It just amazes me that we have post after post, did the Trust hold an AGM, how many board members are co-opted, did you vote for Tom Cliffe ? All questions that in the big scheme of things mean nothing. Yet no one seems bothered that the "No Stand, No Land" has been removed from the deal for CDNL to buy the land, in the big scheme of NTFC's future means hell of a lot
Ask yourself why has this been removed, WNC wouldn't remove it surely, Sixfields is, after all, their asset, so why would it be removed by CDNL they were going to build the Stand ?
The reason it doesn’t get any airplay Rog, is because it’s got nothing to do with the club. It is a glaring omission by the council, but not in any way the clubs fault. Yes, they must have been over the moon when it wasn’t a prerequisite to any deal, but there was no way anyone wishing to do anything with land would argue for that type of caveat to be reintroduced once it was omitted. I still don’t understand it, but in no way do I blame them..
On the other hand, the reason there is some questions around whether or not the Trust is acting in accordance with its own constitution, is simply because they have based a huge amount of their mantra on the adherence to due process. If they are within the confines of the rules of their model, then fine. But it would be totally appropriate to highlight any hypocrisy if it exists. For a long time now we have endured a situation where if something is irregular at the club, the usual suspects (as they are perfectly entitled to) crop up and remind us of it. Surely you would prefer a level playing field with these things.
Just a simple post by a current Trust board member, naming the current board members and how they were instated would clear it up. Surely that’s not too hard of a question for what is a supporters representative..
