I don’t understand why there is an assumption that the the choice is binary between the Trust and the current owners. At the moment, KT and DB are the rightful owners. That’s whether you like it or not. Should that situation change, why is it inevitable that the Trust are the only choice. After all, they are hardly popular with the club staff, and by no means representative of the main body of support.
I do find it interesting though, that we are now seeing ownership coming out as a motivational factor behind their stanceThat just muddies the waters further. Because they will need the land as much as the next man to further the development. So how do we guarantee that in trying to stop KT and DB from allegedly profiteering, that some others (any interested party) don’t just have designs on the land and any potential that comes out of that.
Because if the current owners don't get what they want from the council, with the debt that has been built up around the club no one else is going to bail the current owners out, and no one other than the Trust post apocalypse will want to go anywhere near it?
Just a guess.