Thanks MC, you tell more yours and i'll tell you mine
and remember I asked first
Once again those who hold the Trust to a high level of scrutiny never give any reason or evidence of how or why KT has been good for NTFC
On a side note, if we had done an Exeter and kept with the same manager and support staff, ie: Rob Page, where do you think we would be today?
How much money would we have saved? and even better if that money had gone into infrastructure projects what would we have? obviously not expecting an answer from MC, Tcobb, BOTN, SingCobb, Hammy and others but thought I would ask again
Well let's see....
What has KT/DB done that's been good?
- Paid the inland revenue bill
- Established the education programme
- Made the club run in a much more professional manner
- Stuck some seats in the East Stand so at least we are making some money from it in the interim
- Been happy to engage with fans when approached directly (apparently, never bothered trying it myself beyond a cordial "hello" when passing him on the concourse.)
- Overseen a big increase in the community work done
- Subsidised the club with director loans to keep us going
- Continued to slog through the red tape with the council for the redevelopment work
If by "done an Exeter" you mean gone into fan ownership, we probably wouldn't have been able to afford/attract Rob Page in the first place and if we had, with the side he assembled we'd have been as screwed as we were but unable to even attempt to buy our way out of the mess he'd created during the January transfer window (which we
did try to do, another good thing KT did, even if it didn't work out)
If that money had gone into infrastructure projects? You have noticed we're losing money, right? If we hadn't spent the money on paying people off and trying to bail our way out of trouble, it still wouldn't have been available to invest in infrastructure projects because, in all likelihood, it would be needed to prop the club up (in the absence of director loans coming in).