The Hotel End
June 20, 2019, 19:14:04 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
  Home Help Search Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Redevelopment Closer Than Ever?

Pages: 1 ... 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 [1193] 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 ... 1256   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Redevelopment Closer Than Ever?  (Read 964934 times)
Terryfenwickatemyhamster
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2543


View Profile
« Reply #23840 on: January 14, 2019, 11:14:24 am »

isn't calling Peterborough, scum defamation ?

 Certainly hope so..  Grin Grin
Report Spam   Logged
random
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 745


View Profile
« Reply #23841 on: January 14, 2019, 11:58:04 am »

LOL
 Grin
Report Spam   Logged
guest3245
Guest
« Reply #23842 on: January 14, 2019, 14:49:08 pm »

Compared with quite a few L2 and even some L1 grounds we are an acceptable "dump". Have you been to Fratton Park or Luton for that matter? They are real dumps and at Fratton Park the toilets are so old fashioned you literally stand in rivers of urine. That's if you can reach them in the first case. As for amenities at both they are terrible. Frankly you are speaking out of your backside.

Oh Evers, you young scally-wag.  You do make me chuckle at times.

If you were a fish, you'd spend most of your time flapping about on dry land with a hook in your mouth.

Would you like to re-read my post, consider the information provided, and once you've used your considerable knowledge of Sixfields, re-formulate your response?
Report Spam   Logged
cobblerwatch
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2004


View Profile
« Reply #23843 on: January 14, 2019, 16:11:01 pm »

I love Fratton park. I loved the old Moyes end at the scum.

I like the character and atmosphere that comes with the old grounds.

I think we all from a certain era love the old grounds - they had a smell (generally unpleasant), they had a fear factor and they belonged to the fans - atmosphere never created in the newer ground (maybe the architecture but more likely the type of fans that now attend)
Report Spam   Logged
everbrite
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13360


Suffer fools gladly


View Profile
« Reply #23844 on: January 14, 2019, 16:22:04 pm »

Oh Evers, you young scally-wag.  You do make me chuckle at times.

If you were a fish, you'd spend most of your time flapping about on dry land with a hook in your mouth.

Would you like to re-read my post, consider the information provided, and once you've used your considerable knowledge of Sixfields, re-formulate your response?

Ha Ha - I asked you a question. Were you blindfolded when you went to Stanley,Oldham, Luton and Pompey.  Obviously you were. These a poor grounds and there are more no better than sixfields ; FGR for example.
Report Spam   Logged

Don't mistake activity for achievement
DrillingCobbler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4602


View Profile
« Reply #23845 on: January 14, 2019, 16:54:25 pm »

Factoring in capacity, corporate facilities, general state of ground etc...but most importantly, being able to make money out of it...I reckon, worse than Sixfields:

League2:

Forest Green
Stevenage
Newport
Crawley
Cheltenham
Morecambe
Macclesfield

League1:

Accrington
Fleetwood
AFC Wimbledon

*Luton is an utter dump but capacity is over 10,000 and they also have numerous boxes.
*Fleetwood is debatable given its excellent facilities, its just got a very small capacity.
*Wimbledon are having a new ground built, as ar Forest Green. Luton are also making good progress in that regard.

So out of the 92, I reckon theres 10 grounds that are worse than ours.

Interestingly, none of those grounds are big towns/cities. Even with my claret tinted glasses off, we should be a considerably bigger club than any of those on my list, due to catchment area.

When we moved into Sixfields we had a very decent 4th division ground, but so many clubs have moved on since then and our ground is now incredibly worse than what it was when we moved in!

I find it incredible how anybody can even debate otherwise, its plain silly. It needs sorting and the current owners are not doing it. Despite promising to do so on their arrival.


« Last Edit: January 14, 2019, 16:56:59 pm by DrillingCobbler » Report Spam   Logged
GrangeParkCobbler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5545


View Profile
« Reply #23846 on: January 14, 2019, 17:10:18 pm »

Factoring in capacity, corporate facilities, general state of ground etc...but most importantly, being able to make money out of it...I reckon, worse than Sixfields:

League2:

Forest Green
Stevenage
Newport
Crawley
Cheltenham
Morecambe
Macclesfield

League1:

Accrington
Fleetwood
AFC Wimbledon

*Luton is an utter dump but capacity is over 10,000 and they also have numerous boxes.
*Fleetwood is debatable given its excellent facilities, its just got a very small capacity.
*Wimbledon are having a new ground built, as ar Forest Green. Luton are also making good progress in that regard.

So out of the 92, I reckon theres 10 grounds that are worse than ours.

Interestingly, none of those grounds are big towns/cities. Even with my claret tinted glasses off, we should be a considerably bigger club than any of those on my list, due to catchment area.

When we moved into Sixfields we had a very decent 4th division ground, but so many clubs have moved on since then and our ground is now incredibly worse than what it was when we moved in!

I find it incredible how anybody can even debate otherwise, its plain silly. It needs sorting and the current owners are not doing it. Despite promising to do so on their arrival.




Not a bad summary.......i'd like to add Scunny to the list, the first of the new grounds....opened in 1988, looks very tired now. Maybe Sixfields will look similarly tired in a few years time!
Report Spam   Logged

The Hotel End GTA Champion 2006/7, 2007/8, 2011/12, 2012/13 and 2018/19
everbrite
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13360


Suffer fools gladly


View Profile
« Reply #23847 on: January 14, 2019, 17:39:41 pm »

Factoring in capacity, corporate facilities, general state of ground etc...but most importantly, being able to make money out of it...I reckon, worse than Sixfields:

League2:

Forest Green
Stevenage
Newport
Crawley
Cheltenham
Morecambe
Macclesfield

League1:

Accrington
Fleetwood
AFC Wimbledon

*Luton is an utter dump but capacity is over 10,000 and they also have numerous boxes.
*Fleetwood is debatable given its excellent facilities, its just got a very small capacity.
*Wimbledon are having a new ground built, as ar Forest Green. Luton are also making good progress in that regard.

So out of the 92, I reckon theres 10 grounds that are worse than ours.

Interestingly, none of those grounds are big towns/cities. Even with my claret tinted glasses off, we should be a considerably bigger club than any of those on my list, due to catchment area.

When we moved into Sixfields we had a very decent 4th division ground, but so many clubs have moved on since then and our ground is now incredibly worse than what it was when we moved in!

I find it incredible how anybody can even debate otherwise, its plain silly. It needs sorting and the current owners are not doing it. Despite promising to do so on their arrival.

Thank you for identifying at least 10 possible worse grounds(you forgot Mansfield and possibly Burton)) than Sixfields. Your point about Sixfields failing to be developed over the years is reasonable.  I would say that when CW moved on then any hope of ground development went with him. The team faltered and the succession of managers proved unsettling.  Perhaps and I hope Curle is the new CW to inspire us to greater things. What ever people say it is a catlayst we need first; with team improvent and increased support. People do like putting the cart before the horse on here.
« Last Edit: January 14, 2019, 21:48:50 pm by everbrite » Report Spam   Logged

Don't mistake activity for achievement
meccanostand
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1063


View Profile
« Reply #23848 on: January 14, 2019, 17:42:44 pm »

Factoring in capacity, corporate facilities, general state of ground etc...but most importantly, being able to make money out of it...I reckon, worse than Sixfields:

League2:

Forest Green
Stevenage
Newport
Crawley
Cheltenham
Morecambe
Macclesfield

League1:

Accrington
Fleetwood
AFC Wimbledon

*Luton is an utter dump but capacity is over 10,000 and they also have numerous boxes.
*Fleetwood is debatable given its excellent facilities, its just got a very small capacity.
*Wimbledon are having a new ground built, as ar Forest Green. Luton are also making good progress in that regard.

So out of the 92, I reckon theres 10 grounds that are worse than ours.

Interestingly, none of those grounds are big towns/cities. Even with my claret tinted glasses off, we should be a considerably bigger club than any of those on my list, due to catchment area.

When we moved into Sixfields we had a very decent 4th division ground, but so many clubs have moved on since then and our ground is now incredibly worse than what it was when we moved in!

I find it incredible how anybody can even debate otherwise, its plain silly. It needs sorting and the current owners are not doing it. Despite promising to do so on their arrival.




Andy Holt is making great strides at Accrington including ground improvements. Their "matchday experience" now outstrips ours. Obviously Wimbledon have a new stadium on the way so that list is getting smaller.
Report Spam   Logged
BedsCobb
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 2384


View Profile
« Reply #23849 on: January 14, 2019, 18:27:50 pm »

So the only grounds deemed as bad as Sixfields are those small town clubs newly arrived from the non league, so shouldn't be expected to compete with a much larger sized towns club thats spent 100 years in the football league!  Fleetwood  Morecambe and forest green have superb facilities for towns that have just 20,000 inhabitants, so shouldn't be on the list as they are as good as they can expect.
The other Traditional non league clubs Accrington and Macclesfield are punching so far above their weights, the humble facilities they have , has served then incredibly well.
Stevenage is infested with spurs arsenal and west ham fans so will never be a big draw but saying that, excellent big club house, supporters bar, the away end is quality and they are building a new stand behind the other goal so really ideal for them, so no place on the list for them.
So that leaves just Cheltenham and Newport, the former has a tidy ground and has reasonable facilities for a club that spent most of its time in the non league, so again as much as could be expected.
Newport...  An absolute basket case of a club, spent decades out the league playing wherever they can.
Currently playing at Newport Gwent  Dragons rugby ground, only 3000 turn up for league games despite the size of Newport, maybe Cardiff city going at it in the prem effects the gate?
Anyway, playing at Rodney parade still allows them to compete for promotion as well as regularly playing prem sides in the later rounds of the fa cup, something we unable to do.
Based on ability to  cater for big game capacity and allowing for potential support base growth, matchday facilities,  atmosphere and a ground fans want to return time and again, I would say when all things are considered  us and Newport are level bottom.
Report Spam   Logged
Vintage Cobbler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2275


View Profile
« Reply #23850 on: January 14, 2019, 18:52:28 pm »

I have to disagree with the views of Everbrite and others of that school of thought who argue that you need to create a successful team before you develop the ground.  It is narrow one dimensional thinking.  

Our much needed redevelopment is not just about what happens on the pitch on every other Saturday and occasionally on a Tuesday but to create a stadium with facilities that attract people to spend money at the venue 7 days a week.  

Let me give a concrete example of what I am talking about.  I live and work in the West Midlands.  Worcester RFC is situated just off J6 of the M5 (not much unlike NTFC situated close to 3 M1 junctions) and in recent years demolished a stand worse than our original East Stand and in its place constructed an impressive new stand with restaurants, meeting rooms of various sizes and corporate hospitality boxes. I am not a rugby person but I have been there several times during non-match days at different times and the place has been heaving with people attending training sessions for their companies, marketing functions and so on.  Just outside this stand a John Lloyd Leisure Centre has been built and has a lot of members.  I could go on. Clearly, the club is enjoying a significant income from non-rugby activities that must be of great benefit.  This simple example gives you and outline of what could and indeed should have happened at Sixfields. If supporters cannot see the bigger picture there is no hope and we will continue to be putty in the hands of our owners.

PS. Worcester RFC was recently sold to new owners and the local businessman who developed the ground walked away with a substantial sum of money.
Report Spam   Logged
Manwork04
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2535



View Profile
« Reply #23851 on: January 14, 2019, 18:56:00 pm »

Thank you for identifying at least 10 possible worse grounds(you forgot Mansfield and possibly Burton)) than Sixfields. Your point about Sixfields failing to be developed over the years is reasonable.  I would say that when CW moved on then any hope of ground development went with him. The team faltered and the succession of managers proved unsettling.  Perhaps and I hope Curle is the new CW to inspire us to greater things. What ever people say it is a catlayst we need first; with team improvent and increased support. People do like putting the cart before the horse on here.
Mansfield's ground is miles better than Sixfields.
9.5k capacity for a start, you really do talk utter tripe Evers.
« Last Edit: January 14, 2019, 18:58:01 pm by Manwork04 » Report Spam   Logged

Rule Britannia
Vintage Cobbler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2275


View Profile
« Reply #23852 on: January 14, 2019, 18:56:57 pm »

And for the doubters take a look for yourselves

https://warriors.co.uk/warriors-hospitality/

Over to you Mr Thomas (3.5 years later)
Report Spam   Logged
Manwork04
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2535



View Profile
« Reply #23853 on: January 14, 2019, 18:59:42 pm »

And for the doubters take a look for yourselves

https://warriors.co.uk/warriors-hospitality/

Over to you Mr Thomas (3.5 years later)
I thought it was a picture of Carrs bar for a min  Grin
Report Spam   Logged

Rule Britannia
Boring Bar Steward
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 123


View Profile
« Reply #23854 on: January 14, 2019, 19:02:20 pm »

I have to disagree with the views of Everbrite and others of that school of thought who argue that you need to create a successful team before you develop the ground.  It is narrow one dimensional thinking.  

Our much needed redevelopment is not just about what happens on the pitch on every other Saturday and occasionally on a Tuesday but to create a stadium with facilities that attract people to spend money at the venue 7 days a week.  

Let me give a concrete example of what I am talking about.  I live and work in the West Midlands.  Worcester RFC is situated just off J6 of the M5 (not much unlike NTFC situated close to 3 M1 junctions) and in recent years demolished a stand worse than our original East Stand and in its place constructed an impressive new stand with restaurants, meeting rooms of various sizes and corporate hospitality boxes. I am not a rugby person but I have been there several times during non-match days at different times and the place has been heaving with people attending training sessions for their companies, marketing functions and so on.  Just outside this stand a John Lloyd Leisure Centre has been built and has a lot of members.  I could go on. Clearly, the club is enjoying a significant income from non-rugby activities that must be of great benefit.  This simple example gives you and outline of what could and indeed should have happened at Sixfields. If supporters cannot see the bigger picture there is no hope and we will continue to be putty in the hands of our owners.

PS. Worcester RFC was recently sold to new owners and the local businessman who developed the ground walked away with a substantial sum of money.
You highlight my biggest frustration.
The potential offield business is available, the corporate boxes were ALL verbally spoken for!

What NTFC require is an entrepreneur to be the catalyst to give the Cobblers the facilities, which in turn would offer the team a sustainable longterm backing.

Where is he/her/them?Huh??
Report Spam   Logged
meccanostand
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1063


View Profile
« Reply #23855 on: January 14, 2019, 19:17:26 pm »

I have to disagree with the views of Everbrite and others of that school of thought who argue that you need to create a successful team before you develop the ground.  It is narrow one dimensional thinking.  

Our much needed redevelopment is not just about what happens on the pitch on every other Saturday and occasionally on a Tuesday but to create a stadium with facilities that attract people to spend money at the venue 7 days a week.  

Let me give a concrete example of what I am talking about.  I live and work in the West Midlands.  Worcester RFC is situated just off J6 of the M5 (not much unlike NTFC situated close to 3 M1 junctions) and in recent years demolished a stand worse than our original East Stand and in its place constructed an impressive new stand with restaurants, meeting rooms of various sizes and corporate hospitality boxes. I am not a rugby person but I have been there several times during non-match days at different times and the place has been heaving with people attending training sessions for their companies, marketing functions and so on.  Just outside this stand a John Lloyd Leisure Centre has been built and has a lot of members.  I could go on. Clearly, the club is enjoying a significant income from non-rugby activities that must be of great benefit.  This simple example gives you and outline of what could and indeed should have happened at Sixfields. If supporters cannot see the bigger picture there is no hope and we will continue to be putty in the hands of our owners.

PS. Worcester RFC was recently sold to new owners and the local businessman who developed the ground walked away with a substantial sum of money.

Yes and we need to build a club that the large companies based in the region want to associate with.
Report Spam   Logged
Vintage Cobbler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2275


View Profile
« Reply #23856 on: January 14, 2019, 19:20:38 pm »

Absolutely agree meccano but it's time for the present owners to go their way. They have had more than long enough.
Report Spam   Logged
BedsCobb
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 2384


View Profile
« Reply #23857 on: January 14, 2019, 19:33:43 pm »



Where is he/her/them?Huh??
They are currently outside but struggling to get past the immovable objects laying in their way.
Report Spam   Logged
Zen Master
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2140


Taxi to Kings Heath mate?


View Profile
« Reply #23858 on: January 14, 2019, 20:11:24 pm »

And for the doubters take a look for yourselves

https://warriors.co.uk/warriors-hospitality/


The South Stand shown on here is a similar “better” layout of what the East could be if ever finished.
Report Spam   Logged

I think someone should just take this city of Peterborough and just... just flush it down the f***in' toilet
Vintage Cobbler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2275


View Profile
« Reply #23859 on: January 14, 2019, 20:22:23 pm »

The new main stand to which I was referring cost, if I recall correctly, about £6m.  You can see a photo of it on the home page of Worcester's website. It is very impressive inside, much more so than the photos show. Lifts and a sense of size.  Worcester RFC was owned for years and until recently by successful local businessman. You have to ask yourself why Northampton with a population more than double the size of Worcester cannot do the same when it comes to NTFC.
Report Spam   Logged
Pages: 1 ... 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 [1193] 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 ... 1256   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Parental guidance is urged as this messageboard may not be suitable for all persons especially those under the age of 16 as the forums may contain words, phrases and expressions not considered appropriate for a younger audience so please express caution. If any posts in the forums offend you, please let us know and we will look at them and if we agree with your complaint, we will remove them. You are personally responsible and potentially liable for the contents of your posting and may be sued should your posting contain content of a defamatory or other illegal nature. Every message posted leaves a traceable IP number. We check the forums at various times of the day and remove offending posts. Other supporters are welcome but abusive or silly posts will be removed and the offenders potentially barred from future access to the site. We advise that you never reveal any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example: telephone number, home address or email address), and please do not include postal addresses of any kind. This messageboard is not endorsed or in any way affiliated with Northampton Town FC. All postings on this board become copyright of The Hotel End & may not be reproduced without the permission of the board administrator. By signing up to this message board you agree to this. The Hotel End cannot be held liable for the actions or postings of its members. The Hotel End reserve the right to edit, delete, move or close any thread for any reason. The Hotel End may disclose user information to government authorities at their discretion or when required by law. The Hotel End may also disclose user information when The Hotel End has reason to believe that someone is causing injury to or interference with its rights or property, other The Hotel End users, or anyone else that could be harmed by such activities. By registering for The Hotel End, you agree to indemnify The Hotel End its representatives, and agents, and hold them harmless from any and all claims (including claims for legal fees) which may arise from your participation on the The Hotel End. You also agree that The Hotel End is not responsible for the materials posted by users of The Hotel End. In addition, you grant The Hotel End and its affiliates, worldwide, royalty-free perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive right and license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display any message or content posted on The Hotel End and/or e-mail sent by you to The Hotel End (in whole or in part). The Hotel End reserves the right to make the rules up as it goes along. Thank you - The Hotel End I love Quidco
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMFServer.com - Create your own Forum

Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy