The Hotel End
May 18, 2022, 17:29:47 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
  Home Help Search Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Redevelopment Closer Than Ever?

Pages: 1 ... 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 [1474] 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 ... 1697   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Redevelopment Closer Than Ever?  (Read 1287018 times)
Shoemaker
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6337


View Profile
« Reply #29460 on: October 07, 2021, 18:32:43 pm »

Anyone wish to agree or disagree with this stance? Just so I can see what the "majority" think.......(the majority of posters on here that is!)
That’s fair enough

You’ll never convince me that a trust that was set up as the first to gain a place on a football club board was right to give up its hard earned place and then given the chance to regain it , decided to decline.

Is that not a fair statement.

Imo a new supporters board is needed who won’t capitulate
WILL have board representation and WiLL be open and transparent.

It’s not asking the earth is it???
Report Spam   Logged
BackOfTheNet
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4695


View Profile
« Reply #29461 on: October 07, 2021, 18:39:18 pm »

Anyone wish to agree or disagree with this stance? Just so I can see what the "majority" think.......(the majority of posters on here that is!)

I agree, sort of. I used the very phrase "not fit for purpose" in relation to the Trust only 3 days ago when talking to Random.

That said, I kind of understand why they didn't put anyone forward for the fans role on the board. Having said that, given the field, if there had been an "official" Trust candidate they would almost certainly have won!

I'm not in favour of disbanding the Trust though. I think they still have a role to play, they just have a very long way to go to make themselves relevant again because, as Deepcut so eloquently put it earlier, they seem to have wandered off on their own without bothering to see if anyone was following them.
Report Spam   Logged

The Hotelend Grand National* Sweepstake Champion 2020
Shoemaker
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6337


View Profile
« Reply #29462 on: October 07, 2021, 18:42:54 pm »

I agree, sort of. I used the very phrase "not fit for purpose" in relation to the Trust only 3 days ago when talking to Random.

That said, I kind of understand why they didn't put anyone forward for the fans role on the board. Having said that, given the field, if there had been an "official" Trust candidate they would almost certainly have won!

I'm not in favour of disbanding the Trust though. I think they still have a role to play, they just have a very long way to go to make themselves relevant again because, as Deepcut so eloquently put it earlier, they seem to have wandered off on their own without bothering to see if anyone was following them.
Report Spam   Logged
GrangeParkCobbler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8597


View Profile
« Reply #29463 on: October 07, 2021, 18:50:00 pm »

That’s fair enough

You’ll never convince me that a trust that was set up as the first to gain a place on a football club board was right to give up its hard earned place and then given the chance to regain it , decided to decline.

Is that not a fair statement.

Imo a new supporters board is needed who won’t capitulate
WILL have board representation and WiLL be open and transparent.

It’s not asking the earth is it???

For me....no, its not a fair statement!! As previously posted the fact is that the new owners, led by KT did not want supporter representation on the Board, it was a deal breaker. Are you seriously suggesting that the Trust should and possibly could have forced the club under by sticking to a point of principle?

Andy Clarke was the last holder of the position of Director as part of the old setup under Cardoza, but he resigned around two months before the takeover was completed due to his part in the signing of certain drawdown documents between the Council and the then owners. An interim Director was identified but I don't believe was ever appointed as by that time the crisis had erupted and takeover talks were in progress.
Kelvin Thomas made it a condition of the takeover partly based on the fact that the Trust director had done what he had done so was wary of the Trust's role in the club pre-takeover.

The Trust Board at the time did not want to give up that place but based upon the deal that was on the table, the "promises" that were being made by the incoming owners they did what they believed was in the best interests of the club at the time and stepped aside (with another Trust brokered rescue deal also on the table) in favour of the deal presented by KT.

Now, fast forward six years and a hastily rushed through scheme to bring in a "fans director" was announced. The Trust were not explicitly given the chance to regain a place as the place that was on offer was for an "independent individual", so that chance was as open to the Trust as it was to any member of Joe Public. If a Trust Director had decided to stand and apply for said position there is no doubt at all that they would have had to resign from the Trust board, therefore the position on the Clubs Board was NEVER going to be filled by "The Trust"

Now, if KT had come along to the Trust and offered that place back in its original guise and the Trust had declined you could rightfully claim what you are claiming, but that isn't and wasn't the case.

Is that difficult to understand??
Report Spam   Logged

The Hotel End GTA Champion 2006/7, 2007/8, 2011/12, 2012/13 and 2018/19
random
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1365


View Profile
« Reply #29464 on: October 07, 2021, 18:53:08 pm »

Yes if you got 10000 others to commit to a three year standing order too.
That should just about cover some of the outgoings we'd need.

you do know that 10,000 x £20 = £200,000 per month £2.4m per year £7.2m over 3 years?

Or was it a typo and you meant 1000 ?  Cos given the right circumstances that is more than achievable

Also this is for infrastructure / project improvements not paying our star strikers wages  Smiley Smiley



« Last Edit: October 07, 2021, 18:58:51 pm by random » Report Spam   Logged
Shoemaker
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6337


View Profile
« Reply #29465 on: October 07, 2021, 18:58:22 pm »

I agree, sort of. I used the very phrase "not fit for purpose" in relation to the Trust only 3 days ago when talking to Random.

That said, I kind of understand why they didn't put anyone forward for the fans role on the board. Having said that, given the field, if there had been an "official" Trust candidate they would almost certainly have won!

I'm not in favour of disbanding the Trust though. I think they still have a role to play, they just have a very long way to go to make themselves relevant again because, as Deepcut so eloquently put it earlier, they seem to have wandered off on their own without bothering to see if anyone was following them.
Can anyone come on here and explain how they are fit for purpose??
There whole being was having a seat on the board.
They’ve given one up.
They’ve declined the offer to stand to regain a place on the board.

How can they still be relevant given THEIR choices.

I’ve met many board members and they are decent people , they really are, but the club needs much better representation and a new trust that can work with the club, have board representation and report to fans rather than make ‘executive’ decisions

The trust imo is currently just a clique of rebel rousers who have an aim of fan ownership with no blueprint(even random admits they haven’t canvassed opinion) in how to achieve it.

Fans are actually paying for this level of incompetence.

Things need to move on if there is to be a group of fans who will hold the club to account.
The current trust have proved not once but twice
that they have failed the fan base but somehow think they have the right to represent fans views  Tongue

Imo a new supporters group is needed that can report to the fans, have democratically elected members who will hold the club to account, will have ONE travel club and have the backing of the majority of fans.
We will soon have a new fans rep on the board and imo he needs to address this rather than go backwards to a trust that has become increasingly distant from the club and the fans who pay money for it to represent.

Can anyone argue against this??
Report Spam   Logged
Terryfenwickatemyhamster
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3638


View Profile
« Reply #29466 on: October 07, 2021, 19:05:33 pm »

For me....no, its not a fair statement!! As previously posted the fact is that the new owners, led by KT did not want supporter representation on the Board, it was a deal breaker. Are you seriously suggesting that the Trust should and possibly could have forced the club under by sticking to a point of principle?

Andy Clarke was the last holder of the position of Director as part of the old setup under Cardoza, but he resigned around two months before the takeover was completed due to his part in the signing of certain drawdown documents between the Council and the then owners. An interim Director was identified but I don't believe was ever appointed as by that time the crisis had erupted and takeover talks were in progress.
Kelvin Thomas made it a condition of the takeover partly based on the fact that the Trust director had done what he had done so was wary of the Trust's role in the club pre-takeover.

The Trust Board at the time did not want to give up that place but based upon the deal that was on the table, the "promises" that were being made by the incoming owners they did what they believed was in the best interests of the club at the time and stepped aside (with another Trust brokered rescue deal also on the table) in favour of the deal presented by KT.

Now, fast forward six years and a hastily rushed through scheme to bring in a "fans director" was announced. The Trust were not explicitly given the chance to regain a place as the place that was on offer was for an "independent individual", so that chance was as open to the Trust as it was to any member of Joe Public. If a Trust Director had decided to stand and apply for said position there is no doubt at all that they would have had to resign from the Trust board, therefore the position on the Clubs Board was NEVER going to be filled by "The Trust"

Now, if KT had come along to the Trust and offered that place back in its original guise and the Trust had declined you could rightfully claim what you are claiming, but that isn't and wasn't the case.

Is that difficult to understand??

So in keeping with Rogers new rule. Is that a post from a Trust board member. Or as a standard contributor to this site…

BTW. Your version of events is a lot more simplistic than what actually happened. But I have lot of time for the people involved at that time. So I’ll leave that where it is.
Report Spam   Logged
Shoemaker
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6337


View Profile
« Reply #29467 on: October 07, 2021, 19:06:03 pm »

For me....no, its not a fair statement!! As previously posted the fact is that the new owners, led by KT did not want supporter representation on the Board, it was a deal breaker. Are you seriously suggesting that the Trust should and possibly could have forced the club under by sticking to a point of principle?

Andy Clarke was the last holder of the position of Director as part of the old setup under Cardoza, but he resigned around two months before the takeover was completed due to his part in the signing of certain drawdown documents between the Council and the then owners. An interim Director was identified but I don't believe was ever appointed as by that time the crisis had erupted and takeover talks were in progress.
Kelvin Thomas made it a condition of the takeover partly based on the fact that the Trust director had done what he had done so was wary of the Trust's role in the club pre-takeover.

The Trust Board at the time did not want to give up that place but based upon the deal that was on the table, the "promises" that were being made by the incoming owners they did what they believed was in the best interests of the club at the time and stepped aside (with another Trust brokered rescue deal also on the table) in favour of the deal presented by KT.

Now, fast forward six years and a hastily rushed through scheme to bring in a "fans director" was announced. The Trust were not explicitly given the chance to regain a place as the place that was on offer was for an "independent individual", so that chance was as open to the Trust as it was to any member of Joe Public. If a Trust Director had decided to stand and apply for said position there is no doubt at all that they would have had to resign from the Trust board, therefore the position on the Clubs Board was NEVER going to be filled by "The Trust"

Now, if KT had come along to the Trust and offered that place back in its original guise and the Trust had declined you could rightfully claim what you are claiming, but that isn't and wasn't the case.

Is that difficult to understand??
Im suggesting that they were comprehensively outmanoeuvred by DC and comprehensively outmanoeuvred  by KT.
How hard is it to understand that no one will care what the trust THINK they will be superseded with someone who will KNOW (they will have a legal right as a director to see financial papers that the trust can’t)
Please tell me that’s incorrect…..
The trust just like anyone else will be able to access yearly accounts.
A director on a board will be privy to far more information.

Again anyone wish to dispute that?
Report Spam   Logged
GrangeParkCobbler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8597


View Profile
« Reply #29468 on: October 07, 2021, 19:07:12 pm »

Can anyone come on here and explain how they are fit for purpose??
There whole being was having a seat on the board.
They’ve given one up.
They’ve declined the offer to stand to regain a place on the board.

How can they still be relevant given THEIR choices.

I’ve met many board members and they are decent people , they really are, but the club needs much better representation and a new trust that can work with the club, have board representation and report to fans rather than make ‘executive’ decisions

The trust imo is currently just a clique of rebel rousers who have an aim of fan ownership with no blueprint(even random admits they haven’t canvassed opinion) in how to achieve it.

Fans are actually paying for this level of incompetence.

Things need to move on if there is to be a group of fans who will hold the club to account.
The current trust have proved not once but twice
that they have failed the fan base but somehow think they have the right to represent fans views  Tongue

Imo a new supporters group is needed that can report to the fans, have democratically elected members who will hold the club to account, will have ONE travel club and have the backing of the majority of fans.
We will soon have a new fans rep on the board and imo he needs to address this rather than go backwards to a trust that has become increasingly distant from the club and the fans who pay money for it to represent.

Can anyone argue against this??

I assume this is your pitch about your intention to form and head up Trust Mk2??
Report Spam   Logged

The Hotel End GTA Champion 2006/7, 2007/8, 2011/12, 2012/13 and 2018/19
GrangeParkCobbler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8597


View Profile
« Reply #29469 on: October 07, 2021, 19:09:22 pm »

So in keeping with Rogers new rule. Is that a post from a Trust board member. Or as a standard contributor to this site…

BTW. Your version of events is a lot more simplistic than what actually happened. But I have lot of time for the people involved at that time. So I’ll leave that where it is.

I didn't know Roger made the rules for this site!

Actually, its probably more a post from me as a standard contributor than a Trust Board member, yes its simplistic in parts, but also pretty accurate i'd say...... unless you care to disagree?
Report Spam   Logged

The Hotel End GTA Champion 2006/7, 2007/8, 2011/12, 2012/13 and 2018/19
GrangeParkCobbler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8597


View Profile
« Reply #29470 on: October 07, 2021, 19:15:59 pm »

Im suggesting that they were comprehensively outmanoeuvred by DC and comprehensively outmanoeuvred  by KT.
How hard is it to understand that no one will care what the trust THINK they will be superseded with someone who will KNOW (they will have a legal right as a director to see financial papers that the trust can’t)
Please tell me that’s incorrect…..
The trust just like anyone else will be able to access yearly accounts.
A director on a board will be privy to far more information.

Again anyone wish to dispute that?


Yes, i'll dispute that again.....and as a standard contributor too!

I have yet to see a statement of roles and responsibilities, nor any evidence of what this fans Director will or will not be able to see, what level of involvement he will have, or anything along those lines.

You seem to think that this person will be given unfettered access to everything. What are you expecting? An end to "undisclosed" transfer fees maybe?

They may or may not be privvy to more information....which would then beg the question as to why that sort of information was not made available to fans before, rather than now entrusting it with a supporters rep and letting them tell the fans instead.
Report Spam   Logged

The Hotel End GTA Champion 2006/7, 2007/8, 2011/12, 2012/13 and 2018/19
random
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1365


View Profile
« Reply #29471 on: October 07, 2021, 19:20:29 pm »

Can anyone come on here and explain how they are fit for purpose??
There whole being was having a seat on the board.
They’ve given one up.
They’ve declined the offer to stand to regain a place on the board.

How can they still be relevant given THEIR choices.

I’ve met many board members and they are decent people , they really are, but the club needs much better representation and a new trust that can work with the club, have board representation and report to fans rather than make ‘executive’ decisions

The trust imo is currently just a clique of rebel rousers who have an aim of fan ownership with no blueprint(even random admits they haven’t canvassed opinion) in how to achieve it.

Fans are actually paying for this level of incompetence.

Things need to move on if there is to be a group of fans who will hold the club to account.
The current trust have proved not once but twice
that they have failed the fan base but somehow think they have the right to represent fans views  Tongue

Imo a new supporters group is needed that can report to the fans, have democratically elected members who will hold the club to account, will have ONE travel club and have the backing of the majority of fans.
We will soon have a new fans rep on the board and imo he needs to address this rather than go backwards to a trust that has become increasingly distant from the club and the fans who pay money for it to represent.

Can anyone argue against this??

I can  Grin

The Trust is as new as you want it to be, why not join? or 'come' to a zoom board meeting?

Fans are not really paying for anything, have you see the joining fee?

We are starting to hold the club to account, did you read the presentation, ?

The Trust have democratically elected members, we are valued by some and some very important people at that.

No Trust board can work with the club at the moment, sorry but as soon as anyone upsets KT thats the end. He is fine when you are not pushing him or holding him to account.

Whose going to start this new supporter group? YOU, Hammy, Evers?Huh? The 2 who put themselves up to be Directors?  

Don't throw the baby out with the bath water

Tell me / the Trust EXACTLY what you want us to do. If it's work with the club, then fine, contact KT / GW / JW and see what response you get.

Agree have one travel club, I totally agree but again, YOU get the 3 parties together and see what happens.

Very easy to sit on here and type you should do this, you should do that, but again with a few active board members, trying to do everything on the cheap, against KT with £6m annually, PR & media staff plus local media if aint easy.

I / We get knocked for too little action, too much, being too aggressive, to being too laid back, for not having plans, for not having support, etc etc.

We don't represent the fans - well sorry but WTF does that actually mean?  

What do the fans actually want that in the short term that the Trust can change or have any say in?  And even then who do we listen to?  You, Hammy, Manwork, Who? someone pro club ? someone anti-club?  you tell me who and how?  

Everyone has different feelings and opinions on every subject.

Some of us are trying to make improvements for YOUR football club. Do you want to keep playing Sutton, Crawley, Stevenage and the like, because I know I don't.

The poll recently on here i posted showed almost no-one wanted League 2 football. We all wanted L1 as a minimum.

Its time for not only the Trust to change (which it is doing but again thats wrong cos some of us are too active)  but all of us fans too, time again to start taking actions, time to thinking bigger thoughts and all working towards making NTFC the club we want.

Trouble is it take effort and upsetting the apple cart a bit - which again some don't like (and some do)

« Last Edit: October 07, 2021, 19:28:27 pm by random » Report Spam   Logged
random
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1365


View Profile
« Reply #29472 on: October 07, 2021, 19:22:32 pm »

So if I have shares in Tesco and decide to sell them, would you say I've taken that money out of Tesco?

again WTF, I am speechless.

I give up, 
« Last Edit: October 07, 2021, 19:25:38 pm by random » Report Spam   Logged
GrangeParkCobbler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8597


View Profile
« Reply #29473 on: October 07, 2021, 19:23:33 pm »

Trust hat on now......

An article from back in the archives..... points of interest......

Timeline of when Cardoza was in an exclusivity agreement with Kelvin Thomas, mention of other interested parties that Cardoza was also in contact with at the time (KT's was not the only deal on the table, but perhaps the only deal that was on the table that was able to be completed before the court date), the notice that there was a fallback position brokered by the Trust and other local parties/businessmen which was shared with the Council should the takeover not go ahead, and also reference to the £10k hardship fund, and the explicit line that "We should stress that the fund will be repayable to the Trust if and when a takeover is complete, but for now the immediate priority is to support the staff in this desperate situation."

https://www.ntfctrust.co.uk/news/article/10000-set-aside-for-hardship-fund-for-ntfc-staff
Report Spam   Logged

The Hotel End GTA Champion 2006/7, 2007/8, 2011/12, 2012/13 and 2018/19
Carton Lid
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1028


View Profile
« Reply #29474 on: October 07, 2021, 19:26:36 pm »

Can anyone come on here and explain how they are fit for purpose??
There whole being was having a seat on the board.
They’ve given one up. Being a former Trust board member, I can tell you that the stick you get is totally over the top and unwarranted. I once posted something on FB as a favour to another board member because he was working, I then went out for the evening and got so much abuse for not answering questions about the post.
CAN YOU IMAGINE the abuse if the Trust had of said "We insist on our board place" to KT, after he had said it was a deal breaker. Don't forget, at this time, KT had promised to complete the East Stand , something no other interested party had offered to do, so it was decided that the best outcome for NTFC was to let KT go ahead. He exact words were "We don't hold board meetings as such, I'm in the USA, David is in Dubai and Mike in the UK, we just have the odd 3 way phone calls"


They’ve declined the offer to stand to regain a place on the board.Grange has explained that if the Trust had have put up a candidate, they would have stood down from the Trust to maintain the "independence"



I’ve met many board members and they are decent people , they really are, but the club needs much better representation and a new trust that can work with the club, have board representation and report to fans rather than make ‘executive’ decisions

The trust imo is currently just a clique of rebel rousers who have an aim of fan ownership with no blueprint(even random admits they haven’t canvassed opinion) in how to achieve it. As I posted , in this thread, about 2 hours ago there is NO aim of fan ownership except as a last resort


Imo a new supporters group is needed that can report to the fans, have democratically elected members who will hold the club to account, will have ONE travel club and have the backing of the majority of fans.You have just described the Trust down to a tee
We will soon have a new fans rep on the board and imo he needs to address this rather than go backwards to a trust that has become increasingly distant from the club and the fans who pay money for it to represent.It's not an easy thing to start a fans group, it takes a lot of dedicated people working lots of hours, for nothing, by all means have a go, it takes a bit more hard work than sitting behind a keyboard slagging people off but doing nothing yourself .

« Last Edit: October 07, 2021, 19:29:19 pm by Carton Lid » Report Spam   Logged
1971cobbler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 517


View Profile
« Reply #29475 on: October 07, 2021, 19:29:48 pm »



I think an Infrastructure Foundation is the way to start the ball rolling (towards the net I hope  Smiley).

Manwork, Singcobb, Hammy, Deepcut, Carton, Whitedogdo, Everbrite, Teachers pet, Coolcat, Steve Massey and all you others, in principle, would you contribute a small monthly amount to go towards an infrastructure project?
[/quote]

On this basis, yes, I would be in for that.
Report Spam   Logged
Terryfenwickatemyhamster
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3638


View Profile
« Reply #29476 on: October 07, 2021, 19:34:14 pm »

I didn't know Roger made the rules for this site!

Actually, its probably more a post from me as a standard contributor than a Trust Board member, yes its simplistic in parts, but also pretty accurate i'd say...... unless you care to disagree?

I was there with it going around me, in several meetings. I’m sure I’ll be wrong again 😀😀 But as they say “history is a tool used by people to justify their intentions”. Let’s just say I have heard a few liberal interpretations around this whole fiasco.
Report Spam   Logged
GrangeParkCobbler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8597


View Profile
« Reply #29477 on: October 07, 2021, 19:39:43 pm »

I was there with it going around me, in several meetings. I’m sure I’ll be wrong again 😀😀 But as they say “history is a tool used by people to justify their intentions”. Let’s just say I have heard a few liberal interpretations around this whole fiasco.

So should we get back on topic? Post 29484 on this thread and i'm going to ask is "Redevelopment closer than ever"?
Report Spam   Logged

The Hotel End GTA Champion 2006/7, 2007/8, 2011/12, 2012/13 and 2018/19
Terryfenwickatemyhamster
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3638


View Profile
« Reply #29478 on: October 07, 2021, 19:57:47 pm »

So should we get back on topic? Post 29484 on this thread and i'm going to ask is "Redevelopment closer than ever"?

Imminent…   : Grin

I’ve seen the plans  Grin
Report Spam   Logged
GrangeParkCobbler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8597


View Profile
« Reply #29479 on: October 07, 2021, 19:58:37 pm »

Imminent…   : Grin

I’ve seen the plans  Grin

Ok.....mum's the word!!  Grin
Report Spam   Logged

The Hotel End GTA Champion 2006/7, 2007/8, 2011/12, 2012/13 and 2018/19
Pages: 1 ... 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 [1474] 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 ... 1697   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Parental guidance is urged as this messageboard may not be suitable for all persons especially those under the age of 16 as the forums may contain words, phrases and expressions not considered appropriate for a younger audience so please express caution. If any posts in the forums offend you, please let us know and we will look at them and if we agree with your complaint, we will remove them. You are personally responsible and potentially liable for the contents of your posting and may be sued should your posting contain content of a defamatory or other illegal nature. Every message posted leaves a traceable IP number. We check the forums at various times of the day and remove offending posts. Other supporters are welcome but abusive or silly posts will be removed and the offenders potentially barred from future access to the site. We advise that you never reveal any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example: telephone number, home address or email address), and please do not include postal addresses of any kind. This messageboard is not endorsed or in any way affiliated with Northampton Town FC. All postings on this board become copyright of The Hotel End & may not be reproduced without the permission of the board administrator. By signing up to this message board you agree to this. The Hotel End cannot be held liable for the actions or postings of its members. The Hotel End reserve the right to edit, delete, move or close any thread for any reason. The Hotel End may disclose user information to government authorities at their discretion or when required by law. The Hotel End may also disclose user information when The Hotel End has reason to believe that someone is causing injury to or interference with its rights or property, other The Hotel End users, or anyone else that could be harmed by such activities. By registering for The Hotel End, you agree to indemnify The Hotel End its representatives, and agents, and hold them harmless from any and all claims (including claims for legal fees) which may arise from your participation on the The Hotel End. You also agree that The Hotel End is not responsible for the materials posted by users of The Hotel End. In addition, you grant The Hotel End and its affiliates, worldwide, royalty-free perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive right and license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display any message or content posted on The Hotel End and/or e-mail sent by you to The Hotel End (in whole or in part). The Hotel End reserves the right to make the rules up as it goes along. Thank you - The Hotel End I love Quidco
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMFServer.com - Create your own Forum

Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy