little more than insinuation and supposition with no evidence to back it up.
Maybe the owners did trouser a few million, maybe the payment itself never materialised in full, maybe they gave it back... I've no more of a clue than anyone else but I certainly don't see it as a valid stick to beat them with.
The usual response to this is "KT could clear all this up if he wanted to" but something clearly went badly wrong in the transaction meaning some sort of agreement must have been made at some point to draw the whole mess to a close, and I'd be amazed if that didn't come with a mutual NDA attached.