So in one post you criticise accumulating debt and in the next you run off a string of clubs with debt that dwarfs ours. Peterborough £14 million, at Brentford the owner is in for £100 million, MK £13 million in debt, over at Rotherham Tony Stewart is reportedly in for £50 million etc. So which is it, eye watering debt or not and if the former who exactly is putting there hand in their pocket? You must have had another bang on the head? I’m sorry but if you are going to keep coming out with these ridiculous statements you have to realise they will inevitably get shoved back up your arśe.
For most these clubs those debts are chicken feed. Yes they show up on the accounts but they have a good income streams, play higher up the leagues and subsequently have attracted substantial investments..
It's only when you deliberately remain a lowly league club, attracting very little investment, suffer growth stagnation it becomes a major problem..
Growth is good, stagnation not.