guest49
|
It's fine to challenge but not it lacks concrete data, maybe due to transparency issues.
"The Trust fears that the proposed deal will see any football club profits wiped out by the loan repaid to the owners, leaving the club with minimal investment benefit, no cash in the bank and no land asset."
There has to be an expectation that the owners get their money back and some profit. Whatever has happened to lead us being millions in debt has happened. What is the quantified "minimal investment benefit" or is it a "fear". Is it a "fear" that whatever money is involved (£5m, £10m, £20m, £50m) will be pocketed by the owners? I'd agree with the lack of transparency but that falls both on the owners and the council.
Let's have a transparent deal so we can see who is having what and if conversation gets bogged down about a shed then we all know nothing will ever get built, not in most of our lifetimes anyway.
|
|
|
|
|